Go Pro

Tirupati Graphite (TGR) Competitors

Tirupati Graphite logo
GBX 0.97 +0.07 (+7.78%)
As of 09/4/2026 12:18 PM Eastern

TGR vs. KDNC, GSP, FAR, CTL, and GSCU

Should you buy Tirupati Graphite stock or one of its competitors? Tirupati Graphite's main competitors and comparable companies include Cadence Minerals (KDNC), Gensource Potash (GSP), Ferro-Alloy Resources (FAR), CleanTech Lithium (CTL), and Great Southern Copper (GSCU). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Tirupati Graphite compare to Cadence Minerals?

Tirupati Graphite (LON:TGR) and Cadence Minerals (LON:KDNC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

Tirupati Graphite has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Minerals. Cadence Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tirupati Graphite, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tirupati Graphite£1.67M4.48-£3.59M-£4.00N/A
Cadence MineralsN/AN/A-£5.72M-£0.53N/A

2.1% of Tirupati Graphite shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Cadence Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Tirupati Graphite shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Cadence Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tirupati Graphite has a beta of 1.467, suggesting that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Minerals has a beta of 1.798, suggesting that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tirupati Graphite's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cadence Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tirupati Graphite Neutral
Cadence Minerals Neutral

Cadence Minerals has a net margin of 875.38% compared to Tirupati Graphite's net margin of -356.82%. Cadence Minerals' return on equity of -9.74% beat Tirupati Graphite's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tirupati Graphite-356.82% -32.85% -5.46%
Cadence Minerals 875.38%-9.74%-3.99%

Summary

Cadence Minerals beats Tirupati Graphite on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tirupati Graphite compare to Gensource Potash?

Tirupati Graphite (LON:TGR) and Gensource Potash (LON:GSP) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Tirupati Graphite has a beta of 1.467, suggesting that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gensource Potash has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

In the previous week, Tirupati Graphite's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gensource Potash'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tirupati Graphite Neutral
Gensource Potash Neutral

Gensource Potash has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tirupati Graphite's net margin of -356.82%. Tirupati Graphite's return on equity of -32.85% beat Gensource Potash's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tirupati Graphite-356.82% -32.85% -5.46%
Gensource Potash N/A -45.96%-10.31%

2.1% of Tirupati Graphite shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Tirupati Graphite shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Gensource Potash shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tirupati Graphite has higher revenue and earnings than Gensource Potash. Tirupati Graphite is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gensource Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tirupati Graphite£1.67M4.48-£3.59M-£4.00N/A
Gensource PotashN/AN/A-£6.58M-£0.01N/A

Summary

Tirupati Graphite beats Gensource Potash on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tirupati Graphite compare to Ferro-Alloy Resources?

Tirupati Graphite (LON:TGR) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a net margin of -185.72% compared to Tirupati Graphite's net margin of -356.82%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 283.86% beat Tirupati Graphite's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tirupati Graphite-356.82% -32.85% -5.46%
Ferro-Alloy Resources -185.72%283.86%-21.47%

Tirupati Graphite has a beta of 1.467, indicating that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.819, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

2.1% of Tirupati Graphite shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Tirupati Graphite shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 59.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 30, indicating a potential upside of 700.00%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Tirupati Graphite.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tirupati Graphite
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Tirupati Graphite has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tirupati Graphite, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tirupati Graphite£1.67M4.48-£3.59M-£4.00N/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources£4.53M6.25-£9.69M-£1.70N/A

In the previous week, Tirupati Graphite's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ferro-Alloy Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tirupati Graphite Neutral
Ferro-Alloy Resources Neutral

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources beats Tirupati Graphite on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tirupati Graphite compare to CleanTech Lithium?

CleanTech Lithium (LON:CTL) and Tirupati Graphite (LON:TGR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

CleanTech Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tirupati Graphite's net margin of -356.82%. CleanTech Lithium's return on equity of -16.51% beat Tirupati Graphite's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CleanTech LithiumN/A -16.51% -13.50%
Tirupati Graphite -356.82%-32.85%-5.46%

0.9% of CleanTech Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Tirupati Graphite shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of CleanTech Lithium shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Tirupati Graphite shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CleanTech Lithium has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tirupati Graphite. CleanTech Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tirupati Graphite, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CleanTech LithiumN/AN/A-£2.19M-£2.20N/A
Tirupati Graphite£1.67M4.48-£3.59M-£4.00N/A

In the previous week, CleanTech Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tirupati Graphite'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CleanTech Lithium Neutral
Tirupati Graphite Neutral

CleanTech Lithium presently has a consensus target price of GBX 17, indicating a potential upside of 178.69%. Given CleanTech Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than Tirupati Graphite.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CleanTech Lithium
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Tirupati Graphite
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

CleanTech Lithium has a beta of -0.79, indicating that its stock price is 179% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tirupati Graphite has a beta of 1.467, indicating that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CleanTech Lithium beats Tirupati Graphite on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tirupati Graphite compare to Great Southern Copper?

Tirupati Graphite (LON:TGR) and Great Southern Copper (LON:GSCU) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Tirupati Graphite has a beta of 1.467, meaning that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Southern Copper has a beta of -0.41, meaning that its share price is 141% less volatile than the broader market.

2.1% of Tirupati Graphite shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Great Southern Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Tirupati Graphite shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Great Southern Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Great Southern Copper has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tirupati Graphite's net margin of -356.82%. Tirupati Graphite's return on equity of -32.85% beat Great Southern Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tirupati Graphite-356.82% -32.85% -5.46%
Great Southern Copper N/A -74.17%-29.67%

Tirupati Graphite has higher revenue and earnings than Great Southern Copper. Great Southern Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tirupati Graphite, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tirupati Graphite£1.67M4.48-£3.59M-£4.00N/A
Great Southern CopperN/AN/A-£2.31B-£0.41N/A

In the previous week, Great Southern Copper had 1 more articles in the media than Tirupati Graphite. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Great Southern Copper and 0 mentions for Tirupati Graphite. Tirupati Graphite's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Great Southern Copper'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tirupati Graphite Neutral
Great Southern Copper Neutral

Summary

Tirupati Graphite beats Great Southern Copper on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tirupati Graphite News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TGR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TGR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TGR vs. The Competition

MetricTirupati GraphiteMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£7.45M£4.06B£5.08B£2.54B
Dividend YieldN/A5.16%4.67%6.21%
P/E Ratio-0.2425.3025.77367.84
Price / Sales4.488,948.685,322.8184,012.92
Price / Cash19.0026.6724.6927.89
Price / Book0.0512.8710.676.72
Net Income-£3.59M£127.55M£158.16M£5.89B
7 Day Performance18.00%-0.44%-0.35%11.33%
1 Month Performance28.82%15.38%11.68%1.74%
1 Year PerformanceN/A53.91%42.52%21.39%

Tirupati Graphite Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TGR
Tirupati Graphite
N/AGBX 0.97
+7.8%
N/AN/A£7.45M£1.67MN/A36,000
KDNC
Cadence Minerals
N/AGBX 5.85
-6.6%
N/A+195.9%£24.17MN/AN/A6
GSP
Gensource Potash
N/AN/AN/AN/A£23.61MN/AN/AN/A
FAR
Ferro-Alloy Resources
N/AGBX 3.80
+2.7%
GBX 30
+689.5%
-59.2%£22.34M£4.53MN/A1,000
CTL
CleanTech Lithium
1.7505 of 5 stars
GBX 6
flat
GBX 17
+183.3%
+16.2%£21.78MN/AN/A20

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TGR) was last updated on 9/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners