Strategic Minerals (SML) Competitors

GBX 5.90 +0.05 (+0.85%)

As of 12:34 PM Eastern

SML vs. GFM, TUN, ECOR, PRE, and CAPD

Should you buy Strategic Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Strategic Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Strategic Minerals include Griffin Mining (GFM), Tungsten West (TUN), Ecora Resources (ECOR), Pensana (PRE), and Capital (CAPD). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Griffin Mining?

Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) and Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Griffin Mining	£120.56M	4.58	£25.84M	£4.90	63.88
Strategic Minerals	£4.61M	36.08	-£13.68M	£0.61	9.61

In the previous week, Griffin Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Griffin Mining and 1 mentions for Strategic Minerals. Griffin Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Strategic Minerals' score of 0.25 indicating that Griffin Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Griffin Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Strategic Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Strategic Minerals has a net margin of 14.71% compared to Griffin Mining's net margin of 7.96%. Strategic Minerals' return on equity of 10.40% beat Griffin Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Griffin Mining	7.96%	4.19%	6.85%
Strategic Minerals	14.71%	10.40%	4.39%

Griffin Mining has a beta of 0.542, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.969, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Griffin Mining presently has a consensus target price of GBX 290, indicating a potential downside of 7.35%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Strategic Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Griffin Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Strategic Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Griffin Mining beats Strategic Minerals on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Tungsten West?

Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) and Tungsten West (LON:TUN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

0.7% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Tungsten West shares are held by institutional investors. 17.5% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Tungsten West shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Strategic Minerals has a net margin of 14.71% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -1,343.41%. Tungsten West's return on equity of 233.54% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Strategic Minerals	14.71%	10.40%	4.39%
Tungsten West	-1,343.41%	233.54%	-20.17%

Tungsten West has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Strategic Minerals. Tungsten West is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strategic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Minerals	£4.61M	36.08	-£13.68M	£0.61	9.61
Tungsten West	N/A	N/A	-£10.80M	-£26.00	N/A

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals and Strategic Minerals both had 1 articles in the media. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Tungsten West's score of 0.00 indicating that Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Strategic Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Tungsten West	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.969, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tungsten West has a beta of 0.288, suggesting that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Strategic Minerals beats Tungsten West on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Ecora Resources?

Ecora Resources (LON:ECOR) and Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Ecora Resources has a net margin of 39.81% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of 14.71%. Strategic Minerals' return on equity of 10.40% beat Ecora Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ecora Resources	39.81%	4.99%	5.07%
Strategic Minerals	14.71%	10.40%	4.39%

Ecora Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ecora Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ecora Resources	£55.90M	6.64	£28.84M	£8.88	16.75
Strategic Minerals	£4.61M	36.08	-£13.68M	£0.61	9.61

30.0% of Ecora Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.4% of Ecora Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ecora Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ecora Resources and 1 mentions for Strategic Minerals. Ecora Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Strategic Minerals' score of 0.25 indicating that Ecora Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ecora Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Strategic Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Ecora Resources presently has a consensus price target of GBX 180, suggesting a potential upside of 21.01%. Given Ecora Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ecora Resources is more favorable than Strategic Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ecora Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Strategic Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Ecora Resources has a beta of 0.469, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.969, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ecora Resources beats Strategic Minerals on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Pensana?

Pensana (LON:PRE) and Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Strategic Minerals has a net margin of 14.71% compared to Pensana's net margin of 0.00%. Strategic Minerals' return on equity of 10.40% beat Pensana's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pensana	N/A	-20.38%	-4.97%
Strategic Minerals	14.71%	10.40%	4.39%

10.1% of Pensana shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Pensana shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pensana has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.969, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Pensana has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Strategic Minerals. Pensana is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strategic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pensana	N/A	N/A	-£6.26M	-£4.02	N/A
Strategic Minerals	£4.61M	36.08	-£13.68M	£0.61	9.61

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Pensana. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 0 mentions for Pensana. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Pensana's score of 0.00 indicating that Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pensana	Neutral
Strategic Minerals	Neutral

Summary

Strategic Minerals beats Pensana on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Capital?

Capital (LON:CAPD) and Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Capital has a beta of 0.718, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.969, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital has a net margin of 20.08% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of 14.71%. Capital's return on equity of 21.05% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Capital	20.08%	21.05%	7.53%
Strategic Minerals	14.71%	10.40%	4.39%

Capital presently has a consensus price target of GBX 160, suggesting a potential upside of 40.35%. Given Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Capital is more favorable than Strategic Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Strategic Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strategic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Capital	£345.78M	0.74	£36.18M	£33.98	3.35
Strategic Minerals	£4.61M	36.08	-£13.68M	£0.61	9.61

54.3% of Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.4% of Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Capital had 4 more articles in the media than Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Capital and 1 mentions for Strategic Minerals. Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Strategic Minerals' score of 0.25 indicating that Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Capital	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Strategic Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Capital beats Strategic Minerals on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Strategic Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SML vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Strategic Minerals	Other Industrial Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£166.31M	£1.66B	£4.96B	£2.79B
Dividend Yield	N/A	6.55%	4.97%	6.09%
P/E Ratio	9.61	31.29	23.65	366.15
Price / Sales	36.08	61,327.50	7,251.54	88,429.84
Price / Cash	9.50	24.63	27.65	27.89
Price / Book	24.43	5.74	7.00	7.74
Net Income	-£13.68M	£70.60M	£159.01M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	19.19%	2.56%	1.90%	0.82%
1 Month Performance	11.32%	4.93%	2.55%	2.78%
1 Year Performance	1,821.82%	132.52%	85.99%	87.90%

Strategic Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SML Strategic Minerals	N/A	GBX 5.90 +0.9%	N/A	+1,772.1%	£166.31M	£4.61M	9.61	11
GFM Griffin Mining	0.6998 of 5 stars	GBX 318 +0.7%	GBX 280 -11.9%	+81.5%	£561.56M	£120.56M	64.90	448	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Gap Down
TUN Tungsten West	N/A	GBX 33 -1.5%	N/A	+952.5%	£411.73M	N/A	N/A	15	Gap Up
ECOR Ecora Resources	4.6163 of 5 stars	GBX 151.59 +1.1%	GBX 180 +18.7%	+154.5%	£378.13M	£55.90M	17.07	50	News Coverage
PRE Pensana	N/A	GBX 99.60 +0.9%	N/A	+185.9%	£352.10M	N/A	N/A	1

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SML) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Strategic Minerals (SML) Competitors

SML vs. GFM, TUN, ECOR, PRE, and CAPD

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Griffin Mining?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Tungsten West?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Ecora Resources?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Pensana?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Capital?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SML vs. The Competition

Strategic Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Strategic Minerals (SML) Competitors

SML vs. GFM, TUN, ECOR, PRE, and CAPD

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Griffin Mining?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, GFM or SML?

Does the media favor GFM or SML?

Is GFM or SML more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, GFM or SML?

Do analysts prefer GFM or SML?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of GFM or SML?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Tungsten West?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in SML or TUN?

Is SML or TUN more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, SML or TUN?

Does the media prefer SML or TUN?

Which has more volatility and risk, SML or TUN?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Ecora Resources?

Is ECOR or SML more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, ECOR or SML?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in ECOR or SML?

Does the media refer more to ECOR or SML?

Do analysts prefer ECOR or SML?

Which has more risk & volatility, ECOR or SML?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Pensana?

Is PRE or SML more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PRE or SML?

Which has more risk & volatility, PRE or SML?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PRE or SML?

Does the media prefer PRE or SML?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Capital?

Which has more risk and volatility, CAPD or SML?

Is CAPD or SML more profitable?

Do analysts prefer CAPD or SML?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CAPD or SML?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CAPD or SML?

Does the media favor CAPD or SML?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SML vs. The Competition

Strategic Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools