Free Trial

CML Microsystems (CML) Competitors

CML Microsystems logo
GBX 305 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 12:18 PM Eastern

CML vs. ENSI, FST, SND, AWE, and WNWD

Should you buy CML Microsystems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CML Microsystems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CML Microsystems include EnSilica (ENSI), Frontier Smart Technologies Group (FST), Sondrel (SND), Alphawave IP Group (AWE), and Windward (WNWD). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.

How does CML Microsystems compare to EnSilica?

EnSilica (LON:ENSI) and CML Microsystems (LON:CML) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

EnSilica has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.123, meaning that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, EnSilica and EnSilica both had 1 articles in the media. EnSilica's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat CML Microsystems' score of 0.00 indicating that EnSilica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EnSilica
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CML Microsystems
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CML Microsystems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than EnSilica. EnSilica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EnSilica£21.64M5.61-£221.97K-£2.34N/A
CML Microsystems£19.55M2.60£2.05M£7.1142.90

0.8% of EnSilica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.6% of EnSilica shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of 5.77% compared to EnSilica's net margin of -9.36%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of 2.29% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EnSilica-9.36% -9.80% 1.78%
CML Microsystems 5.77%2.29%1.87%

Summary

CML Microsystems beats EnSilica on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Frontier Smart Technologies Group?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Frontier Smart Technologies Group (LON:FST) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Frontier Smart Technologies Group's net margin of 0.00%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of 2.29% beat Frontier Smart Technologies Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems5.77% 2.29% 1.87%
Frontier Smart Technologies Group N/A N/A N/A

17.2% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. 26.4% of CML Microsystems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Frontier Smart Technologies Group. Frontier Smart Technologies Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£19.55M2.60£2.05M£7.1142.90
Frontier Smart Technologies Group£38.88M0.00N/A-£4.20N/A

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than Frontier Smart Technologies Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for Frontier Smart Technologies Group. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Frontier Smart Technologies Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Neutral
Frontier Smart Technologies Group Neutral

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Frontier Smart Technologies Group on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Sondrel?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Sondrel (LON:SND) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than Sondrel. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for Sondrel. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sondrel'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Neutral
Sondrel Neutral

17.2% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.9% of Sondrel shares are held by institutional investors. 26.4% of CML Microsystems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 24.8% of Sondrel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Sondrel's net margin of -228.31%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of 2.29% beat Sondrel's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems5.77% 2.29% 1.87%
Sondrel -228.31%N/A -52.53%

CML Microsystems has higher revenue and earnings than Sondrel. Sondrel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£19.55M2.60£2.05M£7.1142.90
Sondrel£9.43M0.00-£21.52M-£0.25N/A

CML Microsystems pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Sondrel pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share. CML Microsystems pays out 154.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sondrel pays out -12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Sondrel on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Alphawave IP Group?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Alphawave IP Group (LON:AWE) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Alphawave IP Group's net margin of -54.65%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of 2.29% beat Alphawave IP Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems5.77% 2.29% 1.87%
Alphawave IP Group -54.65%-41.83%-3.94%

17.2% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.3% of Alphawave IP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.4% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 42.1% of Alphawave IP Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than Alphawave IP Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for Alphawave IP Group. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Alphawave IP Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Neutral
Alphawave IP Group Neutral

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alphawave IP Group. Alphawave IP Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£19.55M2.60£2.05M£7.1142.90
Alphawave IP Group£319.58M4.59-£99.26M-£22.99N/A

CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.123, meaning that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alphawave IP Group has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Alphawave IP Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Windward?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Windward (LON:WNWD) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Windward. Windward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£19.55M2.60£2.05M£7.1142.90
Windward£43.06M0.00-£9.55M-£6.87N/A

CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.123, indicating that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Windward has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than Windward. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for Windward. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Windward'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Neutral
Windward Neutral

17.2% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.3% of Windward shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.4% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 53.8% of Windward shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Windward's net margin of -31.74%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of 2.29% beat Windward's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems5.77% 2.29% 1.87%
Windward -31.74%-99.40%-14.48%

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Windward on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CML Microsystems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CML and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CML vs. The Competition

MetricCML MicrosystemsSemiconductors IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£50.81M£2.34B£40.82B£2.77B
Dividend Yield3.12%1.34%3.10%6.12%
P/E Ratio42.9023.93171.21365.21
Price / Sales2.60542.81639.5487,168.40
Price / Cash3.457.4952.1627.85
Price / Book0.964.549.807.68
Net Income£2.05M-£32.65M£1.06B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-12.86%-4.52%-1.86%-0.55%
1 Month Performance27.08%12.15%5.65%3.15%
1 Year Performance15.31%75.94%159.66%73.57%

CML Microsystems Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CML
CML Microsystems
N/AGBX 305
flat
GBX 223
-26.9%
+15.8%£50.81M£19.55M42.90139
ENSI
EnSilica
N/AGBX 113
-2.6%
N/A+174.6%£133.20M£21.64MN/A168
FST
Frontier Smart Technologies Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£11.43M£38.88MN/AN/A
SND
Sondrel
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.37M£9.43MN/A330
AWE
Alphawave IP Group
N/AGBX 185
flat
N/A+30.6%£1.47B£319.58MN/A829

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CML) was last updated on 6/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners