Landore Resources (LND) Competitors

Landore Resources logo
GBX 1.82 -0.09 (-4.47%)
As of 06/26/2026 10:27 AM Eastern

LND vs. AVO, FDP, TED, CMET, and GSP

Should you buy Landore Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Landore Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Landore Resources include Advanced Oncotherapy (AVO), FD Technologies (FDP), Ted Baker (TED), Capital Metals (CMET), and Gensource Potash (GSP).

How does Landore Resources compare to Advanced Oncotherapy?

Landore Resources (LON:LND) and Advanced Oncotherapy (LON:AVO) are both small-cap agriculture companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and risk.

Advanced Oncotherapy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landore Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Landore ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.77M£0.199.55
Advanced OncotherapyN/AN/A-£32.60M-£0.07N/A

Landore Resources has a beta of -0.15, meaning that its share price is 115% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Advanced Oncotherapy has a beta of 0.06, meaning that its share price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

10.6% of Landore Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.8% of Advanced Oncotherapy shares are held by institutional investors. 6.7% of Landore Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 47.5% of Advanced Oncotherapy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Advanced Oncotherapy's return on equity of -67.34% beat Landore Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Landore ResourcesN/A -207.28% -106.31%
Advanced Oncotherapy N/A -67.34%-11.73%

In the previous week, Landore Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Advanced Oncotherapy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Landore Resources and 0 mentions for Advanced Oncotherapy. Landore Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Advanced Oncotherapy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Landore Resources Neutral
Advanced Oncotherapy Neutral

Summary

Advanced Oncotherapy beats Landore Resources on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Landore Resources compare to FD Technologies?

FD Technologies (LON:FDP) and Landore Resources (LON:LND) are both small-cap agriculture companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

85.1% of FD Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.6% of Landore Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.5% of FD Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Landore Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FD Technologies has a net margin of 203.17% compared to Landore Resources' net margin of 0.00%. FD Technologies' return on equity of 96.98% beat Landore Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FD Technologies203.17% 96.98% 0.25%
Landore Resources N/A -207.28%-106.31%

FD Technologies has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Landore Resources has a beta of -0.15, suggesting that its stock price is 115% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Landore Resources had 1 more articles in the media than FD Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Landore Resources and 0 mentions for FD Technologies. FD Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Landore Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
FD Technologies Neutral
Landore Resources Neutral

Landore Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FD Technologies. FD Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landore Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FD Technologies£196.89M2.77-£32.27M-£144.37N/A
Landore ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.77M£0.199.55

Summary

FD Technologies beats Landore Resources on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Landore Resources compare to Ted Baker?

Landore Resources (LON:LND) and Ted Baker (LON:TED) are both small-cap agriculture companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

10.6% of Landore Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 6.7% of Landore Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ted Baker has higher revenue and earnings than Landore Resources. Ted Baker is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landore Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Landore ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.77M£0.199.55
Ted Baker£428.24M0.00N/A-£19.30N/A

Ted Baker's return on equity of 0.00% beat Landore Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Landore ResourcesN/A -207.28% -106.31%
Ted Baker N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Landore Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Ted Baker. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Landore Resources and 0 mentions for Ted Baker. Landore Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ted Baker'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Landore Resources Neutral
Ted Baker Neutral

Summary

Landore Resources beats Ted Baker on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Landore Resources compare to Capital Metals?

Capital Metals (LON:CMET) and Landore Resources (LON:LND) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, Capital Metals and Capital Metals both had 1 articles in the media. Capital Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Landore Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capital Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Landore Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Capital Metals' return on equity of -21.08% beat Landore Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital MetalsN/A -21.08% -8.47%
Landore Resources N/A -207.28%-106.31%

1.5% of Capital Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.6% of Landore Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of Capital Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Landore Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Capital Metals has a beta of 0.66459966, meaning that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Landore Resources has a beta of -0.15, meaning that its share price is 115% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landore Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital MetalsN/AN/A-£1.24M-£0.24N/A
Landore ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.77M£0.199.55

Summary

Capital Metals and Landore Resources tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Landore Resources compare to Gensource Potash?

Landore Resources (LON:LND) and Gensource Potash (LON:GSP) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Landore Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Gensource Potash. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Landore Resources and 0 mentions for Gensource Potash. Landore Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gensource Potash'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Landore Resources Neutral
Gensource Potash Neutral

Gensource Potash's return on equity of -45.96% beat Landore Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Landore ResourcesN/A -207.28% -106.31%
Gensource Potash N/A -45.96%-10.31%

Gensource Potash is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landore Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Landore ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.77M£0.199.55
Gensource PotashN/AN/A-£6.58M-£0.01N/A

Landore Resources has a beta of -0.15, indicating that its share price is 115% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gensource Potash has a beta of 1, indicating that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

10.6% of Landore Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 6.7% of Landore Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Gensource Potash shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Landore Resources beats Gensource Potash on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Landore Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LND and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LND and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LND vs. The Competition

MetricLandore ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£6.74M£1.49B£4.60B£2.78B
Dividend Yield6.74%6.56%5.03%6.16%
P/E Ratio9.5527.3022.88366.66
Price / SalesN/A46,620.375,657.5886,087.92
Price / Cash21.0024.6326.8327.87
Price / Book1.835.288.787.79
Net Income-£3.77M£70.60M£157.40M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-6.92%-4.69%-3.14%-0.63%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-7.65%-6.25%-1.17%
1 Year Performance-34.95%81.77%48.80%65.92%

Landore Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LND
Landore Resources
N/AGBX 1.82
-4.5%
N/A-37.8%£6.74MN/A9.556
AVO
Advanced Oncotherapy
N/AN/AN/AN/A£9.50MN/AN/A3,900
FDP
FD Technologies
N/AGBX 2,450
flat
N/A+0.5%£544.43M£196.89MN/A40,100
TED
Ted Baker
N/AN/AN/AN/A£202.71M£428.24MN/A740
CMET
Capital Metals
N/AGBX 5
+2.0%
N/A+66.7%£24.61MN/AN/A22

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:LND) was last updated on 6/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners