Go Pro
→ Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE (From Base Camp Trading) (Ad)tc pixel Free SEE Stock Alerts

Seeing Machines (SEE) Competitors

Seeing Machines logo
GBX 4.49 +0.01 (+0.22%)
As of 07/17/2026 11:58 AM Eastern
Compare

SEE vs. SLI, LTHM, PURE, FUL, and MOS

Should you buy Seeing Machines stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Seeing Machines with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Seeing Machines include Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust (SLI), James Latham (LTHM), PureCircle (PURE), Fulham Shore (FUL), and Mobile Streams (MOS). These companies are all part of the "chemicals" industry.

How does Seeing Machines compare to Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust?

Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) and Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust (LON:SLI) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

5.1% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seeing Machines Neutral
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust Neutral

Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.59-£46.78M-£0.64N/A
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust£29.95M0.00N/A£21.50N/A

Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust's return on equity of 0.00% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seeing Machines-49.30% -91.82% -13.61%
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust beats Seeing Machines on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to James Latham?

Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) and James Latham (LON:LTHM) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled James Latham'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seeing Machines Neutral
James Latham Neutral

Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.639, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Latham has a beta of 1.3833641, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

James Latham has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than James Latham, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.59-£46.78M-£0.64N/A
James Latham£393.04M0.56£22.24M£92.4011.73

James Latham has a net margin of 4.73% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. James Latham's return on equity of 8.13% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seeing Machines-49.30% -91.82% -13.61%
James Latham 4.73%8.13%6.46%

5.1% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.4% of James Latham shares are held by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of James Latham shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

James Latham beats Seeing Machines on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to PureCircle?

PureCircle (LON:PURE) and Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

PureCircle has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PureCircle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PureCircle£121.14M0.00N/A-£35.80N/A
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.59-£46.78M-£0.64N/A

PureCircle has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. PureCircle's return on equity of 0.00% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PureCircleN/A N/A N/A
Seeing Machines -49.30%-91.82%-13.61%

5.1% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, PureCircle's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seeing Machines'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PureCircle Neutral
Seeing Machines Neutral

Summary

PureCircle beats Seeing Machines on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to Fulham Shore?

Fulham Shore (LON:FUL) and Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation and dividends.

Fulham Shore has a beta of 1.8, meaning that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.639, meaning that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fulham Shore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seeing Machines'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fulham Shore Neutral
Seeing Machines Neutral

Fulham Shore has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulham Shore£93.13M0.00£1.52MN/AN/A
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.59-£46.78M-£0.64N/A

Fulham Shore has a net margin of 1.63% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. Fulham Shore's return on equity of 3.91% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulham Shore1.63% 3.91% 1.17%
Seeing Machines -49.30%-91.82%-13.61%

25.4% of Fulham Shore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. 69.1% of Fulham Shore shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fulham Shore beats Seeing Machines on 9 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to Mobile Streams?

Mobile Streams (LON:MOS) and Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and dividends.

1.1% of Mobile Streams shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.0% of Mobile Streams shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mobile Streams has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Seeing Machines. Mobile Streams is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seeing Machines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mobile Streams£1.41M28.89-£1.63M-£0.03N/A
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.59-£46.78M-£0.64N/A

Seeing Machines has a net margin of -49.30% compared to Mobile Streams' net margin of -191.86%. Seeing Machines' return on equity of -91.82% beat Mobile Streams' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mobile Streams-191.86% -159.82% -58.95%
Seeing Machines -49.30%-91.82%-13.61%

In the previous week, Mobile Streams had 1 more articles in the media than Seeing Machines. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mobile Streams and 0 mentions for Seeing Machines. Mobile Streams' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Seeing Machines' score of 0.00 indicating that Mobile Streams is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mobile Streams Positive
Seeing Machines Neutral

Mobile Streams has a beta of -0.4, suggesting that its share price is 140% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.639, suggesting that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Seeing Machines beats Mobile Streams on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Seeing Machines News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SEE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSeeing MachinesSoftware IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£215.26M£682.92M£37.75B£2.80B
Dividend Yield0.15%4.16%3.15%6.14%
P/E Ratio-7.00677.03169.25368.19
Price / Sales3.5915,276.56592.5284,555.41
Price / Cash4.4915.4644.5327.89
Price / Book5.045.739.287.53
Net Income-£46.78M-£24.99M£1.07B£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.34%-1.79%-2.08%5.77%
1 Month Performance-6.85%-4.06%-2.70%4.95%
1 Year Performance52.03%-10.15%135.17%61.88%

Seeing Machines Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SEE
Seeing Machines
N/AGBX 4.49
+0.2%		N/A+52.0%£215.26M£59.92MN/A16,300
SLI
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£312.43M£29.95M3.672,021
LTHM
James Latham
N/AGBX 1,080
+0.9%		N/A-4.5%£217.73M£393.04M11.691,350
PURE
PureCircle
N/AN/AN/AN/A£183.53M£121.14MN/A10
FUL
Fulham Shore
N/AN/AN/AN/A£89.23M£93.13M975.007,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SEE) was last updated on 7/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon’s new "tollbooth"
The SpaceX IPO was valued at $1.75 trillion. But one analyst says fighting over those shares may be the wrong ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Oil is settling in yuan now - here's what that means for gold
Saudi Arabia has terminated its 1974 petrodollar agreement with the United States - the deal that forced every...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel