Go Pro

Marechale Capital (MAC) Competitors

Marechale Capital logo
GBX 4.60 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06:13 AM Eastern

MAC vs. SBO, VLE, CBA, JGC, and ASLI

Should you buy Marechale Capital stock or one of its competitors? Marechale Capital's main competitors and comparable companies include Schroder British Opportunities (SBO), Volvere (VLE), Ceiba Investments (CBA), Jupiter Green (JGC), and abrdn European Logistics Income (ASLI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Marechale Capital compare to Schroder British Opportunities?

Schroder British Opportunities (LON:SBO) and Marechale Capital (LON:MAC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Schroder British Opportunities has a net margin of 165.49% compared to Marechale Capital's net margin of -267.44%. Schroder British Opportunities' return on equity of -3.04% beat Marechale Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder British Opportunities165.49% -3.04% N/A
Marechale Capital -267.44%-33.83%-5.40%

Schroder British Opportunities has a beta of 0.124, meaning that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marechale Capital has a beta of 0.882, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

5.5% of Schroder British Opportunities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Marechale Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Schroder British Opportunities shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Marechale Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Schroder British Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Marechale Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder British Opportunities Neutral
Marechale Capital Neutral

Schroder British Opportunities has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Marechale Capital. Schroder British Opportunities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marechale Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder British Opportunities-£1.93M-25.13£2.00M-£3.30N/A
Marechale Capital£341.08K34.70-£181.28K-£0.82N/A

Summary

Marechale Capital beats Schroder British Opportunities on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marechale Capital compare to Volvere?

Volvere (LON:VLE) and Marechale Capital (LON:MAC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

7.6% of Volvere shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Marechale Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.2% of Volvere shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Marechale Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volvere has a net margin of 7.90% compared to Marechale Capital's net margin of -267.44%. Volvere's return on equity of 9.96% beat Marechale Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Volvere7.90% 9.96% 6.16%
Marechale Capital -267.44%-33.83%-5.40%

Volvere has a beta of 0.613, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marechale Capital has a beta of 0.882, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Volvere has higher revenue and earnings than Marechale Capital. Marechale Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volvere, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Volvere£52.70M0.88£2.94M£188.8911.27
Marechale Capital£341.08K34.70-£181.28K-£0.82N/A

In the previous week, Volvere's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Marechale Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Volvere Neutral
Marechale Capital Neutral

Summary

Volvere beats Marechale Capital on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marechale Capital compare to Ceiba Investments?

Marechale Capital (LON:MAC) and Ceiba Investments (LON:CBA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Ceiba Investments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Marechale Capital. Marechale Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ceiba Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marechale Capital£341.08K34.70-£181.28K-£0.82N/A
Ceiba Investments-£10.05M-4.77£8.64M-£10.00N/A

Marechale Capital has a net margin of -267.44% compared to Ceiba Investments' net margin of -602.11%. Ceiba Investments' return on equity of -14.58% beat Marechale Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marechale Capital-267.44% -33.83% -5.40%
Ceiba Investments -602.11%-14.58%2.31%

In the previous week, Marechale Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ceiba Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Marechale Capital Neutral
Ceiba Investments Neutral

0.9% of Marechale Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Ceiba Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.9% of Marechale Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.5% of Ceiba Investments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Marechale Capital has a beta of 0.882, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ceiba Investments has a beta of 0.2, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Marechale Capital beats Ceiba Investments on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marechale Capital compare to Jupiter Green?

Jupiter Green (LON:JGC) and Marechale Capital (LON:MAC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, Jupiter Green's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Marechale Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Green Neutral
Marechale Capital Neutral

Jupiter Green has higher revenue and earnings than Marechale Capital. Marechale Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Green, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Green£7.93M0.00£6.55M£34.51N/A
Marechale Capital£341.08K34.70-£181.28K-£0.82N/A

Jupiter Green has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marechale Capital has a beta of 0.882, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Jupiter Green has a net margin of -26.72% compared to Marechale Capital's net margin of -267.44%. Jupiter Green's return on equity of -0.45% beat Marechale Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Green-26.72% -0.45% 0.15%
Marechale Capital -267.44%-33.83%-5.40%

37.4% of Jupiter Green shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Marechale Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 39.6% of Jupiter Green shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Marechale Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Jupiter Green beats Marechale Capital on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marechale Capital compare to abrdn European Logistics Income?

abrdn European Logistics Income (LON:ASLI) and Marechale Capital (LON:MAC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, abrdn European Logistics Income had 1 more articles in the media than Marechale Capital. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for abrdn European Logistics Income and 0 mentions for Marechale Capital. abrdn European Logistics Income's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Marechale Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that abrdn European Logistics Income is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn European Logistics Income Positive
Marechale Capital Neutral

Marechale Capital has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn European Logistics Income. Marechale Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn European Logistics Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn European Logistics Income-£19.34M-2.27-£79.93M-£8.10N/A
Marechale Capital£341.08K34.70-£181.28K-£0.82N/A

abrdn European Logistics Income has a beta of 0.854, meaning that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marechale Capital has a beta of 0.882, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

7.2% of abrdn European Logistics Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Marechale Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of abrdn European Logistics Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Marechale Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

abrdn European Logistics Income has a net margin of -127.31% compared to Marechale Capital's net margin of -267.44%. abrdn European Logistics Income's return on equity of -13.29% beat Marechale Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn European Logistics Income-127.31% -13.29% 1.88%
Marechale Capital -267.44%-33.83%-5.40%

Summary

abrdn European Logistics Income beats Marechale Capital on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Marechale Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MAC vs. The Competition

MetricMarechale CapitalCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£11.84M£5.52B£13.98B£2.87B
Dividend Yield2.88%7.44%5.92%6.22%
P/E Ratio-5.6130.5425.63366.91
Price / Sales34.701,234.10510.0083,611.39
Price / Cash0.5747.9640.7527.89
Price / Book1.463.552.766.40
Net Income-£181.28K£418.04M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-8.18%-1.53%-1.36%-0.70%
1 Month Performance-2.13%-1.32%0.30%0.12%
1 Year Performance145.99%4.60%9.92%20.18%

Marechale Capital Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MAC
Marechale Capital
N/AGBX 4.60
flat
N/A+167.4%£11.84M£341.08KN/A650
SBO
Schroder British Opportunities
N/AGBX 65.50
-0.8%
N/A-13.2%£48.40M-£1.93MN/AN/A
VLE
Volvere
N/AGBX 2,200
+1.9%
N/A+2.3%£48.18M£52.70M11.65226
CBA
Ceiba Investments
N/AGBX 29
flat
N/AN/A£47.91M-£10.05MN/AN/A
JGC
Jupiter Green
N/AN/AN/AN/A£46.49M£7.93M7.10N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:MAC) was last updated on 9/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners