Free Trial
→ Read this or regret it forever (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free CML Stock Alerts

CML Microsystems (CML) Competitors

CML Microsystems logo
GBX 291.33 -11.17 (-3.69%)
As of 12:20 PM Eastern
Compare

CML vs. ENSI, FST, SND, AWE, and BLTG

Should you buy CML Microsystems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CML Microsystems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CML Microsystems include EnSilica (ENSI), Frontier Smart Technologies Group (FST), Sondrel (SND), Alphawave IP Group (AWE), and Blancco Technology Group (BLTG). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.

How does CML Microsystems compare to EnSilica?

EnSilica (LON:ENSI) and CML Microsystems (LON:CML) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

0.8% of EnSilica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.6% of EnSilica shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, EnSilica and EnSilica both had 1 articles in the media. EnSilica's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CML Microsystems'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EnSilica
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CML Microsystems
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CML Microsystems has a net margin of 5.77% compared to EnSilica's net margin of -9.36%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of 2.29% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EnSilica-9.36% -9.80% 1.78%
CML Microsystems 5.77%2.29%1.87%

EnSilica has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.123, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

CML Microsystems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than EnSilica. EnSilica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EnSilica£21.64M6.75-£221.97K-£2.34N/A
CML Microsystems£19.55M2.47£2.05M£7.1140.82

Summary

CML Microsystems beats EnSilica on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Frontier Smart Technologies Group?

Frontier Smart Technologies Group (LON:FST) and CML Microsystems (LON:CML) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Frontier Smart Technologies Group's net margin of 0.00%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of 2.29% beat Frontier Smart Technologies Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frontier Smart Technologies GroupN/A N/A N/A
CML Microsystems 5.77%2.29%1.87%

CML Microsystems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Frontier Smart Technologies Group. Frontier Smart Technologies Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frontier Smart Technologies Group£38.88M0.00N/A-£4.20N/A
CML Microsystems£19.55M2.47£2.05M£7.1140.82

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than Frontier Smart Technologies Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for Frontier Smart Technologies Group. Frontier Smart Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CML Microsystems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frontier Smart Technologies Group Neutral
CML Microsystems Neutral

17.2% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.4% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Frontier Smart Technologies Group on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Sondrel?

Sondrel (LON:SND) and CML Microsystems (LON:CML) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than Sondrel. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for Sondrel. Sondrel's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CML Microsystems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sondrel Neutral
CML Microsystems Neutral

CML Microsystems has higher revenue and earnings than Sondrel. Sondrel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sondrel£9.43M0.00-£21.52M-£0.25N/A
CML Microsystems£19.55M2.47£2.05M£7.1140.82

Sondrel pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share. CML Microsystems pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Sondrel pays out -12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CML Microsystems pays out 154.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

17.9% of Sondrel shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. 24.8% of Sondrel shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of CML Microsystems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Sondrel's net margin of -228.31%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of 2.29% beat Sondrel's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sondrel-228.31% N/A -52.53%
CML Microsystems 5.77%2.29%1.87%

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Sondrel on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Alphawave IP Group?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Alphawave IP Group (LON:AWE) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alphawave IP Group. Alphawave IP Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£19.55M2.47£2.05M£7.1140.82
Alphawave IP Group£319.58M4.59-£99.26M-£22.99N/A

CML Microsystems has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Alphawave IP Group's net margin of -54.65%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of 2.29% beat Alphawave IP Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems5.77% 2.29% 1.87%
Alphawave IP Group -54.65%-41.83%-3.94%

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than Alphawave IP Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for Alphawave IP Group. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Alphawave IP Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Neutral
Alphawave IP Group Neutral

17.2% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.3% of Alphawave IP Group shares are held by institutional investors. 26.4% of CML Microsystems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 42.1% of Alphawave IP Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.123, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alphawave IP Group has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Alphawave IP Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Blancco Technology Group?

Blancco Technology Group (LON:BLTG) and CML Microsystems (LON:CML) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Blancco Technology Group has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.123, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Blancco Technology Group has a net margin of 6.22% compared to CML Microsystems' net margin of 5.77%. Blancco Technology Group's return on equity of 3.52% beat CML Microsystems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blancco Technology Group6.22% 3.52% 2.17%
CML Microsystems 5.77%2.29%1.87%

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than Blancco Technology Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for Blancco Technology Group. Blancco Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CML Microsystems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blancco Technology Group Neutral
CML Microsystems Neutral

Blancco Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than CML Microsystems. Blancco Technology Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blancco Technology Group£44.15M0.00£2.75M£0.04N/A
CML Microsystems£19.55M2.47£2.05M£7.1140.82

Blancco Technology Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. CML Microsystems pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Blancco Technology Group pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CML Microsystems pays out 154.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CML Microsystems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

84.0% of Blancco Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Blancco Technology Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of CML Microsystems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Blancco Technology Group beats CML Microsystems on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CML Microsystems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CML and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CML vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCML MicrosystemsSemiconductors IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£48.34M£2.38B£39.43B£2.79B
Dividend Yield3.64%1.91%3.20%6.09%
P/E Ratio40.8224.23164.91366.11
Price / Sales2.47562.08622.9688,393.80
Price / Cash3.457.4947.8227.89
Price / Book0.924.689.567.70
Net Income£2.05M-£32.65M£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance19.42%6.66%0.39%0.68%
1 Month Performance31.91%28.46%9.59%2.62%
1 Year Performance15.16%69.83%164.62%87.79%

CML Microsystems Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CML
CML Microsystems
N/AGBX 291.33
-3.7%		GBX 223
-23.5%		+14.6%£48.53M£19.55M40.97139
ENSI
EnSilica
N/AGBX 106
+23.1%		N/A+266.7%£124.95M£21.64MN/A168
FST
Frontier Smart Technologies Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£11.43M£38.88MN/AN/A
SND
Sondrel
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.37M£9.43MN/A330
AWE
Alphawave IP Group
N/AGBX 185
flat		N/A+33.0%£1.47B£319.58MN/A829

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CML) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Microscopic Footage Shows Immune Cells Attacking Cancer
Early human trial data from one NASDAQ-listed biotech showed up to a 63.7% reduction in cancer burden using it...
Market Tactic | Sponsoredtc pixel
You're not getting into the SpaceX IPO. Do this instead.
The SpaceX IPO is expected to price at $1.75 trillion - and retail investors won't get an allocation. Banks an...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran's New Leader Just Said Something That Should Terrify Every American
Iran's Supreme Leader has declared the Strait of Hormuz closed as leverage against the U.S. - and with 40% of ...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Rare Earth Shift Few Saw Coming
Rare earth elements are the hidden backbone of electric vehicles, modern defense technology, and advanced elec...
i2i Marketing Group, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
Peptide Company Lands Exclusive MMA Wellness Partnership
A publicly traded peptide company just signed an exclusive partnership with a NYSE-listed MMA media platform t...
The Tomorrow Investor | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX eyes a 1.75 trillion valuation - here's what to know
Elon Musk's team has quietly filed confidential paperwork with the SEC for what Bloomberg estimates could be a...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The worst mistake you can make with the SpaceX IPO
The $1.75 trillion SpaceX IPO is generating massive hype - but history shows retail investors who pile in on d...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel