Does the media favor EDV or PAF?

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Endeavour Mining. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pan African Resources and 3 mentions for Endeavour Mining. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Endeavour Mining's score of -1.08 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Endeavour Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Negative Pan African Resources 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to GGP or PAF?

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 5 more articles in the media than Greatland Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pan African Resources and 1 mentions for Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.02 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Greatland Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Pan African Resources 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend AUY or PAF?

Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156.50, suggesting a potential upside of 37.28%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Yamana Gold. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Yamana Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Pan African Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media prefer HOC or PAF?

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 5 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pan African Resources and 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hochschild Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Pan African Resources 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer CEY or PAF?

Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156.50, indicating a potential upside of 37.28%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Centamin. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Centamin 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Pan African Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Pan African Resources (PAF) Competitors

GBX 113.30 -0.60 (-0.53%)

As of 06:59 AM Eastern

Compare

PAF vs. EDV, GGP, AUY, HOC, and CEY

Should you buy Pan African Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pan African Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pan African Resources include Endeavour Mining (EDV), Greatland Resources (GGP), Yamana Gold (AUY), Hochschild Mining (HOC), and Centamin (CEY). These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Endeavour Mining (LON:EDV) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

59.7% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.7% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.6% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Endeavour Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 145 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Endeavour Mining pays out 41.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.14% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 18.88%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 39.66% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Endeavour Mining	18.88%	27.75%	3.54%
Pan African Resources	29.14%	39.66%	12.99%

Pan African Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endeavour Mining. Pan African Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour Mining	£4.54B	2.25	-£423.98M	£348.00	12.18
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.76	£58.60M	£11.96	9.53

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Endeavour Mining. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pan African Resources and 3 mentions for Endeavour Mining. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Endeavour Mining's score of -1.08 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Pan African Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.116, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.783, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Endeavour Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 5,633.33, indicating a potential upside of 32.86%. Pan African Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 156.50, indicating a potential upside of 37.28%. Given Pan African Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Endeavour Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Endeavour Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Endeavour Mining on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Greatland Resources?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

34.0% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.7% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 39.6% of Greatland Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Pan African Resources' net margin of 29.14%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Pan African Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Greatland Resources	33.53%	41.93%	-7.97%
Pan African Resources	29.14%	39.66%	12.99%

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5656451, meaning that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.783, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 5 more articles in the media than Greatland Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pan African Resources and 1 mentions for Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.02 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Pan African Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Pan African Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources	£2.97B	1.64	-£58.89M	£177.29	4.08
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.76	£58.60M	£11.96	9.53

Greatland Resources presently has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, suggesting a potential upside of 4.52%. Pan African Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 156.50, suggesting a potential upside of 37.28%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Greatland Resources on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Yamana Gold?

Yamana Gold (LON:AUY) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share. Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Yamana Gold pays out -1,204.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pan African Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Yamana Gold. Yamana Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Yamana Gold	£1.81B	0.00	-£982.30M	-£0.83	N/A
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.76	£58.60M	£11.96	9.53

63.8% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.7% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.783, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.14% compared to Yamana Gold's net margin of -54.36%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 39.66% beat Yamana Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Yamana Gold	-54.36%	-31.37%	-13.38%
Pan African Resources	29.14%	39.66%	12.99%

Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156.50, suggesting a potential upside of 37.28%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Yamana Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Yamana Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 6 more articles in the media than Yamana Gold. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pan African Resources and 0 mentions for Yamana Gold. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Yamana Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Yamana Gold	Neutral
Pan African Resources	Neutral

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Yamana Gold on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

32.9% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.7% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 586, suggesting a potential upside of 0.34%. Pan African Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 156.50, suggesting a potential upside of 37.28%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Pan African Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hochschild Mining. Pan African Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	2.54	£38.41M	£39.00	14.97
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.76	£58.60M	£11.96	9.53

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.986, meaning that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.783, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.14% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 39.66% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%
Pan African Resources	29.14%	39.66%	12.99%

Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 5 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pan African Resources and 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Pan African Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Centamin?

Centamin (LON:CEY) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Centamin has higher revenue and earnings than Pan African Resources. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Centamin	£930.75M	0.00	£84.67M	£0.05	N/A
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.76	£58.60M	£11.96	9.53

90.8% of Centamin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.7% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Centamin shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Centamin pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Centamin pays out 6,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan African Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.14% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 39.66% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Centamin	9.10%	14.16%	8.45%
Pan African Resources	29.14%	39.66%	12.99%

Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156.50, indicating a potential upside of 37.28%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Centamin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Centamin	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 6 more articles in the media than Centamin. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pan African Resources and 0 mentions for Centamin. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Centamin's score of 0.00 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Centamin	Neutral
Pan African Resources	Neutral

Centamin has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.783, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Centamin on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pan African Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PAF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PAF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pan African Resources	Gold Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£2.31B	£5.11B	£4.93B	£2.79B
Dividend Yield	1.59%	5.58%	4.95%	6.13%
P/E Ratio	9.53	37.92	23.78	364.91
Price / Sales	2.76	209.00	6,544.15	87,573.60
Price / Cash	11.87	22.11	27.35	27.85
Price / Book	6.00	12.12	9.66	7.84
Net Income	£58.60M	£6.39M	£156.62M	£5.88B
7 Day Performance	-17.09%	0.98%	1.55%	6.80%
1 Month Performance	-18.39%	1.20%	2.22%	10.02%
1 Year Performance	137.25%	80.32%	72.88%	75.92%

Pan African Resources Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PAF Pan African Resources	3.3686 of 5 stars	GBX 113.30 -0.5%	GBX 156.50 +38.1%	+138.8%	£2.30B	£837.76M	9.47	2,469	Analyst Forecast
EDV Endeavour Mining	3.2042 of 5 stars	GBX 4,432.65 -0.1%	GBX 5,633.33 +27.1%	+76.6%	£10.70B	£4.54B	12.74	3,786	News Coverage Negative News Analyst Forecast
GGP Greatland Resources	1.3444 of 5 stars	GBX 701 -2.0%	GBX 755.67 +7.8%	+157.1%	£4.72B	£2.97B	3.95	25
AUY Yamana Gold	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£4.57B	£1.81B	N/A	11,600
HOC Hochschild Mining	1.8122 of 5 stars	GBX 597 +0.3%	GBX 586 -1.8%	+108.5%	£3.07B	£1.18B	15.31	3,029	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PAF) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pan African Resources (PAF) Competitors

PAF vs. EDV, GGP, AUY, HOC, and CEY

How does Pan African Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Greatland Resources?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Yamana Gold?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Centamin?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PAF vs. The Competition

Pan African Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pan African Resources (PAF) Competitors

PAF vs. EDV, GGP, AUY, HOC, and CEY

How does Pan African Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in EDV or PAF?

Is EDV or PAF a better dividend stock?

Is EDV or PAF more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, EDV or PAF?

Does the media favor EDV or PAF?

Which has more risk & volatility, EDV or PAF?

Do analysts prefer EDV or PAF?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Greatland Resources?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in GGP or PAF?

Is GGP or PAF more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, GGP or PAF?

Does the media refer more to GGP or PAF?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, GGP or PAF?

Do analysts prefer GGP or PAF?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Yamana Gold?

Is AUY or PAF a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AUY or PAF?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of AUY or PAF?

Which has more risk and volatility, AUY or PAF?

Is AUY or PAF more profitable?

Do analysts recommend AUY or PAF?

Does the media refer more to AUY or PAF?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HOC or PAF?

Do analysts prefer HOC or PAF?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, HOC or PAF?

Which has more risk and volatility, HOC or PAF?

Is HOC or PAF more profitable?

Is HOC or PAF a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer HOC or PAF?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Centamin?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, CEY or PAF?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CEY or PAF?

Is CEY or PAF a better dividend stock?

Is CEY or PAF more profitable?

Do analysts prefer CEY or PAF?

Does the media prefer CEY or PAF?

Which has more volatility and risk, CEY or PAF?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PAF vs. The Competition

Pan African Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools