Free Trial

Helios Underwriting (HUW) Competitors

Helios Underwriting logo
GBX 216.30 +2.80 (+1.31%)
As of 04:29 AM Eastern

HUW vs. PGH, FBH, ADM, RSA, and HSX

Should you buy Helios Underwriting stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Helios Underwriting with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Helios Underwriting include Personal Group (PGH), FBD (FBH), Admiral Group (ADM), RSA Insurance Group (RSA), and Hiscox (HSX). These companies are all part of the "insurance - property & casualty" industry.

How does Helios Underwriting compare to Personal Group?

Helios Underwriting (LON:HUW) and Personal Group (LON:PGH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Helios Underwriting has higher revenue and earnings than Personal Group. Helios Underwriting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Helios Underwriting£254.15M0.58£17.25M£22.709.53
Personal Group£48.46M2.56£4.55M£22.1017.79

Personal Group has a consensus price target of GBX 522.50, suggesting a potential upside of 32.88%. Given Personal Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Personal Group is more favorable than Helios Underwriting.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Helios Underwriting
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Personal Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Personal Group had 2 more articles in the media than Helios Underwriting. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Personal Group and 0 mentions for Helios Underwriting. Personal Group's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Helios Underwriting's score of 0.00 indicating that Personal Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Helios Underwriting Neutral
Personal Group Very Positive

Helios Underwriting has a beta of 0.14, suggesting that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Personal Group has a beta of 0.153, suggesting that its share price is 85% less volatile than the broader market.

Personal Group has a net margin of 15.06% compared to Helios Underwriting's net margin of -18.86%. Personal Group's return on equity of 20.34% beat Helios Underwriting's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Helios Underwriting-18.86% 10.08% 1.82%
Personal Group 15.06%20.34%7.99%

15.2% of Helios Underwriting shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.6% of Personal Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 32.5% of Helios Underwriting shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 44.8% of Personal Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Helios Underwriting pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Personal Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Helios Underwriting pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Personal Group pays out 82.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Personal Group beats Helios Underwriting on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Helios Underwriting compare to FBD?

FBD (LON:FBH) and Helios Underwriting (LON:HUW) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

FBD pays an annual dividend of GBX 100 per share. Helios Underwriting pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. FBD pays out 5,263.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Helios Underwriting pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helios Underwriting is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, FBD's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Helios Underwriting'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
FBD Neutral
Helios Underwriting Neutral

14.2% of FBD shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of Helios Underwriting shares are held by institutional investors. 43.2% of FBD shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 32.5% of Helios Underwriting shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

FBD has a net margin of 16.45% compared to Helios Underwriting's net margin of -18.86%. FBD's return on equity of 14.85% beat Helios Underwriting's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FBD16.45% 14.85% 5.57%
Helios Underwriting -18.86%10.08%1.82%

FBD has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helios Underwriting has a beta of 0.14, indicating that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

FBD has higher revenue and earnings than Helios Underwriting. FBD is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helios Underwriting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FBD£422.78M0.00£69.26M£1.90N/A
Helios Underwriting£254.15M0.58£17.25M£22.709.53

Summary

FBD beats Helios Underwriting on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Helios Underwriting compare to Admiral Group?

Helios Underwriting (LON:HUW) and Admiral Group (LON:ADM) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Admiral Group has a net margin of 13.47% compared to Helios Underwriting's net margin of -18.86%. Admiral Group's return on equity of 51.59% beat Helios Underwriting's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Helios Underwriting-18.86% 10.08% 1.82%
Admiral Group 13.47%51.59%4.96%

Admiral Group has a consensus price target of GBX 2,803.14, indicating a potential downside of 13.86%. Given Admiral Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Admiral Group is more favorable than Helios Underwriting.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Helios Underwriting
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Admiral Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14

Admiral Group has higher revenue and earnings than Helios Underwriting. Helios Underwriting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Admiral Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Helios Underwriting£254.15M0.58£17.25M£22.709.53
Admiral Group£5.06B1.92£400.40M£241.7013.46

Helios Underwriting pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Admiral Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 177.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Helios Underwriting pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Admiral Group pays out 73.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

15.2% of Helios Underwriting shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.6% of Admiral Group shares are held by institutional investors. 32.5% of Helios Underwriting shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.7% of Admiral Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Helios Underwriting has a beta of 0.14, suggesting that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Admiral Group has a beta of 0.176, suggesting that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Admiral Group's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Helios Underwriting's score of 0.00 indicating that Admiral Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Helios Underwriting Neutral
Admiral Group Positive

Summary

Admiral Group beats Helios Underwriting on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Helios Underwriting compare to RSA Insurance Group?

RSA Insurance Group (LON:RSA) and Helios Underwriting (LON:HUW) are both insurance - property & casualty industry companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, RSA Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Helios Underwriting'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
RSA Insurance Group Neutral
Helios Underwriting Neutral

15.2% of Helios Underwriting shares are held by institutional investors. 32.5% of Helios Underwriting shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Helios Underwriting has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RSA Insurance Group. RSA Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helios Underwriting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RSA Insurance Group£6.55B0.00N/A£30.80N/A
Helios Underwriting£254.15M0.58£17.25M£22.709.53

RSA Insurance Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Helios Underwriting's net margin of -18.86%. Helios Underwriting's return on equity of 10.08% beat RSA Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RSA Insurance GroupN/A N/A N/A
Helios Underwriting -18.86%10.08%1.82%

RSA Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.08 per share. Helios Underwriting pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. RSA Insurance Group pays out 0.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helios Underwriting pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

RSA Insurance Group and Helios Underwriting tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Helios Underwriting compare to Hiscox?

Helios Underwriting (LON:HUW) and Hiscox (LON:HSX) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Hiscox had 4 more articles in the media than Helios Underwriting. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hiscox and 0 mentions for Helios Underwriting. Hiscox's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Helios Underwriting's score of 0.00 indicating that Hiscox is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Helios Underwriting Neutral
Hiscox Positive

15.2% of Helios Underwriting shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.9% of Hiscox shares are owned by institutional investors. 32.5% of Helios Underwriting shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Hiscox shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hiscox has a consensus target price of GBX 1,645.17, suggesting a potential downside of 9.75%. Given Hiscox's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hiscox is more favorable than Helios Underwriting.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Helios Underwriting
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Hiscox
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Hiscox has higher revenue and earnings than Helios Underwriting. Helios Underwriting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hiscox, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Helios Underwriting£254.15M0.58£17.25M£22.709.53
Hiscox£3.95B1.48£876.88M£175.0010.42

Helios Underwriting pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Hiscox pays an annual dividend of GBX 44.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Helios Underwriting pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hiscox pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Helios Underwriting has a beta of 0.14, indicating that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hiscox has a beta of 0.368, indicating that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Hiscox has a net margin of 12.36% compared to Helios Underwriting's net margin of -18.86%. Hiscox's return on equity of 15.63% beat Helios Underwriting's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Helios Underwriting-18.86% 10.08% 1.82%
Hiscox 12.36%15.63%4.09%

Summary

Hiscox beats Helios Underwriting on 16 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Helios Underwriting News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HUW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HUW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HUW vs. The Competition

MetricHelios UnderwritingInsurance IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£148.11M£17.44B£5.69B£2.74B
Dividend Yield2.81%4.75%5.24%6.07%
P/E Ratio9.5310.9916.01365.81
Price / Sales0.5888.211,295.7788,010.24
Price / Cash0.545.7490.6127.89
Price / Book1.132.884.387.63
Net Income£17.25M£1.08B£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.03%0.84%0.20%0.23%
1 Month Performance6.03%2.33%1.98%1.92%
1 Year Performance-4.44%7.07%21.45%86.43%

Helios Underwriting Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HUW
Helios Underwriting
N/AGBX 216.30
+1.3%
N/A-5.0%£148.11M£254.15M9.533
PGH
Personal Group
3.5531 of 5 stars
GBX 375.55
+1.1%
GBX 522.50
+39.1%
+41.5%£118.32M£48.46M16.99259
FBH
FBD
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.26M£422.78M6.82950
ADM
Admiral Group
1.8142 of 5 stars
GBX 3,172
-0.2%
GBX 2,803.14
-11.6%
-1.3%£9.48B£5.06B13.1242,000
RSA
RSA Insurance Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£7.10B£6.55B22.2111,840

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:HUW) was last updated on 5/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners