Go Pro

CML Microsystems (CML) Competitors

CML Microsystems logo
GBX 278.80 -11.20 (-3.86%)
As of 08:35 AM Eastern

CML vs. ENSI, FST, SND, AWE, and RCN

Should you buy CML Microsystems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CML Microsystems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CML Microsystems include EnSilica (ENSI), Frontier Smart Technologies Group (FST), Sondrel (SND), Alphawave IP Group (AWE), and Redcentric (RCN).

How does CML Microsystems compare to EnSilica?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and EnSilica (LON:ENSI) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.255, suggesting that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EnSilica has a beta of 0.934, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of EnSilica shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.0% of EnSilica shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, EnSilica had 1 more articles in the media than CML Microsystems. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for EnSilica and 0 mentions for CML Microsystems. EnSilica's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat CML Microsystems' score of 0.00 indicating that EnSilica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Neutral
EnSilica Positive

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than EnSilica. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EnSilica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.27£2.05M-£0.33N/A
EnSilica£21.64M4.41-£221.97K-£2.34N/A

CML Microsystems has a net margin of -0.26% compared to EnSilica's net margin of -9.36%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of -0.11% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems-0.26% -0.11% 1.87%
EnSilica -9.36%-9.80%1.78%

Summary

CML Microsystems beats EnSilica on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Frontier Smart Technologies Group?

Frontier Smart Technologies Group (LON:FST) and CML Microsystems (LON:CML) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Frontier Smart Technologies Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CML Microsystems' net margin of -0.26%. Frontier Smart Technologies Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat CML Microsystems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frontier Smart Technologies GroupN/A N/A N/A
CML Microsystems -0.26%-0.11%1.87%

CML Microsystems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Frontier Smart Technologies Group. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontier Smart Technologies Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frontier Smart Technologies Group£38.88M0.00N/A-£4.20N/A
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.27£2.05M-£0.33N/A

In the previous week, Frontier Smart Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CML Microsystems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frontier Smart Technologies Group Neutral
CML Microsystems Neutral

Summary

Frontier Smart Technologies Group and CML Microsystems tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Sondrel?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Sondrel (LON:SND) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.9% of Sondrel shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.8% of Sondrel shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CML Microsystems has higher revenue and earnings than Sondrel. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sondrel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.27£2.05M-£0.33N/A
Sondrel£9.43M0.00-£21.52M-£0.25N/A

In the previous week, CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sondrel'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Neutral
Sondrel Neutral

CML Microsystems pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Sondrel pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share. CML Microsystems pays out -3,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sondrel pays out -12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CML Microsystems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of -0.26% compared to Sondrel's net margin of -228.31%. Sondrel's return on equity of 0.00% beat CML Microsystems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems-0.26% -0.11% 1.87%
Sondrel -228.31%N/A -52.53%

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Sondrel on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Alphawave IP Group?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Alphawave IP Group (LON:AWE) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.255, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alphawave IP Group has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Alphawave IP Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Neutral
Alphawave IP Group Neutral

CML Microsystems has a net margin of -0.26% compared to Alphawave IP Group's net margin of -13.82%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of -0.11% beat Alphawave IP Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems-0.26% -0.11% 1.87%
Alphawave IP Group -13.82%-8.87%-3.94%

17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.3% of Alphawave IP Group shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 42.1% of Alphawave IP Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alphawave IP Group. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alphawave IP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.27£2.05M-£0.33N/A
Alphawave IP Group£319.58M4.59-£99.26M-£22.99N/A

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Alphawave IP Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Redcentric?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Redcentric has a net margin of 2.14% compared to CML Microsystems' net margin of -0.26%. Redcentric's return on equity of 4.57% beat CML Microsystems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems-0.26% -0.11% 1.87%
Redcentric 2.14%4.57%1.10%

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Redcentric. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.27£2.05M-£0.33N/A
Redcentric£132.66M1.16-£3.37M£1.5064.67

In the previous week, Redcentric had 5 more articles in the media than CML Microsystems. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for CML Microsystems. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Redcentric's score of -1.17 indicating that CML Microsystems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Neutral
Redcentric Negative

17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.4% of Redcentric shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 34.7% of Redcentric shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.255, suggesting that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.224, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

CML Microsystems pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. CML Microsystems pays out -3,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CML Microsystems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Redcentric on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CML Microsystems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CML and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CML vs. The Competition

MetricCML MicrosystemsSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£46.45M£104.41B£29.84B£2.87B
Dividend Yield4.29%1.53%2.74%6.13%
P/E Ratio-844.8589.7881.21369.19
Price / Sales2.27102.38598.5683,842.23
Price / Cash3.4566.8850.7627.89
Price / Book0.8810.859.257.14
Net Income£2.05M£1.86B£662.75M£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.38%6.77%4.45%1.25%
1 Month Performance5.77%-8.71%-1.37%0.97%
1 Year Performance-9.41%120.67%150.46%75.12%

CML Microsystems Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CML
CML Microsystems
N/AGBX 278.80
-3.9%
GBX 223
-20.0%
-2.8%£46.45M£20.45MN/A139
ENSI
EnSilica
N/AGBX 79.60
-0.5%
N/A+84.0%£93.83M£21.64MN/A168
FST
Frontier Smart Technologies Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£11.43M£38.88MN/AN/A
SND
Sondrel
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.37M£9.43MN/A330
AWE
Alphawave IP Group
N/AGBX 185
flat
N/A+6.7%£1.47B£319.58MN/A829

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CML) was last updated on 8/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners