Go Pro
→ The end of AI data centers coming? (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free SML Stock Alerts

Strategic Minerals (SML) Competitors

Strategic Minerals logo
GBX 5.91 -0.09 (-1.48%)
As of 12:31 PM Eastern
Compare

SML vs. AMRQ, GFM, MTL, AAZ, and CSH

Should you buy Strategic Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Strategic Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Amaroq Minerals (AMRQ), Griffin Mining (GFM), Metals Exploration (MTL), Anglo Asian Mining (AAZ), and Civitas Social Housing (CSH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Amaroq Minerals (LON:AMRQ) and Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Strategic Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Amaroq Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amaroq Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Amaroq Minerals£16.28M33.64-£71.64M-£5.10N/A
Strategic Minerals£3.82M43.57-£13.68M-£0.01N/A

Amaroq Minerals has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.915, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Amaroq Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Amaroq Minerals and 2 mentions for Strategic Minerals. Amaroq Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Strategic Minerals' score of 0.09 indicating that Amaroq Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Amaroq Minerals
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Strategic Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Amaroq Minerals presently has a consensus price target of GBX 132.50, suggesting a potential upside of 12.77%. Given Amaroq Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Amaroq Minerals is more favorable than Strategic Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Amaroq Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Strategic Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Amaroq Minerals has a net margin of 6.56% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -33.55%. Amaroq Minerals' return on equity of 1.87% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Amaroq Minerals6.56% 1.87% -9.95%
Strategic Minerals -33.55%-10.31%4.39%

3.6% of Amaroq Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of Amaroq Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Amaroq Minerals beats Strategic Minerals on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Griffin Mining?

Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) and Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Griffin Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 1 mentions for Griffin Mining. Griffin Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Strategic Minerals' score of 0.09 indicating that Griffin Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Strategic Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Griffin Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.915, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Griffin Mining has a beta of 0.497, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Minerals£3.82M43.57-£13.68M-£0.01N/A
Griffin Mining£144.34M3.79£25.84M£12.1025.62

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 22.62% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -33.55%. Griffin Mining's return on equity of 11.90% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strategic Minerals-33.55% -10.31% 4.39%
Griffin Mining 22.62%11.90%6.85%

Griffin Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 290, indicating a potential downside of 6.45%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Strategic Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Strategic Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Griffin Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Griffin Mining beats Strategic Minerals on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Metals Exploration?

Metals Exploration (LON:MTL) and Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

2.2% of Metals Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 91.9% of Metals Exploration shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Metals Exploration had 3 more articles in the media than Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Metals Exploration and 2 mentions for Strategic Minerals. Metals Exploration's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Strategic Minerals' score of 0.09 indicating that Metals Exploration is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Metals Exploration
0 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Strategic Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Metals Exploration has a beta of 1.105, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.915, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Metals Exploration has a net margin of 18.19% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -33.55%. Metals Exploration's return on equity of 12.83% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Metals Exploration18.19% 12.83% 3.75%
Strategic Minerals -33.55%-10.31%4.39%

Metals Exploration has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metals Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Metals Exploration£208.41M2.44£218.27M£0.9717.11
Strategic Minerals£3.82M43.57-£13.68M-£0.01N/A

Summary

Metals Exploration beats Strategic Minerals on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Anglo Asian Mining?

Anglo Asian Mining (LON:AAZ) and Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Strategic Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Anglo Asian Mining. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Anglo Asian Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Anglo Asian Mining£223.03M2.16-£34.33M£15.4027.27
Strategic Minerals£3.82M43.57-£13.68M-£0.01N/A

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Anglo Asian Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 0 mentions for Anglo Asian Mining. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.09 beat Anglo Asian Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Anglo Asian Mining Neutral
Strategic Minerals Neutral

Anglo Asian Mining has a net margin of 26.42% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -33.55%. Anglo Asian Mining's return on equity of 53.59% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Anglo Asian Mining26.42% 53.59% -12.11%
Strategic Minerals -33.55%-10.31%4.39%

0.7% of Anglo Asian Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.5% of Anglo Asian Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Anglo Asian Mining has a beta of 1.386, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.915, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Anglo Asian Mining beats Strategic Minerals on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Minerals compare to Civitas Social Housing?

Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) and Civitas Social Housing (LON:CSH) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings and dividends.

0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.4% of Civitas Social Housing shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Civitas Social Housing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Civitas Social Housing has a net margin of 129.46% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -33.55%. Civitas Social Housing's return on equity of 10.16% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strategic Minerals-33.55% -10.31% 4.39%
Civitas Social Housing 129.46%10.16%2.39%

Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.915, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Civitas Social Housing has a beta of 0.16, suggesting that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Civitas Social Housing. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 0 mentions for Civitas Social Housing. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.09 beat Civitas Social Housing's score of 0.00 indicating that Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Strategic Minerals Neutral
Civitas Social Housing Neutral

Civitas Social Housing has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Civitas Social Housing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Minerals£3.82M43.57-£13.68M-£0.01N/A
Civitas Social Housing£53.72M0.00£69.54M£0.11N/A

Summary

Civitas Social Housing beats Strategic Minerals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Strategic Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SML and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SML vs. The Competition

Export
MetricStrategic MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£166.62M£3.73B£4.69B£2.80B
Dividend YieldN/A5.25%4.76%6.18%
P/E Ratio-844.4325.0625.09366.17
Price / Sales43.5727,853.1316,596.5889,425.29
Price / Cash9.5027.1024.9427.89
Price / Book24.4812.2810.206.83
Net Income-£13.68M£127.43M£158.44M£5.89B
7 Day Performance12.81%-3.18%-2.73%-0.75%
1 Month Performance6.70%-4.71%-4.51%16.84%
1 Year Performance1,252.63%20.92%18.00%16.40%

Strategic Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SML
Strategic Minerals
N/AGBX 5.91
-1.5%		N/A+1,404.3%£166.62M£3.82MN/A11
AMRQ
Amaroq Minerals
1.2624 of 5 stars		GBX 119.50
+0.4%		GBX 132.50
+10.9%		+63.6%£557.16M£16.28MN/AN/A
GFM
Griffin Mining
1.1619 of 5 stars		GBX 293.84
+1.3%		GBX 290
-1.3%		+69.1%£518.90M£144.34M24.28448
MTL
Metals Exploration
N/AGBX 16.80
flat		N/A+18.6%£513.83M£208.41M17.32791
AAZ
Anglo Asian Mining
N/AGBX 430
+1.2%		N/A+102.4%£492.88M£223.03M27.92950

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SML) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Elon Warns "America Will Go Bankrupt". Trump's Plan Inside.
National debt just crossed 40 trillion dollars, and Elon Musk says America is 1,000% going to go bankrupt with...
American Hartford Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
How options let you do more with less capital
Would you rather spend $5,000 buying 100 shares of a $50 stock, or control those same 100 shares for a fractio...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
WATCH THIS BEFORE DECEMBER 8th!!
James Altucher says a quiet government filing could reveal Elon Musk's biggest move yet, and almost nobody has...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
A new kind of civil war is coming after election day?
Across America, AI-driven backlash is fueling protests, lawsuits, and moratoria that could reshape the politic...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
How Elon’s Empire Ends (and how to profit)
Marc Chaikin, the 60 year Wall Street veteran whose Chaikin Money Flow indicator sits on every Bloomberg termi...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel