Free Trial

Greatland Resources (GGP) Competitors

Greatland Resources logo
GBX 794.24 +17.74 (+2.28%)
As of 05/15/2026 12:39 PM Eastern

GGP vs. EDV, AUY, HOC, PAF, and CEY

Should you buy Greatland Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Greatland Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Greatland Resources include Endeavour Mining (EDV), Yamana Gold (AUY), Hochschild Mining (HOC), Pan African Resources (PAF), and Centamin (CEY). These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Endeavour Mining (LON:EDV) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Endeavour Mining. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Greatland Resources and 1 mentions for Endeavour Mining. Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.47 indicating that Endeavour Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Endeavour Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5522356, meaning that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.116, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

34.0% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.7% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 39.6% of Greatland Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Greatland Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Endeavour Mining. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources£2.97B1.80-£58.89M£177.294.48
Endeavour Mining£4.54B2.44-£423.98M£348.0013.17

Greatland Resources presently has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential downside of 4.86%. Endeavour Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 5,633.33, indicating a potential upside of 22.91%. Given Endeavour Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Endeavour Mining is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Endeavour Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 18.88%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greatland Resources33.53% 41.93% -7.97%
Endeavour Mining 18.88%27.75%3.54%

Summary

Endeavour Mining beats Greatland Resources on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Yamana Gold?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Yamana Gold (LON:AUY) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 4 more articles in the media than Yamana Gold. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Greatland Resources and 0 mentions for Yamana Gold. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Yamana Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources Neutral
Yamana Gold Neutral

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5522356, meaning that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

34.0% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.8% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.6% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Greatland Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Yamana Gold. Yamana Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greatland Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources£2.97B1.80-£58.89M£177.294.48
Yamana Gold£1.81B0.00-£982.30M-£0.83N/A

Greatland Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential downside of 4.86%. Given Yamana Gold's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Yamana Gold is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Yamana Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Yamana Gold's net margin of -54.36%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Yamana Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greatland Resources33.53% 41.93% -7.97%
Yamana Gold -54.36%-31.37%-13.38%

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Yamana Gold on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Greatland Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential downside of 4.86%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 586, indicating a potential downside of 1.16%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Hochschild Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5522356, meaning that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.986, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Greatland Resources and 3 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.25 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Hochschild Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Hochschild Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources£2.97B1.80-£58.89M£177.294.48
Hochschild Mining£1.18B2.58£38.41M£39.0015.20

34.0% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.9% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.6% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greatland Resources33.53% 41.93% -7.97%
Hochschild Mining 17.80%29.48%7.11%

Summary

Greatland Resources and Hochschild Mining tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Pan African Resources?

Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Pan African Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 170.50, indicating a potential upside of 23.69%. Greatland Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, indicating a potential downside of 4.86%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pan African Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.783, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5522356, meaning that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Pan African Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Greatland Resources and 1 mentions for Pan African Resources. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.47 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pan African Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Greatland Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Pan African Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pan African Resources£837.76M3.34£58.60M£11.9611.53
Greatland Resources£2.97B1.80-£58.89M£177.294.48

43.7% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.0% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Pan African Resources' net margin of 29.14%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Pan African Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pan African Resources29.14% 39.66% 12.99%
Greatland Resources 33.53%41.93%-7.97%

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Greatland Resources on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Centamin?

Centamin (LON:CEY) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends and earnings.

Centamin has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greatland Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centamin£930.75M0.00£84.67M£0.05N/A
Greatland Resources£2.97B1.80-£58.89M£177.294.48

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Centamin9.10% 14.16% 8.45%
Greatland Resources 33.53%41.93%-7.97%

Centamin has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.5522356, meaning that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

Greatland Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, suggesting a potential downside of 4.86%. Given Centamin's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Centamin is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Centamin
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

90.8% of Centamin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.0% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Centamin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of Greatland Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 4 more articles in the media than Centamin. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Greatland Resources and 0 mentions for Centamin. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Centamin's score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Centamin Neutral
Greatland Resources Neutral

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Centamin on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Greatland Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GGP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GGP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GGP vs. The Competition

MetricGreatland ResourcesGold IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£5.09B£5.16B£4.84B£2.60B
Dividend YieldN/A5.69%4.99%6.15%
P/E Ratio4.4837.2223.10365.91
Price / Sales1.80228.266,705.6588,030.08
Price / Cash25.6322.1127.1627.89
Price / Book940.5413.306.987.74
Net Income-£58.89M£6.39M£159.16M£5.89B
7 Day Performance4.60%-1.95%-1.21%0.21%
1 Month Performance4.44%-1.84%0.01%1.56%
1 Year Performance237.11%97.75%81.53%77.95%

Greatland Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GGP
Greatland Resources
1.0609 of 5 stars
GBX 794.24
+2.3%
GBX 755.67
-4.9%
+226.0%£5.09B£2.97B4.4825
EDV
Endeavour Mining
3.8258 of 5 stars
GBX 4,801.80
-2.2%
GBX 5,633.33
+17.3%
+119.5%£11.59B£4.54B13.803,786
AUY
Yamana Gold
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.57B£1.81BN/A11,600
HOC
Hochschild Mining
2.3162 of 5 stars
GBX 641
-4.2%
GBX 586
-8.6%
+116.7%£3.30B£1.18B16.443,029
PAF
Pan African Resources
3.5644 of 5 stars
GBX 153.81
-2.1%
GBX 170.50
+10.9%
+197.1%£3.12B£837.76M12.862,469

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GGP) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners