Does the media favor HOC or GGP?

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining had 3 more articles in the media than Greatland Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Hochschild Mining and 2 mentions for Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hochschild Mining 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Greatland Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend CEY or GGP?

Greatland Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 733.67, suggesting a potential upside of 3.92%. Given Greatland Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Centamin. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Centamin 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Greatland Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Greatland Resources (GGP) Competitors

GBX 706 -8.00 (-1.12%)

As of 12:34 PM Eastern

Compare

GGP vs. EDV, HOC, PAF, CEY, and RSG

Should you buy Greatland Resources stock or one of its competitors? Greatland Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Endeavour Mining (EDV), Hochschild Mining (HOC), Pan African Resources (PAF), Centamin (CEY), and Resolute Mining (RSG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Endeavour Mining (LON:EDV) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.139, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.426, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 17.62%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Endeavour Mining	17.62%	26.18%	3.54%
Greatland Resources	33.53%	41.93%	-7.97%

59.5% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.4% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Endeavour Mining presently has a consensus price target of GBX 4,900, suggesting a potential upside of 2.15%. Greatland Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 733.67, suggesting a potential upside of 3.92%. Given Greatland Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Endeavour Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Endeavour Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Endeavour Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greatland Resources and 0 mentions for Endeavour Mining. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Endeavour Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Mining	Neutral
Greatland Resources	Neutral

Greatland Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endeavour Mining. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour Mining	£4.75B	2.44	-£423.98M	£340.00	14.11
Greatland Resources	£2.97B	1.60	-£58.89M	£177.29	3.98

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Endeavour Mining on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 625, indicating a potential downside of 5.16%. Greatland Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 733.67, indicating a potential upside of 3.92%. Given Greatland Resources' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining had 3 more articles in the media than Greatland Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Hochschild Mining and 2 mentions for Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Greatland Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

31.1% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.4% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hochschild Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining	£1.18B	2.87	£38.41M	£39.00	16.90
Greatland Resources	£2.97B	1.60	-£58.89M	£177.29	3.98

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.947, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.426, meaning that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 19.80%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Hochschild Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining	19.80%	35.59%	7.11%
Greatland Resources	33.53%	41.93%	-7.97%

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Pan African Resources?

Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.426, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.701, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Pan African Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greatland Resources and 0 mentions for Pan African Resources. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Greatland Resources	Neutral
Pan African Resources	Neutral

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Pan African Resources' net margin of 29.42%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Greatland Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Greatland Resources	33.53%	41.93%	-7.97%
Pan African Resources	29.42%	49.73%	12.99%

Pan African Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Greatland Resources	£2.97B	1.60	-£58.89M	£177.29	3.98
Pan African Resources	£837.76M	3.30	£58.60M	£11.96	11.40

Greatland Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 733.67, indicating a potential upside of 3.92%. Pan African Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 156, indicating a potential upside of 14.45%. Given Pan African Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

33.8% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.0% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 39.4% of Greatland Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Greatland Resources and Pan African Resources tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Centamin?

Centamin (LON:CEY) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Centamin has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.426, indicating that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Centamin	9.10%	14.16%	8.45%
Greatland Resources	33.53%	41.93%	-7.97%

90.8% of Centamin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Centamin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 39.4% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Centamin. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greatland Resources and 0 mentions for Centamin. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Centamin's score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Centamin	Neutral
Greatland Resources	Neutral

Centamin has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greatland Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Centamin	£930.75M	0.00	£84.67M	£0.05	N/A
Greatland Resources	£2.97B	1.60	-£58.89M	£177.29	3.98

Greatland Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 733.67, suggesting a potential upside of 3.92%. Given Greatland Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Centamin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Centamin	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Centamin on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greatland Resources compare to Resolute Mining?

Resolute Mining (LON:RSG) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Greatland Resources has a net margin of 33.53% compared to Resolute Mining's net margin of 17.87%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Resolute Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Resolute Mining	17.87%	23.32%	6.41%
Greatland Resources	33.53%	41.93%	-7.97%

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Resolute Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greatland Resources and 0 mentions for Resolute Mining. Resolute Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.23 indicating that Resolute Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Resolute Mining	Positive
Greatland Resources	Neutral

Resolute Mining presently has a consensus target price of GBX 240.25, indicating a potential upside of 243.21%. Greatland Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 733.67, indicating a potential upside of 3.92%. Given Resolute Mining's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Resolute Mining is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Resolute Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Greatland Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Resolute Mining has a beta of 1.325, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.426, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Resolute Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Resolute Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Resolute Mining	£1.00B	1.49	£15.35M	£5.99	11.69
Greatland Resources	£2.97B	1.60	-£58.89M	£177.29	3.98

37.6% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Resolute Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 39.4% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Resolute Mining on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Greatland Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GGP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GGP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Greatland Resources	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£4.76B	£4.17B	£5.16B	£2.92B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.17%	4.68%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	3.98	25.80	26.47	367.32
Price / Sales	1.60	8,939.16	5,310.85	83,741.35
Price / Cash	25.63	30.06	27.38	27.89
Price / Book	836.05	10.76	9.10	7.02
Net Income	-£58.89M	£122.92M	£154.63M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	4.75%	11.29%	8.57%	0.89%
1 Month Performance	29.78%	24.65%	19.08%	3.27%
1 Year Performance	171.54%	66.22%	51.40%	22.28%

Greatland Resources Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GGP Greatland Resources	1.4916 of 5 stars	GBX 706 -1.1%	GBX 733.67 +3.9%	+169.4%	£4.76B	£2.97B	3.98	25
EDV Endeavour Mining	1.4264 of 5 stars	GBX 4,111 +0.0%	GBX 4,900 +19.2%	+87.8%	£9.94B	£4.75B	12.09	3,786	Negative News
HOC Hochschild Mining	2.0232 of 5 stars	GBX 525 +3.1%	GBX 560 +6.7%	+108.1%	£2.70B	£1.18B	13.46	3,029	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Gap Up
PAF Pan African Resources	2.0427 of 5 stars	GBX 108.60 +1.5%	GBX 156 +43.6%	+118.9%	£2.20B	£837.76M	9.08	2,469	Gap Up
CEY Centamin	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£1.69B	£930.75M	2,920.00	4,874

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GGP) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Greatland Resources (GGP) Competitors

GGP vs. EDV, HOC, PAF, CEY, and RSG

How does Greatland Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Pan African Resources?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Centamin?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Resolute Mining?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GGP vs. The Competition

Greatland Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Greatland Resources (GGP) Competitors

GGP vs. EDV, HOC, PAF, CEY, and RSG

How does Greatland Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Which has more volatility & risk, EDV or GGP?

Is EDV or GGP more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of EDV or GGP?

Do analysts prefer EDV or GGP?

Does the media refer more to EDV or GGP?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, EDV or GGP?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Hochschild Mining?

Do analysts rate HOC or GGP?

Does the media favor HOC or GGP?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in HOC or GGP?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, HOC or GGP?

Which has more risk & volatility, HOC or GGP?

Is HOC or GGP more profitable?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Pan African Resources?

Which has more risk and volatility, GGP or PAF?

Does the media refer more to GGP or PAF?

Is GGP or PAF more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GGP or PAF?

Do analysts rate GGP or PAF?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in GGP or PAF?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Centamin?

Which has more volatility and risk, CEY or GGP?

Is CEY or GGP more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CEY or GGP?

Does the media refer more to CEY or GGP?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CEY or GGP?

Do analysts recommend CEY or GGP?

Summary

How does Greatland Resources compare to Resolute Mining?

Is RSG or GGP more profitable?

Does the media refer more to RSG or GGP?

Do analysts prefer RSG or GGP?

Which has more risk and volatility, RSG or GGP?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, RSG or GGP?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of RSG or GGP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GGP vs. The Competition

Greatland Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools