Go Pro
→ The end may be near for these iconic stocks (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free SEE Stock Alerts

Seeing Machines (SEE) Competitors

Seeing Machines logo
GBX 4.35 -0.07 (-1.58%)
As of 09/8/2026 12:41 PM Eastern
Compare

SEE vs. LTG, WPS, SDL, ATG, and IMO

Should you buy Seeing Machines stock or one of its competitors? Seeing Machines's main competitors and comparable companies include Learning Technologies Group (LTG), W.A.G payment solutions (WPS), SDL plc (SDL.L) (SDL), Auction Technology Group (ATG), and IMImobile (IMO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "software" industry.

How does Seeing Machines compare to Learning Technologies Group?

Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) and Learning Technologies Group (LON:LTG) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

4.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.7% of Learning Technologies Group shares are held by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.5% of Learning Technologies Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Learning Technologies Group has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. Learning Technologies Group's return on equity of 6.90% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seeing Machines-49.30% -91.82% -13.61%
Learning Technologies Group 5.24%6.90%6.36%

Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.627, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Learning Technologies Group has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Learning Technologies Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seeing Machines Neutral
Learning Technologies Group Neutral

Learning Technologies Group has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Learning Technologies Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.48-£46.78M-£0.64N/A
Learning Technologies Group£529.20M0.00£47.30M£5.96N/A

Summary

Learning Technologies Group beats Seeing Machines on 10 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to W.A.G payment solutions?

W.A.G payment solutions (LON:WPS) and Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

6.0% of W.A.G payment solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.9% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.7% of W.A.G payment solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

W.A.G payment solutions has a net margin of 0.12% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. W.A.G payment solutions' return on equity of 1.04% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
W.A.G payment solutions0.12% 1.04% 1.86%
Seeing Machines -49.30%-91.82%-13.61%

In the previous week, W.A.G payment solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seeing Machines'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
W.A.G payment solutions Neutral
Seeing Machines Neutral

W.A.G payment solutions has a beta of 0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.627, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Seeing Machines has lower revenue, but higher earnings than W.A.G payment solutions. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than W.A.G payment solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
W.A.G payment solutions£2.24B0.33-£49.24M£0.0027,179.49
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.48-£46.78M-£0.64N/A

Summary

W.A.G payment solutions beats Seeing Machines on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to SDL plc (SDL.L)?

SDL plc (SDL.L) (LON:SDL) and Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and profitability.

SDL plc (SDL.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. SDL plc (SDL.L)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SDL plc (SDL.L)N/A N/A N/A
Seeing Machines -49.30%-91.82%-13.61%

In the previous week, SDL plc (SDL.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seeing Machines'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
SDL plc (SDL.L) Neutral
Seeing Machines Neutral

4.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

SDL plc (SDL.L) has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SDL plc (SDL.L), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SDL plc (SDL.L)£374.50M0.00N/A£23.50N/A
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.48-£46.78M-£0.64N/A

Summary

SDL plc (SDL.L) beats Seeing Machines on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to Auction Technology Group?

Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) and Auction Technology Group (LON:ATG) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.627, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Auction Technology Group has a beta of 0.692, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Auction Technology Group has a consensus price target of GBX 555, suggesting a potential upside of 33.48%. Given Auction Technology Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Auction Technology Group is more favorable than Seeing Machines.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seeing Machines
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Auction Technology Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Auction Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Auction Technology Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.48-£46.78M-£0.64N/A
Auction Technology Group£227.25M2.22£10.21M-£124.20N/A

4.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.8% of Auction Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.8% of Auction Technology Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Auction Technology Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seeing Machines Neutral
Auction Technology Group Neutral

Auction Technology Group has a net margin of -33.05% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. Auction Technology Group's return on equity of -19.47% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seeing Machines-49.30% -91.82% -13.61%
Auction Technology Group -33.05%-19.47%2.07%

Summary

Auction Technology Group beats Seeing Machines on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seeing Machines compare to IMImobile?

Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) and IMImobile (LON:IMO) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

4.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled IMImobile'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seeing Machines Neutral
IMImobile Neutral

IMImobile has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. IMImobile's return on equity of 0.00% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seeing Machines-49.30% -91.82% -13.61%
IMImobile N/A N/A N/A

IMImobile has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IMImobile, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.48-£46.78M-£0.64N/A
IMImobile£164.04M0.00N/A£4.80N/A

Summary

IMImobile beats Seeing Machines on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Seeing Machines News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SEE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSeeing MachinesSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£208.78M£15.86B£30.15B£2.92B
Dividend Yield0.15%3.42%2.73%6.22%
P/E Ratio-6.79138.3575.98366.70
Price / Sales3.481,291.02591.4083,694.76
Price / Cash4.4946.1948.1527.89
Price / Book4.898.457.776.58
Net Income-£46.78M£434.48M£703.05M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-5.43%-0.60%0.75%12.36%
1 Month Performance-5.02%-0.50%-2.06%1.01%
1 Year Performance51.04%3.41%185.76%21.13%

Seeing Machines Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SEE
Seeing Machines
N/AGBX 4.35
-1.6%		N/A+51.0%£208.78M£59.92MN/A16,300
LTG
Learning Technologies Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£792.10M£529.20M16.755,001
WPS
W.A.G payment solutions
N/AGBX 106
+8.4%		GBX 120
+13.2%		+0.0%£733.72M£2.24B27,179.491,329
SDL
SDL plc (SDL.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£610.84M£374.50M28.094,300
ATG
Auction Technology Group
N/AGBX 425
-1.0%		GBX 555
+30.6%		+26.2%£514.63M£227.25MN/A396

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SEE) was last updated on 9/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel