Does the media refer more to EDV or HOC?

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Endeavour Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Endeavour Mining 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Hochschild Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend AUY or HOC?

Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 560, indicating a potential upside of 18.39%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Yamana Gold. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Yamana Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Hochschild Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media refer more to HOC or GGP?

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining and Hochschild Mining both had 1 articles in the media. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hochschild Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Greatland Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer HOC or CEY?

Hochschild Mining presently has a consensus target price of GBX 560, indicating a potential upside of 18.39%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Centamin. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Hochschild Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Centamin 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Hochschild Mining (HOC) Competitors

GBX 469.90 +18.50 (+4.10%)

As of 10:24 AM Eastern

Compare

HOC vs. EDV, AUY, GGP, PAF, and CEY

Should you buy Hochschild Mining stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Hochschild Mining with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Hochschild Mining include Endeavour Mining (EDV), Yamana Gold (AUY), Greatland Resources (GGP), Pan African Resources (PAF), and Centamin (CEY).

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Endeavour Mining (LON:EDV) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Hochschild Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endeavour Mining. Endeavour Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour Mining	£4.75B	1.91	-£423.98M	£348.00	10.82
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	2.06	£38.41M	£39.00	12.13

59.0% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.4% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.6% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hochschild Mining has a net margin of 17.80% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 17.62%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 29.48% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Endeavour Mining	17.62%	26.18%	3.54%
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%

Endeavour Mining presently has a consensus target price of GBX 5,366.67, indicating a potential upside of 42.54%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 560, indicating a potential upside of 18.39%. Given Endeavour Mining's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Endeavour Mining is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Endeavour Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Endeavour Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 145 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Endeavour Mining pays out 41.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.139, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.954, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Endeavour Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Mining	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hochschild Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Endeavour Mining on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Yamana Gold?

Yamana Gold (LON:AUY) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

Hochschild Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Yamana Gold. Yamana Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Yamana Gold	£1.81B	0.00	-£982.30M	-£0.83	N/A
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	2.06	£38.41M	£39.00	12.13

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.954, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 560, indicating a potential upside of 18.39%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Yamana Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Yamana Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Hochschild Mining has a net margin of 17.80% compared to Yamana Gold's net margin of -54.36%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 29.48% beat Yamana Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Yamana Gold	-54.36%	-31.37%	-13.38%
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Yamana Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining and 0 mentions for Yamana Gold. Yamana Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Hochschild Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Yamana Gold	Neutral
Hochschild Mining	Neutral

63.8% of Yamana Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.4% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Yamana Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Yamana Gold pays out -1,204.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Yamana Gold on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Greatland Resources?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%
Greatland Resources	33.53%	41.93%	-7.97%

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.954, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5431277, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining and Hochschild Mining both had 1 articles in the media. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Greatland Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

31.4% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.9% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.5% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hochschild Mining presently has a consensus price target of GBX 560, suggesting a potential upside of 18.39%. Greatland Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 755.67, suggesting a potential upside of 28.62%. Given Greatland Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Hochschild Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	2.06	£38.41M	£39.00	12.13
Greatland Resources	£2.97B	1.33	-£58.89M	£177.29	3.31

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Pan African Resources?

Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Pan African Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hochschild Mining. Pan African Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.51	£58.60M	£11.96	8.67
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	2.06	£38.41M	£39.00	12.13

42.2% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.4% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pan African Resources	29.42%	49.73%	12.99%
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Pan African Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining and 0 mentions for Pan African Resources. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pan African Resources	Positive
Hochschild Mining	Neutral

Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.701, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.954, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Pan African Resources presently has a consensus target price of GBX 156.50, suggesting a potential upside of 50.92%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 560, suggesting a potential upside of 18.39%. Given Pan African Resources' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Centamin?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Centamin (LON:CEY) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation and profitability.

Centamin has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hochschild Mining. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	2.06	£38.41M	£39.00	12.13
Centamin	£930.75M	0.00	£84.67M	£0.05	N/A

Hochschild Mining presently has a consensus target price of GBX 560, indicating a potential upside of 18.39%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Centamin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Centamin	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Hochschild Mining has a net margin of 17.80% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 29.48% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%
Centamin	9.10%	14.16%	8.45%

31.4% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Centamin shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Centamin shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Centamin. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining and 0 mentions for Centamin. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Centamin'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining	Neutral
Centamin	Neutral

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.954, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Centamin has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Centamin pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Centamin pays out 6,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hochschild Mining is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Centamin on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hochschild Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HOC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HOC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Hochschild Mining	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£2.43B	£3.57B	£4.65B	£2.86B
Dividend Yield	1.36%	5.29%	4.76%	6.13%
P/E Ratio	12.13	22.04	20.63	368.56
Price / Sales	2.06	7,915.69	4,705.73	83,560.39
Price / Cash	1.65	28.93	26.47	27.89
Price / Book	3.56	9.89	8.36	7.19
Net Income	£38.41M	£122.62M	£155.10M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	8.12%	3.63%	3.16%	1.09%
1 Month Performance	-5.78%	-2.04%	-1.25%	0.78%
1 Year Performance	57.35%	47.71%	38.41%	75.16%

Hochschild Mining Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HOC Hochschild Mining	3.1602 of 5 stars	GBX 469.90 +4.1%	GBX 560 +19.2%	+49.4%	£2.42B	£1.18B	12.05	3,029	Gap Up
EDV Endeavour Mining	3.9669 of 5 stars	GBX 3,588 +0.3%	GBX 5,700 +58.9%	+50.5%	£8.65B	£4.54B	10.31	3,786
AUY Yamana Gold	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£4.57B	£1.81B	N/A	11,600
GGP Greatland Resources	2.4342 of 5 stars	GBX 544 -0.1%	GBX 755.67 +38.9%	+109.8%	£3.66B	£2.97B	3.07	25	Positive News Gap Up
PAF Pan African Resources	3.0272 of 5 stars	GBX 93.92 -1.1%	GBX 156.50 +66.6%	+65.7%	£1.90B	£837.76M	7.85	2,469	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HOC) was last updated on 8/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Hochschild Mining (HOC) Competitors

HOC vs. EDV, AUY, GGP, PAF, and CEY

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Yamana Gold?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Greatland Resources?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Pan African Resources?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Centamin?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HOC vs. The Competition

Hochschild Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Hochschild Mining (HOC) Competitors

HOC vs. EDV, AUY, GGP, PAF, and CEY

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, EDV or HOC?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in EDV or HOC?

Is EDV or HOC more profitable?

Do analysts prefer EDV or HOC?

Is EDV or HOC a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, EDV or HOC?

Does the media refer more to EDV or HOC?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Yamana Gold?

Which has better valuation and earnings, AUY or HOC?

Which has more volatility and risk, AUY or HOC?

Do analysts recommend AUY or HOC?

Is AUY or HOC more profitable?

Does the media favor AUY or HOC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in AUY or HOC?

Is AUY or HOC a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Greatland Resources?

Is HOC or GGP more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, HOC or GGP?

Does the media refer more to HOC or GGP?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of HOC or GGP?

Do analysts recommend HOC or GGP?

Which has better valuation and earnings, HOC or GGP?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Pan African Resources?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PAF or HOC?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PAF or HOC?

Is PAF or HOC more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PAF or HOC?

Is PAF or HOC a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, PAF or HOC?

Do analysts recommend PAF or HOC?

Summary

How does Hochschild Mining compare to Centamin?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, HOC or CEY?

Do analysts prefer HOC or CEY?

Is HOC or CEY more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of HOC or CEY?

Does the media prefer HOC or CEY?

Which has more risk & volatility, HOC or CEY?

Is HOC or CEY a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HOC vs. The Competition

Hochschild Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools