Kelso Group (KLSO) Competitors

GBX 3.07 +0.12 (+4.07%)
As of 10:58 AM Eastern

KLSO vs. FEN, PMI, CRS, AUGM, and AIF

Should you buy Kelso Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Kelso Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Kelso Group include Frenkel Topping Group (FEN), Premier Miton Group (PMI), Crystal Amber (CRS), Augmentum Fintech (AUGM), and Acorn Income Fund (AIF). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Kelso Group compare to Frenkel Topping Group?

Kelso Group (LON:KLSO) and Frenkel Topping Group (LON:FEN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Kelso Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Frenkel Topping Group. Kelso Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frenkel Topping Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kelso Group-£542.92K-26.24£2.11M-£0.15N/A
Frenkel Topping Group£40.46M1.50£1.05M£3.1015.89

Kelso Group has a beta of 1.561, indicating that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frenkel Topping Group has a beta of 0.25956267, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kelso Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Frenkel Topping Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kelso Group Neutral
Frenkel Topping Group Neutral

2.7% of Kelso Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.6% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are held by institutional investors. 19.3% of Kelso Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 48.8% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kelso Group has a net margin of 59.53% compared to Frenkel Topping Group's net margin of 6.83%. Frenkel Topping Group's return on equity of 6.57% beat Kelso Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kelso Group59.53% -5.97% -0.99%
Frenkel Topping Group 6.83%6.57%5.96%

Summary

Frenkel Topping Group beats Kelso Group on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kelso Group compare to Premier Miton Group?

Kelso Group (LON:KLSO) and Premier Miton Group (LON:PMI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

2.7% of Kelso Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Premier Miton Group shares are held by institutional investors. 19.3% of Kelso Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.8% of Premier Miton Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kelso Group has a net margin of 59.53% compared to Premier Miton Group's net margin of 0.16%. Premier Miton Group's return on equity of 0.09% beat Kelso Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kelso Group59.53% -5.97% -0.99%
Premier Miton Group 0.16%0.09%0.86%

Premier Miton Group has higher revenue and earnings than Kelso Group. Kelso Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premier Miton Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kelso Group-£542.92K-26.24£2.11M-£0.15N/A
Premier Miton Group£57.10M1.07£2.12M£0.7650.89

Kelso Group has a beta of 1.561, meaning that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Premier Miton Group has a beta of 0.7154658, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Premier Miton Group's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Kelso Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Premier Miton Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kelso Group Neutral
Premier Miton Group Positive

Premier Miton Group has a consensus target price of GBX 58, suggesting a potential upside of 49.95%. Given Premier Miton Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Premier Miton Group is more favorable than Kelso Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kelso Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Premier Miton Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Premier Miton Group beats Kelso Group on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kelso Group compare to Crystal Amber?

Crystal Amber (LON:CRS) and Kelso Group (LON:KLSO) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Crystal Amber has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kelso Group. Kelso Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crystal Amber, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crystal Amber-£4.61M-12.66£9.56M-£8.44N/A
Kelso Group-£542.92K-26.24£2.11M-£0.15N/A

Kelso Group has a net margin of 59.53% compared to Crystal Amber's net margin of -29.43%. Crystal Amber's return on equity of -1.18% beat Kelso Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crystal Amber-29.43% -1.18% 5.45%
Kelso Group 59.53%-5.97%-0.99%

In the previous week, Crystal Amber's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kelso Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crystal Amber Neutral
Kelso Group Neutral

Crystal Amber has a beta of 0.6821922, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kelso Group has a beta of 1.561, suggesting that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market.

5.5% of Crystal Amber shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.7% of Kelso Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Crystal Amber shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.3% of Kelso Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Crystal Amber beats Kelso Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kelso Group compare to Augmentum Fintech?

Augmentum Fintech (LON:AUGM) and Kelso Group (LON:KLSO) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

12.8% of Augmentum Fintech shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.7% of Kelso Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Augmentum Fintech shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.3% of Kelso Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Augmentum Fintech has a net margin of 187.74% compared to Kelso Group's net margin of 59.53%. Augmentum Fintech's return on equity of -4.20% beat Kelso Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Augmentum Fintech187.74% -4.20% N/A
Kelso Group 59.53%-5.97%-0.99%

Augmentum Fintech has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kelso Group. Kelso Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Augmentum Fintech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Augmentum Fintech-£6.34M-9.22£178.09M-£7.20N/A
Kelso Group-£542.92K-26.24£2.11M-£0.15N/A

Augmentum Fintech has a beta of 1.230375, indicating that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kelso Group has a beta of 1.561, indicating that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Augmentum Fintech's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kelso Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Augmentum Fintech Neutral
Kelso Group Neutral

Summary

Augmentum Fintech beats Kelso Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kelso Group compare to Acorn Income Fund?

Acorn Income Fund (LON:AIF) and Kelso Group (LON:KLSO) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Kelso Group has a net margin of 59.53% compared to Acorn Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Acorn Income Fund's return on equity of 0.00% beat Kelso Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Acorn Income FundN/A N/A N/A
Kelso Group 59.53%-5.97%-0.99%

2.7% of Kelso Group shares are held by institutional investors. 19.3% of Kelso Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Acorn Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kelso Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Acorn Income Fund Neutral
Kelso Group Neutral

Kelso Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Acorn Income Fund. Kelso Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acorn Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acorn Income Fund£25.67M0.00N/A£145.40N/A
Kelso Group-£542.92K-26.24£2.11M-£0.15N/A

Summary

Acorn Income Fund beats Kelso Group on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Kelso Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KLSO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding KLSO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KLSO vs. The Competition

MetricKelso GroupAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£14.25M£2.39B£5.97B£2.77B
Dividend YieldN/A6.02%5.26%6.16%
P/E Ratio-20.4759.7029.08366.66
Price / Sales-26.242,054.671,107.4485,978.63
Price / CashN/A60.3384.9827.87
Price / Book1.141.386.697.76
Net Income£2.11M£265.27M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-9.71%-0.31%-0.31%-0.72%
1 Month Performance-1.29%-0.33%0.42%-1.20%
1 Year Performance-3.76%9.07%18.34%65.93%

Kelso Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KLSO
Kelso Group
N/AGBX 3.07
+4.1%
N/A-12.5%£14.25M-£542.92KN/AN/A
FEN
Frenkel Topping Group
N/AGBX 50
flat
N/AN/A£61.45M£40.46M16.13307
PMI
Premier Miton Group
4.1292 of 5 stars
GBX 38.50
flat
GBX 58
+50.6%
-46.1%£60.67M£57.10M50.66163
CRS
Crystal Amber
N/AGBX 101
-0.5%
N/A-25.4%£60.43M-£4.61MN/A4,100
AUGM
Augmentum Fintech
N/AGBX 34.99
+0.1%
N/A-63.7%£58.53M-£6.34MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:KLSO) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners