Go Pro
→ The retirement stock I'd buy before Nvidia today (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free HAMA Stock Alerts

Hamak Gold (HAMA) Competitors

Hamak Gold logo
GBX 0.72 +0.05 (+6.81%)
As of 09/3/2026 12:35 PM Eastern
Compare

HAMA vs. LEX, XTR, SGZ, GRL, and WSBN

Should you buy Hamak Gold stock or one of its competitors? Hamak Gold's main competitors and comparable companies include Lexington Gold (LEX), Xtract Resources (XTR), Scotgold Resources (SGZ), Goldstone Resources (GRL), and Wishbone Gold (WSBN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Hamak Gold compare to Lexington Gold?

Hamak Gold (LON:HAMA) and Lexington Gold (LON:LEX) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Hamak Gold has a beta of 0.2, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lexington Gold has a beta of 0.07734275, suggesting that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

Lexington Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hamak Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hamak GoldN/AN/A-£950.87K-£1.00N/A
Lexington GoldN/AN/A£495.33K-£0.13N/A

In the previous week, Hamak Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lexington Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hamak Gold Neutral
Lexington Gold Neutral

Lexington Gold's return on equity of -3.69% beat Hamak Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hamak GoldN/A -116.27% -24.80%
Lexington Gold N/A -3.69%-4.17%

Summary

Lexington Gold beats Hamak Gold on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hamak Gold compare to Xtract Resources?

Hamak Gold (LON:HAMA) and Xtract Resources (LON:XTR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Hamak Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Xtract Resources' net margin of -46,750.00%. Xtract Resources' return on equity of -11.84% beat Hamak Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hamak GoldN/A -116.27% -24.80%
Xtract Resources -46,750.00%-11.84%-4.83%

0.1% of Xtract Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Hamak Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.8% of Xtract Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hamak Gold has a beta of 0.2, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Xtract Resources has a beta of 0.444, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Xtract Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hamak Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hamak GoldN/AN/A-£950.87K-£1.00N/A
Xtract ResourcesN/AN/A-£114.43K-£0.23N/A

In the previous week, Hamak Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Xtract Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hamak Gold Neutral
Xtract Resources Neutral

Summary

Xtract Resources beats Hamak Gold on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hamak Gold compare to Scotgold Resources?

Hamak Gold (LON:HAMA) and Scotgold Resources (LON:SGZ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Hamak Gold has a beta of 0.2, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scotgold Resources has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hamak Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Scotgold Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hamak Gold Neutral
Scotgold Resources Neutral

Hamak Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Scotgold Resources' net margin of -70.46%. Scotgold Resources' return on equity of -67.31% beat Hamak Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hamak GoldN/A -116.27% -24.80%
Scotgold Resources -70.46%-67.31%-14.03%

Hamak Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Scotgold Resources. Hamak Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotgold Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hamak GoldN/AN/A-£950.87K-£1.00N/A
Scotgold Resources£20.84M0.00-£14.68M-£0.13N/A

Summary

Scotgold Resources beats Hamak Gold on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hamak Gold compare to Goldstone Resources?

Goldstone Resources (LON:GRL) and Hamak Gold (LON:HAMA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

0.2% of Goldstone Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Goldstone Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Hamak Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Goldstone Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Hamak Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Goldstone Resources and 0 mentions for Hamak Gold. Goldstone Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Hamak Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Goldstone Resources Neutral
Hamak Gold Neutral

Hamak Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Goldstone Resources. Hamak Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goldstone Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goldstone Resources£11.17M0.82-£2.97M-£1.00N/A
Hamak GoldN/AN/A-£950.87K-£1.00N/A

Goldstone Resources has a beta of 0.616, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hamak Gold has a beta of 0.2, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Hamak Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Goldstone Resources' net margin of -98.60%. Goldstone Resources' return on equity of -80.39% beat Hamak Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Goldstone Resources-98.60% -80.39% 4.38%
Hamak Gold N/A -116.27%-24.80%

Summary

Goldstone Resources beats Hamak Gold on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hamak Gold compare to Wishbone Gold?

Wishbone Gold (LON:WSBN) and Hamak Gold (LON:HAMA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, earnings and dividends.

1.1% of Wishbone Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Wishbone Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Hamak Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hamak Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Wishbone Gold's net margin of -685.01%. Wishbone Gold's return on equity of -12.39% beat Hamak Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wishbone Gold-685.01% -12.39% -11.59%
Hamak Gold N/A -116.27%-24.80%

Wishbone Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hamak Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wishbone GoldN/AN/A-£1.80M-£0.04N/A
Hamak GoldN/AN/A-£950.87K-£1.00N/A

In the previous week, Wishbone Gold had 1 more articles in the media than Hamak Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wishbone Gold and 0 mentions for Hamak Gold. Wishbone Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Hamak Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wishbone Gold Neutral
Hamak Gold Neutral

Wishbone Gold has a beta of 1.6642512, suggesting that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hamak Gold has a beta of 0.2, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Wishbone Gold beats Hamak Gold on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hamak Gold News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HAMA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HAMA vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHamak GoldMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.26M£4.05B£5.06B£2.91B
Dividend YieldN/A5.17%4.67%6.18%
P/E Ratio-0.7225.5926.14364.48
Price / SalesN/A8,893.195,289.9683,785.80
Price / Cash10.0329.6827.0927.89
Price / Book0.3312.7410.636.81
Net Income-£950.87K£125.14M£156.32M£5.89B
7 Day Performance15.36%-0.25%-0.29%-0.85%
1 Month Performance16.48%21.37%16.21%2.08%
1 Year Performance-81.79%57.36%45.06%21.68%

Hamak Gold Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HAMA
Hamak Gold
N/AGBX 0.72
+6.8%		N/A-79.8%£3.26MN/AN/A9
LEX
Lexington Gold
N/AGBX 2.62
-4.6%		N/A-28.4%£12.39MN/AN/AN/A
XTR
Xtract Resources
N/AGBX 0.97
+0.3%		N/A+40.6%£11.54MN/AN/A33
SGZ
Scotgold Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/A£10.47M£20.84MN/A96
GRL
Goldstone Resources
N/AGBX 0.54
-10.0%		N/A+37.3%£9.06M£11.17MN/A30

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HAMA) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
A Simple Guide to Options Trading While It's Still Free
A free copy of Options Trading Made Simple is available now but wont stay that way for long. Chris Rowe cal...
True Market Insiders | Sponsoredtc pixel
Before Anthropic becomes impossible to ignore...
Riot Platforms just struck a 20-year, 191-megawatt data-center agreement tied to Anthropic, reportedly worth 9...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
How Long Does $2.5M Last in Retirement?
Having $2.5 million saved puts you ahead of most Americans, but how long it lasts depends on the decisions you...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
A new income category is drawing serious money - here's why
Forbes recently called a new category of exchange-traded income funds a 'golden era,' and Bloomberg noted the ...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran
For a moment… Forget about Trump’s ties to Israel. Forget about reports of Iran’s nuclear program. Be...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock tomorrow morning
A new strategy called Sell This, Buy That aims to help investors rotate out of overpriced AI stocks before a p...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Man who Predicted Trump 2016 Win: “Prepare for Mid-Term Meltdown”
In 2016, major election models gave Hillary Clinton a 99% chance of winning - but former CIA and Pentagon advi...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel