Go Pro

EnSilica (ENSI) Competitors

EnSilica logo
GBX 74.62 -1.38 (-1.82%)
As of 09/11/2026 12:29 PM Eastern

ENSI vs. CML, FST, PVCS, VDTK, and AWE

Should you buy EnSilica stock or one of its competitors? EnSilica's main competitors and comparable companies include CML Microsystems (CML), Frontier Smart Technologies Group (FST), PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L) (PVCS), EARNZ (VDTK), and Alphawave IP Group (AWE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "semiconductors" industry.

How does EnSilica compare to CML Microsystems?

EnSilica (LON:ENSI) and CML Microsystems (LON:CML) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

CML Microsystems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than EnSilica. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EnSilica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EnSilica£21.64M4.63-£221.97K-£2.34N/A
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.36£2.05M-£0.33N/A

0.6% of EnSilica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.9% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of EnSilica shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of -0.26% compared to EnSilica's net margin of -9.36%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of -0.11% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EnSilica-9.36% -9.80% 1.78%
CML Microsystems -0.26%-0.11%1.87%

EnSilica has a beta of 0.912, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.273, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, EnSilica had 4 more articles in the media than CML Microsystems. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for EnSilica and 0 mentions for CML Microsystems. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat EnSilica's score of 0.63 indicating that CML Microsystems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
EnSilica Positive
CML Microsystems Positive

Summary

CML Microsystems beats EnSilica on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does EnSilica compare to Frontier Smart Technologies Group?

EnSilica (LON:ENSI) and Frontier Smart Technologies Group (LON:FST) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, EnSilica had 4 more articles in the media than Frontier Smart Technologies Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for EnSilica and 0 mentions for Frontier Smart Technologies Group. EnSilica's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Frontier Smart Technologies Group's score of 0.00 indicating that EnSilica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
EnSilica Positive
Frontier Smart Technologies Group Neutral

Frontier Smart Technologies Group has higher revenue and earnings than EnSilica. EnSilica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontier Smart Technologies Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EnSilica£21.64M4.63-£221.97K-£2.34N/A
Frontier Smart Technologies Group£38.88M0.00N/A-£4.20N/A

Frontier Smart Technologies Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to EnSilica's net margin of -9.36%. Frontier Smart Technologies Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EnSilica-9.36% -9.80% 1.78%
Frontier Smart Technologies Group N/A N/A N/A

0.6% of EnSilica shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of EnSilica shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

EnSilica beats Frontier Smart Technologies Group on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does EnSilica compare to PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L)?

PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L) (LON:PVCS) and EnSilica (LON:ENSI) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

0.6% of EnSilica shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of EnSilica shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to EnSilica's net margin of -9.36%. PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L)N/A N/A N/A
EnSilica -9.36%-9.80%1.78%

In the previous week, EnSilica had 4 more articles in the media than PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L). MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for EnSilica and 0 mentions for PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L). EnSilica's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that EnSilica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L) Neutral
EnSilica Positive

PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than EnSilica. EnSilica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L)N/AN/AN/A£13.80N/A
EnSilica£21.64M4.63-£221.97K-£2.34N/A

Summary

EnSilica beats PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L) on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does EnSilica compare to EARNZ?

EnSilica (LON:ENSI) and EARNZ (LON:VDTK) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

EARNZ has a net margin of 0.00% compared to EnSilica's net margin of -9.36%. EnSilica's return on equity of -9.80% beat EARNZ's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EnSilica-9.36% -9.80% 1.78%
EARNZ N/A -125.99%-49.09%

In the previous week, EnSilica had 4 more articles in the media than EARNZ. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for EnSilica and 0 mentions for EARNZ. EnSilica's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat EARNZ's score of 0.00 indicating that EnSilica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
EnSilica Positive
EARNZ Neutral

EnSilica has a beta of 0.912, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EARNZ has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

EnSilica has higher revenue and earnings than EARNZ. EnSilica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EARNZ, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EnSilica£21.64M4.63-£221.97K-£2.34N/A
EARNZ£181.04K0.00-£2.21M-£0.01N/A

0.6% of EnSilica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of EARNZ shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of EnSilica shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 53.3% of EARNZ shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

EnSilica and EARNZ tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does EnSilica compare to Alphawave IP Group?

Alphawave IP Group (LON:AWE) and EnSilica (LON:ENSI) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, EnSilica had 4 more articles in the media than Alphawave IP Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for EnSilica and 0 mentions for Alphawave IP Group. EnSilica's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Alphawave IP Group's score of 0.00 indicating that EnSilica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alphawave IP Group Neutral
EnSilica Positive

13.3% of Alphawave IP Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of EnSilica shares are held by institutional investors. 42.1% of Alphawave IP Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of EnSilica shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

EnSilica has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alphawave IP Group. EnSilica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alphawave IP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alphawave IP Group£319.58M4.59-£99.26M-£22.99N/A
EnSilica£21.64M4.63-£221.97K-£2.34N/A

Alphawave IP Group has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EnSilica has a beta of 0.912, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

EnSilica has a net margin of -9.36% compared to Alphawave IP Group's net margin of -13.82%. Alphawave IP Group's return on equity of -8.87% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alphawave IP Group-13.82% -8.87% -3.94%
EnSilica -9.36%-9.80%1.78%

Summary

EnSilica beats Alphawave IP Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get EnSilica News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ENSI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ENSI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ENSI vs. The Competition

MetricEnSilicaSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£100.17M£110.61B£29.64B£2.87B
Dividend YieldN/A1.62%2.74%6.23%
P/E Ratio-31.8979.7276.62366.83
Price / Sales4.6383.14588.6383,599.70
Price / CashN/A62.5747.5027.89
Price / Book2.6410.357.706.33
Net Income-£221.97K£2.07B£704.99M£5.89B
7 Day Performance9.74%1.58%-1.08%-0.69%
1 Month Performance-7.19%-6.68%-3.65%0.18%
1 Year Performance73.53%88.56%180.35%20.03%

EnSilica Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ENSI
EnSilica
N/AGBX 74.62
-1.8%
N/A+65.0%£100.17M£21.64MN/A168
CML
CML Microsystems
N/AGBX 302.22
-3.3%
GBX 223
-26.2%
+10.1%£51.64M£20.45MN/A139
FST
Frontier Smart Technologies Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£11.43M£38.88MN/AN/A
PVCS
PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.41MN/A2.40N/A
VDTK
EARNZ
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.15M£181.04KN/A11

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:ENSI) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners