Free Trial
→ Trump’s New Dollar revealed (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free SKA Stock Alerts

Shuka Minerals (SKA) Competitors

GBX 3.10 +0.15 (+5.02%)
As of 11:15 AM Eastern
Compare

SKA vs. FCM, GROC, ARK, GLR, and JAN

Should you buy Shuka Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Shuka Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Shuka Minerals include First Class Metals (FCM), GreenRoc Mining (GROC), Arkle Resources (ARK), Galileo Resources (GLR), and Jangada Mines (JAN). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to First Class Metals?

Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) and First Class Metals (LON:FCM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Shuka Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled First Class Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shuka Minerals Neutral
First Class Metals Neutral

First Class Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Shuka Minerals' return on equity of -35.19% beat First Class Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shuka Minerals-86,907.55% -35.19% -13.94%
First Class Metals N/A -55.27%N/A

Shuka Minerals has a beta of 0.85, indicating that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Class Metals has a beta of 0.01640514, indicating that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.6% of First Class Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of First Class Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Shuka Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than First Class Metals. First Class Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shuka Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shuka Minerals-£25.00-121,717.94-£1.69M-£2.95N/A
First Class MetalsN/AN/A-£2.20M-£1.38N/A

Summary

Shuka Minerals and First Class Metals tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to GreenRoc Mining?

GreenRoc Mining (LON:GROC) and Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

GreenRoc Mining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. GreenRoc Mining's return on equity of -8.87% beat Shuka Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GreenRoc MiningN/A -8.87% -5.36%
Shuka Minerals -86,907.55%-35.19%-13.94%

1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of GreenRoc Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

GreenRoc Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Shuka Minerals. GreenRoc Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shuka Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GreenRoc MiningN/AN/A-£1.48M-£0.33N/A
Shuka Minerals-£25.00-121,717.94-£1.69M-£2.95N/A

In the previous week, GreenRoc Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Shuka Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
GreenRoc Mining Neutral
Shuka Minerals Neutral

GreenRoc Mining has a beta of -0.33, indicating that its stock price is 133% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shuka Minerals has a beta of 0.85, indicating that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

GreenRoc Mining beats Shuka Minerals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Arkle Resources?

Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) and Arkle Resources (LON:ARK) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Arkle Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Arkle Resources' return on equity of -0.10% beat Shuka Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shuka Minerals-86,907.55% -35.19% -13.94%
Arkle Resources N/A -0.10%-4.49%

1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Arkle Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.1% of Arkle Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Arkle Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Shuka Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Arkle Resources and 0 mentions for Shuka Minerals. Arkle Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Shuka Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Arkle Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shuka Minerals Neutral
Arkle Resources Positive

Arkle Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Shuka Minerals. Shuka Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arkle Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shuka Minerals-£25.00-121,717.94-£1.69M-£2.95N/A
Arkle ResourcesN/AN/A-£633.70K-£42.99N/A

Shuka Minerals has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arkle Resources has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Arkle Resources beats Shuka Minerals on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Galileo Resources?

Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) and Galileo Resources (LON:GLR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Galileo Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Shuka Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Galileo Resources and 0 mentions for Shuka Minerals. Shuka Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Galileo Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shuka Minerals Neutral
Galileo Resources Neutral

1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.0% of Galileo Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Galileo Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Shuka Minerals has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Galileo Resources has a beta of 0.462, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Galileo Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Galileo Resources' return on equity of -10.01% beat Shuka Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shuka Minerals-86,907.55% -35.19% -13.94%
Galileo Resources N/A -10.01%-4.51%

Galileo Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Shuka Minerals. Galileo Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shuka Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shuka Minerals-£25.00-121,717.94-£1.69M-£2.95N/A
Galileo ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.05M-£0.11N/A

Summary

Galileo Resources beats Shuka Minerals on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Jangada Mines?

Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) and Jangada Mines (LON:JAN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Jangada Mines had 2 more articles in the media than Shuka Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Jangada Mines and 0 mentions for Shuka Minerals. Jangada Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Shuka Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Jangada Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shuka Minerals Neutral
Jangada Mines Neutral

Shuka Minerals has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jangada Mines has a beta of 1.774, meaning that its share price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

Jangada Mines has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Shuka Minerals' return on equity of -35.19% beat Jangada Mines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shuka Minerals-86,907.55% -35.19% -13.94%
Jangada Mines N/A -37.79%-14.48%

Jangada Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Shuka Minerals. Jangada Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shuka Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shuka Minerals-£25.00-121,717.94-£1.69M-£2.95N/A
Jangada MinesN/AN/A-£835.63-£0.51N/A

1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Jangada Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.5% of Jangada Mines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Jangada Mines beats Shuka Minerals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Shuka Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SKA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SKA vs. The Competition

Export
MetricShuka MineralsOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.04M£1.67B£4.90B£2.78B
Dividend Yield0.87%6.55%4.95%6.12%
P/E Ratio-1.0530.3323.31363.21
Price / Sales-121,717.9459,217.477,042.0187,415.95
Price / CashN/A24.6327.4327.85
Price / Book0.325.799.467.74
Net Income-£1.69M£70.60M£156.62M£5.89B
7 Day Performance6.72%0.60%-0.39%0.21%
1 Month PerformanceN/AN/A17.35%N/A
1 Year Performance-46.95%112.53%68.64%74.70%

Shuka Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SKA
Shuka Minerals
N/AGBX 3.10
+5.0%		N/A-27.4%£3.04M-£25.00N/A23
FCM
First Class Metals
N/AGBX 2.90
flat		N/A+94.5%£10.67MN/AN/AN/A
GROC
GreenRoc Mining
N/AGBX 3.69
+5.4%		N/A+33.0%£10.47MN/AN/A6
ARK
Arkle Resources
N/AGBX 0.69
-2.1%		N/A+176.8%£10.42MN/AN/A5
GLR
Galileo Resources
N/AGBX 0.75
+7.1%		N/A-21.2%£10.36MN/AN/A1

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SKA) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
How to claim a stake in SpaceX before the June 12 IPO
SpaceX is expected to go public on June 12 - and for the first time, everyday investors may have a way in befo...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s secret China deal
Trump just returned from Beijing with the most powerful business delegation in American history - Elon Musk, J...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
June 4: The day smart money moves (not June 12)
Everyone is watching June 12 - the SpaceX listing date. The real deadline is June 4, when Goldman Sachs, Morga...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
AI breakthrough hidden inside SpaceX exposed on June 11
On June 11, SpaceX is hosting a major investor event - and growth investor Louis Navellier believes Elon Musk ...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
A Multi-Billionaire and Early Open AI Investor Just Made a Stunning Prediction
Vinod Khosla, worth $13 billion and one of OpenAI's earliest investors, just predicted that free AI doctors, t...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel