Go Pro

WizzFinancial (FIN) Competitors

WizzFinancial logo
GBX 7.92 +0.92 (+13.14%)
As of 12:03 PM Eastern

FIN vs. CRTA, GLAN, INSG, APPS, and ALT

Should you buy WizzFinancial stock or one of its competitors? WizzFinancial's main competitors and comparable companies include Cirata (CRTA), Glantus (GLAN), Insig AI (INSG), Appscatter Group (APPS), and Altitude Group (ALT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "software" industry.

How does WizzFinancial compare to Cirata?

Cirata (LON:CRTA) and WizzFinancial (LON:FIN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Cirata presently has a consensus price target of GBX 44, indicating a potential upside of 284.28%. Given Cirata's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Cirata is more favorable than WizzFinancial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cirata
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
WizzFinancial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, WizzFinancial had 1 more articles in the media than Cirata. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for WizzFinancial and 0 mentions for Cirata. Cirata's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled WizzFinancial'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cirata Neutral
WizzFinancial Neutral

Cirata has a beta of 1.606, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WizzFinancial has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

WizzFinancial has higher revenue and earnings than Cirata. WizzFinancial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cirata, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cirata£11.87M1.55-£44.87M-£6.00N/A
WizzFinancial£12.43M0.45£2.46M-£1.92N/A

WizzFinancial has a net margin of -8.95% compared to Cirata's net margin of -58.41%. WizzFinancial's return on equity of -43.85% beat Cirata's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cirata-58.41% -90.39% -126.55%
WizzFinancial -8.95%-43.85%12.56%

0.9% of Cirata shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of WizzFinancial shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.6% of Cirata shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.2% of WizzFinancial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

WizzFinancial beats Cirata on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WizzFinancial compare to Glantus?

WizzFinancial (LON:FIN) and Glantus (LON:GLAN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

1.5% of WizzFinancial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.7% of Glantus shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of WizzFinancial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 62.3% of Glantus shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

WizzFinancial has a net margin of -8.95% compared to Glantus' net margin of -63.48%. WizzFinancial's return on equity of -43.85% beat Glantus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WizzFinancial-8.95% -43.85% 12.56%
Glantus -63.48%-101.18%-9.00%

WizzFinancial has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Glantus has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

WizzFinancial has higher revenue and earnings than Glantus. WizzFinancial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glantus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WizzFinancial£12.43M0.45£2.46M-£1.92N/A
Glantus£9.72M0.00-£6.17M-£0.14N/A

In the previous week, WizzFinancial had 1 more articles in the media than Glantus. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for WizzFinancial and 0 mentions for Glantus. WizzFinancial's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Glantus'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
WizzFinancial Neutral
Glantus Neutral

Summary

WizzFinancial beats Glantus on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WizzFinancial compare to Insig AI?

Insig AI (LON:INSG) and WizzFinancial (LON:FIN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and risk.

WizzFinancial has higher revenue and earnings than Insig AI. Insig AI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WizzFinancial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Insig AI£801.53K20.25-£18.73M-£1.15N/A
WizzFinancial£12.43M0.45£2.46M-£1.92N/A

WizzFinancial has a net margin of -8.95% compared to Insig AI's net margin of -525.23%. Insig AI's return on equity of 240.59% beat WizzFinancial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Insig AI-525.23% 240.59% -11.07%
WizzFinancial -8.95%-43.85%12.56%

Insig AI has a beta of -0.57, suggesting that its stock price is 157% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WizzFinancial has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, WizzFinancial had 1 more articles in the media than Insig AI. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for WizzFinancial and 0 mentions for Insig AI. Insig AI's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled WizzFinancial'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Insig AI Neutral
WizzFinancial Neutral

0.4% of Insig AI shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of WizzFinancial shares are held by institutional investors. 27.4% of Insig AI shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.2% of WizzFinancial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

WizzFinancial beats Insig AI on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WizzFinancial compare to Appscatter Group?

WizzFinancial (LON:FIN) and Appscatter Group (LON:APPS) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

Appscatter Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to WizzFinancial's net margin of -8.95%. Appscatter Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat WizzFinancial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WizzFinancial-8.95% -43.85% 12.56%
Appscatter Group N/A N/A N/A

1.5% of WizzFinancial shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of WizzFinancial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, WizzFinancial had 1 more articles in the media than Appscatter Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for WizzFinancial and 0 mentions for Appscatter Group. WizzFinancial's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Appscatter Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
WizzFinancial Neutral
Appscatter Group Neutral

WizzFinancial has higher revenue and earnings than Appscatter Group. WizzFinancial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Appscatter Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WizzFinancial£12.43M0.45£2.46M-£1.92N/A
Appscatter Group£758.10K0.00N/A-£13.80N/A

Summary

WizzFinancial beats Appscatter Group on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WizzFinancial compare to Altitude Group?

WizzFinancial (LON:FIN) and Altitude Group (LON:ALT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, WizzFinancial had 1 more articles in the media than Altitude Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for WizzFinancial and 0 mentions for Altitude Group. WizzFinancial's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Altitude Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
WizzFinancial Neutral
Altitude Group Neutral

1.5% of WizzFinancial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Altitude Group shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of WizzFinancial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 36.5% of Altitude Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Altitude Group has a net margin of -1.59% compared to WizzFinancial's net margin of -8.95%. Altitude Group's return on equity of -4.69% beat WizzFinancial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WizzFinancial-8.95% -43.85% 12.56%
Altitude Group -1.59%-4.69%1.65%

WizzFinancial has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Altitude Group has a beta of 0.579, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

WizzFinancial has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Altitude Group. Altitude Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WizzFinancial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WizzFinancial£12.43M0.45£2.46M-£1.92N/A
Altitude Group£44.43M0.35£682.34K-£0.33N/A

Summary

WizzFinancial and Altitude Group tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get WizzFinancial News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FIN vs. The Competition

MetricWizzFinancialSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£5.58M£15.50B£30.02B£2.92B
Dividend YieldN/A3.42%2.73%6.22%
P/E Ratio-4.13138.3576.22366.70
Price / Sales0.451,288.86587.2883,694.80
Price / Cash0.0043.1246.8427.89
Price / Book2.008.437.826.60
Net Income£2.46M£434.48M£703.05M£5.89B
7 Day Performance23.75%-0.51%0.94%12.36%
1 Month Performance-29.60%-0.39%-1.85%1.01%
1 Year Performance-64.80%3.53%186.08%21.13%

WizzFinancial Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FIN
WizzFinancial
N/AGBX 7.92
+13.1%
N/A-69.2%£5.58M£12.43MN/A18,201
CRTA
Cirata
N/AGBX 12
-7.7%
GBX 44
+266.7%
-42.9%£19.27M£11.87MN/A112
GLAN
Glantus
N/AN/AN/AN/A£17.13M£9.72MN/A106
INSG
Insig AI
N/AGBX 13
+2.0%
N/A-44.1%£16.88M£801.53KN/A410
APPS
Appscatter Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£16.74M£758.10KN/A840

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FIN) was last updated on 9/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners