Free Trial

Proteome Sciences (PRM) Competitors

Proteome Sciences logo
GBX 1.40 -0.08 (-5.41%)
As of 05/8/2026 12:08 PM Eastern

PRM vs. VGAS, ALB, ADES, LOOP, and PPG

Should you be buying Proteome Sciences stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Proteome Sciences include Volga Gas (VGAS), Albert Technologies (ALB), ADES International (ADES), LoopUp Group (LOOP), and Plutus PowerGen (PPG). These companies are all part of the "chemicals" industry.

How does Proteome Sciences compare to Volga Gas?

Volga Gas (LON:VGAS) and Proteome Sciences (LON:PRM) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Volga Gas' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Proteome Sciences'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Volga Gas Neutral
Proteome Sciences Neutral

Volga Gas has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Proteome Sciences' net margin of -81.50%. Proteome Sciences' return on equity of 33.80% beat Volga Gas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Volga GasN/A N/A N/A
Proteome Sciences -81.50%33.80%-19.25%

Volga Gas has higher revenue and earnings than Proteome Sciences. Proteome Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volga Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Volga Gas£18.73M0.00N/A-£19.20N/A
Proteome Sciences£3.76M1.31-£4.08M-£1.04N/A

0.0% of Proteome Sciences shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.7% of Proteome Sciences shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Volga Gas and Proteome Sciences tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Proteome Sciences compare to Albert Technologies?

Albert Technologies (LON:ALB) and Proteome Sciences (LON:PRM) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

0.0% of Proteome Sciences shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.7% of Proteome Sciences shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Albert Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Proteome Sciences'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Albert Technologies Neutral
Proteome Sciences Neutral

Albert Technologies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Proteome Sciences' net margin of -81.50%. Proteome Sciences' return on equity of 33.80% beat Albert Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Albert TechnologiesN/A N/A N/A
Proteome Sciences -81.50%33.80%-19.25%

Albert Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Proteome Sciences. Proteome Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albert Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Albert Technologies£4.61M0.00N/A-£15.10N/A
Proteome Sciences£3.76M1.31-£4.08M-£1.04N/A

Summary

Albert Technologies and Proteome Sciences tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Proteome Sciences compare to ADES International?

ADES International (LON:ADES) and Proteome Sciences (LON:PRM) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

0.0% of Proteome Sciences shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.7% of Proteome Sciences shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ADES International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Proteome Sciences'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
ADES International Neutral
Proteome Sciences Neutral

ADES International has higher revenue and earnings than Proteome Sciences. Proteome Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ADES International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ADES International£452.11M0.00N/A£0.46N/A
Proteome Sciences£3.76M1.31-£4.08M-£1.04N/A

ADES International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Proteome Sciences' net margin of -81.50%. Proteome Sciences' return on equity of 33.80% beat ADES International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ADES InternationalN/A N/A N/A
Proteome Sciences -81.50%33.80%-19.25%

Summary

ADES International beats Proteome Sciences on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Proteome Sciences compare to LoopUp Group?

LoopUp Group (LON:LOOP) and Proteome Sciences (LON:PRM) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

LoopUp Group has a beta of -0.04, meaning that its share price is 104% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Proteome Sciences has a beta of 0.07, meaning that its share price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500.

24.2% of LoopUp Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Proteome Sciences shares are held by institutional investors. 64.7% of LoopUp Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.7% of Proteome Sciences shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Proteome Sciences has lower revenue, but higher earnings than LoopUp Group. Proteome Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LoopUp Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LoopUp Group£22.07M0.00-£16.28M-£0.12N/A
Proteome Sciences£3.76M1.31-£4.08M-£1.04N/A

In the previous week, LoopUp Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Proteome Sciences'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
LoopUp Group Neutral
Proteome Sciences Neutral

LoopUp Group has a net margin of -73.76% compared to Proteome Sciences' net margin of -81.50%. Proteome Sciences' return on equity of 33.80% beat LoopUp Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LoopUp Group-73.76% -41.98% -6.17%
Proteome Sciences -81.50%33.80%-19.25%

Summary

LoopUp Group beats Proteome Sciences on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Proteome Sciences compare to Plutus PowerGen?

Plutus PowerGen (LON:PPG) and Proteome Sciences (LON:PRM) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Plutus PowerGen's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Proteome Sciences'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Plutus PowerGen Neutral
Proteome Sciences Neutral

0.0% of Proteome Sciences shares are held by institutional investors. 36.7% of Proteome Sciences shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Plutus PowerGen has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Proteome Sciences.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Plutus PowerGen£1.17M0.00N/AN/AN/A
Proteome Sciences£3.76M1.31-£4.08M-£1.04N/A

Plutus PowerGen has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Proteome Sciences' net margin of -81.50%. Proteome Sciences' return on equity of 33.80% beat Plutus PowerGen's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Plutus PowerGenN/A N/A N/A
Proteome Sciences -81.50%33.80%-19.25%

Summary

Proteome Sciences beats Plutus PowerGen on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Proteome Sciences News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PRM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PRM vs. The Competition

MetricProteome SciencesDiagnostics & Research IndustryMedical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£4.91M£45.78M£6.23B£2.77B
Dividend Yield6.17%3.59%2.78%6.15%
P/E Ratio-1.350.9421.19366.07
Price / Sales1.31616.21535.9888,620.40
Price / Cash3.7311.4243.0727.89
Price / Book-0.783.639.977.72
Net Income-£4.08M£334.07B£3.55B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-24.32%-0.56%3.51%63.96%
1 Month Performance-11.39%2.31%4.91%3.12%
1 Year Performance-53.33%17.02%41.94%87.68%

Proteome Sciences Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PRM
Proteome Sciences
N/AGBX 1.40
-5.4%
N/A-53.3%£4.91M£3.76MN/A240
VGAS
Volga Gas
N/AN/AN/AN/A£18.99M£18.73MN/A2
ALB
Albert Technologies
N/AN/AN/AN/A£7.98M£4.61MN/A7,400
ADES
ADES International
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.09M£452.11M26.62140
LOOP
LoopUp Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.43M£22.07MN/A90

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PRM) was last updated on 5/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners