Free Trial

Greatland Resources (GGP) Competitors

Greatland Resources logo
GBX 750.91 +33.41 (+4.66%)
As of 06/5/2026 12:08 PM Eastern

GGP vs. EDV, AUY, HOC, PAF, and CEY

Should you buy Greatland Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Greatland Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Greatland Resources include Endeavour Mining (EDV), Yamana Gold (AUY), Hochschild Mining (HOC), Pan African Resources (PAF), and Centamin (CEY). These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Endeavour Mining (LON:EDV) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.116, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5663316, meaning that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Greatland Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endeavour Mining. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour Mining£4.54B2.11-£423.98M£348.0011.42
Greatland Resources£2.97B1.70-£58.89M£177.294.24

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 18.88%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Endeavour Mining18.88% 27.75% 3.54%
Greatland Resources 33.53%41.93%-7.97%

59.7% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.0% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 6.6% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of Greatland Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Endeavour Mining presently has a consensus target price of GBX 5,900, indicating a potential upside of 48.43%. Greatland Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential upside of 0.63%. Given Endeavour Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Endeavour Mining is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Endeavour Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 4 more articles in the media than Greatland Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 1 mentions for Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Endeavour Mining's score of -0.56 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Greatland Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Endeavour Mining beats Greatland Resources on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Yamana Gold?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Yamana Gold (LON:AUY) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

34.0% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.8% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.6% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Greatland Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential upside of 0.63%. Given Greatland Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Yamana Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Yamana Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Yamana Gold's net margin of -54.36%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Yamana Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greatland Resources33.53% 41.93% -7.97%
Yamana Gold -54.36%-31.37%-13.38%

Greatland Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Yamana Gold. Yamana Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greatland Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources£2.97B1.70-£58.89M£177.294.24
Yamana Gold£1.81B0.00-£982.30M-£0.83N/A

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Yamana Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Greatland Resources and 0 mentions for Yamana Gold. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Yamana Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources Positive
Yamana Gold Neutral

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5663316, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Yamana Gold on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 586, indicating a potential upside of 8.22%. Greatland Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential upside of 0.63%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hochschild Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.986, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5663316, meaning that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Hochschild Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining£1.18B2.36£38.41M£39.0013.88
Greatland Resources£2.97B1.70-£58.89M£177.294.24

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining17.80% 29.48% 7.11%
Greatland Resources 33.53%41.93%-7.97%

32.9% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.0% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Greatland Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hochschild Mining and 1 mentions for Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.25 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Greatland Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Greatland Resources on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Pan African Resources?

Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Pan African Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pan African Resources£837.76M2.67£58.60M£11.969.22
Greatland Resources£2.97B1.70-£58.89M£177.294.24

Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.783, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5663316, indicating that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Pan African Resources presently has a consensus target price of GBX 156.50, indicating a potential upside of 41.87%. Greatland Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential upside of 0.63%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pan African Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Pan African Resources' net margin of 29.14%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Pan African Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pan African Resources29.14% 39.66% 12.99%
Greatland Resources 33.53%41.93%-7.97%

43.7% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.0% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of Greatland Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 5 more articles in the media than Greatland Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pan African Resources and 1 mentions for Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.02 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pan African Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Greatland Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Greatland Resources on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Centamin?

Centamin (LON:CEY) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Centamin. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Greatland Resources and 0 mentions for Centamin. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Centamin's score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Centamin Neutral
Greatland Resources Positive

Greatland Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 755.67, suggesting a potential upside of 0.63%. Given Greatland Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Centamin.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Centamin
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Centamin9.10% 14.16% 8.45%
Greatland Resources 33.53%41.93%-7.97%

Centamin has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5663316, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Centamin has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greatland Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centamin£930.75M0.00£84.67M£0.05N/A
Greatland Resources£2.97B1.70-£58.89M£177.294.24

90.8% of Centamin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.0% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Centamin shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of Greatland Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Centamin on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Greatland Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GGP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GGP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GGP vs. The Competition

MetricGreatland ResourcesGold IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£5.05B£5.08B£4.88B£2.77B
Dividend YieldN/A5.60%4.96%6.12%
P/E Ratio4.2436.1522.54365.21
Price / Sales1.70206.877,026.6487,168.40
Price / Cash25.6322.1127.2127.85
Price / Book889.2411.969.127.68
Net Income-£58.89M£6.39M£156.62M£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.83%-4.58%-4.32%-0.52%
1 Month Performance-2.29%-4.78%-4.00%2.08%
1 Year Performance156.11%71.74%59.95%72.75%

Greatland Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GGP
Greatland Resources
1.3326 of 5 stars
GBX 750.91
+4.7%
GBX 755.67
+0.6%
+158.9%£5.05B£2.97B4.2425
EDV
Endeavour Mining
3.3169 of 5 stars
GBX 4,594
+4.2%
GBX 5,633.33
+22.6%
+66.6%£11.09B£4.54B13.203,786
AUY
Yamana Gold
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.57B£1.81BN/A11,600
HOC
Hochschild Mining
3.0861 of 5 stars
GBX 615.50
+4.6%
GBX 586
-4.8%
+75.1%£3.17B£1.18B15.783,029
PAF
Pan African Resources
3.3721 of 5 stars
GBX 137.70
+0.7%
GBX 170.50
+23.8%
+122.8%£2.79B£837.76M11.512,469

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GGP) was last updated on 6/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners