Go Pro
→ The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free HOC Stock Alerts

Hochschild Mining (HOC) Competitors

Hochschild Mining logo
GBX 625.50 -4.50 (-0.71%)
As of 11:58 AM Eastern
Compare

HOC vs. EDV, GGP, PAF, CEY, and RSG

Should you buy Hochschild Mining stock or one of its competitors? Hochschild Mining's main competitors and comparable companies include Endeavour Mining (EDV), Greatland Resources (GGP), Pan African Resources (PAF), Centamin (CEY), and Resolute Mining (RSG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Endeavour Mining (LON:EDV) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Hochschild Mining has a net margin of 17.80% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 17.62%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 29.48% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Endeavour Mining17.62% 26.18% 3.54%
Hochschild Mining 17.80%29.48%7.11%

59.5% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.1% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Hochschild Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Mining Neutral
Hochschild Mining Neutral

Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.139, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.947, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Endeavour Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 145 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Endeavour Mining pays out 42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hochschild Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endeavour Mining. Endeavour Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour Mining£4.75B2.44-£423.98M£340.0014.10
Hochschild Mining£1.18B2.72£38.41M£39.0016.04

Endeavour Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 4,900, indicating a potential upside of 2.23%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 625, indicating a potential downside of 0.08%. Given Endeavour Mining's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Endeavour Mining is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Endeavour Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Hochschild Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Endeavour Mining on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Greatland Resources?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Hochschild Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources£2.97B1.62-£58.89M£177.294.03
Hochschild Mining£1.18B2.72£38.41M£39.0016.04

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.426, meaning that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.947, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

33.8% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.1% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 39.4% of Greatland Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greatland Resources33.53% 41.93% -7.97%
Hochschild Mining 17.80%29.48%7.11%

Greatland Resources presently has a consensus price target of GBX 733.67, suggesting a potential upside of 2.75%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 625, suggesting a potential downside of 0.08%. Given Greatland Resources' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Hochschild Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greatland Resources and 0 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Greatland Resources' score of -0.18 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources Neutral
Hochschild Mining Neutral

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Pan African Resources?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.947, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.701, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

31.1% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.0% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining17.80% 29.48% 7.11%
Pan African Resources 29.42%49.73%12.99%

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pan African Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining Neutral
Pan African Resources Neutral

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 625, indicating a potential downside of 0.08%. Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156, indicating a potential upside of 12.96%. Given Pan African Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hochschild Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pan African Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Pan African Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hochschild Mining. Pan African Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining£1.18B2.72£38.41M£39.0016.04
Pan African Resources£837.76M3.34£58.60M£11.9611.55

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Centamin?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Centamin (LON:CEY) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Centamin has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hochschild Mining. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining£1.18B2.72£38.41M£39.0016.04
Centamin£930.75M0.00£84.67M£0.05N/A

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.947, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Centamin has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

31.1% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Centamin shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Centamin shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Centamin'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining Neutral
Centamin Neutral

Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Centamin pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Centamin pays out 6,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hochschild Mining is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Hochschild Mining has a net margin of 17.80% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 29.48% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining17.80% 29.48% 7.11%
Centamin 9.10%14.16%8.45%

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 625, suggesting a potential downside of 0.08%. Given Centamin's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Centamin is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hochschild Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Centamin
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Centamin on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Resolute Mining?

Resolute Mining (LON:RSG) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and earnings.

Resolute Mining has a net margin of 17.87% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 29.48% beat Resolute Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Resolute Mining17.87% 23.32% 6.41%
Hochschild Mining 17.80%29.48%7.11%

Resolute Mining has a beta of 1.325, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.947, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Resolute Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 240.25, indicating a potential upside of 253.31%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 625, indicating a potential downside of 0.08%. Given Resolute Mining's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Resolute Mining is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Resolute Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Hochschild Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Hochschild Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Resolute Mining. Resolute Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Resolute Mining£1.00B1.45£15.35M£5.9911.35
Hochschild Mining£1.18B2.72£38.41M£39.0016.04

In the previous week, Resolute Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Resolute Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Resolute Mining Positive
Hochschild Mining Neutral

37.6% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.1% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Resolute Mining on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hochschild Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HOC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HOC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HOC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHochschild MiningMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.22B£4.16B£5.15B£2.92B
Dividend Yield0.92%5.17%4.68%6.17%
P/E Ratio16.0426.1726.79367.30
Price / Sales2.727,986.704,751.6383,463.07
Price / Cash1.6526.6824.7127.89
Price / Book4.7110.949.207.12
Net Income£38.41M£122.81M£154.52M£5.89B
7 Day Performance21.93%4.86%3.90%0.86%
1 Month Performance40.69%13.93%11.06%3.25%
1 Year Performance108.08%58.52%45.95%22.57%

Hochschild Mining Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HOC
Hochschild Mining
1.9341 of 5 stars		GBX 625.50
-0.7%		GBX 625
-0.1%		+109.6%£3.22B£1.18B16.043,029
EDV
Endeavour Mining
1.5291 of 5 stars		GBX 4,098
-2.3%		GBX 4,900
+19.6%		+87.0%£9.90B£4.75B12.053,786
GGP
Greatland Resources
1.3176 of 5 stars		GBX 639.50
-3.9%		GBX 733.67
+14.7%		+170.9%£4.31B£2.97B3.6125
PAF
Pan African Resources
2.0082 of 5 stars		GBX 110.23
-1.8%		GBX 156
+41.5%		+117.0%£2.23B£837.76M9.222,469
CEY
Centamin
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.69B£930.75M2,920.004,874

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HOC) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel