Go Pro

Shuka Minerals (SKA) Competitors

GBX 3.10 +0.20 (+6.90%)
As of 11:57 AM Eastern

SKA vs. GWMO, MTR, XTR, MET1, and ARCM

Should you buy Shuka Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Shuka Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Great Western Mining (GWMO), Metal Tiger (MTR), Xtract Resources (XTR), Metals One (MET1), and Arc Minerals (ARCM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Great Western Mining?

Great Western Mining (LON:GWMO) and Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

5.8% of Great Western Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Great Western Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Shuka Minerals' average media sentiment score of 2.00 beat Great Western Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Shuka Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Great Western Mining Neutral
Shuka Minerals Very Positive

Great Western Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shuka Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Western MiningN/AN/AN/A-£0.01N/A
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.35N/A

Great Western Mining has a beta of 0.19, meaning that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shuka Minerals has a beta of 1.169, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Great Western Mining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Great Western Mining's return on equity of -9.48% beat Shuka Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Western MiningN/A -9.48% -5.92%
Shuka Minerals -86,907.55%-20.62%-13.94%

Summary

Great Western Mining beats Shuka Minerals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Metal Tiger?

Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) and Metal Tiger (LON:MTR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Metal Tiger has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Metal Tiger's return on equity of -18.73% beat Shuka Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shuka Minerals-86,907.55% -20.62% -13.94%
Metal Tiger N/A -18.73%-11.36%

Shuka Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Metal Tiger. Shuka Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metal Tiger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.35N/A
Metal Tiger-£5.90M0.00-£6.63M-£0.04N/A

In the previous week, Shuka Minerals' average media sentiment score of 2.00 beat Metal Tiger's score of 0.00 indicating that Shuka Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shuka Minerals Very Positive
Metal Tiger Neutral

Shuka Minerals has a beta of 1.169, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Metal Tiger has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.0% of Metal Tiger shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.5% of Metal Tiger shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Metal Tiger beats Shuka Minerals on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Xtract Resources?

Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) and Xtract Resources (LON:XTR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Shuka Minerals has a beta of 1.169, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Xtract Resources has a beta of 0.444, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Xtract Resources has a net margin of -46,750.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Xtract Resources' return on equity of -11.84% beat Shuka Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shuka Minerals-86,907.55% -20.62% -13.94%
Xtract Resources -46,750.00%-11.84%-4.83%

1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Xtract Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.8% of Xtract Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Xtract Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shuka Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.35N/A
Xtract ResourcesN/AN/A-£114.43K-£0.23N/A

In the previous week, Xtract Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Shuka Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Xtract Resources and 0 mentions for Shuka Minerals. Shuka Minerals' average media sentiment score of 2.00 beat Xtract Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Shuka Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shuka Minerals Very Positive
Xtract Resources Neutral

Summary

Xtract Resources beats Shuka Minerals on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Metals One?

Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) and Metals One (LON:MET1) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and dividends.

1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Metals One shares are held by institutional investors. 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Metals One shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Shuka Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metals One, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.35N/A
Metals OneN/AN/A-£375.04K-£2.59N/A

In the previous week, Shuka Minerals' average media sentiment score of 2.00 beat Metals One's score of 0.00 indicating that Shuka Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shuka Minerals Very Positive
Metals One Neutral

Metals One has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Shuka Minerals' return on equity of -20.62% beat Metals One's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shuka Minerals-86,907.55% -20.62% -13.94%
Metals One N/A -81.27%-112.94%

Summary

Shuka Minerals beats Metals One on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Arc Minerals?

Arc Minerals (LON:ARCM) and Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

3.2% of Arc Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.2% of Arc Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Arc Minerals has a beta of 0.093, suggesting that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shuka Minerals has a beta of 1.169, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Shuka Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arc Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Arc MineralsN/AN/A£9.42M-£0.47N/A
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.35N/A

Arc Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Shuka Minerals' return on equity of -20.62% beat Arc Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Arc MineralsN/A -123.72% -5.85%
Shuka Minerals -86,907.55%-20.62%-13.94%

In the previous week, Shuka Minerals' average media sentiment score of 2.00 beat Arc Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Shuka Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Arc Minerals Neutral
Shuka Minerals Very Positive

Summary

Arc Minerals beats Shuka Minerals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Shuka Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SKA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SKA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SKA vs. The Competition

MetricShuka MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£4.46M£3.77B£4.83B£2.89B
Dividend Yield0.87%5.22%4.71%6.11%
P/E Ratio-2.3023.4321.87368.70
Price / SalesN/A7,586.204,510.3083,338.10
Price / CashN/A29.7127.1327.89
Price / Book0.3210.488.887.18
Net Income-£1.69M£122.18M£154.16M£5.89B
7 Day Performance6.90%1.39%0.99%0.87%
1 Month Performance14.52%7.99%6.64%2.81%
1 Year Performance14.43%56.26%44.44%69.35%

Shuka Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SKA
Shuka Minerals
N/AGBX 3.10
+6.9%
N/A+9.9%£4.46MN/AN/A23
GWMO
Great Western Mining
N/AGBX 3.56
+1.7%
N/A+262.7%£15.52MN/AN/A9
MTR
Metal Tiger
N/AN/AN/AN/A£15.35M-£5.90MN/A8
XTR
Xtract Resources
N/AGBX 1.29
-1.0%
N/A+95.8%£15.31MN/AN/A33
MET1
Metals One
N/AGBX 1.33
+2.4%
N/A-77.5%£15.06MN/AN/A3

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SKA) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners