Fidelity Asian Values (FAS) Competitors

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and Pantheon International (LON:PIN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Is FAS or PIN more profitable?

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 50.86% compared to Pantheon International's net margin of 42.61%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 3.04% beat Pantheon International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values	50.86%	3.04%	0.25%
Pantheon International	42.61%	1.39%	1.05%

Does the media prefer FAS or PIN?

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values had 1 more articles in the media than Pantheon International. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values and 1 mentions for Pantheon International. Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Pantheon International's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity Asian Values is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Pantheon International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Which has more volatility and risk, FAS or PIN?

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pantheon International has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Which has higher valuation and earnings, FAS or PIN?

Pantheon International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Pantheon International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values	£36.28M	10.53	£11.42M	£0.46	1,282.50
Pantheon International	£4.38M	344.75	£31.00M	-£0.01	-23,728.28

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of FAS or PIN?

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of Pantheon International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Pantheon International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats Pantheon International on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.