Free Trial
→ Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free SKA Stock Alerts

Shuka Minerals (SKA) Competitors

GBX 3.50 +0.10 (+2.94%)
As of 04:23 AM Eastern
Compare

SKA vs. GSP, KDNC, KEN, PALM, and CMET

Should you buy Shuka Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Shuka Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Gensource Potash (GSP), Cadence Minerals (KDNC), Kendrick Resources (KEN), Panther Metals (PALM), and Capital Metals (CMET). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Gensource Potash?

Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) and Gensource Potash (LON:GSP) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Shuka Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gensource Potash'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shuka Minerals Neutral
Gensource Potash Neutral

Shuka Minerals has a beta of 1.186, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gensource Potash has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Shuka Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gensource Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.15N/A
Gensource PotashN/AN/A-£6.58M-£0.01N/A

1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Gensource Potash shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gensource Potash has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Shuka Minerals' return on equity of -15.77% beat Gensource Potash's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shuka Minerals-86,907.55% -15.77% -13.94%
Gensource Potash N/A -45.96%-10.31%

Summary

Shuka Minerals beats Gensource Potash on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Cadence Minerals?

Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) and Cadence Minerals (LON:KDNC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Cadence Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Cadence Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Shuka Minerals has a beta of 1.186, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Minerals has a beta of 1.817, meaning that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

Cadence Minerals has a net margin of 875.38% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Cadence Minerals' return on equity of -12.58% beat Shuka Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shuka Minerals-86,907.55% -15.77% -13.94%
Cadence Minerals 875.38%-12.58%-3.99%

In the previous week, Shuka Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cadence Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shuka Minerals Neutral
Cadence Minerals Neutral

Cadence Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shuka Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.15N/A
Cadence MineralsN/AN/A-£5.72M-£0.59N/A

Summary

Cadence Minerals beats Shuka Minerals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Kendrick Resources?

Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) and Kendrick Resources (LON:KEN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Shuka Minerals has a net margin of -86,907.55% compared to Kendrick Resources' net margin of -227,572.12%. Kendrick Resources' return on equity of 3,889.95% beat Shuka Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shuka Minerals-86,907.55% -15.77% -13.94%
Kendrick Resources -227,572.12%3,889.95%-12.85%

1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Kendrick Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.1% of Kendrick Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Shuka Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kendrick Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shuka Minerals Neutral
Kendrick Resources Neutral

Shuka Minerals has a beta of 1.186, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kendrick Resources has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market.

Kendrick Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shuka Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.15N/A
Kendrick ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.15M-£0.87N/A

Summary

Kendrick Resources beats Shuka Minerals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Panther Metals?

Panther Metals (LON:PALM) and Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Panther Metals has a beta of 0.607, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shuka Minerals has a beta of 1.186, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Panther Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Shuka Minerals' return on equity of -15.77% beat Panther Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Panther MetalsN/A -33.46% -10.72%
Shuka Minerals -86,907.55%-15.77%-13.94%

In the previous week, Panther Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Shuka Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Panther Metals and 0 mentions for Shuka Minerals. Panther Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Shuka Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Panther Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Panther Metals Neutral
Shuka Minerals Neutral

14.6% of Panther Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 22.9% of Panther Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Panther Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shuka Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Panther MetalsN/AN/A-£1.69K-£19.11N/A
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.15N/A

Summary

Panther Metals beats Shuka Minerals on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Capital Metals?

Capital Metals (LON:CMET) and Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Capital Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shuka Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital MetalsN/AN/A-£1.24M-£0.25N/A
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.15N/A

1.5% of Capital Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of Capital Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Capital Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Shuka Minerals' return on equity of -15.77% beat Capital Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital MetalsN/A -20.18% -8.47%
Shuka Minerals -86,907.55%-15.77%-13.94%

Capital Metals has a beta of 0.568, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shuka Minerals has a beta of 1.186, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Capital Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Shuka Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Metals Neutral
Shuka Minerals Neutral

Summary

Capital Metals beats Shuka Minerals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Shuka Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SKA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SKA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SKA vs. The Competition

Export
MetricShuka MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£6.06M£3.74B£4.71B£2.81B
Dividend Yield0.87%5.25%4.77%6.26%
P/E Ratio-3.0421.9822.09366.77
Price / SalesN/A27,082.5916,113.3888,734.84
Price / CashN/A26.9424.8427.83
Price / Book0.3611.599.646.91
Net Income-£1.69M£127.18M£159.17M£5.88B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-3.13%-2.61%0.60%
1 Month Performance9.72%-6.46%-5.83%-0.17%
1 Year Performance-26.47%8.86%8.82%22.19%

Shuka Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SKA
Shuka Minerals
N/AGBX 3.50
+2.9%		N/A-37.4%£6.06MN/AN/A6
GSP
Gensource Potash
N/AN/AN/AN/A£23.61MN/AN/AN/A
KDNC
Cadence Minerals
N/AGBX 4.70
-4.1%		N/A+12.8%£22.71MN/AN/A6
KEN
Kendrick Resources
N/AGBX 5.16
-1.7%		N/A+1,546.7%£22.15MN/AN/A230
PALM
Panther Metals
N/AGBX 196
+10.7%		N/A+143.2%£21.93MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SKA) was last updated on 10/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s Why Trump Won’t End The Iran War
Trump has called an Iran deal close 38 times since the war began, yet the fighting keeps flaring back up. O...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
100% overnight gains?
Rumors are circulating that Elon Musk is preparing to acquire three publicly traded companies. Dr. Mark Sko...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel