Free Trial
→ Read this warning immediately (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free LTHM Stock Alerts

James Latham (LTHM) Competitors

James Latham logo
GBX 1,009 +4.00 (+0.40%)
As of 12:34 PM Eastern
Compare

LTHM vs. SLI, SEE, PURE, FUL, and MOS

Should you buy James Latham stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares James Latham with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with James Latham include Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust (SLI), Seeing Machines (SEE), PureCircle (PURE), Fulham Shore (FUL), and Mobile Streams (MOS). These companies are all part of the "chemicals" industry.

How does James Latham compare to Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust?

Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust (LON:SLI) and James Latham (LON:LTHM) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

James Latham has higher revenue and earnings than Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust. Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than James Latham, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust£29.95M0.00N/A£21.50N/A
James Latham£376.81M0.54£22.24M£87.5011.53

James Latham has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. James Latham's return on equity of 7.92% beat Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Standard Life Investments Property Income TrustN/A N/A N/A
James Latham 4.68%7.92%6.46%

In the previous week, James Latham had 1 more articles in the media than Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Latham and 0 mentions for Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust. Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled James Latham'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust Neutral
James Latham Neutral

Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share. James Latham pays an annual dividend of GBX 35.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. James Latham pays out 40.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

2.4% of James Latham shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.9% of James Latham shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

James Latham beats Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Latham compare to Seeing Machines?

James Latham (LON:LTHM) and Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

James Latham has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. James Latham's return on equity of 7.92% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Latham4.68% 7.92% 6.46%
Seeing Machines -49.30%-91.82%-13.61%

2.4% of James Latham shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.7% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.9% of James Latham shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

James Latham has a beta of 0.737, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.527, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

James Latham has higher revenue and earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than James Latham, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Latham£376.81M0.54£22.24M£87.5011.53
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.83-£46.78M-£0.64N/A

In the previous week, James Latham had 1 more articles in the media than Seeing Machines. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Latham and 0 mentions for Seeing Machines. James Latham's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seeing Machines'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
James Latham Neutral
Seeing Machines Neutral

Summary

James Latham beats Seeing Machines on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Latham compare to PureCircle?

PureCircle (LON:PURE) and James Latham (LON:LTHM) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

James Latham has higher revenue and earnings than PureCircle. PureCircle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than James Latham, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PureCircle£121.14M0.00N/A-£35.80N/A
James Latham£376.81M0.54£22.24M£87.5011.53

In the previous week, James Latham had 1 more articles in the media than PureCircle. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Latham and 0 mentions for PureCircle. PureCircle's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled James Latham'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PureCircle Neutral
James Latham Neutral

James Latham has a net margin of 4.68% compared to PureCircle's net margin of 0.00%. James Latham's return on equity of 7.92% beat PureCircle's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PureCircleN/A N/A N/A
James Latham 4.68%7.92%6.46%

2.4% of James Latham shares are held by institutional investors. 18.9% of James Latham shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

James Latham beats PureCircle on 9 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Latham compare to Fulham Shore?

Fulham Shore (LON:FUL) and James Latham (LON:LTHM) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

James Latham has higher revenue and earnings than Fulham Shore.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulham Shore£93.13M0.00£1.52MN/AN/A
James Latham£376.81M0.54£22.24M£87.5011.53

25.4% of Fulham Shore shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.4% of James Latham shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.1% of Fulham Shore shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.9% of James Latham shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, James Latham had 1 more articles in the media than Fulham Shore. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Latham and 0 mentions for Fulham Shore. Fulham Shore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled James Latham'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fulham Shore Neutral
James Latham Neutral

James Latham has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Fulham Shore's net margin of 1.63%. James Latham's return on equity of 7.92% beat Fulham Shore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulham Shore1.63% 3.91% 1.17%
James Latham 4.68%7.92%6.46%

Fulham Shore has a beta of 1.8, suggesting that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Latham has a beta of 0.737, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

James Latham beats Fulham Shore on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Latham compare to Mobile Streams?

James Latham (LON:LTHM) and Mobile Streams (LON:MOS) are both small-cap chemicals companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, James Latham had 1 more articles in the media than Mobile Streams. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Latham and 0 mentions for Mobile Streams. James Latham's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mobile Streams'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
James Latham Neutral
Mobile Streams Neutral

2.4% of James Latham shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Mobile Streams shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.9% of James Latham shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.0% of Mobile Streams shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

James Latham has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Mobile Streams' net margin of -191.71%. James Latham's return on equity of 7.92% beat Mobile Streams' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Latham4.68% 7.92% 6.46%
Mobile Streams -191.71%-104.54%-58.95%

James Latham has higher revenue and earnings than Mobile Streams. Mobile Streams is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than James Latham, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Latham£376.81M0.54£22.24M£87.5011.53
Mobile Streams£1.41M28.89-£1.63M-£0.03N/A

James Latham has a beta of 0.737, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mobile Streams has a beta of -0.4, suggesting that its share price is 140% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

James Latham beats Mobile Streams on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get James Latham News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LTHM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LTHM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LTHM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricJames LathamLumber & Wood Production IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£203.41M£1.37B£4.90B£2.81B
Dividend Yield3.58%16.08%4.99%6.08%
P/E Ratio11.5315.6223.30365.45
Price / Sales0.5416.087,477.7387,990.19
Price / Cash6.7416.1027.3827.89
Price / Book0.940.936.797.75
Net Income£22.24M-£58.01M£157.24M£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.41%5.55%1.62%1.40%
1 Month Performance-0.85%0.78%1.72%4.10%
1 Year Performance-9.51%-5.64%77.85%69.73%

James Latham Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LTHM
James Latham
N/AGBX 1,009
+0.4%		N/A-5.8%£203.41M£376.81M11.531,350
SLI
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£312.43M£29.95M3.672,021
SEE
Seeing Machines
N/AGBX 4.85
+2.3%		N/A+94.0%£227.50M£59.92MN/A16,300
PURE
PureCircle
N/AN/AN/AN/A£183.53M£121.14MN/A10
FUL
Fulham Shore
N/AN/AN/AN/A£89.23M£93.13M975.007,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:LTHM) was last updated on 5/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
BNZI Breakout Watch: AI Growth Meets Turnaround Setup!
Banzai International (NASDAQ: BNZI) reported full-year 2025 revenue of $12.2 million, up 169% year-over-year, ...
Huge Alerts | Sponsoredtc pixel
Hey, it's Jon Najarian. The SpaceX IPO is right around the corner. But I discovered Elon may have something BIGGER planned. Check this out before June 9th...
After being invited to the SpaceX launch headquarters in Cape Canaveral from one of Elon's top lobbyists… Hall...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
The math on the SpaceX IPO is broken
SpaceX is expected to go public at a $1.75 trillion valuation. For investors to see a 10x return, the company ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
A 25,000% opportunity
Angel investor Jason Calacanis - who made a fortune on an early Uber stake - says Elon Musk's latest project c...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
I paid $5,000 to hear Elon say this
One investor paid $5,000 to be in a private room with Elon Musk in Los Angeles - and what he heard confirmed a...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
This Tech Could Be Bigger Than Apple, Amazon, and Microsoft Combined
A breakthrough technology backed by Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang may hold the answer to ...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
The AI Shakeout Is Coming — Most Investors Won’t Survive
Every major tech shift follows the same pattern: hype, a brutal shakeout, then a handful of winners that take ...
Prosperity Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SMX Could Be One of the Most Interesting Small Caps Right Now
SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited is developing molecular-level markers embedded into plastics, fuels, met...
Smallcaps Daily | Sponsoredtc pixel