Free Trial
→ Read this or regret it forever (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free LAND Stock Alerts

Land Securities Group (LAND) Competitors

Land Securities Group logo
GBX 580.25 +9.75 (+1.71%)
As of 05:59 AM Eastern
Compare

LAND vs. TW, SIR, SAFE, CLIN, and GROW

Should you buy Land Securities Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Land Securities Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Land Securities Group include Taylor Wimpey (TW), Secure Income REIT (SIR), Safestore (SAFE), Clinigen Group (CLIN), and Molten Ventures (GROW). These companies are all part of the "trading" industry.

How does Land Securities Group compare to Taylor Wimpey?

Land Securities Group (LON:LAND) and Taylor Wimpey (LON:TW) are both mid-cap trading companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Land Securities Group had 1 more articles in the media than Taylor Wimpey. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Land Securities Group and 10 mentions for Taylor Wimpey. Land Securities Group's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Taylor Wimpey's score of 0.50 indicating that Land Securities Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Land Securities Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Taylor Wimpey
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Land Securities Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 31.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Taylor Wimpey pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.7%. Land Securities Group pays out 93.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Taylor Wimpey pays out 145.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Land Securities Group has a beta of 1.131, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Taylor Wimpey has a beta of 1.298, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Taylor Wimpey has higher revenue and earnings than Land Securities Group. Taylor Wimpey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Land Securities Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Land Securities Group£869M4.97-£318.80M£33.3017.42
Taylor Wimpey£3.45B0.82£250.27M£6.8511.49

Land Securities Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 642.78, indicating a potential upside of 10.78%. Taylor Wimpey has a consensus target price of GBX 112, indicating a potential upside of 42.17%. Given Taylor Wimpey's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Taylor Wimpey is more favorable than Land Securities Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Land Securities Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Taylor Wimpey
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Land Securities Group has a net margin of 27.98% compared to Taylor Wimpey's net margin of 2.61%. Land Securities Group's return on equity of 3.85% beat Taylor Wimpey's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Land Securities Group27.98% 3.85% 2.40%
Taylor Wimpey 2.61%2.40%4.08%

50.3% of Land Securities Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.7% of Taylor Wimpey shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Land Securities Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Taylor Wimpey shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Land Securities Group beats Taylor Wimpey on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Land Securities Group compare to Secure Income REIT?

Secure Income REIT (LON:SIR) and Land Securities Group (LON:LAND) are both real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

50.3% of Land Securities Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Land Securities Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Secure Income REIT pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.15 per share. Land Securities Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 31.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Secure Income REIT pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Land Securities Group pays out 93.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Land Securities Group has a net margin of 27.98% compared to Secure Income REIT's net margin of 0.00%. Land Securities Group's return on equity of 3.85% beat Secure Income REIT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Secure Income REITN/A N/A N/A
Land Securities Group 27.98%3.85%2.40%

Land Securities Group has a consensus target price of GBX 642.78, indicating a potential upside of 10.78%. Given Land Securities Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Land Securities Group is more favorable than Secure Income REIT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Secure Income REIT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Land Securities Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Land Securities Group had 10 more articles in the media than Secure Income REIT. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Land Securities Group and 1 mentions for Secure Income REIT. Land Securities Group's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Secure Income REIT's score of -0.64 indicating that Land Securities Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Secure Income REIT
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Land Securities Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Secure Income REIT has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Land Securities Group. Secure Income REIT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Land Securities Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Secure Income REIT£122.40M0.00N/A£0.62N/A
Land Securities Group£869M4.97-£318.80M£33.3017.42

Summary

Land Securities Group beats Secure Income REIT on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Land Securities Group compare to Safestore?

Land Securities Group (LON:LAND) and Safestore (LON:SAFE) are both real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Safestore has a net margin of 47.44% compared to Land Securities Group's net margin of 27.98%. Safestore's return on equity of 4.88% beat Land Securities Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Land Securities Group27.98% 3.85% 2.40%
Safestore 47.44%4.88%2.81%

In the previous week, Land Securities Group had 10 more articles in the media than Safestore. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Land Securities Group and 1 mentions for Safestore. Land Securities Group's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Safestore's score of 0.75 indicating that Land Securities Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Land Securities Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Safestore
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Safestore has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Land Securities Group. Safestore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Land Securities Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Land Securities Group£869M4.97-£318.80M£33.3017.42
Safestore£234.30M6.15£263.67M£50.6013.03

50.3% of Land Securities Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.9% of Safestore shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Land Securities Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.9% of Safestore shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Land Securities Group has a beta of 1.131, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safestore has a beta of 1.168, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Land Securities Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 642.78, indicating a potential upside of 10.78%. Safestore has a consensus price target of GBX 751, indicating a potential upside of 13.87%. Given Safestore's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Safestore is more favorable than Land Securities Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Land Securities Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Safestore
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Land Securities Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 31.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Safestore pays an annual dividend of GBX 30.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Land Securities Group pays out 93.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Safestore pays out 60.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Safestore beats Land Securities Group on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Land Securities Group compare to Clinigen Group?

Clinigen Group (LON:CLIN) and Land Securities Group (LON:LAND) are both trading companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Land Securities Group has a net margin of 27.98% compared to Clinigen Group's net margin of 0.00%. Land Securities Group's return on equity of 3.85% beat Clinigen Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Clinigen GroupN/A N/A N/A
Land Securities Group 27.98%3.85%2.40%

In the previous week, Land Securities Group had 11 more articles in the media than Clinigen Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Land Securities Group and 0 mentions for Clinigen Group. Land Securities Group's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Clinigen Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Land Securities Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Clinigen Group Neutral
Land Securities Group Positive

Clinigen Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Land Securities Group. Clinigen Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Land Securities Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clinigen Group£565.60M0.00N/A£14.30N/A
Land Securities Group£869M4.97-£318.80M£33.3017.42

50.3% of Land Securities Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Land Securities Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Land Securities Group has a consensus price target of GBX 642.78, indicating a potential upside of 10.78%. Given Land Securities Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Land Securities Group is more favorable than Clinigen Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Clinigen Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Land Securities Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Clinigen Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.08 per share. Land Securities Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 31.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Clinigen Group pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Land Securities Group pays out 93.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Land Securities Group beats Clinigen Group on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Land Securities Group compare to Molten Ventures?

Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) and Land Securities Group (LON:LAND) are both trading companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

41.3% of Molten Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.3% of Land Securities Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Land Securities Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Molten Ventures currently has a consensus price target of GBX 599.67, indicating a potential upside of 0.04%. Land Securities Group has a consensus price target of GBX 642.78, indicating a potential upside of 10.78%. Given Land Securities Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Land Securities Group is more favorable than Molten Ventures.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Land Securities Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 193.06% compared to Land Securities Group's net margin of 27.98%. Molten Ventures' return on equity of 8.81% beat Land Securities Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Molten Ventures193.06% 8.81% -3.46%
Land Securities Group 27.98%3.85%2.40%

In the previous week, Land Securities Group had 10 more articles in the media than Molten Ventures. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Land Securities Group and 1 mentions for Molten Ventures. Land Securities Group's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Molten Ventures' score of 0.29 indicating that Land Securities Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Molten Ventures
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Land Securities Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Molten Ventures has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Land Securities Group. Molten Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Land Securities Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Molten Ventures£125.60M8.22-£33.58M£61.609.73
Land Securities Group£869M4.97-£318.80M£33.3017.42

Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.93827, suggesting that its stock price is 94% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Land Securities Group has a beta of 1.131, suggesting that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Molten Ventures and Land Securities Group tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Land Securities Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LAND and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAND and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LAND vs. The Competition

Export
MetricLand Securities GroupREIT IndustryReal Estate SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£4.32B£1.12B£1.90B£2.78B
Dividend Yield13.49%11.44%6.93%6.09%
P/E Ratio17.4215.3127.17365.94
Price / Sales4.97419.39842.9288,399.10
Price / Cash98.03127.7868.0627.89
Price / Book0.670.761.307.72
Net Income-£318.80M£51.66M-£124.57M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.41%-0.46%-0.72%0.49%
1 Month Performance-2.29%-0.74%-0.30%2.48%
1 Year Performance-1.98%2.11%3.91%87.19%

Land Securities Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LAND
Land Securities Group
3.9612 of 5 stars		GBX 581
+1.8%		GBX 642.78
+10.6%		-3.5%£4.33B£869M17.45598
TW
Taylor Wimpey
4.7719 of 5 stars		GBX 79.08
-0.5%		GBX 114.60
+44.9%		-32.1%£2.84B£3.45B11.541,090
SIR
Secure Income REIT
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.49B£122.40M743.55N/A
SAFE
Safestore
3.5329 of 5 stars		GBX 667.69
+1.6%		GBX 751
+12.5%		+4.3%£1.46B£234.30M13.20120
CLIN
Clinigen Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.23B£565.60M64.691,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:LAND) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Is this AI lab Elon’s SpaceX lifeline?
Elon Musk went from calling one AI lab 'evil' to striking a deal giving it access to SpaceX's entire Colossus ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
The one number Musk can't hide in the S-1
When SpaceX files its S-1 in June, one number will stand out - power consumption. Running 1 million GPUs requi...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran's New Leader Just Said Something That Should Terrify Every American
Iran's Supreme Leader has declared the Strait of Hormuz closed as leverage against the U.S. - and with 40% of ...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
Collect $1,170 a month from silver
I've Rarely Seen This With Silver This combination - 20% dividends + 68% share appreciation - never happens...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
The system holding the dollar together is gone…
Saudi Arabia has terminated its 1974 petrodollar agreement with the United States - the deal that forced every...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX IPO Warning: Before you buy any SpaceX shares, read this.
The SpaceX IPO is valued at $1.75 trillion - but buying shares directly may not be the strongest play availabl...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
This is the worst news for stocks in 50 years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are issuing a rare warning: what's ahead for U.S. stocks could be the worst e...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel