Free Trial

Marks and Spencer Group (MKS) Competitors

Marks and Spencer Group logo
GBX 331.80 +0.30 (+0.09%)
As of 05/8/2026 12:44 PM Eastern

MKS vs. ALY, NXT, FLTR, SKG, and SMDS

Should you be buying Marks and Spencer Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Marks and Spencer Group include Laura Ashley (ALY), NEXT (NXT), Flutter Entertainment (FLTR), Smurfit Kappa Group (SKG), and DS Smith (SMDS).

How does Marks and Spencer Group compare to Laura Ashley?

Marks and Spencer Group (LON:MKS) and Laura Ashley (LON:ALY) are both department stores industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and earnings.

Marks and Spencer Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 416.43, suggesting a potential upside of 25.51%. Given Marks and Spencer Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Marks and Spencer Group is more favorable than Laura Ashley.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marks and Spencer Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Laura Ashley
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Marks and Spencer Group had 1 more articles in the media than Laura Ashley. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Marks and Spencer Group and 0 mentions for Laura Ashley. Marks and Spencer Group's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Laura Ashley's score of 0.00 indicating that Marks and Spencer Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Marks and Spencer Group Positive
Laura Ashley Neutral

Marks and Spencer Group has higher revenue and earnings than Laura Ashley. Laura Ashley is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marks and Spencer Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marks and Spencer Group£15.28B0.44£501.71M£0.90368.67
Laura Ashley£219.20M0.00N/A-£2.30N/A

Marks and Spencer Group has a net margin of 0.13% compared to Laura Ashley's net margin of 0.00%. Marks and Spencer Group's return on equity of 0.69% beat Laura Ashley's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marks and Spencer Group0.13% 0.69% 6.30%
Laura Ashley N/A N/A N/A

57.8% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Marks and Spencer Group beats Laura Ashley on 13 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marks and Spencer Group compare to NEXT?

Marks and Spencer Group (LON:MKS) and NEXT (LON:NXT) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and profitability.

57.8% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of NEXT shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of NEXT shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Marks and Spencer Group has a beta of 1.019, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NEXT has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, NEXT had 9 more articles in the media than Marks and Spencer Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for NEXT and 1 mentions for Marks and Spencer Group. Marks and Spencer Group's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat NEXT's score of 0.35 indicating that Marks and Spencer Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Marks and Spencer Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NEXT
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Marks and Spencer Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. NEXT pays an annual dividend of GBX 245 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Marks and Spencer Group pays out 400.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. NEXT pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NEXT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Marks and Spencer Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 416.43, suggesting a potential upside of 25.51%. NEXT has a consensus target price of £140.98, suggesting a potential upside of 6.92%. Given Marks and Spencer Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Marks and Spencer Group is more favorable than NEXT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marks and Spencer Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
NEXT
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

NEXT has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Marks and Spencer Group. NEXT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marks and Spencer Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marks and Spencer Group£15.28B0.44£501.71M£0.90368.67
NEXT£6.90B2.20£784.86M£745.4017.69

NEXT has a net margin of 12.87% compared to Marks and Spencer Group's net margin of 0.13%. NEXT's return on equity of 52.86% beat Marks and Spencer Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marks and Spencer Group0.13% 0.69% 6.30%
NEXT 12.87%52.86%14.42%

Summary

NEXT beats Marks and Spencer Group on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marks and Spencer Group compare to Flutter Entertainment?

Flutter Entertainment (LON:FLTR) and Marks and Spencer Group (LON:MKS) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, earnings and risk.

Marks and Spencer Group has a net margin of 0.13% compared to Flutter Entertainment's net margin of -3.10%. Marks and Spencer Group's return on equity of 0.69% beat Flutter Entertainment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flutter Entertainment-3.10% -7.69% 1.18%
Marks and Spencer Group 0.13%0.69%6.30%

Flutter Entertainment presently has a consensus target price of £184.50, indicating a potential upside of 142.76%. Marks and Spencer Group has a consensus target price of GBX 416.43, indicating a potential upside of 25.51%. Given Flutter Entertainment's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Flutter Entertainment is more favorable than Marks and Spencer Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flutter Entertainment
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Marks and Spencer Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

78.8% of Flutter Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Flutter Entertainment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Flutter Entertainment has a beta of 1.154, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Marks and Spencer Group has a beta of 1.019, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Flutter Entertainment had 6 more articles in the media than Marks and Spencer Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Flutter Entertainment and 1 mentions for Marks and Spencer Group. Flutter Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Marks and Spencer Group's score of 0.59 indicating that Flutter Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Flutter Entertainment
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Marks and Spencer Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Marks and Spencer Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Flutter Entertainment. Flutter Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marks and Spencer Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flutter Entertainment£16.38B0.81-£807.30M-£175.00N/A
Marks and Spencer Group£15.28B0.44£501.71M£0.90368.67

Summary

Flutter Entertainment and Marks and Spencer Group tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marks and Spencer Group compare to Smurfit Kappa Group?

Smurfit Kappa Group (LON:SKG) and Marks and Spencer Group (LON:MKS) are both mid-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Smurfit Kappa Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Marks and Spencer Group. Smurfit Kappa Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marks and Spencer Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smurfit Kappa Group£11.27B0.00£758M£2.48N/A
Marks and Spencer Group£15.28B0.44£501.71M£0.90368.67

In the previous week, Marks and Spencer Group had 1 more articles in the media than Smurfit Kappa Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Marks and Spencer Group and 0 mentions for Smurfit Kappa Group. Marks and Spencer Group's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Smurfit Kappa Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Marks and Spencer Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Smurfit Kappa Group Neutral
Marks and Spencer Group Positive

75.8% of Smurfit Kappa Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Smurfit Kappa Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Smurfit Kappa Group has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Marks and Spencer Group has a beta of 1.019, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Smurfit Kappa Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 131 per share. Marks and Spencer Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Smurfit Kappa Group pays out 5,282.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marks and Spencer Group pays out 400.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marks and Spencer Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Smurfit Kappa Group has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Marks and Spencer Group's net margin of 0.13%. Smurfit Kappa Group's return on equity of 14.31% beat Marks and Spencer Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smurfit Kappa Group6.72% 14.31% 6.89%
Marks and Spencer Group 0.13%0.69%6.30%

Marks and Spencer Group has a consensus target price of GBX 416.43, indicating a potential upside of 25.51%. Given Marks and Spencer Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Marks and Spencer Group is more favorable than Smurfit Kappa Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Smurfit Kappa Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Marks and Spencer Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Summary

Marks and Spencer Group beats Smurfit Kappa Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marks and Spencer Group compare to DS Smith?

DS Smith (LON:SMDS) and Marks and Spencer Group (LON:MKS) are both mid-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Marks and Spencer Group has higher revenue and earnings than DS Smith. DS Smith is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marks and Spencer Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DS Smith£6.83B0.00£385.48M£27.86N/A
Marks and Spencer Group£15.28B0.44£501.71M£0.90368.67

In the previous week, Marks and Spencer Group had 1 more articles in the media than DS Smith. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Marks and Spencer Group and 0 mentions for DS Smith. Marks and Spencer Group's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat DS Smith's score of 0.00 indicating that Marks and Spencer Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
DS Smith Neutral
Marks and Spencer Group Positive

88.1% of DS Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of DS Smith shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

DS Smith has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Marks and Spencer Group has a beta of 1.019, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

DS Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 18 per share. Marks and Spencer Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. DS Smith pays out 64.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marks and Spencer Group pays out 400.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

DS Smith has a net margin of 5.64% compared to Marks and Spencer Group's net margin of 0.13%. DS Smith's return on equity of 9.59% beat Marks and Spencer Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DS Smith5.64% 9.59% 4.02%
Marks and Spencer Group 0.13%0.69%6.30%

Marks and Spencer Group has a consensus target price of GBX 416.43, indicating a potential upside of 25.51%. Given Marks and Spencer Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Marks and Spencer Group is more favorable than DS Smith.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DS Smith
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Marks and Spencer Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Summary

Marks and Spencer Group beats DS Smith on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Marks and Spencer Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MKS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MKS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MKS vs. The Competition

MetricMarks and Spencer GroupDepartment Stores IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£6.72B£9.81B£4.01B£2.77B
Dividend Yield1.18%1.12%3.58%6.15%
P/E Ratio368.6724.0772.60366.07
Price / Sales0.4423.23329.8188,619.89
Price / Cash3.0812.2830.8727.89
Price / Book2.214.023.257.72
Net Income£501.71M£421.19M£249.43M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.70%-0.47%0.95%63.96%
1 Month Performance-9.76%-2.02%1.34%4.05%
1 Year Performance-7.32%-2.83%4.27%87.37%

Marks and Spencer Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MKS
Marks and Spencer Group
3.39 of 5 stars
GBX 331.80
+0.1%
GBX 416.43
+25.5%
N/A£6.72B£15.28B368.6764,000
ALY
Laura Ashley
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.84M£219.20MN/A2,980
NXT
NEXT
2.4666 of 5 stars
£126.25
-2.9%
£140.98
+11.7%
N/A£14.47B£6.90B16.9431,947
FLTR
Flutter Entertainment
2.8614 of 5 stars
GBX 7,709.27
-2.3%
£189.40
+145.7%
N/A£13.45B£16.38BN/A23,053
SKG
Smurfit Kappa Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£9.55B£11.27B1,474.1947,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:MKS) was last updated on 5/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners