Go Pro
→ Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now (From Awesomely) (Ad)tc pixel Free HAN Stock Alerts

Hansa Investment (HAN) Competitors

Hansa Investment logo
GBX 338 +6.00 (+1.81%)
As of 07:33 AM Eastern
Compare

HAN vs. HICL, MNKS, INPP, AJB, and HVPE

Should you buy Hansa Investment stock or one of its competitors? Hansa Investment's main competitors and comparable companies include HICL Infrastructure (HICL), Monks (MNKS), International Public Partnerships (INPP), AJ Bell (AJB), and HarbourVest Global Private Equity (HVPE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Hansa Investment compare to HICL Infrastructure?

HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) and Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to HICL Infrastructure's net margin of 88.60%. Hansa Investment's return on equity of 17.81% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HICL Infrastructure88.60% 8.82% 0.58%
Hansa Investment 422.56%17.81%13.97%

HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. HICL Infrastructure pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hansa Investment pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

HICL Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than Hansa Investment. Hansa Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HICL Infrastructure£277.40M9.37£101.36M£13.8010.12
Hansa Investment£136.53M4.83£77.36M£89.903.76

In the previous week, HICL Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Hansa Investment'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
HICL Infrastructure Neutral
Hansa Investment Neutral

HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.515, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.209, indicating that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HICL Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Hansa Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

28.0% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.6% of Hansa Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

HICL Infrastructure beats Hansa Investment on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hansa Investment compare to Monks?

Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) and Monks (LON:MNKS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Monks has higher revenue and earnings than Hansa Investment. Hansa Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hansa Investment£136.53M4.83£77.36M£89.903.76
Monks£635.93M3.89£589.71M£368.554.38

Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.209, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monks has a beta of 0.912, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Monks shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.6% of Hansa Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Monks shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Monks had 10 more articles in the media than Hansa Investment. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Monks and 0 mentions for Hansa Investment. Hansa Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Monks' score of -0.08 indicating that Hansa Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hansa Investment Neutral
Monks Neutral

Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Hansa Investment pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monks pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to Monks' net margin of 96.74%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Hansa Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hansa Investment422.56% 17.81% 13.97%
Monks 96.74%24.22%9.21%

Summary

Monks beats Hansa Investment on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hansa Investment compare to International Public Partnerships?

Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. 17.6% of Hansa Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.209, meaning that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54338694, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat Hansa Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hansa Investment Neutral
International Public Partnerships Neutral

Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Hansa Investment pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to International Public Partnerships' net margin of 97.32%. Hansa Investment's return on equity of 17.81% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hansa Investment422.56% 17.81% 13.97%
International Public Partnerships 97.32%9.61%0.63%

Hansa Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than International Public Partnerships. Hansa Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hansa Investment£136.53M4.83£77.36M£89.903.76
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.35£43.53M£14.289.79

Summary

Hansa Investment and International Public Partnerships tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hansa Investment compare to AJ Bell?

AJ Bell (LON:AJB) and Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

AJ Bell has higher revenue and earnings than Hansa Investment. Hansa Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AJ Bell, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AJ Bell£347.57M7.02£81.11M£30.3320.41
Hansa Investment£136.53M4.83£77.36M£89.903.76

48.5% of AJ Bell shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 24.4% of AJ Bell shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.6% of Hansa Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to AJ Bell's net margin of 35.42%. AJ Bell's return on equity of 57.35% beat Hansa Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AJ Bell35.42% 57.35% 36.07%
Hansa Investment 422.56%17.81%13.97%

In the previous week, AJ Bell had 2 more articles in the media than Hansa Investment. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for AJ Bell and 0 mentions for Hansa Investment. AJ Bell's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Hansa Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that AJ Bell is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
AJ Bell Positive
Hansa Investment Neutral

AJ Bell pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. AJ Bell pays out 47.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hansa Investment pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

AJ Bell has a beta of 0.866, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.209, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

AJ Bell currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,265, indicating a potential upside of 104.36%. Given AJ Bell's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe AJ Bell is more favorable than Hansa Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
AJ Bell
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
Hansa Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

AJ Bell beats Hansa Investment on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hansa Investment compare to HarbourVest Global Private Equity?

Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) and HarbourVest Global Private Equity (LON:HVPE) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hansa Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
HarbourVest Global Private Equity
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.3% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are held by institutional investors. 17.6% of Hansa Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hansa Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled HarbourVest Global Private Equity'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hansa Investment Neutral
HarbourVest Global Private Equity Neutral

Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.209, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HarbourVest Global Private Equity has a beta of 0.428, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Hansa Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than HarbourVest Global Private Equity. Hansa Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HarbourVest Global Private Equity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hansa Investment£136.53M4.83£77.36M£89.903.76
HarbourVest Global Private Equity£344.77M6.76£12.26M£457.007.33

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to HarbourVest Global Private Equity's net margin of 168.07%. Hansa Investment's return on equity of 17.81% beat HarbourVest Global Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hansa Investment422.56% 17.81% 13.97%
HarbourVest Global Private Equity 168.07%7.85%2.14%

Summary

HarbourVest Global Private Equity beats Hansa Investment on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hansa Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HAN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HAN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHansa InvestmentCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£659.38M£5.70B£14.05B£2.93B
Dividend Yield0.59%7.40%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio3.7632.3126.60367.39
Price / Sales4.831,251.43521.5483,439.19
Price / Cash18.4548.3338.5027.89
Price / Book0.892.142.197.03
Net Income£77.36M£417.46M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.17%0.70%1.46%1.06%
1 Month Performance4.32%2.43%3.03%3.46%
1 Year Performance22.95%7.80%11.51%22.09%

Hansa Investment Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HAN
Hansa Investment
N/AGBX 338
+1.8%		N/A+18.8%£659.38M£136.53M3.76N/A
HICL
HICL Infrastructure
1.3217 of 5 stars		GBX 138.57
+0.6%		N/A+12.5%£2.58B£277.40M10.04N/A
MNKS
Monks
N/AGBX 1,632
-0.5%		N/A+14.4%£2.50B£635.93M4.43N/A
INPP
International Public Partnerships
N/AGBX 139.60
-0.4%		N/A+13.4%£2.50B£267.76M9.78N/A
AJB
AJ Bell
3.5435 of 5 stars		GBX 618
+1.0%		GBX 1,265
+104.7%		+18.6%£2.44B£347.57M20.381,373

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HAN) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Gold Explorer Sits Between Barrick’s Nevada Giants
Barrick Mining has spent decades building one of Nevada's richest gold districts, anchored by Fourmile, Goldru...
Wall Street Logic | Sponsoredtc pixel
A Simple Guide to Options Trading While It's Still Free
A free copy of Options Trading Made Simple is available now but wont stay that way for long. Chris Rowe cal...
True Market Insiders | Sponsoredtc pixel
A $382 trillion migration and the position no one is talking about
Trump just signed a law requiring America's entire $382 trillion financial system to migrate to a new money ne...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
The AI company everyone's heard of goes public
You don't need to be an AI expert to know the name Claude…. It's one of the handful of AI companies that's act...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bezos… DOOMED
A single FCC filing hints Elon Musk is planning his biggest project yet - bigger than Tesla, SpaceX, and X com...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s New Currency Reset
Trump is launching a new $250 bill - but that may be a distraction. Behind the scenes, Executive Order 14241 i...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel