Ground Rents Income Fund (GRIO) Competitors

Ground Rents Income Fund has a beta of 0.75587523, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alternative Income REIT has a beta of 0.66938424, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Alternative Income REIT had 5 more articles in the media than Ground Rents Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Alternative Income REIT and 0 mentions for Ground Rents Income Fund. Alternative Income REIT's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Ground Rents Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Alternative Income REIT is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Alternative Income REIT has higher revenue and earnings than Ground Rents Income Fund. Ground Rents Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alternative Income REIT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ground Rents Income Fund has a net margin of 1,164.41% compared to Alternative Income REIT's net margin of 77.88%. Alternative Income REIT's return on equity of 10.22% beat Ground Rents Income Fund's return on equity.

13.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Alternative Income REIT shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Alternative Income REIT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Ground Rents Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Real Estate Investors'average media sentiment score.

Ground Rents Income Fund has a beta of 0.75587523, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Real Estate Investors has a beta of 0.371, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Real Estate Investors has higher revenue and earnings than Ground Rents Income Fund. Real Estate Investors is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ground Rents Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ground Rents Income Fund has a net margin of 1,164.41% compared to Real Estate Investors' net margin of -8.96%. Real Estate Investors' return on equity of -0.96% beat Ground Rents Income Fund's return on equity.

13.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.9% of Real Estate Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Real Estate Investors shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

0.4% of Town Centre Securities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.9% of Town Centre Securities shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Town Centre Securities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ground Rents Income Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Town Centre Securities has a beta of 0.637, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ground Rents Income Fund has a beta of 0.75587523, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Ground Rents Income Fund has a net margin of 1,164.41% compared to Town Centre Securities' net margin of -15.27%. Town Centre Securities' return on equity of -4.75% beat Ground Rents Income Fund's return on equity.

Town Centre Securities has higher revenue and earnings than Ground Rents Income Fund. Town Centre Securities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ground Rents Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ground Rents Income Fund has a net margin of 1,164.41% compared to Palace Capital's net margin of -67.58%. Palace Capital's return on equity of -11.17% beat Ground Rents Income Fund's return on equity.

Ground Rents Income Fund has a beta of 0.75587523, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Palace Capital has a beta of 0.142, suggesting that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ground Rents Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Palace Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Palace Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Ground Rents Income Fund. Palace Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ground Rents Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

13.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Palace Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Ground Rents Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Palace Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.