Free Trial

Liontrust Asset Management (LIO) Competitors

Liontrust Asset Management logo
GBX 278.26 -5.74 (-2.02%)
As of 05/15/2026 12:06 PM Eastern

LIO vs. BGFD, BRSC, BUT, ATR, and AAS

Should you buy Liontrust Asset Management stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Liontrust Asset Management with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Liontrust Asset Management include The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust (BGFD), BlackRock Smaller Companies (BRSC), Brunner (BUT), Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (ATR), and abrdn Asia Focus (AAS). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Liontrust Asset Management compare to The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust?

Liontrust Asset Management (LON:LIO) and The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust (LON:BGFD) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and risk.

Liontrust Asset Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liontrust Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Liontrust Asset Management£151.89M1.10£68.85M£20.0213.90
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust£154.29M4.28£65.49M£188.955.07

Liontrust Asset Management has a beta of 1.411, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust has a beta of 0.9864226, meaning that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

42.0% of Liontrust Asset Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.8% of The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.2% of Liontrust Asset Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust has a net margin of 158.45% compared to Liontrust Asset Management's net margin of 8.31%. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust's return on equity of 19.34% beat Liontrust Asset Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Liontrust Asset Management8.31% 10.12% 5.02%
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust 158.45%19.34%0.31%

Liontrust Asset Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 72 per share and has a dividend yield of 25.9%. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Liontrust Asset Management pays out 359.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Liontrust Asset Management presently has a consensus target price of GBX 322, indicating a potential upside of 15.72%. Given Liontrust Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Liontrust Asset Management is more favorable than The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Liontrust Asset Management
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Liontrust Asset Management and Liontrust Asset Management both had 1 articles in the media. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Liontrust Asset Management's score of 1.08 indicating that The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Liontrust Asset Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Liontrust Asset Management beats The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liontrust Asset Management compare to BlackRock Smaller Companies?

BlackRock Smaller Companies (LON:BRSC) and Liontrust Asset Management (LON:LIO) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

BlackRock Smaller Companies has a net margin of 102.92% compared to Liontrust Asset Management's net margin of 8.31%. Liontrust Asset Management's return on equity of 10.12% beat BlackRock Smaller Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock Smaller Companies102.92% -15.07% -2.39%
Liontrust Asset Management 8.31%10.12%5.02%

Liontrust Asset Management has a consensus target price of GBX 322, indicating a potential upside of 15.72%. Given Liontrust Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Liontrust Asset Management is more favorable than BlackRock Smaller Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BlackRock Smaller Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Liontrust Asset Management
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Liontrust Asset Management had 1 more articles in the media than BlackRock Smaller Companies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Liontrust Asset Management and 0 mentions for BlackRock Smaller Companies. Liontrust Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat BlackRock Smaller Companies' score of 0.00 indicating that Liontrust Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock Smaller Companies Neutral
Liontrust Asset Management Positive

BlackRock Smaller Companies has a beta of 0.932, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liontrust Asset Management has a beta of 1.411, indicating that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

45.7% of BlackRock Smaller Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.0% of Liontrust Asset Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of BlackRock Smaller Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.2% of Liontrust Asset Management shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

BlackRock Smaller Companies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Liontrust Asset Management. BlackRock Smaller Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liontrust Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock Smaller Companies-£89.64M-7.22£120.17M-£189.42N/A
Liontrust Asset Management£151.89M1.10£68.85M£20.0213.90

BlackRock Smaller Companies pays an annual dividend of GBX 44 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Liontrust Asset Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 72 per share and has a dividend yield of 25.9%. BlackRock Smaller Companies pays out -23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Liontrust Asset Management pays out 359.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Liontrust Asset Management beats BlackRock Smaller Companies on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liontrust Asset Management compare to Brunner?

Brunner (LON:BUT) and Liontrust Asset Management (LON:LIO) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Brunner has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liontrust Asset Management has a beta of 1.411, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Brunner has a net margin of 94.80% compared to Liontrust Asset Management's net margin of 8.31%. Liontrust Asset Management's return on equity of 10.12% beat Brunner's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunner94.80% 8.72% 11.63%
Liontrust Asset Management 8.31%10.12%5.02%

In the previous week, Brunner and Brunner both had 1 articles in the media. Liontrust Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Brunner's score of 0.89 indicating that Liontrust Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brunner
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Liontrust Asset Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Liontrust Asset Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 72 per share and has a dividend yield of 25.9%. Brunner pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Liontrust Asset Management pays out 359.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Liontrust Asset Management has a consensus target price of GBX 322, indicating a potential upside of 15.72%. Given Liontrust Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Liontrust Asset Management is more favorable than Brunner.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brunner
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Liontrust Asset Management
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Brunner has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Liontrust Asset Management. Brunner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liontrust Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunner£57.55M11.05£105.32M£128.4811.49
Liontrust Asset Management£151.89M1.10£68.85M£20.0213.90

5.3% of Brunner shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.0% of Liontrust Asset Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Brunner shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.2% of Liontrust Asset Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Liontrust Asset Management beats Brunner on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liontrust Asset Management compare to Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.?

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (LON:ATR) and Liontrust Asset Management (LON:LIO) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Liontrust Asset Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 72 per share and has a dividend yield of 25.9%. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays out 16.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Liontrust Asset Management pays out 359.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

13.9% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.0% of Liontrust Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.2% of Liontrust Asset Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a beta of 1.0190377, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liontrust Asset Management has a beta of 1.411, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Liontrust Asset Management had 1 more articles in the media than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Liontrust Asset Management and 0 mentions for Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. Liontrust Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s score of 0.00 indicating that Liontrust Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. Neutral
Liontrust Asset Management Positive

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a net margin of 254.00% compared to Liontrust Asset Management's net margin of 8.31%. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s return on equity of 13.06% beat Liontrust Asset Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.254.00% 13.06% 4.75%
Liontrust Asset Management 8.31%10.12%5.02%

Liontrust Asset Management has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liontrust Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.£66.61M9.40£66.84M£68.579.81
Liontrust Asset Management£151.89M1.10£68.85M£20.0213.90

Liontrust Asset Management has a consensus target price of GBX 322, indicating a potential upside of 15.72%. Given Liontrust Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Liontrust Asset Management is more favorable than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Liontrust Asset Management
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Liontrust Asset Management beats Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liontrust Asset Management compare to abrdn Asia Focus?

abrdn Asia Focus (LON:AAS) and Liontrust Asset Management (LON:LIO) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

abrdn Asia Focus pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Liontrust Asset Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 72 per share and has a dividend yield of 25.9%. abrdn Asia Focus pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Liontrust Asset Management pays out 359.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

11.5% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.0% of Liontrust Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.2% of Liontrust Asset Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

abrdn Asia Focus has a beta of 0.71611387, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liontrust Asset Management has a beta of 1.411, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Liontrust Asset Management had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn Asia Focus. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Liontrust Asset Management and 0 mentions for abrdn Asia Focus. Liontrust Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat abrdn Asia Focus' score of 0.00 indicating that Liontrust Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn Asia Focus Neutral
Liontrust Asset Management Positive

abrdn Asia Focus has a net margin of 102.94% compared to Liontrust Asset Management's net margin of 8.31%. abrdn Asia Focus' return on equity of 19.85% beat Liontrust Asset Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Asia Focus102.94% 19.85% 2.79%
Liontrust Asset Management 8.31%10.12%5.02%

Liontrust Asset Management has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Asia Focus. abrdn Asia Focus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liontrust Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Asia Focus£115.75M5.34£36.71M£77.495.74
Liontrust Asset Management£151.89M1.10£68.85M£20.0213.90

Liontrust Asset Management has a consensus target price of GBX 322, indicating a potential upside of 15.72%. Given Liontrust Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Liontrust Asset Management is more favorable than abrdn Asia Focus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
abrdn Asia Focus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Liontrust Asset Management
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Liontrust Asset Management beats abrdn Asia Focus on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Liontrust Asset Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LIO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LIO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LIO vs. The Competition

MetricLiontrust Asset ManagementAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£167.51M£2.35B£5.16B£2.60B
Dividend Yield20.43%5.97%5.25%6.15%
P/E Ratio13.9025.1415.93365.91
Price / Sales1.102,063.581,025.1088,030.08
Price / Cash5.6160.1791.0127.89
Price / Book1.041.356.597.74
Net Income£68.85M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance4.03%-0.71%-0.26%0.21%
1 Month Performance7.66%1.69%1.19%1.56%
1 Year Performance-26.39%12.04%18.11%77.95%

Liontrust Asset Management Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LIO
Liontrust Asset Management
3.2208 of 5 stars
GBX 278.26
-2.0%
GBX 322
+15.7%
-24.9%£167.51M£151.89M13.90241
BGFD
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust
N/AGBX 953
flat
N/A+27.7%£656.67M£154.29M5.04N/A
BRSC
BlackRock Smaller Companies
N/AGBX 1,272
flat
N/A-0.8%£642.68M-£89.64MN/AN/A
BUT
Brunner
N/AGBX 1,468
flat
N/A+7.1%£632.46M£57.55M11.43N/A
ATR
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.
N/AGBX 678
flat
N/A+42.6%£630.96M£66.61M9.8913,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:LIO) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners