Go Pro

Greatland Resources (GGP) Competitors

Greatland Resources logo
GBX 569.50 +15.50 (+2.80%)
As of 05:27 AM Eastern

GGP vs. EDV, HOC, PAF, CEY, and RSG

Should you buy Greatland Resources stock or one of its competitors? Greatland Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Endeavour Mining (EDV), Hochschild Mining (HOC), Pan African Resources (PAF), Centamin (CEY), and Resolute Mining (RSG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Endeavour Mining (LON:EDV) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Greatland Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 733.67, suggesting a potential upside of 28.94%. Endeavour Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 4,900, suggesting a potential upside of 8.00%. Given Greatland Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Endeavour Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Endeavour Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Endeavour Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greatland Resources and 0 mentions for Endeavour Mining. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Endeavour Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources Neutral
Endeavour Mining Neutral

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 38.25% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 17.62%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 43.79% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greatland Resources38.25% 43.79% -7.97%
Endeavour Mining 17.62%26.18%3.54%

Greatland Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Endeavour Mining. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources£2.26B1.70-£58.89M£241.922.35
Endeavour Mining£4.75B2.30-£423.98M£340.0013.34

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.401, meaning that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.139, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

33.6% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.6% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 36.0% of Greatland Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Endeavour Mining on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Greatland Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 733.67, suggesting a potential upside of 28.94%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 671, suggesting a potential upside of 13.63%. Given Greatland Resources' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Hochschild Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.401, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.996, suggesting that its share price is 0% less volatile than the broader market.

33.6% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.3% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 36.0% of Greatland Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greatland Resources and 1 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.37 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Hochschild Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 38.25% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 19.80%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 43.79% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greatland Resources38.25% 43.79% -7.97%
Hochschild Mining 19.80%35.59%7.11%

Hochschild Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources£2.26B1.70-£58.89M£241.922.35
Hochschild Mining£1.51B2.02£38.41M£58.0010.18

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Pan African Resources?

Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

41.9% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.6% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.0% of Greatland Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 38.25% compared to Pan African Resources' net margin of 29.42%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Greatland Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pan African Resources29.42% 49.73% 12.99%
Greatland Resources 38.25%43.79%-7.97%

Pan African Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pan African Resources£837.76M2.91£58.60M£11.9610.06
Greatland Resources£2.26B1.70-£58.89M£241.922.35

Pan African Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 156, indicating a potential upside of 29.68%. Greatland Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 733.67, indicating a potential upside of 28.94%. Given Pan African Resources' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pan African Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.701, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.401, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pan African Resources had 7 more articles in the media than Greatland Resources. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Pan African Resources and 2 mentions for Greatland Resources. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.37 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pan African Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Greatland Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Greatland Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Centamin?

Centamin (LON:CEY) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Centamin. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greatland Resources and 0 mentions for Centamin. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Centamin's score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Centamin Neutral
Greatland Resources Neutral

Greatland Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 733.67, indicating a potential upside of 28.94%. Given Greatland Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Centamin.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Centamin
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

90.8% of Centamin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.6% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Centamin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 36.0% of Greatland Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Centamin has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.401, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 38.25% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 43.79% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Centamin9.10% 14.16% 8.45%
Greatland Resources 38.25%43.79%-7.97%

Centamin has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greatland Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centamin£930.75M0.00£84.67M£0.05N/A
Greatland Resources£2.26B1.70-£58.89M£241.922.35

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Centamin on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Resolute Mining?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Resolute Mining (LON:RSG) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Resolute Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greatland Resources and 0 mentions for Resolute Mining. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Resolute Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources Neutral
Resolute Mining Neutral

33.6% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.8% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.0% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Resolute Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Resolute Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources£2.26B1.70-£58.89M£241.922.35
Resolute Mining£1.00B1.44£15.35M£9.047.48

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 38.25% compared to Resolute Mining's net margin of 17.87%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 43.79% beat Resolute Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greatland Resources38.25% 43.79% -7.97%
Resolute Mining 17.87%23.32%6.41%

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.401, meaning that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resolute Mining has a beta of 1.325, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Greatland Resources presently has a consensus target price of GBX 733.67, indicating a potential upside of 28.94%. Resolute Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 240.25, indicating a potential upside of 255.40%. Given Resolute Mining's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Resolute Mining is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Resolute Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Resolute Mining on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Greatland Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GGP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GGP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GGP vs. The Competition

MetricGreatland ResourcesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.84B£3.88B£4.87B£2.87B
Dividend YieldN/A5.19%4.70%6.26%
P/E Ratio2.3525.1625.26366.51
Price / Sales1.7029,283.0617,395.8290,108.27
Price / Cash25.6329.3226.7627.89
Price / Book673.8111.739.776.40
Net Income-£58.89M£127.55M£158.15M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-6.64%-3.73%-3.09%-0.17%
1 Month Performance-11.58%7.72%5.38%-0.48%
1 Year Performance86.56%103.87%79.03%20.19%

Greatland Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GGP
Greatland Resources
2.9854 of 5 stars
GBX 569.50
+2.8%
GBX 733.67
+28.8%
+89.0%£3.84B£2.26B2.3525
EDV
Endeavour Mining
2.0335 of 5 stars
GBX 4,723
-0.2%
GBX 4,900
+3.7%
+53.5%£11.42B£4.75B13.893,786
HOC
Hochschild Mining
4.0414 of 5 stars
GBX 660.95
-1.4%
GBX 671
+1.5%
+76.9%£3.40B£1.51B16.953,029
PAF
Pan African Resources
3.3349 of 5 stars
GBX 137.92
+1.2%
GBX 156
+13.1%
+46.5%£2.80B£837.76M11.532,469
CEY
Centamin
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.69B£930.75M2,920.004,874

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GGP) was last updated on 9/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners