Free Trial
→ Read now. Do not delete. You’ve been warned. (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free SEE Stock Alerts

Seeing Machines (SEE) Competitors

Seeing Machines logo
GBX 4.86 -0.23 (-4.42%)
As of 06:56 AM Eastern
Compare

SEE vs. SLI, LTHM, PURE, FUL, and MOS

Should you buy Seeing Machines stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Seeing Machines with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Seeing Machines include Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust (SLI), James Latham (LTHM), PureCircle (PURE), Fulham Shore (FUL), and Mobile Streams (MOS). These companies are all part of the "chemicals" industry.

How does Seeing Machines compare to Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust?

Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) and Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust (LON:SLI) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.89-£46.78M-£0.64N/A
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust£29.95M0.00N/A£21.50N/A

5.7% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seeing Machines Neutral
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust Neutral

Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust's return on equity of 0.00% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seeing Machines-49.30% -91.82% -13.61%
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust beats Seeing Machines on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to James Latham?

James Latham (LON:LTHM) and Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation and dividends.

James Latham has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than James Latham, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Latham£376.81M0.54£22.24M£87.5011.60
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.89-£46.78M-£0.64N/A

James Latham has a beta of 0.737, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.527, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

2.4% of James Latham shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.7% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. 18.9% of James Latham shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, James Latham had 1 more articles in the media than Seeing Machines. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Latham and 0 mentions for Seeing Machines. James Latham's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Seeing Machines' score of 0.00 indicating that James Latham is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
James Latham Positive
Seeing Machines Neutral

James Latham has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. James Latham's return on equity of 7.92% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Latham4.68% 7.92% 6.46%
Seeing Machines -49.30%-91.82%-13.61%

Summary

James Latham beats Seeing Machines on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to PureCircle?

PureCircle (LON:PURE) and Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, PureCircle's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seeing Machines'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PureCircle Neutral
Seeing Machines Neutral

PureCircle has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PureCircle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PureCircle£121.14M0.00N/A-£35.80N/A
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.89-£46.78M-£0.64N/A

PureCircle has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. PureCircle's return on equity of 0.00% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PureCircleN/A N/A N/A
Seeing Machines -49.30%-91.82%-13.61%

5.7% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

PureCircle beats Seeing Machines on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to Fulham Shore?

Fulham Shore (LON:FUL) and Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Fulham Shore has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulham Shore£93.13M0.00£1.52MN/AN/A
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.89-£46.78M-£0.64N/A

Fulham Shore has a beta of 1.8, meaning that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.527, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fulham Shore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seeing Machines'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fulham Shore Neutral
Seeing Machines Neutral

25.4% of Fulham Shore shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.7% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.1% of Fulham Shore shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fulham Shore has a net margin of 1.63% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. Fulham Shore's return on equity of 3.91% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulham Shore1.63% 3.91% 1.17%
Seeing Machines -49.30%-91.82%-13.61%

Summary

Fulham Shore beats Seeing Machines on 9 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to Mobile Streams?

Mobile Streams (LON:MOS) and Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, Mobile Streams' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seeing Machines'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mobile Streams Neutral
Seeing Machines Neutral

Mobile Streams has a beta of -0.4, suggesting that its share price is 140% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.527, suggesting that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Seeing Machines has a net margin of -49.30% compared to Mobile Streams' net margin of -191.71%. Seeing Machines' return on equity of -91.82% beat Mobile Streams' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mobile Streams-191.71% -104.54% -58.95%
Seeing Machines -49.30%-91.82%-13.61%

Mobile Streams has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Seeing Machines. Mobile Streams is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seeing Machines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mobile Streams£1.41M28.89-£1.63M-£0.03N/A
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.89-£46.78M-£0.64N/A

1.1% of Mobile Streams shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.7% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. 9.0% of Mobile Streams shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Seeing Machines beats Mobile Streams on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Seeing Machines News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SEE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSeeing MachinesSoftware IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£233.26M£718.47M£38.74B£2.74B
Dividend Yield0.15%4.01%3.21%6.15%
P/E Ratio-7.59665.90168.33365.72
Price / Sales3.8916,761.02625.6388,197.72
Price / Cash4.4915.4647.8127.89
Price / Book5.466.929.667.63
Net Income-£46.78M-£18.69M£1.06B£5.89B
7 Day Performance18.25%-1.12%-1.43%6.37%
1 Month Performance45.07%0.43%4.16%0.57%
1 Year Performance94.40%-4.39%161.37%77.05%

Seeing Machines Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SEE
Seeing Machines
N/AGBX 4.86
-4.4%		N/A+102.8%£233.26M£59.92MN/A16,300
SLI
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£312.43M£29.95M3.672,021
LTHM
James Latham
N/AGBX 1,013.50
-1.1%		N/A-13.6%£204.32M£376.81M11.581,350
PURE
PureCircle
N/AN/AN/AN/A£183.53M£121.14MN/A10
FUL
Fulham Shore
N/AN/AN/AN/A£89.23M£93.13M975.007,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SEE) was last updated on 5/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Hey, it's Jon Najarian. The SpaceX IPO is right around the corner. But I discovered Elon may have something BIGGER planned. Check this out before June 9th...
After being invited to the SpaceX launch headquarters in Cape Canaveral from one of Elon's top lobbyists… Hall...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Distracted Americans set to miss out on quadrillions
Technology expert and Washington D.C. insider Jeff Brown - who identified Bitcoin, Tesla, and Nvidia early - s...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX will mint billionaires. You won't be one of them.
By the time a company goes public, 95% of profits have already been made. Insiders bought SpaceX at $20 billio...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
The cat is out the bag
Almost 80,000 tech jobs vanished in the first three months of 2026. Meta cut 14,000 roles, Microsoft offered s...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
The filing was one thing. June 1 is another.
The SpaceX filing got attention - but according to macroeconomic strategist Dr. Mark Skousen of The Oxford Clu...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel