Go Pro

CML Microsystems (CML) Competitors

CML Microsystems logo
GBX 264.20 +2.20 (+0.84%)
As of 12:16 PM Eastern

CML vs. ENSI, FST, SND, AWE, and BLTG

Should you buy CML Microsystems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CML Microsystems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CML Microsystems include EnSilica (ENSI), Frontier Smart Technologies Group (FST), Sondrel (SND), Alphawave IP Group (AWE), and Blancco Technology Group (BLTG). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.

How does CML Microsystems compare to EnSilica?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and EnSilica (LON:ENSI) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, EnSilica had 1 more articles in the media than CML Microsystems. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for EnSilica and 0 mentions for CML Microsystems. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled EnSilica'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Neutral
EnSilica Neutral

17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of EnSilica shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.0% of EnSilica shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.255, meaning that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EnSilica has a beta of 0.934, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of -0.26% compared to EnSilica's net margin of -9.36%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of -0.11% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems-0.26% -0.11% 1.87%
EnSilica -9.36%-9.80%1.78%

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than EnSilica. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EnSilica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.15£2.05M-£0.33N/A
EnSilica£21.64M4.67-£221.97K-£2.34N/A

Summary

CML Microsystems beats EnSilica on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Frontier Smart Technologies Group?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Frontier Smart Technologies Group (LON:FST) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Frontier Smart Technologies Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CML Microsystems' net margin of -0.26%. Frontier Smart Technologies Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat CML Microsystems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems-0.26% -0.11% 1.87%
Frontier Smart Technologies Group N/A N/A N/A

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Frontier Smart Technologies Group. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontier Smart Technologies Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.15£2.05M-£0.33N/A
Frontier Smart Technologies Group£38.88M0.00N/A-£4.20N/A

In the previous week, CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Frontier Smart Technologies Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Neutral
Frontier Smart Technologies Group Neutral

17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CML Microsystems and Frontier Smart Technologies Group tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Sondrel?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Sondrel (LON:SND) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.9% of Sondrel shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.8% of Sondrel shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CML Microsystems has higher revenue and earnings than Sondrel. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sondrel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.15£2.05M-£0.33N/A
Sondrel£9.43M0.00-£21.52M-£0.25N/A

CML Microsystems pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Sondrel pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share. CML Microsystems pays out -3,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sondrel pays out -12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CML Microsystems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of -0.26% compared to Sondrel's net margin of -228.31%. Sondrel's return on equity of 0.00% beat CML Microsystems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems-0.26% -0.11% 1.87%
Sondrel -228.31%N/A -52.53%

In the previous week, CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sondrel'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Neutral
Sondrel Neutral

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Sondrel on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Alphawave IP Group?

Alphawave IP Group (LON:AWE) and CML Microsystems (LON:CML) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

13.3% of Alphawave IP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. 42.1% of Alphawave IP Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alphawave IP Group has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.255, indicating that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Alphawave IP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CML Microsystems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alphawave IP Group Neutral
CML Microsystems Neutral

CML Microsystems has a net margin of -0.26% compared to Alphawave IP Group's net margin of -13.82%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of -0.11% beat Alphawave IP Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alphawave IP Group-13.82% -8.87% -3.94%
CML Microsystems -0.26%-0.11%1.87%

CML Microsystems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alphawave IP Group. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alphawave IP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alphawave IP Group£319.58M4.59-£99.26M-£22.99N/A
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.15£2.05M-£0.33N/A

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Alphawave IP Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Blancco Technology Group?

Blancco Technology Group (LON:BLTG) and CML Microsystems (LON:CML) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Blancco Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CML Microsystems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blancco Technology Group Neutral
CML Microsystems Neutral

Blancco Technology Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. CML Microsystems pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Blancco Technology Group pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CML Microsystems pays out -3,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CML Microsystems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Blancco Technology Group has a net margin of 6.22% compared to CML Microsystems' net margin of -0.26%. Blancco Technology Group's return on equity of 3.52% beat CML Microsystems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blancco Technology Group6.22% 3.52% 2.17%
CML Microsystems -0.26%-0.11%1.87%

Blancco Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than CML Microsystems. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blancco Technology Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blancco Technology Group£44.15M0.00£2.75M£0.04N/A
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.15£2.05M-£0.33N/A

84.0% of Blancco Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Blancco Technology Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Blancco Technology Group has a beta of 0.14, suggesting that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.255, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Blancco Technology Group beats CML Microsystems on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CML Microsystems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CML and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CML vs. The Competition

MetricCML MicrosystemsSemiconductors IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£44.01M£1.57B£38.08B£2.78B
Dividend Yield4.53%21.72%3.21%6.12%
P/E Ratio-800.6117.89168.69368.59
Price / Sales2.15430.60591.1984,769.25
Price / Cash3.457.4947.0327.89
Price / Book0.844.409.387.57
Net Income£2.05M-£32.65M£1.07B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.23%-2.77%-2.24%0.46%
1 Month Performance-10.74%-6.77%-2.36%-1.09%
1 Year Performance-18.38%47.96%137.15%62.60%

CML Microsystems Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CML
CML Microsystems
N/AGBX 264.20
+0.8%
GBX 223
-15.6%
-20.0%£44.01M£20.45MN/A139
ENSI
EnSilica
N/AGBX 91
-1.6%
N/A+125.8%£110.80M£21.64MN/A168
FST
Frontier Smart Technologies Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£11.43M£38.88MN/AN/A
SND
Sondrel
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.37M£9.43MN/A330
AWE
Alphawave IP Group
N/AGBX 185
flat
N/A+5.7%£1.47B£319.58MN/A829

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CML) was last updated on 7/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners