Go Pro
→ SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years (From TradeSmith) (Ad)tc pixel Free SML Stock Alerts

Strategic Minerals (SML) Competitors

Strategic Minerals logo
GBX 4 -0.20 (-4.76%)
As of 07/13/2026 11:53 AM Eastern
Compare

SML vs. TUN, ECOR, PRE, CAPD, and SVML

Should you buy Strategic Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Strategic Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Strategic Minerals include Tungsten West (TUN), Ecora Resources (ECOR), Pensana (PRE), Capital (CAPD), and Sovereign Metals (SVML). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Tungsten West?

Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) and Tungsten West (LON:TUN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.905, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tungsten West has a beta of 0.286, meaning that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tungsten West had 3 more articles in the media than Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tungsten West and 0 mentions for Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tungsten West'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Strategic Minerals Neutral
Tungsten West Neutral

Tungsten West has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tungsten West, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Minerals£4.23M26.65-£13.68M-£0.01N/A
Tungsten WestN/AN/A-£10.80M-£26.00N/A

0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.5% of Tungsten West shares are held by institutional investors. 14.7% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Tungsten West shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Strategic Minerals has a net margin of -3.23% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -1,343.41%. Tungsten West's return on equity of 233.54% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strategic Minerals-3.23% -2.03% 4.39%
Tungsten West -1,343.41%233.54%-20.17%

Summary

Strategic Minerals beats Tungsten West on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Ecora Resources?

Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) and Ecora Resources (LON:ECOR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.4% of Ecora Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 14.7% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Ecora Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ecora Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Strategic Minerals Neutral
Ecora Resources Neutral

Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.905, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ecora Resources has a beta of 0.466, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Ecora Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 183.33, suggesting a potential upside of 43.01%. Given Ecora Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ecora Resources is more favorable than Strategic Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Strategic Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ecora Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Ecora Resources has a net margin of 40.38% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Ecora Resources' return on equity of 5.06% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strategic Minerals-3.23% -2.03% 4.39%
Ecora Resources 40.38%5.06%5.07%

Ecora Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ecora Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Minerals£4.23M26.65-£13.68M-£0.01N/A
Ecora Resources£55.90M5.72£28.84M£8.8814.44

Summary

Ecora Resources beats Strategic Minerals on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Pensana?

Pensana (LON:PRE) and Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Pensana has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Strategic Minerals' return on equity of -2.03% beat Pensana's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PensanaN/A -18.08% -4.97%
Strategic Minerals -3.23%-2.03%4.39%

Pensana has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pensana, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PensanaN/AN/A-£6.26M-£4.02N/A
Strategic Minerals£4.23M26.65-£13.68M-£0.01N/A

Pensana has a beta of 1.051, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.905, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

10.1% of Pensana shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Pensana shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.7% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Pensana's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Strategic Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pensana Neutral
Strategic Minerals Neutral

Summary

Pensana and Strategic Minerals tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Capital?

Capital (LON:CAPD) and Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

In the previous week, Capital had 14 more articles in the media than Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Capital and 0 mentions for Strategic Minerals. Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Strategic Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Neutral
Strategic Minerals Neutral

52.1% of Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 26.4% of Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.7% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Capital has a beta of 0.694, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.905, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital has a net margin of 20.08% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Capital's return on equity of 21.05% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital20.08% 21.05% 7.53%
Strategic Minerals -3.23%-2.03%4.39%

Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital£345.78M0.67£36.18M£33.983.03
Strategic Minerals£4.23M26.65-£13.68M-£0.01N/A

Capital presently has a consensus target price of GBX 160, suggesting a potential upside of 55.34%. Given Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Capital is more favorable than Strategic Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Strategic Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Capital beats Strategic Minerals on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Sovereign Metals?

Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) and Sovereign Metals (LON:SVML) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.905, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sovereign Metals has a beta of 1.116, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Sovereign Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Strategic Minerals' return on equity of -2.03% beat Sovereign Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strategic Minerals-3.23% -2.03% 4.39%
Sovereign Metals N/A -63.52%-50.84%

0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.1% of Sovereign Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 14.7% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 35.2% of Sovereign Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Sovereign Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Sovereign Metals and 0 mentions for Strategic Minerals. Sovereign Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.12 beat Strategic Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Sovereign Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Strategic Minerals Neutral
Sovereign Metals Neutral

Strategic Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Sovereign Metals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sovereign Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Minerals£4.23M26.65-£13.68M-£0.01N/A
Sovereign MetalsN/AN/A-£39.22M-£4.72N/A

Summary

Sovereign Metals beats Strategic Minerals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Strategic Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SML and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SML vs. The Competition

Export
MetricStrategic MineralsOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£115.57M£1.46B£4.58B£2.85B
Dividend YieldN/A6.58%5.02%6.16%
P/E Ratio-571.4317.6620.85368.18
Price / Sales26.6548,207.955,824.1984,612.72
Price / Cash9.5024.6324.1727.87
Price / Book16.575.478.687.49
Net Income-£13.68M£70.60M£157.11M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.82%-1.94%-1.21%-0.19%
1 Month Performance-12.09%-7.08%-4.45%-1.00%
1 Year Performance1,169.84%64.62%37.28%61.67%

Strategic Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SML
Strategic Minerals
N/AGBX 4
-4.8%		N/A+1,190.3%£115.57M£4.23MN/A11
TUN
Tungsten West
N/AGBX 35.50
+2.9%		N/A+239.8%£450.41MN/AN/A15
ECOR
Ecora Resources
N/AGBX 137.54
+1.9%		GBX 183.33
+33.3%		+97.8%£341.25M£55.90M15.4950
PRE
Pensana
N/AGBX 86.50
-1.4%		N/A-9.9%£305.79MN/AN/A1
CAPD
Capital
4.8236 of 5 stars		GBX 108.50
+2.4%		GBX 160
+47.5%		+20.0%£244.89M£345.78M3.192,739

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SML) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
They told you not to miss this one
The largest companies in the SP 500 are now more overvalued relative to fundamentals than they were at the abs...
Thor Metals | Sponsoredtc pixel
Forget SpaceX, this is Elon’s Next Breakthrough
Jeff Brown and Marc Chaikin - two investors who called Nvidia a decade ago - say Elon Musk's newly filed AI pa...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
When I found Rolls-Royce under $2, most people thought I was crazy
In 2022, Karim Rahemtulla recommended Rolls-Royce when it traded under $2. The stock climbed more than 1,100% ...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
BofA: Digital Dollar Coming 2025-2030
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel