Free Trial

Seeing Machines (SEE) Competitors

Seeing Machines logo
GBX 4.65 +0.10 (+2.20%)
As of 06/5/2026 12:41 PM Eastern

SEE vs. SLI, LTHM, PURE, FUL, and MOS

Should you buy Seeing Machines stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Seeing Machines with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Seeing Machines include Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust (SLI), James Latham (LTHM), PureCircle (PURE), Fulham Shore (FUL), and Mobile Streams (MOS). These companies are all part of the "chemicals" industry.

How does Seeing Machines compare to Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust?

Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) and Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust (LON:SLI) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.72-£46.78M-£0.64N/A
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust£29.95M0.00N/A£21.50N/A

Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust's return on equity of 0.00% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seeing Machines-49.30% -91.82% -13.61%
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seeing Machines Neutral
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust Neutral

5.1% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust beats Seeing Machines on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to James Latham?

James Latham (LON:LTHM) and Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

James Latham has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than James Latham, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Latham£376.81M0.54£22.24M£87.5011.53
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.72-£46.78M-£0.64N/A

2.4% of James Latham shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. 19.0% of James Latham shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, James Latham had 1 more articles in the media than Seeing Machines. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Latham and 0 mentions for Seeing Machines. James Latham's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seeing Machines'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
James Latham Neutral
Seeing Machines Neutral

James Latham has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. James Latham's return on equity of 7.92% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Latham4.68% 7.92% 6.46%
Seeing Machines -49.30%-91.82%-13.61%

James Latham has a beta of 0.737, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.527, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

James Latham beats Seeing Machines on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to PureCircle?

Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) and PureCircle (LON:PURE) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

5.1% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

PureCircle has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PureCircle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.72-£46.78M-£0.64N/A
PureCircle£121.14M0.00N/A-£35.80N/A

In the previous week, Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PureCircle'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seeing Machines Neutral
PureCircle Neutral

PureCircle has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. PureCircle's return on equity of 0.00% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seeing Machines-49.30% -91.82% -13.61%
PureCircle N/A N/A N/A

Summary

PureCircle beats Seeing Machines on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to Fulham Shore?

Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) and Fulham Shore (LON:FUL) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and dividends.

5.1% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.4% of Fulham Shore shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 69.1% of Fulham Shore shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fulham Shore'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seeing Machines Neutral
Fulham Shore Neutral

Fulham Shore has a net margin of 1.63% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. Fulham Shore's return on equity of 3.91% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seeing Machines-49.30% -91.82% -13.61%
Fulham Shore 1.63%3.91%1.17%

Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.527, suggesting that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fulham Shore has a beta of 1.8, suggesting that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

Fulham Shore has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.72-£46.78M-£0.64N/A
Fulham Shore£93.13M0.00£1.52MN/AN/A

Summary

Fulham Shore beats Seeing Machines on 9 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to Mobile Streams?

Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) and Mobile Streams (LON:MOS) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mobile Streams'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seeing Machines Neutral
Mobile Streams Neutral

Mobile Streams has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Seeing Machines. Mobile Streams is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seeing Machines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.72-£46.78M-£0.64N/A
Mobile Streams£1.41M28.89-£1.63M-£0.03N/A

Seeing Machines has a net margin of -49.30% compared to Mobile Streams' net margin of -191.71%. Seeing Machines' return on equity of -91.82% beat Mobile Streams' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seeing Machines-49.30% -91.82% -13.61%
Mobile Streams -191.71%-104.54%-58.95%

Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.527, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mobile Streams has a beta of -0.4, indicating that its share price is 140% less volatile than the broader market.

5.1% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Mobile Streams shares are held by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.0% of Mobile Streams shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Seeing Machines beats Mobile Streams on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Seeing Machines News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SEE vs. The Competition

MetricSeeing MachinesSoftware IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£223.18M£736.19M£38.93B£2.75B
Dividend Yield0.15%4.03%3.14%6.16%
P/E Ratio-7.26666.45171.35366.37
Price / Sales3.7216,677.76640.0787,126.24
Price / Cash4.4915.4648.5927.85
Price / Book5.236.539.617.68
Net Income-£46.78M-£18.69M£1.07B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.31%1.06%-1.00%-0.50%
1 Month Performance12.86%2.85%4.47%1.84%
1 Year Performance101.30%-3.46%157.99%72.87%

Seeing Machines Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SEE
Seeing Machines
N/AGBX 4.65
+2.2%
N/A+101.3%£223.18M£59.92MN/A16,300
SLI
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£312.43M£29.95M3.672,021
LTHM
James Latham
N/AGBX 1,002
+0.2%
N/A-11.4%£202.00M£376.81M11.451,350
PURE
PureCircle
N/AN/AN/AN/A£183.53M£121.14MN/A10
FUL
Fulham Shore
N/AN/AN/AN/A£89.23M£93.13M975.007,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SEE) was last updated on 6/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners