Do analysts rate AUY or HOC?

Hochschild Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 586, indicating a potential upside of 29.70%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Yamana Gold. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Yamana Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Hochschild Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80

Do analysts prefer CEY or HOC?

Hochschild Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 586, suggesting a potential upside of 29.70%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Centamin. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Centamin 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Hochschild Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80

Hochschild Mining (HOC) Competitors

GBX 451.80 -9.80 (-2.12%)

As of 12:00 PM Eastern

Compare

HOC vs. EDV, AUY, GGP, PAF, and CEY

Should you buy Hochschild Mining stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Hochschild Mining with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Hochschild Mining include Endeavour Mining (EDV), Yamana Gold (AUY), Greatland Resources (GGP), Pan African Resources (PAF), and Centamin (CEY). These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Endeavour Mining (LON:EDV) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

31.4% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 0 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Endeavour Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining	Neutral
Endeavour Mining	Neutral

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.954, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.139, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Endeavour Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 145 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Endeavour Mining pays out 41.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Endeavour Mining has a net margin of 18.88% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 29.48% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%
Endeavour Mining	18.88%	27.75%	3.54%

Hochschild Mining presently has a consensus price target of GBX 586, indicating a potential upside of 29.70%. Endeavour Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 5,900, indicating a potential upside of 68.57%. Given Endeavour Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Endeavour Mining is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Endeavour Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Hochschild Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Endeavour Mining. Endeavour Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	1.97	£38.41M	£39.00	11.58
Endeavour Mining	£4.54B	1.86	-£423.98M	£348.00	10.06

Summary

Endeavour Mining beats Hochschild Mining on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Yamana Gold?

Yamana Gold (LON:AUY) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Yamana Gold pays out -1,204.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

63.8% of Yamana Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.4% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Yamana Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Yamana Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Hochschild Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Yamana Gold	Neutral
Hochschild Mining	Neutral

Hochschild Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 586, indicating a potential upside of 29.70%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Yamana Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Yamana Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Hochschild Mining has a net margin of 17.80% compared to Yamana Gold's net margin of -54.36%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 29.48% beat Yamana Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Yamana Gold	-54.36%	-31.37%	-13.38%
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.954, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Hochschild Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Yamana Gold. Yamana Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Yamana Gold	£1.81B	0.00	-£982.30M	-£0.83	N/A
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	1.97	£38.41M	£39.00	11.58

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Yamana Gold on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Greatland Resources?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.954, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5431277, meaning that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%
Greatland Resources	33.53%	41.93%	-7.97%

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 586, suggesting a potential upside of 29.70%. Greatland Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, suggesting a potential upside of 36.53%. Given Greatland Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

31.4% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.9% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 39.5% of Greatland Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining	Neutral
Greatland Resources	Positive

Hochschild Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	1.97	£38.41M	£39.00	11.58
Greatland Resources	£2.97B	1.25	-£58.89M	£177.29	3.12

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Pan African Resources?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining	Neutral
Pan African Resources	Positive

Pan African Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hochschild Mining. Pan African Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	1.97	£38.41M	£39.00	11.58
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.17	£58.60M	£11.96	7.51

31.4% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.2% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%
Pan African Resources	29.42%	49.73%	12.99%

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.954, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.705, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Hochschild Mining presently has a consensus target price of GBX 586, suggesting a potential upside of 29.70%. Pan African Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 156.50, suggesting a potential upside of 74.31%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Centamin?

Centamin (LON:CEY) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

90.8% of Centamin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.4% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Centamin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hochschild Mining has a net margin of 17.80% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 29.48% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Centamin	9.10%	14.16%	8.45%
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%

Centamin has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hochschild Mining. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Centamin	£930.75M	0.00	£84.67M	£0.05	N/A
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	1.97	£38.41M	£39.00	11.58

Hochschild Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 586, suggesting a potential upside of 29.70%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Centamin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Centamin	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Centamin pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Centamin pays out 6,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Centamin has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.954, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Centamin's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Hochschild Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Centamin	Neutral
Hochschild Mining	Neutral

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Centamin on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hochschild Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HOC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HOC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Hochschild Mining	Gold Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£2.32B	£4.72B	£4.58B	£2.79B
Dividend Yield	1.29%	5.64%	5.03%	6.12%
P/E Ratio	11.58	36.05	20.35	368.63
Price / Sales	1.97	199.48	6,453.30	84,796.26
Price / Cash	1.65	22.11	26.57	27.87
Price / Book	3.40	10.73	8.78	7.77
Net Income	£38.41M	£6.39M	£157.11M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	2.82%	0.02%	0.23%	1.32%
1 Month Performance	-23.99%	-4.74%	-5.47%	-0.69%
1 Year Performance	64.65%	46.19%	38.64%	62.54%

Hochschild Mining Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HOC Hochschild Mining	N/A	GBX 451.80 -2.1%	GBX 586 +29.7%	+60.0%	£2.32B	£1.18B	11.58	3,029
EDV Endeavour Mining	3.9055 of 5 stars	GBX 3,833 -2.7%	GBX 5,900 +53.9%	+56.9%	£9.74B	£4.54B	11.01	3,786	Gap Down High Trading Volume
AUY Yamana Gold	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£4.57B	£1.81B	N/A	11,600
GGP Greatland Resources	2.2331 of 5 stars	GBX 587.50 -4.1%	GBX 755.67 +28.6%	+69.4%	£4.14B	£2.97B	3.31	25	Gap Down
PAF Pan African Resources	3.9389 of 5 stars	GBX 99.49 -3.1%	GBX 156.50 +57.3%	+79.7%	£2.10B	£837.76M	8.32	2,469	Gap Down High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HOC) was last updated on 7/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Hochschild Mining (HOC) Competitors

HOC vs. EDV, AUY, GGP, PAF, and CEY

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Yamana Gold?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Greatland Resources?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Pan African Resources?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Centamin?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HOC vs. The Competition

Hochschild Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Hochschild Mining (HOC) Competitors

HOC vs. EDV, AUY, GGP, PAF, and CEY

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in HOC or EDV?

Does the media prefer HOC or EDV?

Which has more volatility and risk, HOC or EDV?

Is HOC or EDV a better dividend stock?

Is HOC or EDV more profitable?

Do analysts rate HOC or EDV?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, HOC or EDV?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Yamana Gold?

Is AUY or HOC a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in AUY or HOC?

Does the media favor AUY or HOC?

Do analysts rate AUY or HOC?

Is AUY or HOC more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, AUY or HOC?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, AUY or HOC?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Greatland Resources?

Which has more volatility and risk, HOC or GGP?

Is HOC or GGP more profitable?

Do analysts rate HOC or GGP?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of HOC or GGP?

Does the media favor HOC or GGP?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, HOC or GGP?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Pan African Resources?

Does the media favor HOC or PAF?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, HOC or PAF?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in HOC or PAF?

Is HOC or PAF more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, HOC or PAF?

Do analysts prefer HOC or PAF?

Is HOC or PAF a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Centamin?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CEY or HOC?

Is CEY or HOC more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CEY or HOC?

Do analysts prefer CEY or HOC?

Is CEY or HOC a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, CEY or HOC?

Does the media refer more to CEY or HOC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HOC vs. The Competition

Hochschild Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools