Does the media favor HOC or EDV?

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Endeavour Mining's score of -1.08 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hochschild Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Endeavour Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

Does the media favor GGP or HOC?

In the previous week, Greatland Resources and Greatland Resources both had 1 articles in the media. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.72 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Greatland Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hochschild Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend AUY or HOC?

Hochschild Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 586, suggesting a potential upside of 1.47%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Yamana Gold. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Yamana Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Hochschild Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80

Does the media refer more to PAF or HOC?

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 5 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pan African Resources and 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.02 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pan African Resources 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Hochschild Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer HOC or CEY?

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 586, suggesting a potential upside of 1.47%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Centamin. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Hochschild Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80 Centamin 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Hochschild Mining (HOC) Competitors

GBX 577.50 -15.00 (-2.53%)

As of 11:58 AM Eastern

Compare

HOC vs. EDV, GGP, AUY, PAF, and CEY

Should you buy Hochschild Mining stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Hochschild Mining with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Hochschild Mining include Endeavour Mining (EDV), Greatland Resources (GGP), Yamana Gold (AUY), Pan African Resources (PAF), and Centamin (CEY). These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Endeavour Mining (LON:EDV) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

Endeavour Mining has a net margin of 18.88% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 29.48% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%
Endeavour Mining	18.88%	27.75%	3.54%

Hochschild Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Endeavour Mining. Endeavour Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	2.51	£38.41M	£39.00	14.81
Endeavour Mining	£4.54B	2.25	-£423.98M	£348.00	12.17

Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Endeavour Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 145 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Endeavour Mining pays out 41.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.986, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.116, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

32.9% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.7% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 586, indicating a potential upside of 1.47%. Endeavour Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 5,633.33, indicating a potential upside of 33.05%. Given Endeavour Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Endeavour Mining is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Endeavour Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Endeavour Mining's score of -1.08 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Endeavour Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

Summary

Hochschild Mining and Endeavour Mining tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Greatland Resources?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5656451, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.986, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Hochschild Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources	£2.97B	1.63	-£58.89M	£177.29	4.06
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	2.51	£38.41M	£39.00	14.81

In the previous week, Greatland Resources and Greatland Resources both had 1 articles in the media. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.72 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hochschild Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Greatland Resources currently has a consensus price target of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential upside of 4.88%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 586, indicating a potential upside of 1.47%. Given Greatland Resources' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

34.0% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.9% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.6% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Greatland Resources	33.53%	41.93%	-7.97%
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Greatland Resources on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Yamana Gold?

Yamana Gold (LON:AUY) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment and earnings.

Hochschild Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 586, suggesting a potential upside of 1.47%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Yamana Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Yamana Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.986, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Hochschild Mining has a net margin of 17.80% compared to Yamana Gold's net margin of -54.36%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 29.48% beat Yamana Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Yamana Gold	-54.36%	-31.37%	-13.38%
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%

63.8% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.9% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Yamana Gold pays out -1,204.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hochschild Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Yamana Gold. Yamana Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Yamana Gold	£1.81B	0.00	-£982.30M	-£0.83	N/A
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	2.51	£38.41M	£39.00	14.81

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Yamana Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining and 0 mentions for Yamana Gold. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Yamana Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Yamana Gold	Neutral
Hochschild Mining	Positive

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Yamana Gold on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Pan African Resources?

Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Pan African Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hochschild Mining. Pan African Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.70	£58.60M	£11.96	9.32
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	2.51	£38.41M	£39.00	14.81

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 5 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pan African Resources and 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.02 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pan African Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hochschild Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

43.7% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.9% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pan African Resources presently has a consensus target price of GBX 156.50, indicating a potential upside of 40.36%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 586, indicating a potential upside of 1.47%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.783, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.986, meaning that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.14% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 39.66% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pan African Resources	29.14%	39.66%	12.99%
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Centamin?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Centamin (LON:CEY) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.986, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Centamin has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 586, suggesting a potential upside of 1.47%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Centamin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Centamin	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Centamin pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Centamin pays out 6,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hochschild Mining is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Hochschild Mining has a net margin of 17.80% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 29.48% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%
Centamin	9.10%	14.16%	8.45%

32.9% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Centamin shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Centamin shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Centamin. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining and 0 mentions for Centamin. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Centamin's score of 0.00 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining	Positive
Centamin	Neutral

Centamin has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hochschild Mining. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	2.51	£38.41M	£39.00	14.81
Centamin	£930.75M	0.00	£84.67M	£0.05	N/A

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Centamin on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hochschild Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HOC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HOC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Hochschild Mining	Gold Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£2.97B	£5.04B	£4.97B	£2.78B
Dividend Yield	0.96%	5.59%	4.95%	6.13%
P/E Ratio	14.81	37.42	23.42	364.74
Price / Sales	2.51	206.91	6,527.01	87,565.33
Price / Cash	1.65	22.11	27.43	27.85
Price / Book	4.34	12.02	9.44	7.71
Net Income	£38.41M	£6.39M	£156.62M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-3.27%	-0.39%	0.07%	0.07%
1 Month Performance	-6.56%	-0.26%	0.81%	3.26%
1 Year Performance	105.96%	77.32%	70.03%	75.52%

Hochschild Mining Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HOC Hochschild Mining	2.5638 of 5 stars	GBX 577.50 -2.5%	GBX 586 +1.5%	+108.5%	£2.97B	£1.18B	14.81	3,029	News Coverage Gap Down
EDV Endeavour Mining	3.1544 of 5 stars	GBX 4,250 -3.8%	GBX 5,633.33 +32.5%	+76.6%	£10.26B	£4.54B	12.21	3,786	News Coverage Negative News Analyst Forecast
GGP Greatland Resources	1.5182 of 5 stars	GBX 720 -0.6%	GBX 755.67 +5.0%	+157.1%	£4.84B	£2.97B	4.06	25
AUY Yamana Gold	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£4.57B	£1.81B	N/A	11,600
PAF Pan African Resources	3.3313 of 5 stars	GBX 113.90 -1.0%	GBX 156.50 +37.4%	+138.8%	£2.31B	£837.76M	9.52	2,469	Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HOC) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Hochschild Mining (HOC) Competitors

HOC vs. EDV, GGP, AUY, PAF, and CEY

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Greatland Resources?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Yamana Gold?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Pan African Resources?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Centamin?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HOC vs. The Competition

Hochschild Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Hochschild Mining (HOC) Competitors

HOC vs. EDV, GGP, AUY, PAF, and CEY

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Is HOC or EDV more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, HOC or EDV?

Is HOC or EDV a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, HOC or EDV?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in HOC or EDV?

Do analysts prefer HOC or EDV?

Does the media favor HOC or EDV?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Greatland Resources?

Which has more risk and volatility, GGP or HOC?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, GGP or HOC?

Does the media favor GGP or HOC?

Do analysts prefer GGP or HOC?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in GGP or HOC?

Is GGP or HOC more profitable?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Yamana Gold?

Do analysts recommend AUY or HOC?

Which has more volatility and risk, AUY or HOC?

Is AUY or HOC more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in AUY or HOC?

Is AUY or HOC a better dividend stock?

Which has better valuation and earnings, AUY or HOC?

Does the media favor AUY or HOC?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Pan African Resources?

Which has better valuation & earnings, PAF or HOC?

Does the media refer more to PAF or HOC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PAF or HOC?

Do analysts prefer PAF or HOC?

Is PAF or HOC a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, PAF or HOC?

Is PAF or HOC more profitable?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Centamin?

Which has more risk & volatility, HOC or CEY?

Do analysts prefer HOC or CEY?

Is HOC or CEY a better dividend stock?

Is HOC or CEY more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in HOC or CEY?

Does the media favor HOC or CEY?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, HOC or CEY?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HOC vs. The Competition

Hochschild Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools