Go Pro

Concurrent Technologies (CNC) Competitors

Concurrent Technologies logo
GBX 266.15 -11.35 (-4.09%)
As of 08:30 AM Eastern

CNC vs. PTV, PRW, CAN, RPI, and IDEA

Should you buy Concurrent Technologies stock or one of its competitors? Concurrent Technologies's main competitors and comparable companies include PeerTV (PTV), Promethean World (PRW), Canaan (CAN), Raspberry Pi (RPI), and Ideagen (IDEA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology hardware, storage & peripherals" industry.

How does Concurrent Technologies compare to PeerTV?

Concurrent Technologies (LON:CNC) and PeerTV (LON:PTV) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Concurrent Technologies presently has a consensus target price of GBX 285, indicating a potential upside of 7.08%. Given Concurrent Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Concurrent Technologies is more favorable than PeerTV.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Concurrent Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
PeerTV
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

15.3% of Concurrent Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.4% of Concurrent Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Concurrent Technologies has a net margin of 10.85% compared to PeerTV's net margin of 0.00%. Concurrent Technologies' return on equity of 11.21% beat PeerTV's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Concurrent Technologies10.85% 11.21% 8.31%
PeerTV N/A N/A N/A

Concurrent Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than PeerTV.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Concurrent Technologies£45.87M5.27£5.09M£5.5847.70
PeerTVN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Concurrent Technologies had 6 more articles in the media than PeerTV. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Concurrent Technologies and 0 mentions for PeerTV. Concurrent Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat PeerTV's score of 0.00 indicating that Concurrent Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Concurrent Technologies Positive
PeerTV Neutral

Summary

Concurrent Technologies beats PeerTV on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concurrent Technologies compare to Promethean World?

Promethean World (LON:PRW) and Concurrent Technologies (LON:CNC) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Concurrent Technologies has a consensus price target of GBX 285, suggesting a potential upside of 7.08%. Given Concurrent Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Concurrent Technologies is more favorable than Promethean World.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Promethean World
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Concurrent Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

15.3% of Concurrent Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.4% of Concurrent Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Concurrent Technologies has a net margin of 10.85% compared to Promethean World's net margin of 0.00%. Concurrent Technologies' return on equity of 11.21% beat Promethean World's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Promethean WorldN/A N/A N/A
Concurrent Technologies 10.85%11.21%8.31%

In the previous week, Concurrent Technologies had 6 more articles in the media than Promethean World. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Concurrent Technologies and 0 mentions for Promethean World. Concurrent Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Promethean World's score of 0.00 indicating that Concurrent Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Promethean World Neutral
Concurrent Technologies Positive

Concurrent Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Promethean World.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Promethean WorldN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Concurrent Technologies£45.87M5.27£5.09M£5.5847.70

Summary

Concurrent Technologies beats Promethean World on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concurrent Technologies compare to Canaan?

Canaan (LON:CAN) and Concurrent Technologies (LON:CNC) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

Canaan pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Concurrent Technologies pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Canaan pays out -24.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Concurrent Technologies pays out 19.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Canaan is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Concurrent Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Canaan. Canaan is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concurrent Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Canaan£8.16B0.30N/A-£9.00N/A
Concurrent Technologies£45.87M5.27£5.09M£5.5847.70

Concurrent Technologies has a net margin of 10.85% compared to Canaan's net margin of -0.55%. Concurrent Technologies' return on equity of 11.21% beat Canaan's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Canaan-0.55% -1.48% N/A
Concurrent Technologies 10.85%11.21%8.31%

Canaan presently has a consensus price target of GBX 350, indicating a potential upside of 38.56%. Concurrent Technologies has a consensus price target of GBX 285, indicating a potential upside of 7.08%. Given Canaan's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Canaan is more favorable than Concurrent Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Canaan
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Concurrent Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Canaan has a beta of 2.1, meaning that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Concurrent Technologies has a beta of 1.292, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

22.5% of Canaan shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.3% of Concurrent Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Canaan shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Concurrent Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Concurrent Technologies had 6 more articles in the media than Canaan. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Concurrent Technologies and 0 mentions for Canaan. Concurrent Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Canaan's score of 0.00 indicating that Concurrent Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Canaan Neutral
Concurrent Technologies Positive

Summary

Concurrent Technologies beats Canaan on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concurrent Technologies compare to Raspberry Pi?

Concurrent Technologies (LON:CNC) and Raspberry Pi (LON:RPI) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Concurrent Technologies presently has a consensus price target of GBX 285, indicating a potential upside of 7.08%. Raspberry Pi has a consensus price target of GBX 760, indicating a potential upside of 33.80%. Given Raspberry Pi's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Raspberry Pi is more favorable than Concurrent Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Concurrent Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Raspberry Pi
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Concurrent Technologies has a net margin of 10.85% compared to Raspberry Pi's net margin of 7.15%. Raspberry Pi's return on equity of 12.98% beat Concurrent Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Concurrent Technologies10.85% 11.21% 8.31%
Raspberry Pi 7.15%12.98%N/A

Raspberry Pi has higher revenue and earnings than Concurrent Technologies. Concurrent Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Raspberry Pi, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Concurrent Technologies£45.87M5.27£5.09M£5.5847.70
Raspberry Pi£323.20M3.40£5.93M£11.0051.64

Concurrent Technologies has a beta of 1.292, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Raspberry Pi has a beta of 0.451, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

15.3% of Concurrent Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.1% of Raspberry Pi shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Concurrent Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Raspberry Pi shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Concurrent Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Raspberry Pi. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Concurrent Technologies and 2 mentions for Raspberry Pi. Concurrent Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Raspberry Pi's score of 0.14 indicating that Concurrent Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Concurrent Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Raspberry Pi
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Concurrent Technologies beats Raspberry Pi on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concurrent Technologies compare to Ideagen?

Concurrent Technologies (LON:CNC) and Ideagen (LON:IDEA) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Concurrent Technologies has a net margin of 10.85% compared to Ideagen's net margin of 0.00%. Concurrent Technologies' return on equity of 11.21% beat Ideagen's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Concurrent Technologies10.85% 11.21% 8.31%
Ideagen N/A N/A N/A

Concurrent Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ideagen. Ideagen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concurrent Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Concurrent Technologies£45.87M5.27£5.09M£5.5847.70
Ideagen£75.28M0.00N/A£0.02N/A

Concurrent Technologies presently has a consensus price target of GBX 285, suggesting a potential upside of 7.08%. Given Concurrent Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Concurrent Technologies is more favorable than Ideagen.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Concurrent Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ideagen
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Concurrent Technologies had 6 more articles in the media than Ideagen. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Concurrent Technologies and 0 mentions for Ideagen. Ideagen's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Concurrent Technologies' score of 0.59 indicating that Ideagen is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Concurrent Technologies Positive
Ideagen Positive

Concurrent Technologies pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Ideagen pays an annual dividend of GBX 0 per share. Concurrent Technologies pays out 19.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ideagen pays out 18.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

15.3% of Concurrent Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.4% of Concurrent Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Concurrent Technologies beats Ideagen on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Concurrent Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CNC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CNC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CNC vs. The Competition

MetricConcurrent TechnologiesTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£241.78M£113.61B£30.16B£2.88B
Dividend Yield0.44%1.65%2.73%6.22%
P/E Ratio47.7028.0376.07366.59
Price / Sales5.27102.71586.5583,707.12
Price / Cash6.3820.9148.1527.89
Price / Book6.078.177.766.51
Net Income£5.09M£3.57B£703.05M£5.89B
7 Day Performance5.52%0.73%0.65%18.11%
1 Month Performance7.08%2.39%-2.12%0.81%
1 Year Performance38.62%81.70%183.82%20.25%

Concurrent Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CNC
Concurrent Technologies
1.3239 of 5 stars
GBX 266.15
-4.1%
GBX 285
+7.1%
+49.5%£241.78M£45.87M47.7074,300
PTV
PeerTV
N/AN/AN/AN/A£0.00N/AN/A147,000
PRW
Promethean World
N/AN/AN/AN/A£0.00N/AN/A147,000
CAN
Canaan
1.294 of 5 stars
GBX 270.20
+0.7%
GBX 350
+29.5%
+5.9%£2.68B£8.16BN/AN/A
RPI
Raspberry Pi
2.2591 of 5 stars
GBX 596.52
+2.9%
GBX 760
+27.4%
+35.1%£1.15B£323.20M54.23N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CNC) was last updated on 9/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners