Go Pro

Rockfire Resources (ROCK) Competitors

Rockfire Resources logo
GBX 0.12 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 10/2/2026 12:10 PM Eastern

ROCK vs. ZIOC, RLM, IRON, MTA, and IFL

Should you buy Rockfire Resources stock or one of its competitors? Rockfire Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Zanaga Iron Ore (ZIOC), Realm Therapeutics (RLM), Ironveld (IRON), ArcelorMittal (MTA), and International Ferro Metals (IFL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "steel" industry.

How does Rockfire Resources compare to Zanaga Iron Ore?

Zanaga Iron Ore (LON:ZIOC) and Rockfire Resources (LON:ROCK) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

Zanaga Iron Ore's return on equity of -8.68% beat Rockfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zanaga Iron OreN/A -8.68% -2.48%
Rockfire Resources N/A -40.49%-24.89%

Rockfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zanaga Iron Ore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zanaga Iron OreN/AN/A-£4.62K-£0.90N/A
Rockfire ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.26M-£0.03N/A

Zanaga Iron Ore has a beta of 1.863, meaning that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rockfire Resources has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Rockfire Resources had 5 more articles in the media than Zanaga Iron Ore. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Rockfire Resources and 2 mentions for Zanaga Iron Ore. Zanaga Iron Ore's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Rockfire Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Zanaga Iron Ore is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Zanaga Iron Ore
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Rockfire Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

2.2% of Zanaga Iron Ore shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Rockfire Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Zanaga Iron Ore shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.0% of Rockfire Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Zanaga Iron Ore beats Rockfire Resources on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Rockfire Resources compare to Realm Therapeutics?

Realm Therapeutics (LON:RLM) and Rockfire Resources (LON:ROCK) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

0.1% of Rockfire Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 6.0% of Rockfire Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Realm Therapeutics' return on equity of 0.00% beat Rockfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Realm TherapeuticsN/A N/A N/A
Rockfire Resources N/A -40.49%-24.89%

Realm Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than Rockfire Resources. Rockfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Realm Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Realm Therapeutics£501.92K0.00N/A-£17.50N/A
Rockfire ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.26M-£0.03N/A

In the previous week, Rockfire Resources had 7 more articles in the media than Realm Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Rockfire Resources and 0 mentions for Realm Therapeutics. Realm Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Rockfire Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Realm Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Realm Therapeutics Neutral
Rockfire Resources Neutral

Summary

Realm Therapeutics beats Rockfire Resources on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Rockfire Resources compare to Ironveld?

Rockfire Resources (LON:ROCK) and Ironveld (LON:IRON) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Rockfire Resources had 6 more articles in the media than Ironveld. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Rockfire Resources and 1 mentions for Ironveld. Rockfire Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Ironveld's score of -0.54 indicating that Rockfire Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Rockfire Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ironveld
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

0.1% of Rockfire Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.4% of Ironveld shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.0% of Rockfire Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.3% of Ironveld shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ironveld has higher revenue and earnings than Rockfire Resources. Ironveld is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rockfire Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rockfire ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.26M-£0.03N/A
Ironveld£4K984.19N/A-£0.00N/A

Rockfire Resources has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ironveld has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Rockfire Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ironveld's net margin of -35,975.00%. Ironveld's return on equity of -7.16% beat Rockfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rockfire ResourcesN/A -40.49% -24.89%
Ironveld -35,975.00%-7.16%-1.97%

Summary

Ironveld beats Rockfire Resources on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Rockfire Resources compare to ArcelorMittal?

Rockfire Resources (LON:ROCK) and ArcelorMittal (LON:MTA) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

ArcelorMittal's return on equity of 0.00% beat Rockfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rockfire ResourcesN/A -40.49% -24.89%
ArcelorMittal N/A N/A N/A

0.1% of Rockfire Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.0% of Rockfire Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rockfire ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.26M-£0.03N/A
ArcelorMittalN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Rockfire Resources had 6 more articles in the media than ArcelorMittal. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Rockfire Resources and 1 mentions for ArcelorMittal. Rockfire Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat ArcelorMittal's score of -0.39 indicating that Rockfire Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Rockfire Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ArcelorMittal
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Rockfire Resources beats ArcelorMittal on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Rockfire Resources compare to International Ferro Metals?

International Ferro Metals (LON:IFL) and Rockfire Resources (LON:ROCK) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and media sentiment.

International Ferro Metals' return on equity of 0.00% beat Rockfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Ferro MetalsN/A N/A N/A
Rockfire Resources N/A -40.49%-24.89%

In the previous week, Rockfire Resources had 7 more articles in the media than International Ferro Metals. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Rockfire Resources and 0 mentions for International Ferro Metals. International Ferro Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Rockfire Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that International Ferro Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
International Ferro Metals Neutral
Rockfire Resources Neutral

0.1% of Rockfire Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 6.0% of Rockfire Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Ferro MetalsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Rockfire ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.26M-£0.03N/A

Summary

International Ferro Metals and Rockfire Resources tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Rockfire Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ROCK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ROCK vs. The Competition

MetricRockfire ResourcesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£12.80M£3.71B£4.67B£2.81B
Dividend YieldN/A5.25%4.75%6.18%
P/E Ratio-4.0025.0625.13366.16
Price / SalesN/A27,921.1716,620.3989,425.30
Price / Cash1.7327.1024.9427.89
Price / BookN/A12.2810.206.83
Net Income-£2.26M£127.43M£158.44M£5.89B
7 Day Performance12.15%-3.13%-2.68%-0.73%
1 Month Performance8.11%-5.47%-5.08%16.59%
1 Year Performance-52.00%20.19%17.39%23.09%

Rockfire Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ROCK
Rockfire Resources
N/AGBX 0.12
flat
N/A-52.0%£12.80MN/AN/A2,140
ZIOC
Zanaga Iron Ore
N/AGBX 3.60
-4.1%
N/A-58.0%£35.68MN/AN/AN/A
RLM
Realm Therapeutics
N/AN/AN/AN/A£13.41M£501.92KN/AN/A
IRON
Ironveld
N/AGBX 0.02
flat
N/A-53.7%£4.35M£4KN/A30
MTA
ArcelorMittal
N/AN/AN/AN/A£0.00N/AN/A9

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:ROCK) was last updated on 10/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners