Do analysts rate SML or AMRQ?

Amaroq Minerals has a consensus target price of GBX 132.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.26%. Given Amaroq Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Amaroq Minerals is more favorable than Strategic Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Strategic Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Amaroq Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts rate SML or GFM?

Griffin Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 290, suggesting a potential upside of 3.57%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Strategic Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Strategic Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Griffin Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media refer more to SML or GFM?

In the previous week, Griffin Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Griffin Mining and 3 mentions for Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Griffin Mining's score of -0.14 indicating that Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Strategic Minerals 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Griffin Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Strategic Minerals (SML) Competitors

GBX 4.90 -0.20 (-3.92%)

As of 09/11/2026 11:52 AM Eastern

Compare

SML vs. AMRQ, GFM, MTL, CSH, and AAZ

Should you buy Strategic Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Strategic Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Amaroq Minerals (AMRQ), Griffin Mining (GFM), Metals Exploration (MTL), Civitas Social Housing (CSH), and Anglo Asian Mining (AAZ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) and Amaroq Minerals (LON:AMRQ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Amaroq Minerals has a net margin of 6.56% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Amaroq Minerals' return on equity of 1.87% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Strategic Minerals	-3.23%	-2.03%	4.39%
Amaroq Minerals	6.56%	1.87%	-9.95%

0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.6% of Amaroq Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Amaroq Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.915, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amaroq Minerals has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Amaroq Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 0 mentions for Amaroq Minerals. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Amaroq Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Strategic Minerals	Neutral
Amaroq Minerals	Neutral

Amaroq Minerals has a consensus target price of GBX 132.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.26%. Given Amaroq Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Amaroq Minerals is more favorable than Strategic Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Strategic Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Amaroq Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Strategic Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Amaroq Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amaroq Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Minerals	£4.23M	32.64	-£13.68M	-£0.01	N/A
Amaroq Minerals	£16.28M	32.35	-£71.64M	-£5.10	N/A

Summary

Strategic Minerals and Amaroq Minerals tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Griffin Mining?

Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) and Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, Griffin Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Griffin Mining and 3 mentions for Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Griffin Mining's score of -0.14 indicating that Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Strategic Minerals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Griffin Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Minerals	£4.23M	32.64	-£13.68M	-£0.01	N/A
Griffin Mining	£144.34M	3.43	£25.84M	£12.10	23.14

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 22.62% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Griffin Mining's return on equity of 11.90% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Strategic Minerals	-3.23%	-2.03%	4.39%
Griffin Mining	22.62%	11.90%	6.85%

Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.915, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Griffin Mining has a beta of 0.497, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Griffin Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 290, suggesting a potential upside of 3.57%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Strategic Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Strategic Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Griffin Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Griffin Mining beats Strategic Minerals on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Metals Exploration?

Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) and Metals Exploration (LON:MTL) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Metals Exploration has a net margin of 13.86% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Metals Exploration's return on equity of 12.27% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Strategic Minerals	-3.23%	-2.03%	4.39%
Metals Exploration	13.86%	12.27%	3.75%

Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.915, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Metals Exploration has a beta of 1.105, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Metals Exploration. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 0 mentions for Metals Exploration. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Metals Exploration's score of 0.00 indicating that Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Strategic Minerals	Neutral
Metals Exploration	Neutral

0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of Metals Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 91.9% of Metals Exploration shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Metals Exploration has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metals Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Minerals	£4.23M	32.64	-£13.68M	-£0.01	N/A
Metals Exploration	£208.41M	2.35	£218.27M	£0.97	16.53

Summary

Metals Exploration beats Strategic Minerals on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Civitas Social Housing?

Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) and Civitas Social Housing (LON:CSH) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Civitas Social Housing has a net margin of 129.46% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Civitas Social Housing's return on equity of 10.16% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Strategic Minerals	-3.23%	-2.03%	4.39%
Civitas Social Housing	129.46%	10.16%	2.39%

Civitas Social Housing has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Civitas Social Housing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Minerals	£4.23M	32.64	-£13.68M	-£0.01	N/A
Civitas Social Housing	£53.72M	0.00	£69.54M	£0.11	N/A

0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.4% of Civitas Social Housing shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Civitas Social Housing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Civitas Social Housing. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 0 mentions for Civitas Social Housing. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Civitas Social Housing's score of 0.00 indicating that Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Strategic Minerals	Neutral
Civitas Social Housing	Neutral

Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.915, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Civitas Social Housing has a beta of 0.16, suggesting that its share price is 84% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Civitas Social Housing beats Strategic Minerals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Anglo Asian Mining?

Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) and Anglo Asian Mining (LON:AAZ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Strategic Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Anglo Asian Mining. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Anglo Asian Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Minerals	£4.23M	32.64	-£13.68M	-£0.01	N/A
Anglo Asian Mining	£122.79M	3.88	-£34.33M	£15.40	26.98

Anglo Asian Mining has a net margin of 14.40% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Anglo Asian Mining's return on equity of 22.56% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Strategic Minerals	-3.23%	-2.03%	4.39%
Anglo Asian Mining	14.40%	22.56%	-12.11%

Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.915, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Anglo Asian Mining has a beta of 1.386, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Anglo Asian Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.5% of Anglo Asian Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Anglo Asian Mining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 0 mentions for Anglo Asian Mining. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Anglo Asian Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Strategic Minerals	Neutral
Anglo Asian Mining	Neutral

Summary

Anglo Asian Mining beats Strategic Minerals on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Strategic Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SML vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Strategic Minerals	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£138.12M	£3.94B	£4.94B	£2.51B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.17%	4.68%	6.23%
P/E Ratio	-700.00	26.28	26.17	366.83
Price / Sales	32.64	8,053.86	4,791.71	83,599.68
Price / Cash	9.50	29.47	26.89	27.89
Price / Book	20.29	12.33	10.24	6.33
Net Income	-£13.68M	£127.55M	£158.16M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-5.77%	-1.43%	-1.45%	-0.69%
1 Month Performance	0.82%	9.72%	7.08%	0.18%
1 Year Performance	1,485.76%	47.16%	37.22%	20.03%

Strategic Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SML Strategic Minerals	N/A	GBX 4.90 -3.9%	N/A	+1,371.5%	£138.12M	£4.23M	N/A	11
AMRQ Amaroq Minerals	N/A	GBX 113 +0.9%	GBX 132.50 +17.3%	+63.8%	£526.86M	£16.28M	N/A	N/A
GFM Griffin Mining	1.3456 of 5 stars	GBX 280 -4.8%	GBX 290 +3.6%	+41.4%	£494.46M	£144.34M	23.14	448	News Coverage Analyst Forecast
MTL Metals Exploration	N/A	GBX 16.03 -1.6%	N/A	+22.4%	£490.34M	£208.41M	16.53	791
CSH Civitas Social Housing	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£483.90M	£53.72M	725.45	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SML) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Strategic Minerals (SML) Competitors

SML vs. AMRQ, GFM, MTL, CSH, and AAZ

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Griffin Mining?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Metals Exploration?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Civitas Social Housing?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Anglo Asian Mining?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SML vs. The Competition

Strategic Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Strategic Minerals (SML) Competitors

SML vs. AMRQ, GFM, MTL, CSH, and AAZ

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Is SML or AMRQ more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of SML or AMRQ?

Which has more volatility & risk, SML or AMRQ?

Does the media favor SML or AMRQ?

Do analysts rate SML or AMRQ?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, SML or AMRQ?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Griffin Mining?

Does the media refer more to SML or GFM?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, SML or GFM?

Is SML or GFM more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, SML or GFM?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of SML or GFM?

Do analysts rate SML or GFM?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Metals Exploration?

Is SML or MTL more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, SML or MTL?

Does the media prefer SML or MTL?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in SML or MTL?

Which has better valuation and earnings, SML or MTL?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Civitas Social Housing?

Is SML or CSH more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, SML or CSH?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in SML or CSH?

Does the media favor SML or CSH?

Which has more risk and volatility, SML or CSH?

Summary

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Anglo Asian Mining?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, SML or AAZ?

Is SML or AAZ more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, SML or AAZ?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of SML or AAZ?

Does the media prefer SML or AAZ?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SML vs. The Competition

Strategic Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools