Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ 2,000 missiles didn't hit Iran. They hit China. (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free CML Stock Alerts

CML Microsystems (CML) Competitors

CML Microsystems logo
GBX 263 -2.00 (-0.75%)
As of 06:21 AM Eastern
Compare

CML vs. ENSI, FST, SND, AWE, and BLTG

Should you buy CML Microsystems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CML Microsystems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CML Microsystems include EnSilica (ENSI), Frontier Smart Technologies Group (FST), Sondrel (SND), Alphawave IP Group (AWE), and Blancco Technology Group (BLTG). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.

How does CML Microsystems compare to EnSilica?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and EnSilica (LON:ENSI) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than EnSilica. EnSilica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.14£2.05M£7.1136.99
EnSilica£21.64M4.97-£221.97K-£2.34N/A

CML Microsystems has a net margin of -0.26% compared to EnSilica's net margin of -9.36%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of -0.11% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems-0.26% -0.11% 1.87%
EnSilica -9.36%-9.80%1.78%

17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of EnSilica shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.0% of EnSilica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.204, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EnSilica has a beta of 0.912, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CML Microsystems and CML Microsystems both had 1 articles in the media. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat EnSilica's score of 0.65 indicating that CML Microsystems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
EnSilica
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

CML Microsystems beats EnSilica on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Frontier Smart Technologies Group?

Frontier Smart Technologies Group (LON:FST) and CML Microsystems (LON:CML) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Frontier Smart Technologies Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CML Microsystems' net margin of -0.26%. Frontier Smart Technologies Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat CML Microsystems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frontier Smart Technologies GroupN/A N/A N/A
CML Microsystems -0.26%-0.11%1.87%

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than Frontier Smart Technologies Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for Frontier Smart Technologies Group. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Frontier Smart Technologies Group's score of 0.00 indicating that CML Microsystems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frontier Smart Technologies Group Neutral
CML Microsystems Positive

CML Microsystems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Frontier Smart Technologies Group. Frontier Smart Technologies Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frontier Smart Technologies Group£38.88M0.00N/A-£4.20N/A
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.14£2.05M£7.1136.99

17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Frontier Smart Technologies Group on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Sondrel?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Sondrel (LON:SND) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

CML Microsystems pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Sondrel pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share. CML Microsystems pays out 154.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sondrel pays out -12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

CML Microsystems has higher revenue and earnings than Sondrel. Sondrel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.14£2.05M£7.1136.99
Sondrel£9.43M0.00-£21.52M-£0.25N/A

17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.9% of Sondrel shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 24.8% of Sondrel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than Sondrel. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for Sondrel. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Sondrel's score of 0.00 indicating that CML Microsystems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Positive
Sondrel Neutral

CML Microsystems has a net margin of -0.26% compared to Sondrel's net margin of -228.31%. Sondrel's return on equity of 0.00% beat CML Microsystems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems-0.26% -0.11% 1.87%
Sondrel -228.31%N/A -52.53%

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Sondrel on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Alphawave IP Group?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Alphawave IP Group (LON:AWE) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than Alphawave IP Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for Alphawave IP Group. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Alphawave IP Group's score of 0.00 indicating that CML Microsystems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Positive
Alphawave IP Group Neutral

17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.3% of Alphawave IP Group shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 42.1% of Alphawave IP Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.204, meaning that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alphawave IP Group has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of -0.26% compared to Alphawave IP Group's net margin of -54.65%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of -0.11% beat Alphawave IP Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems-0.26% -0.11% 1.87%
Alphawave IP Group -54.65%-41.83%-3.94%

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alphawave IP Group. Alphawave IP Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.14£2.05M£7.1136.99
Alphawave IP Group£319.58M4.59-£99.26M-£22.99N/A

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Alphawave IP Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Blancco Technology Group?

Blancco Technology Group (LON:BLTG) and CML Microsystems (LON:CML) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

84.0% of Blancco Technology Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Blancco Technology Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than Blancco Technology Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for Blancco Technology Group. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Blancco Technology Group's score of 0.00 indicating that CML Microsystems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blancco Technology Group Neutral
CML Microsystems Positive

Blancco Technology Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. CML Microsystems pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Blancco Technology Group pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CML Microsystems pays out 154.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CML Microsystems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Blancco Technology Group has a net margin of 6.22% compared to CML Microsystems' net margin of -0.26%. Blancco Technology Group's return on equity of 3.52% beat CML Microsystems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blancco Technology Group6.22% 3.52% 2.17%
CML Microsystems -0.26%-0.11%1.87%

Blancco Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than CML Microsystems. Blancco Technology Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blancco Technology Group£44.15M0.00£2.75M£0.04N/A
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.14£2.05M£7.1136.99

Blancco Technology Group has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.204, meaning that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Blancco Technology Group and CML Microsystems tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CML Microsystems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CML and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CML vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCML MicrosystemsSemiconductors IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£43.81M£1.98B£38.16B£2.76B
Dividend Yield4.58%18.93%3.30%6.16%
P/E Ratio36.9922.11170.70366.57
Price / Sales2.14520.60617.5986,073.01
Price / Cash3.457.4946.3327.87
Price / Book0.834.439.557.83
Net Income£2.05M-£32.65M£1.07B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.45%-2.21%-1.99%-0.93%
1 Month Performance-14.40%-4.71%-0.81%-1.39%
1 Year Performance6.05%63.95%155.14%65.78%

CML Microsystems Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CML
CML Microsystems
N/AGBX 263
-0.8%		GBX 223
-15.2%		+6.9%£43.81M£20.45M36.99139
ENSI
EnSilica
N/AGBX 99
-1.0%		N/A+132.5%£116.70M£21.64MN/A168
FST
Frontier Smart Technologies Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£11.43M£38.88MN/AN/A
SND
Sondrel
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.37M£9.43MN/A330
AWE
Alphawave IP Group
N/AGBX 185
flat		N/A+6.3%£1.47B£319.58MN/A829

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CML) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SpaceX IPO “cancelled”?
SpaceX is approaching what could be a $1.6 trillion IPO - potentially the largest in history. But Louis Navell...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX just went public - and Whitney Tilson, Harvard MBA and 30-year Wall Street veteran, says buying in coul...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
The EPA just put a kill switch on Elon’s empire
A federal EPA permit expires January 2, 2027 - and if Elon Musk's Colossus supercomputer loses power that day,...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock is hoarding it. JPMorgan is hoarding it. Do you own it?
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
Quick favor to ask you
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book at no charge - the same book that sells for $...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Millionaire trader who went 13-for-13 on Trump in 2025 now turns his attention to Elon.
Hedge fund trader Larry Benedict went 13-for-13 in Q1 2025 - not a single losing trade - and finished the year...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Rickards Predicts: Trump to buy tiny $2 stock?
Jim Rickards believes the Trump administration is about to take a direct stake in a $2 stock sitting on the la...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel