Free Trial

Greatland Resources (GGP) Competitors

Greatland Resources logo
GBX 544.50 +11.00 (+2.06%)
As of 11:59 AM Eastern

GGP vs. EDV, HOC, PAF, CEY, and RSG

Should you buy Greatland Resources stock or one of its competitors? Greatland Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Endeavour Mining (EDV), Hochschild Mining (HOC), Pan African Resources (PAF), Centamin (CEY), and Resolute Mining (RSG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Endeavour Mining (LON:EDV) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Endeavour Mining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Greatland Resources and 2 mentions for Endeavour Mining. Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.22 indicating that Endeavour Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Greatland Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 38.25% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 17.62%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 43.79% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Endeavour Mining17.62% 26.18% 3.54%
Greatland Resources 38.25%43.79%-7.97%

Endeavour Mining presently has a consensus price target of GBX 4,900, suggesting a potential upside of 15.95%. Greatland Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 733.67, suggesting a potential upside of 37.13%. Given Greatland Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Endeavour Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Endeavour Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Greatland Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endeavour Mining. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour Mining£4.75B2.14-£423.98M£340.0012.43
Greatland Resources£2.26B1.60-£58.89M£241.922.21

Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.139, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.401, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

59.6% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.6% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.0% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Endeavour Mining on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 38.25% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 19.80%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 43.79% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining19.80% 35.59% 7.11%
Greatland Resources 38.25%43.79%-7.97%

Hochschild Mining presently has a consensus price target of GBX 671, indicating a potential upside of 26.72%. Greatland Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 733.67, indicating a potential upside of 37.13%. Given Greatland Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hochschild Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

32.3% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.6% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.0% of Greatland Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.996, indicating that its stock price is 0% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.401, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Greatland Resources and 2 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.22 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Greatland Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Hochschild Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining£1.51B1.81£38.41M£58.009.13
Greatland Resources£2.26B1.60-£58.89M£241.922.21

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Pan African Resources?

Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 38.25% compared to Pan African Resources' net margin of 30.89%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 61.74% beat Greatland Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pan African Resources30.89% 61.74% 12.99%
Greatland Resources 38.25%43.79%-7.97%

41.9% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.6% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.0% of Greatland Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pan African Resources presently has a consensus price target of GBX 156, suggesting a potential upside of 29.68%. Greatland Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 733.67, suggesting a potential upside of 37.13%. Given Greatland Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Pan African Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pan African Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Pan African Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pan African Resources£1.16B2.11£58.60M£17.606.84
Greatland Resources£2.26B1.60-£58.89M£241.922.21

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Pan African Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Greatland Resources and 1 mentions for Pan African Resources. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.22 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pan African Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Greatland Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.744, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.401, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pan African Resources and Greatland Resources tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Centamin?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Centamin (LON:CEY) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 38.25% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 43.79% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greatland Resources38.25% 43.79% -7.97%
Centamin 9.10%14.16%8.45%

33.6% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Centamin shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.0% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Centamin shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Greatland Resources presently has a consensus target price of GBX 733.67, suggesting a potential upside of 37.13%. Given Greatland Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Centamin.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Centamin
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.401, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Centamin has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Centamin has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greatland Resources. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greatland Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources£2.26B1.60-£58.89M£241.922.21
Centamin£930.75M0.00£84.67M£0.05N/A

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Centamin. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Greatland Resources and 0 mentions for Centamin. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Centamin's score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources Neutral
Centamin Neutral

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Centamin on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Resolute Mining?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Resolute Mining (LON:RSG) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

33.6% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.8% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.0% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 38.25% compared to Resolute Mining's net margin of 17.87%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 43.79% beat Resolute Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greatland Resources38.25% 43.79% -7.97%
Resolute Mining 17.87%23.32%6.41%

Greatland Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 733.67, indicating a potential upside of 37.13%. Resolute Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 240.25, indicating a potential upside of 288.75%. Given Resolute Mining's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Resolute Mining is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Resolute Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.401, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resolute Mining has a beta of 1.325, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Resolute Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Resolute Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources£2.26B1.60-£58.89M£241.922.21
Resolute Mining£1.00B1.32£15.35M£9.046.84

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Resolute Mining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Greatland Resources and 2 mentions for Resolute Mining. Resolute Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.22 indicating that Resolute Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Resolute Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Resolute Mining on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Greatland Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GGP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GGP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GGP vs. The Competition

MetricGreatland ResourcesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.67B£3.78B£4.75B£2.83B
Dividend YieldN/A5.24%4.76%6.26%
P/E Ratio2.2525.2425.05366.25
Price / Sales1.6327,015.2616,097.9389,151.67
Price / Cash25.6327.1324.9927.89
Price / Book644.8011.639.696.96
Net Income-£58.89M£127.14M£159.30M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.63%-1.12%-1.00%-0.62%
1 Month Performance-12.18%-5.15%-4.92%-1.07%
1 Year Performance45.59%19.05%16.28%22.84%

Greatland Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GGP
Greatland Resources
3.2345 of 5 stars
GBX 544.50
+2.1%
GBX 733.67
+34.7%
+48.9%£3.67B£2.26B2.2525
EDV
Endeavour Mining
3.1024 of 5 stars
GBX 4,525
+1.6%
GBX 4,900
+8.3%
+35.9%£10.91B£4.75B13.313,786
HOC
Hochschild Mining
4.6317 of 5 stars
GBX 570.50
+2.1%
GBX 671
+17.6%
+40.5%£2.93B£1.51B9.843,199
PAF
Pan African Resources
3.6234 of 5 stars
GBX 122.32
+1.2%
GBX 156
+27.5%
+32.9%£2.48B£1.16B10.232,494
CEY
Centamin
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.69B£930.75M2,920.004,874

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GGP) was last updated on 10/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners