Go Pro
→ CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent? (From Paradigm Press) (Ad)tc pixel Free SKA Stock Alerts

Shuka Minerals (SKA) Competitors

GBX 3.81 +0.11 (+2.89%)
As of 11:55 AM Eastern
Compare

SKA vs. GSCU, RMR, PALM, GEMD, and GWMO

Should you buy Shuka Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Shuka Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Great Southern Copper (GSCU), Rome Resources (RMR), Panther Metals (PALM), Gem Diamonds (GEMD), and Great Western Mining (GWMO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Great Southern Copper?

Great Southern Copper (LON:GSCU) and Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Great Southern Copper has a beta of -0.41, suggesting that its stock price is 141% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shuka Minerals has a beta of 1.186, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Great Southern Copper has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Shuka Minerals' return on equity of -20.62% beat Great Southern Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Southern CopperN/A -74.17% -29.67%
Shuka Minerals -86,907.55%-20.62%-13.94%

Great Southern Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shuka Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Southern CopperN/AN/A-£2.31B-£0.41N/A
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.35N/A

0.3% of Great Southern Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Great Southern Copper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Great Southern Copper had 3 more articles in the media than Shuka Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Great Southern Copper and 0 mentions for Shuka Minerals. Great Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Shuka Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Great Southern Copper Neutral
Shuka Minerals Neutral

Summary

Shuka Minerals beats Great Southern Copper on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Rome Resources?

Rome Resources (LON:RMR) and Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

4.1% of Rome Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.6% of Rome Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Rome Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Rome Resources' return on equity of -9.76% beat Shuka Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rome ResourcesN/A -9.76% -3.97%
Shuka Minerals -86,907.55%-20.62%-13.94%

Rome Resources has a beta of 0.531, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shuka Minerals has a beta of 1.186, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Rome Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Shuka Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Rome Resources Neutral
Shuka Minerals Neutral

Rome Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shuka Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rome ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.02N/A
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.35N/A

Summary

Rome Resources beats Shuka Minerals on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Panther Metals?

Panther Metals (LON:PALM) and Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Panther Metals has a beta of 0.607, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shuka Minerals has a beta of 1.186, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Panther Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Shuka Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Panther Metals Neutral
Shuka Minerals Neutral

10.1% of Panther Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.9% of Panther Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Panther Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Shuka Minerals' return on equity of -20.62% beat Panther Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Panther MetalsN/A -62.33% -10.72%
Shuka Minerals -86,907.55%-20.62%-13.94%

Panther Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shuka Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Panther MetalsN/AN/A-£1.69K-£24.85N/A
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.35N/A

Summary

Shuka Minerals beats Panther Metals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Gem Diamonds?

Gem Diamonds (LON:GEMD) and Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Gem Diamonds has a net margin of -82.35% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Shuka Minerals' return on equity of -20.62% beat Gem Diamonds' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gem Diamonds-82.35% -83.04% 2.31%
Shuka Minerals -86,907.55%-20.62%-13.94%

In the previous week, Gem Diamonds' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Shuka Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gem Diamonds Neutral
Shuka Minerals Neutral

Gem Diamonds has higher revenue and earnings than Shuka Minerals. Shuka Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gem Diamonds, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gem Diamonds£112.78M0.14£1.14M-£74.40N/A
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.35N/A

Gem Diamonds has a beta of 1.287, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shuka Minerals has a beta of 1.186, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

4.4% of Gem Diamonds shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Gem Diamonds shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gem Diamonds beats Shuka Minerals on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shuka Minerals compare to Great Western Mining?

Great Western Mining (LON:GWMO) and Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Great Western Mining has a beta of 0.19, meaning that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shuka Minerals has a beta of 1.186, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Great Western Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shuka Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Western MiningN/AN/AN/A-£0.01N/A
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.35N/A

5.8% of Great Western Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 6.2% of Great Western Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Great Western Mining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Great Western Mining's return on equity of -9.48% beat Shuka Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Western MiningN/A -9.48% -5.92%
Shuka Minerals -86,907.55%-20.62%-13.94%

In the previous week, Great Western Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Shuka Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Great Western Mining and 0 mentions for Shuka Minerals. Great Western Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Shuka Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Great Western Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Great Western Mining Positive
Shuka Minerals Neutral

Summary

Great Western Mining beats Shuka Minerals on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Shuka Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SKA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SKA vs. The Competition

Export
MetricShuka MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£5.47M£3.91B£4.91B£2.88B
Dividend Yield0.87%5.20%4.71%6.22%
P/E Ratio-2.8225.5525.79366.48
Price / SalesN/A29,648.0917,613.1390,069.93
Price / CashN/A29.4726.8927.89
Price / Book0.3911.849.856.39
Net Income-£1.69M£127.53M£158.14M£5.89B
7 Day Performance22.81%0.70%0.13%-0.04%
1 Month Performance22.81%-2.33%-2.49%6.15%
1 Year Performance-4.83%30.77%25.49%19.05%

Shuka Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SKA
Shuka Minerals
N/AGBX 3.81
+2.9%		N/A+7.5%£5.47MN/AN/A6
GSCU
Great Southern Copper
N/AGBX 2.32
-3.3%		N/A-31.8%£17.94MN/AN/A9
RMR
Rome Resources
N/AGBX 0.23
-3.4%		N/A-33.8%£17.43MN/AN/AN/A
PALM
Panther Metals
N/AGBX 158.50
+3.9%		N/A+90.0%£17.10MN/AN/AN/A
GEMD
Gem Diamonds
N/AGBX 12.20
+5.2%		N/A+235.4%£17.08M£112.78MN/A327

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SKA) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
They're shrinking your dollars every single month
Since 2020, the dollar has lost roughly a quarter of its buying power. A $500,000 nest egg today buys about wh...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
Shocking new footage just released
Gerardo Del Real is calling it the Third Convergence Event, a new catalyst hitting the uranium market that he ...
Digest Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
NASA's ISS Replacement Could Go to This Tiny Space Firm
NASA has commissioned SpaceX to decommission the $150 billion International Space Station, but the contract to...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
The retirement stock I'd buy before Nvidia today
In 2014, Marc Chaikin pointed readers toward Nvidia. Now the 60-year Wall Street veteran and creator of the Ch...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel