Do analysts recommend GGP or AUY?

Greatland Resources currently has a consensus price target of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential upside of 17.34%. Given Greatland Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Yamana Gold. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Greatland Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Yamana Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts recommend CEY or GGP?

Greatland Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential upside of 17.34%. Given Greatland Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Centamin. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Centamin 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Greatland Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Greatland Resources (GGP) Competitors

GBX 644 +11.00 (+1.74%)

As of 06/26/2026 12:03 PM Eastern

Compare

GGP vs. EDV, AUY, HOC, PAF, and CEY

Should you buy Greatland Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Greatland Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Greatland Resources include Endeavour Mining (EDV), Yamana Gold (AUY), Hochschild Mining (HOC), Pan African Resources (PAF), and Centamin (CEY). These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Endeavour Mining (LON:EDV) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 18.88%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Endeavour Mining	18.88%	27.75%	3.54%
Greatland Resources	33.53%	41.93%	-7.97%

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Greatland Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Mining	Neutral
Greatland Resources	Neutral

Endeavour Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 5,900, indicating a potential upside of 52.85%. Greatland Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential upside of 17.34%. Given Endeavour Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Endeavour Mining is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Endeavour Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Greatland Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endeavour Mining. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour Mining	£4.54B	2.05	-£423.98M	£348.00	11.09
Greatland Resources	£2.97B	1.46	-£58.89M	£177.29	3.63

59.5% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 6.6% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 39.5% of Greatland Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.102, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5663316, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Endeavour Mining beats Greatland Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Yamana Gold?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Yamana Gold (LON:AUY) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Yamana Gold's net margin of -54.36%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Yamana Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Greatland Resources	33.53%	41.93%	-7.97%
Yamana Gold	-54.36%	-31.37%	-13.38%

In the previous week, Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Yamana Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources	Neutral
Yamana Gold	Neutral

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5663316, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Greatland Resources currently has a consensus price target of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential upside of 17.34%. Given Greatland Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Yamana Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Yamana Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

33.8% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.8% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.5% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Greatland Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Yamana Gold. Yamana Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greatland Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources	£2.97B	1.46	-£58.89M	£177.29	3.63
Yamana Gold	£1.81B	0.00	-£982.30M	-£0.83	N/A

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Yamana Gold on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Hochschild Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources	£2.97B	1.46	-£58.89M	£177.29	3.63
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	2.12	£38.41M	£39.00	12.49

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5663316, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.975, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Greatland Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential upside of 17.34%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 586, indicating a potential upside of 20.28%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Greatland Resources	33.53%	41.93%	-7.97%
Hochschild Mining	17.80%	29.48%	7.11%

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Greatland Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining and 0 mentions for Greatland Resources. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources	Neutral
Hochschild Mining	Positive

33.8% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.8% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.5% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Greatland Resources on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Pan African Resources?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and risk.

33.8% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.7% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.5% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pan African Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources	£2.97B	1.46	-£58.89M	£177.29	3.63
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	2.46	£58.60M	£11.96	8.48

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Pan African Resources' net margin of 29.14%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Pan African Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Greatland Resources	33.53%	41.93%	-7.97%
Pan African Resources	29.14%	39.66%	12.99%

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Greatland Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pan African Resources and 0 mentions for Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pan African Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources	Neutral
Pan African Resources	Neutral

Greatland Resources currently has a consensus price target of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential upside of 17.34%. Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156.50, indicating a potential upside of 54.26%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5663316, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.731, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Greatland Resources on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Centamin?

Centamin (LON:CEY) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Centamin has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greatland Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Centamin	£930.75M	0.00	£84.67M	£0.05	N/A
Greatland Resources	£2.97B	1.46	-£58.89M	£177.29	3.63

Greatland Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential upside of 17.34%. Given Greatland Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Centamin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Centamin	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, Centamin's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Greatland Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Centamin	Neutral
Greatland Resources	Neutral

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Centamin	9.10%	14.16%	8.45%
Greatland Resources	33.53%	41.93%	-7.97%

90.8% of Centamin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Centamin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 39.5% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Centamin has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5663316, meaning that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Centamin on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Greatland Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GGP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GGP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Greatland Resources	Gold Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£4.33B	£4.86B	£4.60B	£2.78B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.64%	5.03%	6.16%
P/E Ratio	3.63	36.20	22.88	366.66
Price / Sales	1.46	200.94	5,657.58	86,088.44
Price / Cash	25.63	22.11	26.83	27.87
Price / Book	762.63	11.30	8.78	7.79
Net Income	-£58.89M	£6.39M	£157.40M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-10.43%	-2.60%	-3.15%	-0.61%
1 Month Performance	-8.13%	-5.37%	-6.25%	-1.14%
1 Year Performance	95.74%	53.21%	48.80%	65.93%

Greatland Resources Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GGP Greatland Resources	1.7253 of 5 stars	GBX 644 +1.7%	GBX 755.67 +17.3%	+78.4%	£4.33B	£2.97B	3.63	25
EDV Endeavour Mining	3.3963 of 5 stars	GBX 4,042 -3.3%	GBX 5,900 +46.0%	+68.9%	£9.75B	£4.54B	11.61	3,786
AUY Yamana Gold	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£4.57B	£1.81B	N/A	11,600
HOC Hochschild Mining	4.1597 of 5 stars	GBX 544.50 -4.9%	GBX 586 +7.6%	+88.5%	£2.80B	£1.18B	13.96	3,029	News Coverage High Trading Volume
PAF Pan African Resources	3.3144 of 5 stars	GBX 106.40 -5.9%	GBX 156.50 +47.1%	+115.4%	£2.16B	£837.76M	8.90	2,469	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GGP) was last updated on 6/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Greatland Resources (GGP) Competitors

GGP vs. EDV, AUY, HOC, PAF, and CEY

How does Greatland Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Yamana Gold?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Pan African Resources?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Centamin?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GGP vs. The Competition

Greatland Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Greatland Resources (GGP) Competitors

GGP vs. EDV, AUY, HOC, PAF, and CEY

How does Greatland Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Is EDV or GGP more profitable?

Does the media refer more to EDV or GGP?

Do analysts prefer EDV or GGP?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, EDV or GGP?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in EDV or GGP?

Which has more volatility and risk, EDV or GGP?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Yamana Gold?

Is GGP or AUY more profitable?

Does the media prefer GGP or AUY?

Which has more volatility and risk, GGP or AUY?

Do analysts recommend GGP or AUY?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in GGP or AUY?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, GGP or AUY?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, GGP or HOC?

Which has more risk and volatility, GGP or HOC?

Do analysts prefer GGP or HOC?

Is GGP or HOC more profitable?

Does the media prefer GGP or HOC?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in GGP or HOC?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Pan African Resources?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in GGP or PAF?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GGP or PAF?

Is GGP or PAF more profitable?

Does the media favor GGP or PAF?

Do analysts recommend GGP or PAF?

Which has more volatility & risk, GGP or PAF?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Centamin?

Which has better earnings & valuation, CEY or GGP?

Do analysts recommend CEY or GGP?

Does the media refer more to CEY or GGP?

Is CEY or GGP more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CEY or GGP?

Which has more risk and volatility, CEY or GGP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GGP vs. The Competition

Greatland Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools