Go Pro

Ground Rents Income Fund (GRIO) Competitors

Ground Rents Income Fund logo
GBX 17.50 +0.93 (+5.63%)
As of 04:09 AM Eastern

GRIO vs. AEWL, TOWN, AIRE, RLE, and HCFT

Should you buy Ground Rents Income Fund stock or one of its competitors? Ground Rents Income Fund's main competitors and comparable companies include AEW UK Long Lease REIT (AEWL), Town Centre Securities (TOWN), Alternative Income REIT (AIRE), Real Estate Investors (RLE), and Highcroft Investments (HCFT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "diversified reits" industry.

How does Ground Rents Income Fund compare to AEW UK Long Lease REIT?

AEW UK Long Lease REIT (LON:AEWL) and Ground Rents Income Fund (LON:GRIO) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

In the previous week, Ground Rents Income Fund had 1 more articles in the media than AEW UK Long Lease REIT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ground Rents Income Fund and 0 mentions for AEW UK Long Lease REIT. AEW UK Long Lease REIT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ground Rents Income Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
AEW UK Long Lease REIT Neutral
Ground Rents Income Fund Neutral

13.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ground Rents Income Fund has a net margin of 1,164.41% compared to AEW UK Long Lease REIT's net margin of 0.00%. AEW UK Long Lease REIT's return on equity of 0.00% beat Ground Rents Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AEW UK Long Lease REITN/A N/A N/A
Ground Rents Income Fund 1,164.41%-47.94%1.71%

AEW UK Long Lease REIT has higher revenue and earnings than Ground Rents Income Fund. Ground Rents Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AEW UK Long Lease REIT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AEW UK Long Lease REIT£6.91M0.00N/A£5.30N/A
Ground Rents Income Fund-£17.02M-0.98-£23.35M-£20.80N/A

Summary

Ground Rents Income Fund beats AEW UK Long Lease REIT on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ground Rents Income Fund compare to Town Centre Securities?

Ground Rents Income Fund (LON:GRIO) and Town Centre Securities (LON:TOWN) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Ground Rents Income Fund and Ground Rents Income Fund both had 1 articles in the media. Town Centre Securities' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Ground Rents Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Town Centre Securities is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ground Rents Income Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Town Centre Securities
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Town Centre Securities has higher revenue and earnings than Ground Rents Income Fund. Town Centre Securities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ground Rents Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ground Rents Income Fund-£17.02M-0.98-£23.35M-£20.80N/A
Town Centre Securities£33.22M1.57-£7.52M-£13.70N/A

Ground Rents Income Fund has a net margin of 1,164.41% compared to Town Centre Securities' net margin of -15.27%. Town Centre Securities' return on equity of -4.75% beat Ground Rents Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ground Rents Income Fund1,164.41% -47.94% 1.71%
Town Centre Securities -15.27%-4.75%1.89%

Ground Rents Income Fund has a beta of 0.75587523, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Town Centre Securities has a beta of 0.637, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

13.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Town Centre Securities shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Town Centre Securities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Town Centre Securities beats Ground Rents Income Fund on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ground Rents Income Fund compare to Alternative Income REIT?

Alternative Income REIT (LON:AIRE) and Ground Rents Income Fund (LON:GRIO) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

0.5% of Alternative Income REIT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Alternative Income REIT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Alternative Income REIT has higher revenue and earnings than Ground Rents Income Fund. Ground Rents Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alternative Income REIT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alternative Income REIT£7.81M7.26£2.24M£8.598.21
Ground Rents Income Fund-£17.02M-0.98-£23.35M-£20.80N/A

Ground Rents Income Fund has a net margin of 1,164.41% compared to Alternative Income REIT's net margin of 77.88%. Alternative Income REIT's return on equity of 10.22% beat Ground Rents Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alternative Income REIT77.88% 10.22% 3.56%
Ground Rents Income Fund 1,164.41%-47.94%1.71%

Alternative Income REIT has a beta of 0.66938424, meaning that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ground Rents Income Fund has a beta of 0.75587523, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ground Rents Income Fund had 1 more articles in the media than Alternative Income REIT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ground Rents Income Fund and 0 mentions for Alternative Income REIT. Ground Rents Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Alternative Income REIT's score of -0.30 indicating that Ground Rents Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alternative Income REIT Neutral
Ground Rents Income Fund Neutral

Summary

Alternative Income REIT beats Ground Rents Income Fund on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ground Rents Income Fund compare to Real Estate Investors?

Real Estate Investors (LON:RLE) and Ground Rents Income Fund (LON:GRIO) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Real Estate Investors has higher revenue and earnings than Ground Rents Income Fund. Real Estate Investors is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ground Rents Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Real Estate Investors£9.37M5.90-£11.83M-£0.48N/A
Ground Rents Income Fund-£17.02M-0.98-£23.35M-£20.80N/A

Ground Rents Income Fund has a net margin of 1,164.41% compared to Real Estate Investors' net margin of -8.96%. Real Estate Investors' return on equity of -0.96% beat Ground Rents Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Real Estate Investors-8.96% -0.96% 2.46%
Ground Rents Income Fund 1,164.41%-47.94%1.71%

In the previous week, Real Estate Investors had 1 more articles in the media than Ground Rents Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Real Estate Investors and 1 mentions for Ground Rents Income Fund. Real Estate Investors' average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Ground Rents Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Real Estate Investors is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Real Estate Investors
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ground Rents Income Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Real Estate Investors has a beta of 0.367, meaning that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ground Rents Income Fund has a beta of 0.75587523, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

13.9% of Real Estate Investors shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 17.1% of Real Estate Investors shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Real Estate Investors beats Ground Rents Income Fund on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ground Rents Income Fund compare to Highcroft Investments?

Highcroft Investments (LON:HCFT) and Ground Rents Income Fund (LON:GRIO) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Ground Rents Income Fund has a net margin of 1,164.41% compared to Highcroft Investments' net margin of -218.87%. Highcroft Investments' return on equity of -18.72% beat Ground Rents Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Highcroft Investments-218.87% -18.72% 2.51%
Ground Rents Income Fund 1,164.41%-47.94%1.71%

In the previous week, Ground Rents Income Fund had 1 more articles in the media than Highcroft Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ground Rents Income Fund and 0 mentions for Highcroft Investments. Highcroft Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ground Rents Income Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Highcroft Investments Neutral
Ground Rents Income Fund Neutral

Highcroft Investments has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ground Rents Income Fund has a beta of 0.75587523, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

0.1% of Highcroft Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 91.8% of Highcroft Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Highcroft Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Ground Rents Income Fund. Ground Rents Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Highcroft Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Highcroft Investments£5.44M0.00-£11.90M-£2.29N/A
Ground Rents Income Fund-£17.02M-0.98-£23.35M-£20.80N/A

Summary

Highcroft Investments beats Ground Rents Income Fund on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ground Rents Income Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GRIO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GRIO vs. The Competition

MetricGround Rents Income FundDiversified REITs IndustryReal Estate SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£16.74M£1.49B£5.66B£2.90B
Dividend Yield6.45%13.07%6.30%6.17%
P/E Ratio-0.8410.2328.95367.67
Price / Sales-0.98270.26129.1083,454.87
Price / Cash25.3530.7734.3427.89
Price / Book0.301.171.917.31
Net Income-£23.35M£52.69M-£63.99M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.09%0.27%0.56%
1 Month Performance6.06%-2.28%-0.65%3.17%
1 Year Performance-35.42%-2.57%11.30%22.34%

Ground Rents Income Fund Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GRIO
Ground Rents Income Fund
N/AGBX 17.50
+5.6%
N/A-38.9%£16.74M-£17.02MN/A4
AEWL
AEW UK Long Lease REIT
N/AN/AN/AN/A£58.36M£6.91M13.68N/A
TOWN
Town Centre Securities
N/AGBX 135
+4.2%
N/A-2.9%£56.71M£33.22MN/A129
AIRE
Alternative Income REIT
N/AGBX 70.39
-2.0%
N/A+7.3%£56.67M£7.81M8.19220
RLE
Real Estate Investors
N/AGBX 30.75
+0.2%
N/A-3.5%£53.77M£9.37MN/A7

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GRIO) was last updated on 8/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners