James Cropper (CRPR) Competitors

James Cropper logo
GBX 360 +11.75 (+3.37%)
As of 10:13 AM Eastern

CRPR vs. MNDI, SML, IRR, GAL, and ALL

Should you buy James Cropper stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares James Cropper with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with James Cropper include Mondi (MNDI), Strategic Minerals (SML), IronRidge Resources (IRR), Galantas Gold (GAL), and Atlantic Lithium (ALL). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.

How does James Cropper compare to Mondi?

James Cropper (LON:CRPR) and Mondi (LON:MNDI) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Mondi has a net margin of 1.40% compared to James Cropper's net margin of -2.71%. Mondi's return on equity of 1.69% beat James Cropper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Cropper-2.71% -12.28% 1.18%
Mondi 1.40%1.69%3.13%

James Cropper has a beta of 0.465, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mondi has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

17.1% of James Cropper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.0% of Mondi shares are held by institutional investors. 30.3% of James Cropper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Mondi shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mondi has a consensus target price of GBX 1,035, suggesting a potential upside of 41.78%. Given Mondi's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Mondi is more favorable than James Cropper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
James Cropper
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Mondi
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Mondi has higher revenue and earnings than James Cropper. James Cropper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mondi, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Cropper£101.19M0.34-£3.99M-£28.60N/A
Mondi£7.66B0.42£460.67M£37.4019.52

In the previous week, Mondi had 1 more articles in the media than James Cropper. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Mondi and 1 mentions for James Cropper. James Cropper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Mondi's score of -0.62 indicating that James Cropper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
James Cropper
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Mondi
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Summary

Mondi beats James Cropper on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Cropper compare to Strategic Minerals?

Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) and James Cropper (LON:CRPR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.969, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Cropper has a beta of 0.465, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, James Cropper had 1 more articles in the media than Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Cropper and 0 mentions for Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled James Cropper'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Strategic Minerals Neutral
James Cropper Neutral

James Cropper has a net margin of -2.71% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Strategic Minerals' return on equity of -2.03% beat James Cropper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strategic Minerals-3.23% -2.03% 4.39%
James Cropper -2.71%-12.28%1.18%

0.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.1% of James Cropper shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.7% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of James Cropper shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

James Cropper has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than James Cropper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Minerals£4.23M32.64-£13.68M-£0.01N/A
James Cropper£101.19M0.34-£3.99M-£28.60N/A

Summary

James Cropper beats Strategic Minerals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Cropper compare to IronRidge Resources?

James Cropper (LON:CRPR) and IronRidge Resources (LON:IRR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

IronRidge Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to James Cropper's net margin of -2.71%. IronRidge Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat James Cropper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Cropper-2.71% -12.28% 1.18%
IronRidge Resources N/A N/A N/A

IronRidge Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than James Cropper. James Cropper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IronRidge Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Cropper£101.19M0.34-£3.99M-£28.60N/A
IronRidge Resources£56.06K0.00N/A-£0.60N/A

In the previous week, James Cropper had 1 more articles in the media than IronRidge Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Cropper and 0 mentions for IronRidge Resources. James Cropper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled IronRidge Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
James Cropper Neutral
IronRidge Resources Neutral

17.1% of James Cropper shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.3% of James Cropper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

James Cropper beats IronRidge Resources on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Cropper compare to Galantas Gold?

Galantas Gold (LON:GAL) and James Cropper (LON:CRPR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, James Cropper had 1 more articles in the media than Galantas Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Cropper and 0 mentions for Galantas Gold. Galantas Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled James Cropper'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Galantas Gold Neutral
James Cropper Neutral

0.1% of Galantas Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.1% of James Cropper shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.4% of Galantas Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of James Cropper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Galantas Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than James Cropper. James Cropper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galantas Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Galantas GoldN/AN/AN/A-£7.00N/A
James Cropper£101.19M0.34-£3.99M-£28.60N/A

Galantas Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to James Cropper's net margin of -2.71%. Galantas Gold's return on equity of 0.00% beat James Cropper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Galantas GoldN/A N/A N/A
James Cropper -2.71%-12.28%1.18%

Summary

James Cropper beats Galantas Gold on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Cropper compare to Atlantic Lithium?

James Cropper (LON:CRPR) and Atlantic Lithium (LON:ALL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Atlantic Lithium has a consensus target price of GBX 37, suggesting a potential upside of 133.44%. Given Atlantic Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Atlantic Lithium is more favorable than James Cropper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
James Cropper
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Atlantic Lithium
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

James Cropper has a net margin of -2.71% compared to Atlantic Lithium's net margin of -2,532.15%. James Cropper's return on equity of -12.28% beat Atlantic Lithium's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Cropper-2.71% -12.28% 1.18%
Atlantic Lithium -2,532.15%-15.05%-18.38%

James Cropper has higher revenue and earnings than Atlantic Lithium. Atlantic Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than James Cropper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Cropper£101.19M0.34-£3.99M-£28.60N/A
Atlantic Lithium£10.65K11,934.07-£27.20M-£1.00N/A

In the previous week, Atlantic Lithium had 1 more articles in the media than James Cropper. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Atlantic Lithium and 1 mentions for James Cropper. James Cropper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Atlantic Lithium's score of -0.27 indicating that James Cropper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
James Cropper
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Atlantic Lithium
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

James Cropper has a beta of 0.465, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atlantic Lithium has a beta of 0.313, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

17.1% of James Cropper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.2% of Atlantic Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 30.3% of James Cropper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Atlantic Lithium shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

James Cropper beats Atlantic Lithium on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get James Cropper News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRPR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRPR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRPR vs. The Competition

MetricJames CropperPaper & Paper Products IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£34.40M£1.10B£4.80B£2.80B
Dividend Yield2.48%2.90%4.98%6.16%
P/E Ratio-12.594.3623.49367.11
Price / Sales0.3425.345,899.1686,377.90
Price / Cash5.9118.2627.0627.85
Price / Book1.350.999.257.95
Net Income-£3.99M£91.41M£156.93M£5.89B
7 Day Performance8.70%1.31%2.10%1.38%
1 Month Performance13.56%1.05%-2.86%1.63%
1 Year Performance56.52%11.20%56.78%73.73%

James Cropper Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRPR
James Cropper
N/AGBX 360
+3.4%
N/A+46.3%£34.40M£101.19MN/A600
MNDI
Mondi
4.5639 of 5 stars
GBX 747.35
-0.8%
GBX 1,035
+38.5%
-38.4%£3.30B£7.66B19.9821,200
SML
Strategic Minerals
N/AGBX 4.90
flat
N/A+1,577.4%£138.12M£4.23MN/A11
IRR
IronRidge Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/A£134.83M£56.06KN/AN/A
GAL
Galantas Gold
N/AGBX 24.80
-4.6%
N/AN/A£133.27MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CRPR) was last updated on 6/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners