Do analysts recommend SEE or BYIT?

Bytes Technology Group has a consensus price target of £620.17, suggesting a potential upside of 15,100.29%. Given Bytes Technology Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bytes Technology Group is more favorable than Seeing Machines. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Seeing Machines 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Bytes Technology Group 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Does the media prefer SEE or BYIT?

In the previous week, Seeing Machines and Seeing Machines both had 1 articles in the media. Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Bytes Technology Group's score of 0.47 indicating that Seeing Machines is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Seeing Machines 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Bytes Technology Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate SEE or WPS?

W.A.G payment solutions has a consensus target price of GBX 120, indicating a potential upside of 13.21%. Given W.A.G payment solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe W.A.G payment solutions is more favorable than Seeing Machines. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Seeing Machines 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 W.A.G payment solutions 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Seeing Machines (SEE) Competitors

GBX 4.94 +0.30 (+6.38%)

As of 12:52 PM Eastern

Compare

SEE vs. BYIT, LTG, WPS, SDL, and ATG

Should you buy Seeing Machines stock or one of its competitors? Seeing Machines's main competitors and comparable companies include Bytes Technology Group (BYIT), Learning Technologies Group (LTG), W.A.G payment solutions (WPS), SDL plc (SDL.L) (SDL), and Auction Technology Group (ATG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "software" industry.

How does Seeing Machines compare to Bytes Technology Group?

Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) and Bytes Technology Group (LON:BYIT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

4.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.6% of Bytes Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Bytes Technology Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Seeing Machines and Seeing Machines both had 1 articles in the media. Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Bytes Technology Group's score of 0.47 indicating that Seeing Machines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Seeing Machines	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Bytes Technology Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.627, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bytes Technology Group has a beta of 0.708, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Bytes Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bytes Technology Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Seeing Machines	£59.92M	3.95	-£46.78M	-£0.64	N/A
Bytes Technology Group	£220.56M	4.30	£52.30M	£20.74	19.67

Bytes Technology Group has a consensus price target of £620.17, suggesting a potential upside of 15,100.29%. Given Bytes Technology Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bytes Technology Group is more favorable than Seeing Machines.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Seeing Machines	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Bytes Technology Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Bytes Technology Group has a net margin of 23.25% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. Bytes Technology Group's return on equity of 64.69% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Seeing Machines	-49.30%	-91.82%	-13.61%
Bytes Technology Group	23.25%	64.69%	10.12%

Summary

Bytes Technology Group beats Seeing Machines on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to Learning Technologies Group?

Learning Technologies Group (LON:LTG) and Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and media sentiment.

Learning Technologies Group has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Learning Technologies Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Learning Technologies Group	£529.20M	0.00	£47.30M	£5.96	N/A
Seeing Machines	£59.92M	3.95	-£46.78M	-£0.64	N/A

Learning Technologies Group has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.627, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

60.7% of Learning Technologies Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. 31.5% of Learning Technologies Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Learning Technologies Group has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. Learning Technologies Group's return on equity of 6.90% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Learning Technologies Group	5.24%	6.90%	6.36%
Seeing Machines	-49.30%	-91.82%	-13.61%

In the previous week, Seeing Machines had 1 more articles in the media than Learning Technologies Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Seeing Machines and 0 mentions for Learning Technologies Group. Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Learning Technologies Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Seeing Machines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Learning Technologies Group	Neutral
Seeing Machines	Positive

Summary

Learning Technologies Group beats Seeing Machines on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to W.A.G payment solutions?

Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) and W.A.G payment solutions (LON:WPS) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

W.A.G payment solutions has a net margin of 0.12% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. W.A.G payment solutions' return on equity of 1.04% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Seeing Machines	-49.30%	-91.82%	-13.61%
W.A.G payment solutions	0.12%	1.04%	1.86%

In the previous week, Seeing Machines had 1 more articles in the media than W.A.G payment solutions. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Seeing Machines and 0 mentions for W.A.G payment solutions. Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat W.A.G payment solutions' score of 0.00 indicating that Seeing Machines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Seeing Machines	Positive
W.A.G payment solutions	Neutral

Seeing Machines has higher earnings, but lower revenue than W.A.G payment solutions. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than W.A.G payment solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Seeing Machines	£59.92M	3.95	-£46.78M	-£0.64	N/A
W.A.G payment solutions	£2.24B	0.33	-£49.24M	£0.00	27,179.49

Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.627, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, W.A.G payment solutions has a beta of 0.13, indicating that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

4.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.0% of W.A.G payment solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 47.7% of W.A.G payment solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

W.A.G payment solutions has a consensus target price of GBX 120, indicating a potential upside of 13.21%. Given W.A.G payment solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe W.A.G payment solutions is more favorable than Seeing Machines.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Seeing Machines	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
W.A.G payment solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

W.A.G payment solutions beats Seeing Machines on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to SDL plc (SDL.L)?

Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) and SDL plc (SDL.L) (LON:SDL) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

SDL plc (SDL.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. SDL plc (SDL.L)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Seeing Machines	-49.30%	-91.82%	-13.61%
SDL plc (SDL.L)	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Seeing Machines had 1 more articles in the media than SDL plc (SDL.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Seeing Machines and 0 mentions for SDL plc (SDL.L). Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat SDL plc (SDL.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Seeing Machines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Seeing Machines	Positive
SDL plc (SDL.L)	Neutral

4.9% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

SDL plc (SDL.L) has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SDL plc (SDL.L), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Seeing Machines	£59.92M	3.95	-£46.78M	-£0.64	N/A
SDL plc (SDL.L)	£374.50M	0.00	N/A	£23.50	N/A

Summary

SDL plc (SDL.L) beats Seeing Machines on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to Auction Technology Group?

Auction Technology Group (LON:ATG) and Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Seeing Machines had 1 more articles in the media than Auction Technology Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Seeing Machines and 0 mentions for Auction Technology Group. Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Auction Technology Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Seeing Machines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Auction Technology Group	Neutral
Seeing Machines	Positive

47.9% of Auction Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. 16.8% of Auction Technology Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Auction Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Auction Technology Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Auction Technology Group	£227.25M	2.33	£10.21M	-£124.20	N/A
Seeing Machines	£59.92M	3.95	-£46.78M	-£0.64	N/A

Auction Technology Group has a beta of 0.694, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.627, indicating that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Auction Technology Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 555, indicating a potential upside of 26.71%. Given Auction Technology Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Auction Technology Group is more favorable than Seeing Machines.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Auction Technology Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Seeing Machines	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Auction Technology Group has a net margin of -33.05% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. Auction Technology Group's return on equity of -19.47% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Auction Technology Group	-33.05%	-19.47%	2.07%
Seeing Machines	-49.30%	-91.82%	-13.61%

Summary

Auction Technology Group beats Seeing Machines on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Seeing Machines News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SEE vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Seeing Machines	Software Industry	Technology Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£236.91M	£15.39B	£30.43B	£2.88B
Dividend Yield	0.15%	3.42%	2.72%	6.10%
P/E Ratio	-7.71	126.95	75.51	368.46
Price / Sales	3.95	1,305.66	600.77	83,426.45
Price / Cash	4.49	45.53	53.35	27.89
Price / Book	5.55	8.64	8.36	7.08
Net Income	-£46.78M	£435.62M	£679.85M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	3.92%	-0.41%	1.33%	0.54%
1 Month Performance	10.06%	2.77%	4.55%	3.02%
1 Year Performance	73.19%	5.95%	200.66%	64.50%

Seeing Machines Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SEE Seeing Machines	N/A	GBX 4.94 +6.4%	N/A	+62.8%	£236.91M	£59.92M	N/A	16,300	Gap Up High Trading Volume
BYIT Bytes Technology Group	3.8083 of 5 stars	GBX 406.60 -2.3%	£620.17 +15,152.6%	+6.2%	£945.56M	£220.56M	19.60	930	News Coverage Gap Down
LTG Learning Technologies Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£792.10M	£529.20M	16.75	5,001
WPS W.A.G payment solutions	N/A	GBX 106 +8.4%	GBX 120 +13.2%	+19.1%	£733.72M	£2.24B	27,179.49	1,329
SDL SDL plc (SDL.L)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£610.84M	£374.50M	28.09	4,300	High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SEE) was last updated on 8/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Seeing Machines (SEE) Competitors

SEE vs. BYIT, LTG, WPS, SDL, and ATG

How does Seeing Machines compare to Bytes Technology Group?

Summary

How does Seeing Machines compare to Learning Technologies Group?

Summary

How does Seeing Machines compare to W.A.G payment solutions?

Summary

How does Seeing Machines compare to SDL plc (SDL.L)?

Summary

How does Seeing Machines compare to Auction Technology Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SEE vs. The Competition

Seeing Machines Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Seeing Machines (SEE) Competitors

SEE vs. BYIT, LTG, WPS, SDL, and ATG

How does Seeing Machines compare to Bytes Technology Group?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in SEE or BYIT?

Does the media prefer SEE or BYIT?

Which has more risk & volatility, SEE or BYIT?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, SEE or BYIT?

Do analysts recommend SEE or BYIT?

Is SEE or BYIT more profitable?

Summary

How does Seeing Machines compare to Learning Technologies Group?

Which has better earnings & valuation, LTG or SEE?

Which has more risk and volatility, LTG or SEE?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in LTG or SEE?

Is LTG or SEE more profitable?

Does the media favor LTG or SEE?

Summary

How does Seeing Machines compare to W.A.G payment solutions?

Is SEE or WPS more profitable?

Does the media prefer SEE or WPS?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, SEE or WPS?

Which has more volatility & risk, SEE or WPS?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of SEE or WPS?

Do analysts rate SEE or WPS?

Summary

How does Seeing Machines compare to SDL plc (SDL.L)?

Is SEE or SDL more profitable?

Does the media prefer SEE or SDL?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in SEE or SDL?

Which has better earnings and valuation, SEE or SDL?

Summary

How does Seeing Machines compare to Auction Technology Group?

Does the media prefer ATG or SEE?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ATG or SEE?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ATG or SEE?

Which has more risk & volatility, ATG or SEE?

Do analysts rate ATG or SEE?

Is ATG or SEE more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SEE vs. The Competition

Seeing Machines Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools