Go Pro
→ I don't write about politics. Until today. (From American Alternative) (Ad)tc pixel Free HAN Stock Alerts

Hansa Investment (HAN) Competitors

Hansa Investment logo
GBX 336.03 +0.03 (+0.01%)
As of 09/15/2026 12:29 PM Eastern
Compare

HAN vs. QLT, HICL, MNKS, INPP, and AJB

Should you buy Hansa Investment stock or one of its competitors? Hansa Investment's main competitors and comparable companies include Quilter (QLT), HICL Infrastructure (HICL), Monks (MNKS), International Public Partnerships (INPP), and AJ Bell (AJB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Hansa Investment compare to Quilter?

Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) and Quilter (LON:QLT) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Hansa Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quilter. Hansa Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quilter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hansa Investment£136.53M4.79£77.36M£89.903.74
Quilter£13.46B0.18£49.61M£8.5021.62

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to Quilter's net margin of 0.88%. Hansa Investment's return on equity of 17.81% beat Quilter's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hansa Investment422.56% 17.81% 13.97%
Quilter 0.88%8.39%0.21%

Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.207, suggesting that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quilter has a beta of 0.823, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Quilter has a consensus price target of GBX 210.86, suggesting a potential upside of 14.72%. Given Quilter's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quilter is more favorable than Hansa Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hansa Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Quilter
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Hansa Investment pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quilter pays out 74.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.4% of Quilter shares are held by institutional investors. 17.6% of Hansa Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Quilter shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Quilter's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Hansa Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Quilter is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hansa Investment Neutral
Quilter Positive

Summary

Quilter beats Hansa Investment on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hansa Investment compare to HICL Infrastructure?

Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) and HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to HICL Infrastructure's net margin of 88.60%. Hansa Investment's return on equity of 17.81% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hansa Investment422.56% 17.81% 13.97%
HICL Infrastructure 88.60%8.82%0.58%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hansa Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
HICL Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.0% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 17.6% of Hansa Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Hansa Investment pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HICL Infrastructure pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.207, indicating that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

HICL Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than Hansa Investment. Hansa Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hansa Investment£136.53M4.79£77.36M£89.903.74
HICL Infrastructure£277.40M8.92£101.36M£13.809.64

In the previous week, Hansa Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled HICL Infrastructure'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hansa Investment Neutral
HICL Infrastructure Neutral

Summary

HICL Infrastructure beats Hansa Investment on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hansa Investment compare to Monks?

Monks (LON:MNKS) and Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Monks had 15 more articles in the media than Hansa Investment. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Monks and 0 mentions for Hansa Investment. Monks' average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat Hansa Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Monks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Monks Neutral
Hansa Investment Neutral

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to Monks' net margin of 96.74%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Hansa Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Monks96.74% 24.22% 9.21%
Hansa Investment 422.56%17.81%13.97%

Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Monks pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hansa Investment pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Monks has higher revenue and earnings than Hansa Investment. Hansa Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Monks£635.93M3.80£589.71M£368.554.31
Hansa Investment£136.53M4.79£77.36M£89.903.74

Monks has a beta of 0.903, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.207, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

10.1% of Monks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Monks shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.6% of Hansa Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Monks beats Hansa Investment on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hansa Investment compare to International Public Partnerships?

Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.207, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.533, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to International Public Partnerships' net margin of 95.13%. Hansa Investment's return on equity of 17.81% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hansa Investment422.56% 17.81% 13.97%
International Public Partnerships 95.13%8.29%0.63%

0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. 17.6% of Hansa Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships had 3 more articles in the media than Hansa Investment. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for International Public Partnerships and 0 mentions for Hansa Investment. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Hansa Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hansa Investment Neutral
International Public Partnerships Positive

Hansa Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than International Public Partnerships. Hansa Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hansa Investment£136.53M4.79£77.36M£89.903.74
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.23£43.53M£14.289.66

Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Hansa Investment pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

International Public Partnerships beats Hansa Investment on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hansa Investment compare to AJ Bell?

Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) and AJ Bell (LON:AJB) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Hansa Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled AJ Bell'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hansa Investment Neutral
AJ Bell Neutral

Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.207, suggesting that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AJ Bell has a beta of 0.866, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

AJ Bell has a consensus target price of GBX 1,265, indicating a potential upside of 118.29%. Given AJ Bell's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe AJ Bell is more favorable than Hansa Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hansa Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
AJ Bell
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. AJ Bell pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Hansa Investment pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AJ Bell pays out 47.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to AJ Bell's net margin of 35.42%. AJ Bell's return on equity of 57.35% beat Hansa Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hansa Investment422.56% 17.81% 13.97%
AJ Bell 35.42%57.35%36.07%

AJ Bell has higher revenue and earnings than Hansa Investment. Hansa Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AJ Bell, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hansa Investment£136.53M4.79£77.36M£89.903.74
AJ Bell£347.57M6.55£81.11M£30.3319.11

0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.4% of AJ Bell shares are held by institutional investors. 17.6% of Hansa Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 24.4% of AJ Bell shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

AJ Bell beats Hansa Investment on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hansa Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HAN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HAN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHansa InvestmentCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£644.58M£5.42B£14.02B£2.88B
Dividend Yield0.61%7.50%5.95%6.26%
P/E Ratio3.7430.0225.34366.92
Price / Sales4.791,198.12503.4490,001.88
Price / Cash18.4547.9140.5727.89
Price / Book0.893.512.746.33
Net Income£77.36M£417.39M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.07%-1.30%-0.66%-0.36%
1 Month Performance-1.75%-2.81%-0.93%-0.68%
1 Year Performance23.98%4.04%9.99%19.86%

Hansa Investment Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HAN
Hansa Investment
N/AGBX 336.03
+0.0%		N/A+24.2%£644.58M£136.53M3.74N/A
QLT
Quilter
2.4944 of 5 stars		GBX 186.18
-0.1%		GBX 210.86
+13.3%		+11.5%£2.52B£13.46B21.652,983
HICL
HICL Infrastructure
N/AGBX 135.20
+0.1%		N/A+11.2%£2.52B£277.40M9.80N/A
MNKS
Monks
N/AGBX 1,626
-0.1%		N/A+11.2%£2.50B£635.93M4.41N/A
INPP
International Public Partnerships
N/AGBX 139.20
+0.6%		N/A+15.0%£2.49B£267.76M9.75N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HAN) was last updated on 9/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
This Microcap Is Taking On the Energy Industry’s Dirtiest Problems
A small company has developed water-based cleaning technologies aimed at some of heavy industry's toughest pro...
Wall Street Logic | Sponsoredtc pixel
“This is the Perfect Tech Stock”
Jeff Brown, the tech investor who identified Nvidia in 2016 before its 37,000% run, has flagged a new AI compa...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Jon Najarian's #1 Energy Trade for 2026
Jon Najarian says he's never been more excited about an energy opportunity. SpaceX just went public at over $2...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
A “bloodbath” Is Coming
Reports suggest some Silicon Valley billionaires are stockpiling gold, guns, and gas masks - or leaving the co...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
The national debt just passed $39 trillion
The U.S. national debt just topped $39 trillion, up nearly $3 trillion in a single year and on pace to hit $40...
US Gold Bureau | Sponsoredtc pixel
You’ve never seen anything like this before
For centuries, families like the Rothschilds, Morgans, and Rockefellers have quietly used one overlooked type ...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel