Go Pro

Crystal Amber (CRS) Competitors

Crystal Amber logo
GBX 85.08 -0.52 (-0.60%)
As of 11:33 AM Eastern

CRS vs. JMF, BMD, LIO, MGCI, and BVT

Should you buy Crystal Amber stock or one of its competitors? Crystal Amber's main competitors and comparable companies include JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust (JMF), Baronsmead Second Venture Trust (BMD), Liontrust Asset Management (LIO), M&G Credit Income Investment (MGCI), and Baronsmead Venture Trust (BVT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Crystal Amber compare to JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust?

JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust (LON:JMF) and Crystal Amber (LON:CRS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

27.9% of JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.5% of Crystal Amber shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Crystal Amber shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Crystal Amber had 1 more articles in the media than JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Crystal Amber and 0 mentions for JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust. JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Crystal Amber'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust Neutral
Crystal Amber Neutral

JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Crystal Amber. Crystal Amber is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust£17.85M0.00£14.57M£0.66N/A
Crystal Amber-£4.61M-10.99£9.56M-£8.44N/A

JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crystal Amber has a beta of 0.232, meaning that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust has a net margin of 81.64% compared to Crystal Amber's net margin of -75.64%. JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust's return on equity of 6.55% beat Crystal Amber's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust81.64% 6.55% 3.91%
Crystal Amber -75.64%-5.11%5.45%

Summary

JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust beats Crystal Amber on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crystal Amber compare to Baronsmead Second Venture Trust?

Crystal Amber (LON:CRS) and Baronsmead Second Venture Trust (LON:BMD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

Crystal Amber has a beta of 0.232, suggesting that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baronsmead Second Venture Trust has a beta of 0.228, suggesting that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

Crystal Amber has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Baronsmead Second Venture Trust. Baronsmead Second Venture Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crystal Amber, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crystal Amber-£4.61M-10.99£9.56M-£8.44N/A
Baronsmead Second Venture Trust-£1.31M-148.65£4.53M-£0.27N/A

5.5% of Crystal Amber shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Baronsmead Second Venture Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Crystal Amber shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Baronsmead Second Venture Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Crystal Amber has a net margin of -75.64% compared to Baronsmead Second Venture Trust's net margin of -617.73%. Crystal Amber's return on equity of -5.11% beat Baronsmead Second Venture Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crystal Amber-75.64% -5.11% 5.45%
Baronsmead Second Venture Trust -617.73%-13.58%1.23%

In the previous week, Crystal Amber and Crystal Amber both had 1 articles in the media. Baronsmead Second Venture Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Crystal Amber's score of 0.00 indicating that Baronsmead Second Venture Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Crystal Amber
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Baronsmead Second Venture Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Crystal Amber beats Baronsmead Second Venture Trust on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crystal Amber compare to Liontrust Asset Management?

Crystal Amber (LON:CRS) and Liontrust Asset Management (LON:LIO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Liontrust Asset Management has a net margin of 7.14% compared to Crystal Amber's net margin of -75.64%. Liontrust Asset Management's return on equity of 8.74% beat Crystal Amber's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crystal Amber-75.64% -5.11% 5.45%
Liontrust Asset Management 7.14%8.74%5.02%

In the previous week, Crystal Amber and Crystal Amber both had 1 articles in the media. Liontrust Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Crystal Amber's score of 0.00 indicating that Liontrust Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Crystal Amber
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Liontrust Asset Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Liontrust Asset Management has a consensus price target of GBX 364, indicating a potential upside of 16.67%. Given Liontrust Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Liontrust Asset Management is more favorable than Crystal Amber.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crystal Amber
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Liontrust Asset Management
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

5.5% of Crystal Amber shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.0% of Liontrust Asset Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Crystal Amber shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.2% of Liontrust Asset Management shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Liontrust Asset Management has higher revenue and earnings than Crystal Amber. Crystal Amber is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liontrust Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crystal Amber-£4.61M-10.99£9.56M-£8.44N/A
Liontrust Asset Management£134.38M1.44£68.85M£15.3920.27

Crystal Amber has a beta of 0.232, indicating that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liontrust Asset Management has a beta of 1.455, indicating that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Liontrust Asset Management beats Crystal Amber on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crystal Amber compare to M&G Credit Income Investment?

M&G Credit Income Investment (LON:MGCI) and Crystal Amber (LON:CRS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

M&G Credit Income Investment has a net margin of 107.13% compared to Crystal Amber's net margin of -75.64%. M&G Credit Income Investment's return on equity of 7.50% beat Crystal Amber's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
M&G Credit Income Investment107.13% 7.50% 6.00%
Crystal Amber -75.64%-5.11%5.45%

M&G Credit Income Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Crystal Amber. Crystal Amber is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G Credit Income Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M&G Credit Income Investment£11.25M16.80£15.42M£5.8715.64
Crystal Amber-£4.61M-10.99£9.56M-£8.44N/A

M&G Credit Income Investment has a beta of 0.333, meaning that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crystal Amber has a beta of 0.232, meaning that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

19.9% of M&G Credit Income Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.5% of Crystal Amber shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of M&G Credit Income Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Crystal Amber shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, M&G Credit Income Investment had 1 more articles in the media than Crystal Amber. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for M&G Credit Income Investment and 1 mentions for Crystal Amber. M&G Credit Income Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat Crystal Amber's score of 0.00 indicating that M&G Credit Income Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
M&G Credit Income Investment
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Crystal Amber
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

M&G Credit Income Investment beats Crystal Amber on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crystal Amber compare to Baronsmead Venture Trust?

Baronsmead Venture Trust (LON:BVT) and Crystal Amber (LON:CRS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

0.0% of Baronsmead Venture Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.5% of Crystal Amber shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Baronsmead Venture Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Crystal Amber shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Crystal Amber had 1 more articles in the media than Baronsmead Venture Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Crystal Amber and 0 mentions for Baronsmead Venture Trust. Baronsmead Venture Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Crystal Amber'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baronsmead Venture Trust Neutral
Crystal Amber Neutral

Baronsmead Venture Trust has a net margin of -19.61% compared to Crystal Amber's net margin of -75.64%. Baronsmead Venture Trust's return on equity of -0.49% beat Crystal Amber's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baronsmead Venture Trust-19.61% -0.49% 1.39%
Crystal Amber -75.64%-5.11%5.45%

Baronsmead Venture Trust has a beta of 0.128, meaning that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crystal Amber has a beta of 0.232, meaning that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

Baronsmead Venture Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Crystal Amber. Crystal Amber is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baronsmead Venture Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baronsmead Venture Trust-£289K-672.41£13.28M£0.5185.49
Crystal Amber-£4.61M-10.99£9.56M-£8.44N/A

Summary

Baronsmead Venture Trust beats Crystal Amber on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Crystal Amber News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRS vs. The Competition

MetricCrystal AmberCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£50.66M£5.67B£13.97B£2.92B
Dividend Yield76.92%7.39%5.90%6.17%
P/E Ratio-10.0838.9129.59367.62
Price / Sales-10.991,231.53516.3983,465.25
Price / Cash0.6748.3130.7127.89
Price / Book0.563.762.877.11
Net Income£9.56M£417.46M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.07%-0.16%0.65%0.51%
1 Month Performance-6.48%1.94%2.70%3.12%
1 Year Performance-43.65%5.58%10.48%22.15%

Crystal Amber Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRS
Crystal Amber
N/AGBX 85.08
-0.6%
N/A-43.3%£50.66M-£4.61MN/A4,100
JMF
JPMorgan Mid Cap Investment Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£196.54M£17.85M1,381.82N/A
BMD
Baronsmead Second Venture Trust
N/AGBX 43.60
-2.2%
N/A-6.9%£190.32M-£1.31MN/AN/A
LIO
Liontrust Asset Management
2.4167 of 5 stars
GBX 307.50
-0.8%
GBX 364
+18.4%
-16.3%£190.25M£134.38M19.98241
MGCI
M&G Credit Income Investment
N/AGBX 92.20
+0.9%
N/A-3.9%£189.93M£11.25M15.71N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CRS) was last updated on 8/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners