Do analysts recommend PAF or AUY?

Pan African Resources presently has a consensus price target of GBX 156.50, indicating a potential upside of 69.83%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Yamana Gold. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pan African Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Yamana Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts rate CEY or PAF?

Pan African Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 156.50, suggesting a potential upside of 69.83%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Centamin. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Centamin 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Pan African Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Pan African Resources (PAF) Competitors

GBX 92.15 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 07/31/2026 12:33 PM Eastern

Compare

PAF vs. AUY, GGP, HOC, CEY, and RSG

Should you buy Pan African Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pan African Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pan African Resources include Yamana Gold (AUY), Greatland Resources (GGP), Hochschild Mining (HOC), Centamin (CEY), and Resolute Mining (RSG).

How does Pan African Resources compare to Yamana Gold?

Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) and Yamana Gold (LON:AUY) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability and dividends.

42.2% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.8% of Yamana Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Yamana Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pan African Resources presently has a consensus price target of GBX 156.50, indicating a potential upside of 69.83%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Yamana Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Yamana Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Yamana Gold's net margin of -54.36%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Yamana Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pan African Resources	29.42%	49.73%	12.99%
Yamana Gold	-54.36%	-31.37%	-13.38%

Pan African Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Yamana Gold. Yamana Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.23	£58.60M	£11.96	7.70
Yamana Gold	£1.81B	0.00	-£982.30M	-£0.83	N/A

Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.705, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yamana Gold pays out -1,204.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Yamana Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pan African Resources	Neutral
Yamana Gold	Neutral

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Yamana Gold on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Greatland Resources?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

Greatland Resources presently has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential upside of 46.45%. Pan African Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 156.50, indicating a potential upside of 69.83%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

33.9% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.2% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.5% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5431277, meaning that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.705, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Pan African Resources' net margin of 29.42%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Greatland Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Greatland Resources	33.53%	41.93%	-7.97%
Pan African Resources	29.42%	49.73%	12.99%

Pan African Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources	£2.97B	1.17	-£58.89M	£177.29	2.91
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.23	£58.60M	£11.96	7.70

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Pan African Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greatland Resources and 0 mentions for Pan African Resources. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources	Positive
Pan African Resources	Neutral

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Greatland Resources on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%
Pan African Resources	29.42%	49.73%	12.99%

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Pan African Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hochschild Mining and 0 mentions for Pan African Resources. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining	Positive
Pan African Resources	Neutral

Pan African Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hochschild Mining. Pan African Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	1.88	£38.41M	£39.00	11.06
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.23	£58.60M	£11.96	7.70

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 560, indicating a potential upside of 29.81%. Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156.50, indicating a potential upside of 69.83%. Given Pan African Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.954, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.705, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

31.4% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.2% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Pan African Resources on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Centamin?

Centamin (LON:CEY) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Centamin	9.10%	14.16%	8.45%
Pan African Resources	29.42%	49.73%	12.99%

90.8% of Centamin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.2% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Centamin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Centamin's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pan African Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Centamin	Neutral
Pan African Resources	Neutral

Centamin has higher revenue and earnings than Pan African Resources. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Centamin	£930.75M	0.00	£84.67M	£0.05	N/A
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.23	£58.60M	£11.96	7.70

Centamin pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Centamin pays out 6,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan African Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Pan African Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 156.50, suggesting a potential upside of 69.83%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Centamin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Centamin	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Centamin has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.705, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Centamin on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Resolute Mining?

Resolute Mining (LON:RSG) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Resolute Mining's net margin of 12.76%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Resolute Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Resolute Mining	12.76%	17.01%	6.41%
Pan African Resources	29.42%	49.73%	12.99%

In the previous week, Resolute Mining had 4 more articles in the media than Pan African Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Resolute Mining and 0 mentions for Pan African Resources. Resolute Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Resolute Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Resolute Mining	Positive
Pan African Resources	Neutral

Pan African Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Resolute Mining. Pan African Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Resolute Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Resolute Mining	£865.60M	1.21	£15.35M	£5.99	8.18
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.23	£58.60M	£11.96	7.70

Resolute Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 283.67, indicating a potential upside of 478.91%. Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156.50, indicating a potential upside of 69.83%. Given Resolute Mining's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Resolute Mining is more favorable than Pan African Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Resolute Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Resolute Mining has a beta of 1.319, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.705, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

37.9% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.2% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Resolute Mining on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pan African Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PAF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PAF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pan African Resources	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£1.87B	£3.51B	£4.60B	£2.79B
Dividend Yield	2.36%	5.28%	4.76%	6.15%
P/E Ratio	7.70	21.28	20.10	368.29
Price / Sales	2.23	7,980.09	4,739.84	83,501.30
Price / Cash	11.87	26.27	24.35	27.89
Price / Book	4.85	9.66	8.19	7.04
Net Income	£58.60M	£122.62M	£155.10M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-4.11%	-1.07%	-0.85%	6.05%
1 Month Performance	-11.05%	-4.62%	-3.51%	-0.22%
1 Year Performance	66.04%	47.32%	37.92%	63.72%

Pan African Resources Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PAF Pan African Resources	N/A	GBX 92.15 flat	GBX 156.50 +69.8%	+66.0%	£1.87B	£837.76M	7.70	2,469	Gap Up
AUY Yamana Gold	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£4.57B	£1.81B	N/A	11,600
GGP Greatland Resources	2.3976 of 5 stars	GBX 517.50 -4.9%	GBX 755.67 +46.0%	+96.9%	£3.48B	£2.97B	2.92	25	Gap Up
HOC Hochschild Mining	4.4049 of 5 stars	GBX 437.49 -1.6%	GBX 560 +28.0%	+48.6%	£2.25B	£1.18B	11.22	3,029	High Trading Volume
CEY Centamin	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£1.69B	£930.75M	2,920.00	4,874

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PAF) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pan African Resources (PAF) Competitors

PAF vs. AUY, GGP, HOC, CEY, and RSG

How does Pan African Resources compare to Yamana Gold?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Greatland Resources?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Centamin?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Resolute Mining?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PAF vs. The Competition

Pan African Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pan African Resources (PAF) Competitors

PAF vs. AUY, GGP, HOC, CEY, and RSG

How does Pan African Resources compare to Yamana Gold?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in PAF or AUY?

Do analysts recommend PAF or AUY?

Is PAF or AUY more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, PAF or AUY?

Which has more volatility & risk, PAF or AUY?

Is PAF or AUY a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer PAF or AUY?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Greatland Resources?

Do analysts recommend GGP or PAF?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in GGP or PAF?

Which has more volatility and risk, GGP or PAF?

Is GGP or PAF more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, GGP or PAF?

Does the media prefer GGP or PAF?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Is HOC or PAF more profitable?

Does the media favor HOC or PAF?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, HOC or PAF?

Do analysts rate HOC or PAF?

Which has more volatility and risk, HOC or PAF?

Is HOC or PAF a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in HOC or PAF?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Centamin?

Is CEY or PAF more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CEY or PAF?

Does the media prefer CEY or PAF?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CEY or PAF?

Is CEY or PAF a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate CEY or PAF?

Which has more risk and volatility, CEY or PAF?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Resolute Mining?

Is RSG or PAF more profitable?

Does the media prefer RSG or PAF?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, RSG or PAF?

Do analysts prefer RSG or PAF?

Which has more risk & volatility, RSG or PAF?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in RSG or PAF?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PAF vs. The Competition

Pan African Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools