Free Trial

Landore Resources (LND) Competitors

Landore Resources logo
GBX 2.10 +0.10 (+5.00%)
As of 12:34 PM Eastern

LND vs. AVO, FDP, TED, RMR, and KDNC

Should you buy Landore Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Landore Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Landore Resources include Advanced Oncotherapy (AVO), FD Technologies (FDP), Ted Baker (TED), Rome Resources (RMR), and Cadence Minerals (KDNC).

How does Landore Resources compare to Advanced Oncotherapy?

Landore Resources (LON:LND) and Advanced Oncotherapy (LON:AVO) are both small-cap agriculture companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Landore Resources has a beta of -0.15, suggesting that its stock price is 115% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Advanced Oncotherapy has a beta of 0.06, suggesting that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

Advanced Oncotherapy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landore Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Landore ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.77M£0.1911.05
Advanced OncotherapyN/AN/A-£32.60M-£0.07N/A

Advanced Oncotherapy's return on equity of -67.34% beat Landore Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Landore ResourcesN/A -207.28% -106.31%
Advanced Oncotherapy N/A -67.34%-11.73%

In the previous week, Landore Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Advanced Oncotherapy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Landore Resources and 0 mentions for Advanced Oncotherapy. Advanced Oncotherapy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Landore Resources' score of -0.32 indicating that Advanced Oncotherapy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Landore Resources Neutral
Advanced Oncotherapy Neutral

10.6% of Landore Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.8% of Advanced Oncotherapy shares are held by institutional investors. 6.7% of Landore Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 47.5% of Advanced Oncotherapy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Advanced Oncotherapy beats Landore Resources on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Landore Resources compare to FD Technologies?

FD Technologies (LON:FDP) and Landore Resources (LON:LND) are both small-cap agriculture companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Landore Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FD Technologies. FD Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landore Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FD Technologies£196.89M2.77-£32.27M-£144.37N/A
Landore ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.77M£0.1911.05

85.1% of FD Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.6% of Landore Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 16.5% of FD Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Landore Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FD Technologies has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Landore Resources has a beta of -0.15, meaning that its share price is 115% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Landore Resources had 2 more articles in the media than FD Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Landore Resources and 0 mentions for FD Technologies. FD Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Landore Resources' score of -0.32 indicating that FD Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FD Technologies Neutral
Landore Resources Neutral

FD Technologies has a net margin of 203.17% compared to Landore Resources' net margin of 0.00%. FD Technologies' return on equity of 96.98% beat Landore Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FD Technologies203.17% 96.98% 0.25%
Landore Resources N/A -207.28%-106.31%

Summary

FD Technologies beats Landore Resources on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Landore Resources compare to Ted Baker?

Ted Baker (LON:TED) and Landore Resources (LON:LND) are both small-cap agriculture companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Landore Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Ted Baker. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Landore Resources and 0 mentions for Ted Baker. Ted Baker's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Landore Resources' score of -0.32 indicating that Ted Baker is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ted Baker Neutral
Landore Resources Neutral

Ted Baker's return on equity of 0.00% beat Landore Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ted BakerN/A N/A N/A
Landore Resources N/A -207.28%-106.31%

10.6% of Landore Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of Landore Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ted Baker has higher revenue and earnings than Landore Resources. Ted Baker is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landore Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ted Baker£428.24M0.00N/A-£19.30N/A
Landore ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.77M£0.1911.05

Summary

Landore Resources beats Ted Baker on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Landore Resources compare to Rome Resources?

Landore Resources (LON:LND) and Rome Resources (LON:RMR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Landore Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Rome Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Landore Resources and 0 mentions for Rome Resources. Rome Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Landore Resources' score of -0.32 indicating that Rome Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Landore Resources Neutral
Rome Resources Neutral

Rome Resources' return on equity of -32.93% beat Landore Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Landore ResourcesN/A -207.28% -106.31%
Rome Resources N/A -32.93%-3.97%

10.6% of Landore Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.1% of Rome Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of Landore Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.0% of Rome Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Landore Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rome Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Landore ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.77M£0.1911.05
Rome ResourcesN/AN/AN/A£0.001,755.00

Landore Resources has a beta of -0.15, indicating that its stock price is 115% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rome Resources has a beta of 0.008853154, indicating that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Rome Resources beats Landore Resources on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Landore Resources compare to Cadence Minerals?

Landore Resources (LON:LND) and Cadence Minerals (LON:KDNC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Landore Resources has a beta of -0.15, suggesting that its stock price is 115% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Minerals has a beta of 1.861, suggesting that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

Cadence Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landore Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Landore ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.77M£0.1911.05
Cadence MineralsN/AN/A-£5.72M-£0.55N/A

10.6% of Landore Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Cadence Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of Landore Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.8% of Cadence Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Landore Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Cadence Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Landore Resources and 0 mentions for Cadence Minerals. Cadence Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Landore Resources' score of -0.32 indicating that Cadence Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Landore Resources Neutral
Cadence Minerals Neutral

Cadence Minerals has a net margin of 134.07% compared to Landore Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Cadence Minerals' return on equity of -9.71% beat Landore Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Landore ResourcesN/A -207.28% -106.31%
Cadence Minerals 134.07%-9.71%-3.99%

Summary

Cadence Minerals beats Landore Resources on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Landore Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LND and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LND vs. The Competition

MetricLandore ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£7.80M£1.60B£4.87B£2.77B
Dividend Yield6.74%6.54%4.96%6.12%
P/E Ratio11.0528.7421.93365.54
Price / SalesN/A58,938.227,026.6487,173.10
Price / Cash21.0024.6327.2127.85
Price / Book2.125.579.127.68
Net Income-£3.77M£70.60M£156.62M£5.89B
7 Day Performance16.67%-3.77%-4.36%-0.55%
1 Month Performance-4.55%-0.40%-2.03%3.15%
1 Year Performance-41.67%102.31%60.03%73.57%

Landore Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LND
Landore Resources
N/AGBX 2.10
+5.0%
N/A-45.1%£7.80MN/A11.056
AVO
Advanced Oncotherapy
N/AN/AN/AN/A£9.50MN/AN/A3,900
FDP
FD Technologies
N/AGBX 2,450
flat
N/A+1.7%£544.43M£196.89MN/A40,100
TED
Ted Baker
N/AN/AN/AN/A£202.71M£428.24MN/A740
RMR
Rome Resources
N/AGBX 0.35
-6.4%
N/A+11.2%£26.84MN/A1,750.00N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:LND) was last updated on 6/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners