Does the media prefer HOC or EDV?

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining and Hochschild Mining both had 2 articles in the media. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Endeavour Mining's score of 0.34 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hochschild Mining 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Endeavour Mining 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor HOC or GGP?

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Greatland Resources and 2 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.22 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hochschild Mining 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Greatland Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer PAF or HOC?

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Pan African Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hochschild Mining and 1 mentions for Pan African Resources. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.67 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pan African Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hochschild Mining 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer CEY or HOC?

Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 671, suggesting a potential upside of 25.54%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Centamin. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Centamin 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Hochschild Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media refer more to HOC or RSG?

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining and Hochschild Mining both had 2 articles in the media. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Resolute Mining's score of 0.57 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hochschild Mining 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Resolute Mining 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Hochschild Mining (HOC) Competitors

GBX 522.50 -12.00 (-2.25%)

As of 11:59 AM Eastern

Compare

HOC vs. EDV, GGP, PAF, CEY, and RSG

Should you buy Hochschild Mining stock or one of its competitors? Hochschild Mining's main competitors and comparable companies include Endeavour Mining (EDV), Greatland Resources (GGP), Pan African Resources (PAF), Centamin (CEY), and Resolute Mining (RSG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Endeavour Mining (LON:EDV) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.996, suggesting that its share price is 0% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.139, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Hochschild Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Endeavour Mining. Hochschild Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining	£1.51B	1.83	£38.41M	£58.00	9.22
Endeavour Mining	£4.75B	2.14	-£423.98M	£340.00	12.44

Hochschild Mining has a net margin of 19.80% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 17.62%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 35.59% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining	19.80%	35.59%	7.11%
Endeavour Mining	17.62%	26.18%	3.54%

Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Endeavour Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 145 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Hochschild Mining pays out 10.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Endeavour Mining pays out 42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hochschild Mining presently has a consensus target price of GBX 671, suggesting a potential upside of 25.54%. Endeavour Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 4,900, suggesting a potential upside of 15.87%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Endeavour Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Endeavour Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining and Hochschild Mining both had 2 articles in the media. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Endeavour Mining's score of 0.34 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Endeavour Mining	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

32.3% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.6% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Endeavour Mining on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Greatland Resources?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

32.3% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.6% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 36.0% of Greatland Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hochschild Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining	£1.51B	1.83	£38.41M	£58.00	9.22
Greatland Resources	£2.26B	1.59	-£58.89M	£241.92	2.21

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 671, indicating a potential upside of 25.54%. Greatland Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 733.67, indicating a potential upside of 37.52%. Given Greatland Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 38.25% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 19.80%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 43.79% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining	19.80%	35.59%	7.11%
Greatland Resources	38.25%	43.79%	-7.97%

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Greatland Resources and 2 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.22 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Greatland Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.996, meaning that its stock price is 0% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.401, meaning that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Pan African Resources?

Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

Pan African Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hochschild Mining. Pan African Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pan African Resources	£1.16B	2.11	£58.60M	£17.60	6.85
Hochschild Mining	£1.51B	1.83	£38.41M	£58.00	9.22

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Pan African Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hochschild Mining and 1 mentions for Pan African Resources. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.67 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pan African Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hochschild Mining	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.744, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.996, meaning that its stock price is 0% less volatile than the broader market.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 30.89% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 19.80%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 61.74% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pan African Resources	30.89%	61.74%	12.99%
Hochschild Mining	19.80%	35.59%	7.11%

Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.89 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Pan African Resources pays out 16.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining pays out 10.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

41.9% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.3% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pan African Resources presently has a consensus target price of GBX 156, suggesting a potential upside of 29.44%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 671, suggesting a potential upside of 25.54%. Given Pan African Resources' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Pan African Resources on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Centamin?

Centamin (LON:CEY) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk and dividends.

Centamin has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.996, suggesting that its stock price is 0% less volatile than the broader market.

90.8% of Centamin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.3% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Centamin shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Centamin has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hochschild Mining. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Centamin	£930.75M	0.00	£84.67M	£0.05	N/A
Hochschild Mining	£1.51B	1.83	£38.41M	£58.00	9.22

Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 671, suggesting a potential upside of 25.54%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Centamin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Centamin	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Centamin. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hochschild Mining and 0 mentions for Centamin. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Centamin's score of 0.00 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Centamin	Neutral
Hochschild Mining	Positive

Hochschild Mining has a net margin of 19.80% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 35.59% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Centamin	9.10%	14.16%	8.45%
Hochschild Mining	19.80%	35.59%	7.11%

Centamin pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Centamin pays out 6,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hochschild Mining pays out 10.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Centamin on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Resolute Mining?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Resolute Mining (LON:RSG) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 671, suggesting a potential upside of 25.54%. Resolute Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 240.25, suggesting a potential upside of 291.29%. Given Resolute Mining's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Resolute Mining is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Resolute Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Hochschild Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Resolute Mining. Resolute Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining	£1.51B	1.83	£38.41M	£58.00	9.22
Resolute Mining	£1.00B	1.31	£15.35M	£9.04	6.79

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.996, indicating that its share price is 0% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resolute Mining has a beta of 1.325, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining and Hochschild Mining both had 2 articles in the media. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Resolute Mining's score of 0.57 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Resolute Mining	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

32.3% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.8% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hochschild Mining has a net margin of 19.80% compared to Resolute Mining's net margin of 17.87%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 35.59% beat Resolute Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining	19.80%	35.59%	7.11%
Resolute Mining	17.87%	23.32%	6.41%

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Resolute Mining on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hochschild Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HOC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HOC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Hochschild Mining	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£2.69B	£3.78B	£4.75B	£2.83B
Dividend Yield	1.23%	5.24%	4.76%	6.26%
P/E Ratio	9.01	22.96	23.31	366.25
Price / Sales	1.78	27,015.27	16,097.93	89,151.67
Price / Cash	1.65	27.13	24.99	27.89
Price / Book	3.93	11.63	9.69	6.96
Net Income	£38.41M	£127.14M	£159.30M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.58%	-1.12%	-1.00%	-0.62%
1 Month Performance	-20.95%	-5.15%	-4.92%	-1.07%
1 Year Performance	35.84%	19.05%	16.28%	22.84%

Hochschild Mining Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count
HOC Hochschild Mining	4.6317 of 5 stars	GBX 522.50 -2.2%	GBX 671 +28.4%	+40.5%	£2.69B	£1.51B	9.01	3,199
EDV Endeavour Mining	3.1024 of 5 stars	GBX 4,284 -0.9%	GBX 4,900 +14.4%	+35.9%	£10.33B	£4.75B	12.60	3,786
GGP Greatland Resources	3.2345 of 5 stars	GBX 553.50 +2.6%	GBX 733.67 +32.6%	+48.9%	£3.73B	£2.26B	2.29	25
PAF Pan African Resources	3.6234 of 5 stars	GBX 118.52 +1.1%	GBX 156 +31.6%	+32.9%	£2.40B	£1.16B	9.91	2,494
CEY Centamin	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£1.69B	£930.75M	2,920.00	4,874

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HOC) was last updated on 10/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Hochschild Mining (HOC) Competitors

HOC vs. EDV, GGP, PAF, CEY, and RSG

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Greatland Resources?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Pan African Resources?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Centamin?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Resolute Mining?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HOC vs. The Competition

Hochschild Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Hochschild Mining (HOC) Competitors

HOC vs. EDV, GGP, PAF, CEY, and RSG

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Which has more risk & volatility, HOC or EDV?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, HOC or EDV?

Is HOC or EDV more profitable?

Is HOC or EDV a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate HOC or EDV?

Does the media prefer HOC or EDV?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of HOC or EDV?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Greatland Resources?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in HOC or GGP?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, HOC or GGP?

Do analysts prefer HOC or GGP?

Is HOC or GGP more profitable?

Does the media favor HOC or GGP?

Which has more risk and volatility, HOC or GGP?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Pan African Resources?

Which has better valuation & earnings, PAF or HOC?

Does the media prefer PAF or HOC?

Which has more volatility and risk, PAF or HOC?

Is PAF or HOC more profitable?

Is PAF or HOC a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PAF or HOC?

Do analysts recommend PAF or HOC?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Centamin?

Which has more risk and volatility, CEY or HOC?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CEY or HOC?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CEY or HOC?

Do analysts prefer CEY or HOC?

Does the media prefer CEY or HOC?

Is CEY or HOC more profitable?

Is CEY or HOC a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Resolute Mining?

Do analysts recommend HOC or RSG?

Which has better earnings and valuation, HOC or RSG?

Which has more risk and volatility, HOC or RSG?

Does the media refer more to HOC or RSG?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of HOC or RSG?

Is HOC or RSG more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HOC vs. The Competition

Hochschild Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools