Does the media favor GGP or PAF?

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 4 more articles in the media than Greatland Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Pan African Resources and 1 mentions for Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.30 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Greatland Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Pan African Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to PAF or HOC?

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 4 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Pan African Resources and 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.30 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pan African Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Hochschild Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer PAF or CEY?

Pan African Resources currently has a consensus price target of GBX 156, suggesting a potential upside of 26.42%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Centamin. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pan African Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Centamin 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts rate HGM or PAF?

Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156, suggesting a potential upside of 26.42%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L) 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Pan African Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Pan African Resources (PAF) Competitors

GBX 123.40 -2.80 (-2.22%)

As of 09/11/2026 12:44 PM Eastern

Compare

PAF vs. GGP, HOC, CEY, RSG, and HGM

Should you buy Pan African Resources stock or one of its competitors? Pan African Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Greatland Resources (GGP), Hochschild Mining (HOC), Centamin (CEY), Resolute Mining (RSG), and Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L) (HGM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Greatland Resources?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability and dividends.

33.6% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.9% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 36.0% of Greatland Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 4 more articles in the media than Greatland Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Pan African Resources and 1 mentions for Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.30 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Pan African Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Pan African Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources	£2.26B	1.74	-£58.89M	£241.92	2.41
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.99	£58.60M	£11.96	10.32

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 38.25% compared to Pan African Resources' net margin of 29.42%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Greatland Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Greatland Resources	38.25%	43.79%	-7.97%
Pan African Resources	29.42%	49.73%	12.99%

Greatland Resources currently has a consensus price target of GBX 733.67, suggesting a potential upside of 26.06%. Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156, suggesting a potential upside of 26.42%. Given Pan African Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.401, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.701, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Greatland Resources on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Pan African Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hochschild Mining. Pan African Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.99	£58.60M	£11.96	10.32
Hochschild Mining	£1.51B	2.09	£38.41M	£58.00	10.55

Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining pays out 10.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 4 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Pan African Resources and 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.30 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pan African Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hochschild Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

41.9% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.3% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pan African Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 156, suggesting a potential upside of 26.42%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 671, suggesting a potential upside of 9.64%. Given Pan African Resources' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.701, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.996, suggesting that its stock price is 0% less volatile than the broader market.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 19.80%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pan African Resources	29.42%	49.73%	12.99%
Hochschild Mining	19.80%	35.59%	7.11%

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Centamin?

Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) and Centamin (LON:CEY) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

41.9% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Centamin shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Centamin shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pan African Resources	29.42%	49.73%	12.99%
Centamin	9.10%	14.16%	8.45%

Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.701, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Centamin has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Centamin pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Centamin pays out 6,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pan African Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Pan African Resources currently has a consensus price target of GBX 156, suggesting a potential upside of 26.42%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Centamin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Centamin	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Centamin has higher revenue and earnings than Pan African Resources. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.99	£58.60M	£11.96	10.32
Centamin	£930.75M	0.00	£84.67M	£0.05	N/A

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 5 more articles in the media than Centamin. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Pan African Resources and 0 mentions for Centamin. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Centamin's score of 0.00 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pan African Resources	Neutral
Centamin	Neutral

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Centamin on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Resolute Mining?

Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) and Resolute Mining (LON:RSG) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

Pan African Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 156, suggesting a potential upside of 26.42%. Resolute Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 240.25, suggesting a potential upside of 224.66%. Given Resolute Mining's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Resolute Mining is more favorable than Pan African Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Resolute Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Resolute Mining's net margin of 17.87%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Resolute Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pan African Resources	29.42%	49.73%	12.99%
Resolute Mining	17.87%	23.32%	6.41%

41.9% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.8% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pan African Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Resolute Mining. Resolute Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.99	£58.60M	£11.96	10.32
Resolute Mining	£1.00B	1.58	£15.35M	£9.04	8.19

Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.701, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resolute Mining has a beta of 1.325, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 5 more articles in the media than Resolute Mining. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Pan African Resources and 0 mentions for Resolute Mining. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Resolute Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pan African Resources	Neutral
Resolute Mining	Neutral

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Resolute Mining on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)?

Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L) (LON:HGM) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L) pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L) pays out 15.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)	N/A	N/A	N/A
Pan African Resources	29.42%	49.73%	12.99%

41.9% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pan African Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L). Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)	£415.23M	0.00	N/A	£46.30	N/A
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.99	£58.60M	£11.96	10.32

Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156, suggesting a potential upside of 26.42%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 5 more articles in the media than Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L). MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Pan African Resources and 0 mentions for Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L). Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)	Neutral
Pan African Resources	Neutral

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L) on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pan African Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PAF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PAF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pan African Resources	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£2.50B	£3.93B	£4.92B	£2.87B
Dividend Yield	1.62%	5.17%	4.68%	6.23%
P/E Ratio	10.32	26.26	26.16	366.83
Price / Sales	2.99	8,047.91	4,792.90	83,599.70
Price / Cash	11.87	29.51	26.92	27.89
Price / Book	6.50	12.33	10.24	6.33
Net Income	£58.60M	£127.55M	£158.16M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-10.53%	-1.38%	-1.40%	-0.69%
1 Month Performance	7.49%	9.77%	7.12%	0.18%
1 Year Performance	60.26%	47.25%	37.29%	20.03%

Pan African Resources Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PAF Pan African Resources	3.2932 of 5 stars	GBX 123.40 -2.2%	GBX 156 +26.4%	+61.7%	£2.50B	£837.76M	10.32	2,494	News Coverage Analyst Forecast High Trading Volume
GGP Greatland Resources	3.0324 of 5 stars	GBX 609.50 -0.1%	GBX 733.67 +20.4%	+90.8%	£4.11B	£4.35B	2.52	25
HOC Hochschild Mining	3.5819 of 5 stars	GBX 647.44 -0.8%	GBX 671 +3.6%	+84.6%	£3.33B	£1.51B	11.16	3,029	Gap Down
CEY Centamin	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£1.69B	£930.75M	2,920.00	4,874
RSG Resolute Mining	2.4329 of 5 stars	GBX 77 +2.9%	GBX 240.25 +212.0%	+78.3%	£1.65B	£1.00B	8.52	40,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PAF) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pan African Resources (PAF) Competitors

PAF vs. GGP, HOC, CEY, RSG, and HGM

How does Pan African Resources compare to Greatland Resources?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Centamin?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Resolute Mining?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PAF vs. The Competition

Pan African Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pan African Resources (PAF) Competitors

PAF vs. GGP, HOC, CEY, RSG, and HGM

How does Pan African Resources compare to Greatland Resources?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in GGP or PAF?

Does the media favor GGP or PAF?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GGP or PAF?

Is GGP or PAF more profitable?

Do analysts rate GGP or PAF?

Which has more volatility & risk, GGP or PAF?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PAF or HOC?

Is PAF or HOC a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to PAF or HOC?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PAF or HOC?

Do analysts prefer PAF or HOC?

Which has more volatility and risk, PAF or HOC?

Is PAF or HOC more profitable?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Centamin?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PAF or CEY?

Is PAF or CEY more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, PAF or CEY?

Is PAF or CEY a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer PAF or CEY?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PAF or CEY?

Does the media prefer PAF or CEY?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Resolute Mining?

Do analysts recommend PAF or RSG?

Is PAF or RSG more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of PAF or RSG?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PAF or RSG?

Which has more volatility & risk, PAF or RSG?

Does the media prefer PAF or RSG?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)?

Is HGM or PAF a better dividend stock?

Is HGM or PAF more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in HGM or PAF?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, HGM or PAF?

Do analysts rate HGM or PAF?

Does the media favor HGM or PAF?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PAF vs. The Competition

Pan African Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools