Go Pro

EnSilica (ENSI) Competitors

EnSilica logo
GBX 92 +4.00 (+4.55%)
As of 11:55 AM Eastern

ENSI vs. CML, FST, SND, AWE, and MNO

Should you buy EnSilica stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares EnSilica with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with EnSilica include CML Microsystems (CML), Frontier Smart Technologies Group (FST), Sondrel (SND), Alphawave IP Group (AWE), and Maestrano Group (MNO). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.

How does EnSilica compare to CML Microsystems?

EnSilica (LON:ENSI) and CML Microsystems (LON:CML) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of -0.26% compared to EnSilica's net margin of -9.36%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of -0.11% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EnSilica-9.36% -9.80% 1.78%
CML Microsystems -0.26%-0.11%1.87%

CML Microsystems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than EnSilica. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EnSilica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EnSilica£21.64M5.01-£221.97K-£2.34N/A
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.16£2.05M-£0.33N/A

In the previous week, EnSilica had 3 more articles in the media than CML Microsystems. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for EnSilica and 0 mentions for CML Microsystems. EnSilica's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat CML Microsystems' score of 0.00 indicating that EnSilica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
EnSilica Neutral
CML Microsystems Neutral

0.6% of EnSilica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. 16.0% of EnSilica shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

EnSilica has a beta of 0.934, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.255, suggesting that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CML Microsystems beats EnSilica on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does EnSilica compare to Frontier Smart Technologies Group?

Frontier Smart Technologies Group (LON:FST) and EnSilica (LON:ENSI) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Frontier Smart Technologies Group has higher revenue and earnings than EnSilica. EnSilica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontier Smart Technologies Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frontier Smart Technologies Group£38.88M0.00N/A-£4.20N/A
EnSilica£21.64M5.01-£221.97K-£2.34N/A

0.6% of EnSilica shares are held by institutional investors. 16.0% of EnSilica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Frontier Smart Technologies Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to EnSilica's net margin of -9.36%. Frontier Smart Technologies Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frontier Smart Technologies GroupN/A N/A N/A
EnSilica -9.36%-9.80%1.78%

In the previous week, EnSilica had 3 more articles in the media than Frontier Smart Technologies Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for EnSilica and 0 mentions for Frontier Smart Technologies Group. EnSilica's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Frontier Smart Technologies Group's score of 0.00 indicating that EnSilica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frontier Smart Technologies Group Neutral
EnSilica Neutral

Summary

EnSilica beats Frontier Smart Technologies Group on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does EnSilica compare to Sondrel?

Sondrel (LON:SND) and EnSilica (LON:ENSI) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

EnSilica has a net margin of -9.36% compared to Sondrel's net margin of -228.31%. Sondrel's return on equity of 0.00% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sondrel-228.31% N/A -52.53%
EnSilica -9.36%-9.80%1.78%

17.9% of Sondrel shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of EnSilica shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.8% of Sondrel shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.0% of EnSilica shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, EnSilica had 3 more articles in the media than Sondrel. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for EnSilica and 0 mentions for Sondrel. EnSilica's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Sondrel's score of 0.00 indicating that EnSilica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sondrel Neutral
EnSilica Neutral

EnSilica has higher revenue and earnings than Sondrel. EnSilica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sondrel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sondrel£9.43M0.00-£21.52M-£0.25N/A
EnSilica£21.64M5.01-£221.97K-£2.34N/A

Summary

EnSilica beats Sondrel on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does EnSilica compare to Alphawave IP Group?

Alphawave IP Group (LON:AWE) and EnSilica (LON:ENSI) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

EnSilica has a net margin of -9.36% compared to Alphawave IP Group's net margin of -13.82%. Alphawave IP Group's return on equity of -8.87% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alphawave IP Group-13.82% -8.87% -3.94%
EnSilica -9.36%-9.80%1.78%

In the previous week, EnSilica had 3 more articles in the media than Alphawave IP Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for EnSilica and 0 mentions for Alphawave IP Group. EnSilica's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Alphawave IP Group's score of 0.00 indicating that EnSilica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alphawave IP Group Neutral
EnSilica Neutral

EnSilica has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alphawave IP Group. EnSilica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alphawave IP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alphawave IP Group£319.58M4.59-£99.26M-£22.99N/A
EnSilica£21.64M5.01-£221.97K-£2.34N/A

13.3% of Alphawave IP Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of EnSilica shares are held by institutional investors. 42.1% of Alphawave IP Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.0% of EnSilica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alphawave IP Group has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EnSilica has a beta of 0.934, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

EnSilica beats Alphawave IP Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does EnSilica compare to Maestrano Group?

Maestrano Group (LON:MNO) and EnSilica (LON:ENSI) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Maestrano Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 168, suggesting a potential upside of 97.65%. Given Maestrano Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Maestrano Group is more favorable than EnSilica.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Maestrano Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
EnSilica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Maestrano Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to EnSilica's net margin of -9.36%. Maestrano Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Maestrano GroupN/A N/A N/A
EnSilica -9.36%-9.80%1.78%

In the previous week, EnSilica had 3 more articles in the media than Maestrano Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for EnSilica and 0 mentions for Maestrano Group. EnSilica's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Maestrano Group's score of 0.00 indicating that EnSilica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Maestrano Group Neutral
EnSilica Neutral

Maestrano Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than EnSilica. EnSilica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maestrano Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Maestrano GroupN/AN/AN/A-£6.00N/A
EnSilica£21.64M5.01-£221.97K-£2.34N/A

26.0% of Maestrano Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of EnSilica shares are held by institutional investors. 26.3% of Maestrano Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.0% of EnSilica shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Maestrano Group beats EnSilica on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get EnSilica News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ENSI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ENSI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ENSI vs. The Competition

MetricEnSilicaSemiconductors IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£108.45M£1.64B£39.06B£2.77B
Dividend YieldN/A21.18%3.19%6.15%
P/E Ratio-39.3219.37162.58368.14
Price / Sales5.01522.02599.7684,566.23
Price / CashN/A7.4946.3727.87
Price / Book3.254.449.607.68
Net Income-£221.97K-£32.65M£1.07B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.10%-0.16%-0.26%-0.66%
1 Month PerformanceN/A1.11%0.84%-0.17%
1 Year Performance137.11%58.45%141.15%61.64%

EnSilica Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ENSI
EnSilica
N/AGBX 92
+4.5%
N/A+126.8%£108.45M£21.64MN/A168
CML
CML Microsystems
N/AGBX 264
-0.4%
GBX 223
-15.5%
-4.5%£43.73M£20.45M37.13139
FST
Frontier Smart Technologies Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£11.43M£38.88MN/AN/A
SND
Sondrel
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.37M£9.43MN/A330
AWE
Alphawave IP Group
N/AGBX 185
flat
N/A+6.1%£1.47B£319.58MN/A829

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:ENSI) was last updated on 7/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners