Does the media prefer PAF or GGP?

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Pan African Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Greatland Resources and 1 mentions for Pan African Resources. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.22 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pan African Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Greatland Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer PAF or HOC?

In the previous week, Pan African Resources and Pan African Resources both had 1 articles in the media. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.03 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pan African Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hochschild Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend CEY or PAF?

Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156, indicating a potential upside of 26.52%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Centamin. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Centamin 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Pan African Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media favor RSG or PAF?

In the previous week, Resolute Mining and Resolute Mining both had 1 articles in the media. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Resolute Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Resolute Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Pan African Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend HGM or PAF?

Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156, indicating a potential upside of 26.52%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L) 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Pan African Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Pan African Resources (PAF) Competitors

GBX 122.10 +1.90 (+1.58%)

As of 11:01 AM Eastern

Compare

PAF vs. GGP, HOC, CEY, RSG, and HGM

Should you buy Pan African Resources stock or one of its competitors? Pan African Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Greatland Resources (GGP), Hochschild Mining (HOC), Centamin (CEY), Resolute Mining (RSG), and Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L) (HGM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Greatland Resources?

Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Pan African Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 156, suggesting a potential upside of 26.52%. Greatland Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 733.67, suggesting a potential upside of 34.08%. Given Greatland Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Pan African Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

41.9% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.6% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.0% of Greatland Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.744, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.401, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Pan African Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Greatland Resources and 1 mentions for Pan African Resources. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.22 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pan African Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Greatland Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 38.25% compared to Pan African Resources' net margin of 30.89%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 61.74% beat Greatland Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pan African Resources	30.89%	61.74%	12.99%
Greatland Resources	38.25%	43.79%	-7.97%

Pan African Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pan African Resources	£1.16B	2.16	£58.60M	£11.96	10.31
Greatland Resources	£2.26B	1.63	-£58.89M	£241.92	2.26

Summary

Pan African Resources and Greatland Resources tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

Pan African Resources currently has a consensus price target of GBX 156, suggesting a potential upside of 26.52%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 671, suggesting a potential upside of 21.56%. Given Pan African Resources' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.744, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.996, meaning that its stock price is 0% less volatile than the broader market.

Pan African Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hochschild Mining. Hochschild Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pan African Resources	£1.16B	2.16	£58.60M	£11.96	10.31
Hochschild Mining	£1.51B	1.88	£38.41M	£58.00	9.52

41.9% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.3% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Pan African Resources and Pan African Resources both had 1 articles in the media. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.03 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pan African Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hochschild Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 30.89% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 19.80%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 61.74% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pan African Resources	30.89%	61.74%	12.99%
Hochschild Mining	19.80%	35.59%	7.11%

Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining pays out 10.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Centamin?

Centamin (LON:CEY) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156, indicating a potential upside of 26.52%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Centamin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Centamin	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Centamin has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.744, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Centamin pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Centamin pays out 6,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan African Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Centamin. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pan African Resources and 0 mentions for Centamin. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Centamin's score of 0.00 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Centamin	Neutral
Pan African Resources	Positive

90.8% of Centamin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.9% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Centamin shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 30.89% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 61.74% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Centamin	9.10%	14.16%	8.45%
Pan African Resources	30.89%	61.74%	12.99%

Centamin has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pan African Resources. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Centamin	£930.75M	0.00	£84.67M	£0.05	N/A
Pan African Resources	£1.16B	2.16	£58.60M	£11.96	10.31

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Centamin on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Resolute Mining?

Resolute Mining (LON:RSG) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation and earnings.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 30.89% compared to Resolute Mining's net margin of 17.87%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 61.74% beat Resolute Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Resolute Mining	17.87%	23.32%	6.41%
Pan African Resources	30.89%	61.74%	12.99%

Resolute Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 240.25, indicating a potential upside of 298.87%. Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156, indicating a potential upside of 26.52%. Given Resolute Mining's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Resolute Mining is more favorable than Pan African Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Resolute Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Pan African Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Resolute Mining. Resolute Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Resolute Mining	£1.00B	1.28	£15.35M	£9.04	6.66
Pan African Resources	£1.16B	2.16	£58.60M	£11.96	10.31

Resolute Mining has a beta of 1.325, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.744, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Resolute Mining and Resolute Mining both had 1 articles in the media. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Resolute Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Resolute Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Pan African Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

37.8% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.9% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Resolute Mining on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan African Resources compare to Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)?

Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L) (LON:HGM) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156, indicating a potential upside of 26.52%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pan African Resources and 0 mentions for Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L). Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)	Neutral
Pan African Resources	Positive

41.9% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pan African Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L). Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)	£415.23M	0.00	N/A	£46.30	N/A
Pan African Resources	£1.16B	2.16	£58.60M	£11.96	10.31

Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L) pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L) pays out 15.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 30.89% compared to Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 61.74% beat Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)	N/A	N/A	N/A
Pan African Resources	30.89%	61.74%	12.99%

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L) on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pan African Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PAF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PAF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pan African Resources	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£2.50B	£3.72B	£4.71B	£2.80B
Dividend Yield	3.01%	5.24%	4.75%	6.18%
P/E Ratio	10.31	24.81	25.09	366.12
Price / Sales	2.16	27,822.55	16,578.37	89,425.17
Price / Cash	11.87	27.14	24.99	27.89
Price / Book	6.49	12.27	10.18	6.83
Net Income	£58.60M	£127.43M	£158.44M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.80%	-3.19%	-2.77%	-0.70%
1 Month Performance	-6.02%	-4.54%	-4.42%	16.91%
1 Year Performance	37.81%	20.64%	17.73%	16.43%

Pan African Resources Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PAF Pan African Resources	3.6436 of 5 stars	GBX 122.10 +1.6%	GBX 156 +27.8%	+37.3%	£2.48B	£1.16B	10.21	2,494
GGP Greatland Resources	3.0396 of 5 stars	GBX 582 +1.0%	GBX 733.67 +26.1%	+47.8%	£3.93B	£2.26B	2.41	25
HOC Hochschild Mining	4.305 of 5 stars	GBX 581 -2.6%	GBX 671 +15.5%	+42.9%	£2.99B	£1.51B	10.02	3,199
CEY Centamin	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£1.69B	£930.75M	2,920.00	4,874
RSG Resolute Mining	2.2859 of 5 stars	GBX 63.20 -2.8%	GBX 240.25 +280.1%	+18.6%	£1.35B	£1.00B	6.99	40,000	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PAF) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pan African Resources (PAF) Competitors

PAF vs. GGP, HOC, CEY, RSG, and HGM

How does Pan African Resources compare to Greatland Resources?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Centamin?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Resolute Mining?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PAF vs. The Competition

Pan African Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pan African Resources (PAF) Competitors

PAF vs. GGP, HOC, CEY, RSG, and HGM

How does Pan African Resources compare to Greatland Resources?

Do analysts rate PAF or GGP?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of PAF or GGP?

Which has more volatility and risk, PAF or GGP?

Does the media prefer PAF or GGP?

Is PAF or GGP more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PAF or GGP?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Do analysts recommend PAF or HOC?

Which has more volatility & risk, PAF or HOC?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PAF or HOC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PAF or HOC?

Does the media prefer PAF or HOC?

Is PAF or HOC more profitable?

Is PAF or HOC a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Centamin?

Do analysts recommend CEY or PAF?

Which has more volatility & risk, CEY or PAF?

Is CEY or PAF a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to CEY or PAF?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CEY or PAF?

Is CEY or PAF more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CEY or PAF?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Resolute Mining?

Is RSG or PAF more profitable?

Do analysts rate RSG or PAF?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, RSG or PAF?

Which has more risk & volatility, RSG or PAF?

Does the media favor RSG or PAF?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in RSG or PAF?

Summary

How does Pan African Resources compare to Highland Gold Mining Limited (HGM.L)?

Do analysts recommend HGM or PAF?

Does the media favor HGM or PAF?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in HGM or PAF?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, HGM or PAF?

Is HGM or PAF a better dividend stock?

Is HGM or PAF more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PAF vs. The Competition

Pan African Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools