Go Pro

Hansa Investment (HAN) Competitors

Hansa Investment logo
GBX 334 +6.00 (+1.83%)
As of 08/5/2026 12:34 PM Eastern

HAN vs. MNKS, HVPE, AJB, JTC, and MYI

Should you buy Hansa Investment stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Hansa Investment with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Hansa Investment include Monks (MNKS), HarbourVest Global Private Equity (HVPE), AJ Bell (AJB), JTC (JTC), and Murray International (MYI). These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Hansa Investment compare to Monks?

Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) and Monks (LON:MNKS) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Monks shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.6% of Hansa Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Monks shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Monks has higher revenue and earnings than Hansa Investment. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hansa Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hansa Investment£26.42M24.73£77.36M£19.3017.31
Monks£635.93M3.97£589.71M£368.554.44

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to Monks' net margin of 96.74%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Hansa Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hansa Investment422.56% 17.81% 13.97%
Monks 96.74%24.22%9.21%

In the previous week, Monks had 11 more articles in the media than Hansa Investment. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Monks and 1 mentions for Hansa Investment. Monks' average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Hansa Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Monks is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hansa Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Monks
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Hansa Investment pays out 12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monks pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.204, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monks has a beta of 0.944, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Monks beats Hansa Investment on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hansa Investment compare to HarbourVest Global Private Equity?

Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) and HarbourVest Global Private Equity (LON:HVPE) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and dividends.

0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.3% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.6% of Hansa Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.204, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HarbourVest Global Private Equity has a beta of 0.433, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hansa Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
HarbourVest Global Private Equity
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to HarbourVest Global Private Equity's net margin of 168.07%. Hansa Investment's return on equity of 17.81% beat HarbourVest Global Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hansa Investment422.56% 17.81% 13.97%
HarbourVest Global Private Equity 168.07%7.85%2.14%

In the previous week, Hansa Investment and Hansa Investment both had 1 articles in the media. Hansa Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled HarbourVest Global Private Equity'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hansa Investment Neutral
HarbourVest Global Private Equity Neutral

Hansa Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than HarbourVest Global Private Equity. HarbourVest Global Private Equity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hansa Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hansa Investment£26.42M24.73£77.36M£19.3017.31
HarbourVest Global Private Equity£344.77M6.97£12.26M£457.007.54

Summary

Hansa Investment beats HarbourVest Global Private Equity on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hansa Investment compare to AJ Bell?

AJ Bell (LON:AJB) and Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

AJ Bell currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,265, suggesting a potential upside of 110.27%. Given AJ Bell's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe AJ Bell is more favorable than Hansa Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
AJ Bell
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
Hansa Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

51.4% of AJ Bell shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 24.3% of AJ Bell shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 20.6% of Hansa Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to AJ Bell's net margin of 35.42%. AJ Bell's return on equity of 57.35% beat Hansa Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AJ Bell35.42% 57.35% 36.07%
Hansa Investment 422.56%17.81%13.97%

In the previous week, AJ Bell had 1 more articles in the media than Hansa Investment. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for AJ Bell and 1 mentions for Hansa Investment. AJ Bell's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Hansa Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that AJ Bell is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
AJ Bell
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hansa Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

AJ Bell has a beta of 0.866, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.204, meaning that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

AJ Bell pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. AJ Bell pays out 47.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hansa Investment pays out 12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

AJ Bell has higher revenue and earnings than Hansa Investment. Hansa Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AJ Bell, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AJ Bell£347.57M6.84£81.11M£30.3319.84
Hansa Investment£26.42M24.73£77.36M£19.3017.31

Summary

AJ Bell beats Hansa Investment on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hansa Investment compare to JTC?

JTC (LON:JTC) and Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and profitability.

27.8% of JTC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of JTC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 20.6% of Hansa Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hansa Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than JTC. Hansa Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JTC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JTC£381.95M6.02£29.99M£0.552,427.27
Hansa Investment£26.42M24.73£77.36M£19.3017.31

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to JTC's net margin of 0.24%. Hansa Investment's return on equity of 17.81% beat JTC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JTC0.24% 0.18% 4.96%
Hansa Investment 422.56%17.81%13.97%

In the previous week, JTC had 2 more articles in the media than Hansa Investment. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for JTC and 1 mentions for Hansa Investment. JTC's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Hansa Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that JTC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
JTC
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Hansa Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

JTC pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. JTC pays out 2,407.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hansa Investment pays out 12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

JTC currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,112.50, indicating a potential downside of 16.67%. Given JTC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe JTC is more favorable than Hansa Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
JTC
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Hansa Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

JTC has a beta of 0.927, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.204, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

JTC beats Hansa Investment on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hansa Investment compare to Murray International?

Murray International (LON:MYI) and Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Murray International pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Murray International pays out 20.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hansa Investment pays out 12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Murray International has a beta of 0.87265795, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.204, indicating that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

5.6% of Murray International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Murray International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.6% of Hansa Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to Murray International's net margin of 94.44%. Murray International's return on equity of 19.22% beat Hansa Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Murray International94.44% 19.22% 6.89%
Hansa Investment 422.56%17.81%13.97%

In the previous week, Murray International and Murray International both had 1 articles in the media. Murray International's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Hansa Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Murray International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Murray International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hansa Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Murray International has higher revenue and earnings than Hansa Investment. Murray International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hansa Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Murray International£358.82M6.12£178.39M£58.706.29
Hansa Investment£26.42M24.73£77.36M£19.3017.31

Summary

Murray International beats Hansa Investment on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hansa Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HAN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HAN vs. The Competition

MetricHansa InvestmentCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£653.14M£5.61B£14.07B£2.86B
Dividend Yield0.60%7.46%5.91%6.13%
P/E Ratio17.3137.8729.17368.56
Price / Sales24.731,250.63512.9283,547.19
Price / Cash18.4548.2339.3227.89
Price / Book0.883.713.737.14
Net Income£77.36M£417.17M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.83%1.26%1.21%0.96%
1 Month Performance3.09%-0.46%0.56%0.72%
1 Year Performance32.02%6.72%13.31%75.20%

Hansa Investment Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HAN
Hansa Investment
N/AGBX 334
+1.8%
N/A+28.9%£653.14M£26.42M17.31N/A
MNKS
Monks
N/AGBX 1,578
+0.8%
N/A+20.4%£2.43B£635.93M4.28N/A
HVPE
HarbourVest Global Private Equity
1.1282 of 5 stars
GBX 3,335
flat
N/A+28.8%£2.34B£344.77M7.30N/A
AJB
AJ Bell
4.0402 of 5 stars
GBX 587.50
-1.9%
GBX 1,265
+115.3%
+14.5%£2.32B£347.57M19.371,373
JTC
JTC
0.1969 of 5 stars
GBX 1,327
+0.2%
GBX 1,112.50
-16.2%
+44.2%£2.28B£381.95M2,412.731,603

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:HAN) was last updated on 8/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners