Free Trial

Wizz Financial (FIN) Competitors

Wizz Financial logo
GBX 8 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 11:54 AM Eastern

FIN vs. MMX, PULS, CLBS, GLAN, and BIRD

Should you buy Wizz Financial stock or one of its competitors? Wizz Financial's main competitors and comparable companies include Minds and Machines Group (MMX), Pulsar Group (PULS), Celebrus Technologies (CLBS), Glantus (GLAN), and Blackbird (BIRD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "software" industry.

How does Wizz Financial compare to Minds and Machines Group?

Minds and Machines Group (LON:MMX) and Wizz Financial (LON:FIN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and earnings.

Minds and Machines Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Wizz Financial's net margin of -18.79%. Minds and Machines Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Wizz Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Minds and Machines GroupN/A N/A N/A
Wizz Financial -18.79%-111.47%12.56%

In the previous week, Wizz Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Minds and Machines Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wizz Financial and 0 mentions for Minds and Machines Group. Wizz Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Minds and Machines Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Wizz Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Minds and Machines Group Neutral
Wizz Financial Positive

Wizz Financial has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Minds and Machines Group. Wizz Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minds and Machines Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Minds and Machines Group£14.57M0.00N/A£0.30N/A
Wizz Financial£11.94M0.47£2.46M-£3.64N/A

1.5% of Wizz Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Wizz Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Minds and Machines Group and Wizz Financial tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wizz Financial compare to Pulsar Group?

Wizz Financial (LON:FIN) and Pulsar Group (LON:PULS) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Wizz Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Pulsar Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wizz Financial and 0 mentions for Pulsar Group. Wizz Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Pulsar Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Wizz Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wizz Financial Positive
Pulsar Group Neutral

1.5% of Wizz Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Pulsar Group shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Wizz Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 44.6% of Pulsar Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pulsar Group has a net margin of -11.97% compared to Wizz Financial's net margin of -18.79%. Pulsar Group's return on equity of -21.57% beat Wizz Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wizz Financial-18.79% -111.47% 12.56%
Pulsar Group -11.97%-21.57%0.02%

Wizz Financial has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pulsar Group has a beta of 0.088, meaning that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

Wizz Financial has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pulsar Group. Pulsar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wizz Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wizz Financial£11.94M0.47£2.46M-£3.64N/A
Pulsar Group£64.07M0.31-£6.53M-£5.44N/A

Summary

Wizz Financial beats Pulsar Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wizz Financial compare to Celebrus Technologies?

Celebrus Technologies (LON:CLBS) and Wizz Financial (LON:FIN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, Wizz Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Celebrus Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wizz Financial and 0 mentions for Celebrus Technologies. Wizz Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Celebrus Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Wizz Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celebrus Technologies Neutral
Wizz Financial Positive

Celebrus Technologies presently has a consensus price target of GBX 150, suggesting a potential upside of 163.16%. Given Celebrus Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Celebrus Technologies is more favorable than Wizz Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celebrus Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Wizz Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Celebrus Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Wizz Financial. Celebrus Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wizz Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celebrus Technologies£23.59M0.90£4.03M-£1.21N/A
Wizz Financial£11.94M0.47£2.46M-£3.64N/A

Celebrus Technologies has a net margin of -2.17% compared to Wizz Financial's net margin of -18.79%. Celebrus Technologies' return on equity of -1.32% beat Wizz Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celebrus Technologies-2.17% -1.32% 6.33%
Wizz Financial -18.79%-111.47%12.56%

Celebrus Technologies has a beta of 0.878, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wizz Financial has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

18.5% of Celebrus Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Wizz Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 18.6% of Celebrus Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.2% of Wizz Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Celebrus Technologies beats Wizz Financial on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wizz Financial compare to Glantus?

Wizz Financial (LON:FIN) and Glantus (LON:GLAN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Wizz Financial has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Glantus has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Wizz Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Glantus. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wizz Financial and 0 mentions for Glantus. Wizz Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Glantus' score of 0.00 indicating that Wizz Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wizz Financial Positive
Glantus Neutral

Wizz Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Glantus. Wizz Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glantus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wizz Financial£11.94M0.47£2.46M-£3.64N/A
Glantus£9.72M0.00-£6.17M-£0.14N/A

Wizz Financial has a net margin of -18.79% compared to Glantus' net margin of -63.48%. Glantus' return on equity of -101.18% beat Wizz Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wizz Financial-18.79% -111.47% 12.56%
Glantus -63.48%-101.18%-9.00%

1.5% of Wizz Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.7% of Glantus shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Wizz Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 62.3% of Glantus shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Wizz Financial beats Glantus on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wizz Financial compare to Blackbird?

Wizz Financial (LON:FIN) and Blackbird (LON:BIRD) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

1.5% of Wizz Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of Blackbird shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Wizz Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of Blackbird shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Wizz Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Blackbird. Blackbird is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wizz Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wizz Financial£11.94M0.47£2.46M-£3.64N/A
Blackbird£1.34M15.12-£2.48M-£0.54N/A

Wizz Financial has a net margin of -18.79% compared to Blackbird's net margin of -189.99%. Blackbird's return on equity of -39.59% beat Wizz Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wizz Financial-18.79% -111.47% 12.56%
Blackbird -189.99%-39.59%-17.94%

In the previous week, Blackbird had 8 more articles in the media than Wizz Financial. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Blackbird and 1 mentions for Wizz Financial. Wizz Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Blackbird's score of -0.04 indicating that Wizz Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Wizz Financial
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Blackbird
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Wizz Financial has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackbird has a beta of 0.834, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Wizz Financial beats Blackbird on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Wizz Financial News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FIN vs. The Competition

MetricWizz FinancialSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£5.64M£15.71B£26.72B£2.84B
Dividend YieldN/A3.38%2.89%5.10%
P/E Ratio-2.2048.2644.4623.37
Price / Sales0.476.135.645.03
Price / Cash0.0028.0927.7520.23
Price / Book2.026.245.312.45
Net Income£2.46M£424.69M£786.79M£5.88B
7 Day Performance11.11%-0.42%0.95%0.83%
1 Month Performance60.00%-4.32%-8.17%-1.81%
1 Year Performance-46.84%-10.54%1.91%7.19%

Wizz Financial Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FIN
Wizz Financial
N/AGBX 8
flat
N/A-41.2%£5.64M£11.94MN/A18,201
MMX
Minds and Machines Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£23.60M£14.57M29.009,400
PULS
Pulsar Group
N/AGBX 14.75
flat
N/AN/A£20M£64.07MN/A1,101
CLBS
Celebrus Technologies
1.9839 of 5 stars
GBX 49.50
-0.6%
GBX 150
+203.0%
-60.6%£18.30M£23.59MN/A151
GLAN
Glantus
N/AN/AN/AN/A£17.13M£9.72MN/A106

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FIN) was last updated on 11/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners