Hochschild Mining Competitors

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and KAZ Minerals (LON:KAZ) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Dividends

Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. KAZ Minerals pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Hochschild Mining pays out 1.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. KAZ Minerals pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Hochschild Mining and KAZ Minerals' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

KAZ Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Hochschild Mining and KAZ Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 209, suggesting a potential upside of 3.47%. KAZ Minerals has a consensus price target of GBX 672.50, suggesting a potential downside of 20.77%. Given Hochschild Mining's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than KAZ Minerals.

Profitability

This table compares Hochschild Mining and KAZ Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

KAZ Minerals beats Hochschild Mining on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Eurasia Mining (LON:EUA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Hochschild Mining and Eurasia Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Hochschild Mining and Eurasia Mining's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Eurasia Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Hochschild Mining and Eurasia Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 209, suggesting a potential upside of 3.47%. Given Hochschild Mining's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Eurasia Mining.

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Eurasia Mining on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Civitas Social Housing (LON:CSH) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Dividends

Civitas Social Housing pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Civitas Social Housing pays out 1.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining pays out 1.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Civitas Social Housing is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Civitas Social Housing and Hochschild Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Civitas Social Housing and Hochschild Mining's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Civitas Social Housing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Civitas Social Housing and Hochschild Mining, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Civitas Social Housing currently has a consensus target price of GBX 116.50, indicating a potential upside of 5.14%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 209, indicating a potential upside of 3.47%. Given Civitas Social Housing's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Civitas Social Housing is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Summary

Civitas Social Housing beats Hochschild Mining on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

SolGold (LON:SOLG) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares SolGold and Hochschild Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for SolGold and Hochschild Mining, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

SolGold currently has a consensus target price of GBX 39, indicating a potential upside of 44.72%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 209, indicating a potential upside of 3.47%. Given SolGold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe SolGold is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SolGold and Hochschild Mining's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SolGold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Hochschild Mining and Central Asia Metals' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Central Asia Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Hochschild Mining and Central Asia Metals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 209, suggesting a potential upside of 3.47%. Central Asia Metals has a consensus price target of GBX 230, suggesting a potential downside of 11.76%. Given Hochschild Mining's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Central Asia Metals.

Dividends

Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Central Asia Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Hochschild Mining pays out 1.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Central Asia Metals pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Central Asia Metals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Hochschild Mining and Central Asia Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Central Asia Metals beats Hochschild Mining on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kenmare Resources (LON:KMR) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Kenmare Resources and Hochschild Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.

Kenmare Resources currently has a consensus price target of GBX 405, suggesting a potential downside of 4.03%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 209, suggesting a potential upside of 3.47%. Given Hochschild Mining's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Kenmare Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Kenmare Resources and Hochschild Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Kenmare Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Kenmare Resources pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining pays out 1.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Kenmare Resources and Hochschild Mining's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Kenmare Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kenmare Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.