Do analysts recommend SML or GFM?

Griffin Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 300, indicating a potential upside of 6.38%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Strategic Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Strategic Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Griffin Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media prefer SML or GFM?

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals and Strategic Minerals both had 1 articles in the media. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Griffin Mining'saverage media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Strategic Minerals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Griffin Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend AMRQ or SML?

Amaroq Minerals currently has a consensus target price of GBX 132.50, suggesting a potential upside of 27.40%. Given Amaroq Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Amaroq Minerals is more favorable than Strategic Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Amaroq Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Strategic Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer THX or SML?

Thor Explorations presently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 79.56%. Given Thor Explorations' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Thor Explorations is more favorable than Strategic Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Thor Explorations 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Strategic Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Strategic Minerals (SML) Competitors

GBX 4.66 +0.26 (+5.91%)

As of 08/21/2026 12:05 PM Eastern

Compare

SML vs. GFM, AMRQ, CSH, THX, and AAZ

Should you buy Strategic Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Strategic Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Griffin Mining (GFM), Amaroq Minerals (AMRQ), Civitas Social Housing (CSH), Thor Explorations (THX), and Anglo Asian Mining (AAZ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Griffin Mining?

Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) and Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability and dividends.

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 20.09% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Griffin Mining's return on equity of 8.42% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Strategic Minerals	-3.23%	-2.03%	4.39%
Griffin Mining	20.09%	8.42%	6.85%

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals and Strategic Minerals both had 1 articles in the media. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Griffin Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Strategic Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Griffin Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Griffin Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 300, indicating a potential upside of 6.38%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Strategic Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Strategic Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Griffin Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.871, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Griffin Mining has a beta of 0.502, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Minerals	£4.23M	31.05	-£13.68M	-£0.01	N/A
Griffin Mining	£144.34M	3.45	£25.84M	£12.10	23.31

0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Griffin Mining beats Strategic Minerals on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Amaroq Minerals (LON:AMRQ) and Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Strategic Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Amaroq Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amaroq Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Amaroq Minerals	£16.28M	29.78	-£71.64M	-£5.10	N/A
Strategic Minerals	£4.23M	31.05	-£13.68M	-£0.01	N/A

Amaroq Minerals currently has a consensus target price of GBX 132.50, suggesting a potential upside of 27.40%. Given Amaroq Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Amaroq Minerals is more favorable than Strategic Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Amaroq Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Strategic Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Amaroq Minerals has a net margin of 6.56% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Amaroq Minerals' return on equity of 1.87% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Amaroq Minerals	6.56%	1.87%	-9.95%
Strategic Minerals	-3.23%	-2.03%	4.39%

Amaroq Minerals has a beta of 0.875, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.871, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

3.6% of Amaroq Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 8.0% of Amaroq Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Amaroq Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 0 mentions for Amaroq Minerals. Amaroq Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Strategic Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Amaroq Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Amaroq Minerals	Neutral
Strategic Minerals	Neutral

Summary

Amaroq Minerals beats Strategic Minerals on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Civitas Social Housing?

Civitas Social Housing (LON:CSH) and Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Civitas Social Housing has a beta of 0.16, indicating that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.871, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Civitas Social Housing has a net margin of 129.46% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Civitas Social Housing's return on equity of 10.16% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Civitas Social Housing	129.46%	10.16%	2.39%
Strategic Minerals	-3.23%	-2.03%	4.39%

Civitas Social Housing has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Civitas Social Housing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Civitas Social Housing	£53.72M	0.00	£69.54M	£0.11	N/A
Strategic Minerals	£4.23M	31.05	-£13.68M	-£0.01	N/A

79.4% of Civitas Social Housing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Civitas Social Housing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Civitas Social Housing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 0 mentions for Civitas Social Housing. Civitas Social Housing's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Strategic Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Civitas Social Housing	Neutral
Strategic Minerals	Neutral

Summary

Civitas Social Housing beats Strategic Minerals on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Thor Explorations?

Thor Explorations (LON:THX) and Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Thor Explorations has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Explorations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thor Explorations	£330.59M	1.46	£68.07M	£31.80	2.28
Strategic Minerals	£4.23M	31.05	-£13.68M	-£0.01	N/A

Thor Explorations has a net margin of 62.17% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Thor Explorations' return on equity of 52.14% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thor Explorations	62.17%	52.14%	12.12%
Strategic Minerals	-3.23%	-2.03%	4.39%

Thor Explorations has a beta of 1.735, meaning that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.871, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Thor Explorations presently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 79.56%. Given Thor Explorations' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Thor Explorations is more favorable than Strategic Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Thor Explorations	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Strategic Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

12.3% of Thor Explorations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 12.6% of Thor Explorations shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Thor Explorations. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 0 mentions for Thor Explorations. Thor Explorations' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Strategic Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Thor Explorations	Neutral
Strategic Minerals	Neutral

Summary

Thor Explorations beats Strategic Minerals on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Anglo Asian Mining?

Anglo Asian Mining (LON:AAZ) and Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and valuation.

Strategic Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Anglo Asian Mining. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Anglo Asian Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Anglo Asian Mining	£122.79M	3.78	-£34.33M	£15.40	26.30
Strategic Minerals	£4.23M	31.05	-£13.68M	-£0.01	N/A

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Anglo Asian Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 0 mentions for Anglo Asian Mining. Anglo Asian Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Strategic Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Anglo Asian Mining	Neutral
Strategic Minerals	Neutral

Anglo Asian Mining has a beta of 1.378, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.871, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Anglo Asian Mining has a net margin of 14.40% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Anglo Asian Mining's return on equity of 22.56% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Anglo Asian Mining	14.40%	22.56%	-12.11%
Strategic Minerals	-3.23%	-2.03%	4.39%

0.7% of Anglo Asian Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.5% of Anglo Asian Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Anglo Asian Mining beats Strategic Minerals on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Strategic Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SML vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Strategic Minerals	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£124.03M	£4.11B	£5.13B	£2.54B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.19%	4.69%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	-665.71	25.65	26.61	367.57
Price / Sales	31.05	8,013.90	4,771.11	83,481.74
Price / Cash	9.50	29.94	27.30	27.89
Price / Book	19.30	10.57	8.96	7.19
Net Income	-£13.68M	£122.32M	£154.93M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-6.05%	3.27%	2.58%	0.30%
1 Month Performance	37.06%	12.55%	10.18%	3.31%
1 Year Performance	1,564.29%	57.65%	45.55%	22.13%

Strategic Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SML Strategic Minerals	N/A	GBX 4.66 +5.9%	N/A	+1,564.3%	£124.03M	£4.23M	N/A	11
GFM Griffin Mining	1.1937 of 5 stars	GBX 282 flat	GBX 300 +6.4%	+55.8%	£497.99M	£144.34M	23.31	448	Gap Up
AMRQ Amaroq Minerals	1.6188 of 5 stars	GBX 104 +2.0%	GBX 132.50 +27.4%	+52.9%	£484.89M	£16.28M	N/A	N/A
CSH Civitas Social Housing	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£483.90M	£53.72M	725.45	N/A
THX Thor Explorations	3.2185 of 5 stars	GBX 72.40 +8.1%	GBX 130 +79.6%	+47.8%	£482.60M	£330.59M	2.28	N/A	Gap Down High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SML) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Strategic Minerals (SML) Competitors

SML vs. GFM, AMRQ, CSH, THX, and AAZ

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Griffin Mining?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Civitas Social Housing?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Thor Explorations?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Anglo Asian Mining?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SML vs. The Competition

Strategic Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Strategic Minerals (SML) Competitors

SML vs. GFM, AMRQ, CSH, THX, and AAZ

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Griffin Mining?

Is SML or GFM more profitable?

Does the media prefer SML or GFM?

Do analysts recommend SML or GFM?

Which has more risk & volatility, SML or GFM?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, SML or GFM?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in SML or GFM?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Which has better valuation & earnings, AMRQ or SML?

Do analysts recommend AMRQ or SML?

Is AMRQ or SML more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, AMRQ or SML?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in AMRQ or SML?

Does the media refer more to AMRQ or SML?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Civitas Social Housing?

Which has more volatility & risk, CSH or SML?

Is CSH or SML more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CSH or SML?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CSH or SML?

Does the media favor CSH or SML?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Thor Explorations?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, THX or SML?

Is THX or SML more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, THX or SML?

Do analysts prefer THX or SML?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in THX or SML?

Does the media favor THX or SML?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Anglo Asian Mining?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, AAZ or SML?

Does the media refer more to AAZ or SML?

Which has more risk & volatility, AAZ or SML?

Is AAZ or SML more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AAZ or SML?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SML vs. The Competition

Strategic Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools