Land Securities Group (LAND) Competitors

Land Securities Group logo
GBX 618.50 -5.00 (-0.80%)
As of 08:33 AM Eastern

LAND vs. TW, SIR, SAFE, CLIN, and GROW

Should you buy Land Securities Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Land Securities Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Land Securities Group include Taylor Wimpey (TW), Secure Income REIT (SIR), Safestore (SAFE), Clinigen Group (CLIN), and Molten Ventures (GROW). These companies are all part of the "trading" industry.

How does Land Securities Group compare to Taylor Wimpey?

Land Securities Group (LON:LAND) and Taylor Wimpey (LON:TW) are both mid-cap trading companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Land Securities Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 641.33, suggesting a potential upside of 3.69%. Taylor Wimpey has a consensus target price of GBX 109, suggesting a potential upside of 36.66%. Given Taylor Wimpey's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Taylor Wimpey is more favorable than Land Securities Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Land Securities Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Taylor Wimpey
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Taylor Wimpey has higher revenue and earnings than Land Securities Group. Taylor Wimpey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Land Securities Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Land Securities Group£870M5.30-£318.80M£45.9013.47
Taylor Wimpey£3.45B0.83£250.27M£6.8511.64

50.3% of Land Securities Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.7% of Taylor Wimpey shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Land Securities Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Taylor Wimpey shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Land Securities Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 31.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Taylor Wimpey pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.5%. Land Securities Group pays out 68.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Taylor Wimpey pays out 145.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Land Securities Group has a net margin of 38.45% compared to Taylor Wimpey's net margin of 2.61%. Land Securities Group's return on equity of 5.29% beat Taylor Wimpey's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Land Securities Group38.45% 5.29% 2.40%
Taylor Wimpey 2.61%2.40%4.08%

Land Securities Group has a beta of 1.148, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Taylor Wimpey has a beta of 1.312, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Land Securities Group and Land Securities Group both had 2 articles in the media. Land Securities Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Taylor Wimpey's score of 0.51 indicating that Land Securities Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Land Securities Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Taylor Wimpey
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Land Securities Group beats Taylor Wimpey on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Land Securities Group compare to Secure Income REIT?

Land Securities Group (LON:LAND) and Secure Income REIT (LON:SIR) are both real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

Land Securities Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 641.33, indicating a potential upside of 3.69%. Given Land Securities Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Land Securities Group is more favorable than Secure Income REIT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Land Securities Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Secure Income REIT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Land Securities Group has a net margin of 38.45% compared to Secure Income REIT's net margin of 0.00%. Land Securities Group's return on equity of 5.29% beat Secure Income REIT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Land Securities Group38.45% 5.29% 2.40%
Secure Income REIT N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Land Securities Group had 2 more articles in the media than Secure Income REIT. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Land Securities Group and 0 mentions for Secure Income REIT. Land Securities Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Secure Income REIT's score of 0.00 indicating that Land Securities Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Land Securities Group Positive
Secure Income REIT Neutral

Secure Income REIT has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Land Securities Group. Secure Income REIT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Land Securities Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Land Securities Group£870M5.30-£318.80M£45.9013.47
Secure Income REIT£122.40M0.00N/A£0.62N/A

50.3% of Land Securities Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Land Securities Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Land Securities Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 31.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Secure Income REIT pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.15 per share. Land Securities Group pays out 68.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Secure Income REIT pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Land Securities Group beats Secure Income REIT on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Land Securities Group compare to Safestore?

Safestore (LON:SAFE) and Land Securities Group (LON:LAND) are both real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Land Securities Group has a net margin of 38.45% compared to Safestore's net margin of 26.93%. Land Securities Group's return on equity of 5.29% beat Safestore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safestore26.93% 2.86% 2.81%
Land Securities Group 38.45%5.29%2.40%

Safestore pays an annual dividend of GBX 30.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Land Securities Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 31.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Safestore pays out 60.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Land Securities Group pays out 68.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Safestore is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Land Securities Group had 2 more articles in the media than Safestore. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Land Securities Group and 0 mentions for Safestore. Land Securities Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Safestore's score of 0.00 indicating that Land Securities Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Safestore Neutral
Land Securities Group Positive

Safestore has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Land Securities Group. Safestore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Land Securities Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safestore£242.10M5.23£263.67M£50.6011.45
Land Securities Group£870M5.30-£318.80M£45.9013.47

Safestore has a beta of 1.143, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Land Securities Group has a beta of 1.148, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

57.3% of Safestore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.3% of Land Securities Group shares are held by institutional investors. 7.9% of Safestore shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Land Securities Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Safestore currently has a consensus target price of GBX 824, suggesting a potential upside of 42.19%. Land Securities Group has a consensus target price of GBX 641.33, suggesting a potential upside of 3.69%. Given Safestore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Safestore is more favorable than Land Securities Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safestore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Land Securities Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Safestore and Land Securities Group tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Land Securities Group compare to Clinigen Group?

Clinigen Group (LON:CLIN) and Land Securities Group (LON:LAND) are both trading companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Clinigen Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Land Securities Group. Clinigen Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Land Securities Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clinigen Group£565.60M0.00N/A£14.30N/A
Land Securities Group£870M5.30-£318.80M£45.9013.47

In the previous week, Land Securities Group had 2 more articles in the media than Clinigen Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Land Securities Group and 0 mentions for Clinigen Group. Land Securities Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Clinigen Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Land Securities Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Clinigen Group Neutral
Land Securities Group Positive

Land Securities Group has a net margin of 38.45% compared to Clinigen Group's net margin of 0.00%. Land Securities Group's return on equity of 5.29% beat Clinigen Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Clinigen GroupN/A N/A N/A
Land Securities Group 38.45%5.29%2.40%

50.3% of Land Securities Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Land Securities Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Clinigen Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.08 per share. Land Securities Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 31.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Clinigen Group pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Land Securities Group pays out 68.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Land Securities Group has a consensus target price of GBX 641.33, indicating a potential upside of 3.69%. Given Land Securities Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Land Securities Group is more favorable than Clinigen Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Clinigen Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Land Securities Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Land Securities Group beats Clinigen Group on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Land Securities Group compare to Molten Ventures?

Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) and Land Securities Group (LON:LAND) are both trading companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Molten Ventures had 1 more articles in the media than Land Securities Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Molten Ventures and 2 mentions for Land Securities Group. Molten Ventures' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Land Securities Group's score of 0.67 indicating that Molten Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Molten Ventures
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Land Securities Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 193.06% compared to Land Securities Group's net margin of 38.45%. Molten Ventures' return on equity of 8.51% beat Land Securities Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Molten Ventures193.06% 8.51% -3.46%
Land Securities Group 38.45%5.29%2.40%

Molten Ventures presently has a consensus price target of GBX 638.67, suggesting a potential upside of 12.64%. Land Securities Group has a consensus price target of GBX 641.33, suggesting a potential upside of 3.69%. Given Molten Ventures' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Molten Ventures is more favorable than Land Securities Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Land Securities Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

41.3% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.3% of Land Securities Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Land Securities Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Molten Ventures has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Land Securities Group. Molten Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Land Securities Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Molten Ventures£125.60M7.77-£33.58M£61.609.20
Land Securities Group£870M5.30-£318.80M£45.9013.47

Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.9414055, suggesting that its stock price is 94% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Land Securities Group has a beta of 1.148, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Molten Ventures beats Land Securities Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Land Securities Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LAND and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAND and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LAND vs. The Competition

MetricLand Securities GroupREIT IndustryReal Estate SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£4.61B£1.15B£1.97B£2.77B
Dividend Yield14.31%13.89%7.21%6.16%
P/E Ratio13.4715.0229.51365.58
Price / Sales5.30419.56380.5186,302.69
Price / Cash98.03127.7867.9427.85
Price / Book0.710.761.337.92
Net Income-£318.80M£51.66M-£124.57M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-6.32%-0.90%3.36%-1.02%
1 Month Performance-1.83%-1.31%3.10%-0.98%
1 Year Performance-0.40%0.63%3.70%72.40%

Land Securities Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LAND
Land Securities Group
3.8492 of 5 stars
GBX 618.50
-0.8%
GBX 641.33
+3.7%
-0.2%£4.61B£870M13.47598
TW
Taylor Wimpey
4.7691 of 5 stars
GBX 76.90
+0.3%
GBX 109
+41.7%
-34.1%£2.76B£3.45B11.221,090
SIR
Secure Income REIT
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.49B£122.40M743.55N/A
SAFE
Safestore
4.0721 of 5 stars
GBX 610
-0.3%
GBX 824
+35.1%
-11.9%£1.33B£242.10M12.06120
CLIN
Clinigen Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.23B£565.60M64.691,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:LAND) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners