Do analysts recommend NCYF or ASHM?

Ashmore Group has a consensus price target of GBX 155, suggesting a potential downside of 28.05%. Given Ashmore Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than CQS New City High Yield. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score CQS New City High Yield 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Ashmore Group 2 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67

CQS New City High Yield (NCYF) Competitors

GBX 52.13 -0.17 (-0.33%)

As of 07/13/2026 12:27 PM Eastern

Compare

NCYF vs. WWH, FSV, ASHM, BNKR, and BHMG

Should you buy CQS New City High Yield stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CQS New City High Yield with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CQS New City High Yield include Worldwide Healthcare (WWH), Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (FSV), Ashmore Group (ASHM), The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR), and BH Macro GBP (BHMG). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and dividends.

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Worldwide Healthcare has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. Worldwide Healthcare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield	£22.87M	15.74	£47.15M	£3.48	14.98
Worldwide Healthcare	£118.16M	11.80	£227.88M	£26.70	14.52

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 2 more articles in the media than CQS New City High Yield. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for CQS New City High Yield. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat CQS New City High Yield's score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield	Neutral
Worldwide Healthcare	Very Positive

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.08, suggesting that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.266, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Worldwide Healthcare has a net margin of 85.46% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity of 8.01% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield	73.82%	7.00%	4.54%
Worldwide Healthcare	85.46%	8.01%	-2.02%

Summary

Worldwide Healthcare beats CQS New City High Yield on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (LON:FSV) and CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CQS New City High Yield'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values	Neutral
CQS New City High Yield	Neutral

12.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a net margin of 95.92% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' return on equity of 25.87% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values	95.92%	25.87%	0.33%
CQS New City High Yield	73.82%	7.00%	4.54%

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values	£354.63M	3.96	£223.72M	£109.34	3.96
CQS New City High Yield	£22.87M	15.74	£47.15M	£3.48	14.98

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a beta of 1.2700156, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.08, meaning that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values beats CQS New City High Yield on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Ashmore Group?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Ashmore Group has a net margin of 78.55% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. Ashmore Group's return on equity of 14.60% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield	73.82%	7.00%	4.54%
Ashmore Group	78.55%	14.60%	4.52%

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.4% of Ashmore Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ashmore Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Ashmore Group had 1 more articles in the media than CQS New City High Yield. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ashmore Group and 0 mentions for CQS New City High Yield. Ashmore Group's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat CQS New City High Yield's score of 0.00 indicating that Ashmore Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield	Neutral
Ashmore Group	Positive

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.08, suggesting that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ashmore Group has a beta of 0.962, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. Ashmore Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ashmore Group pays out 102.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Ashmore Group has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. Ashmore Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield	£22.87M	15.74	£47.15M	£3.48	14.98
Ashmore Group	£135.90M	10.31	£94.67M	£16.54	13.03

Ashmore Group has a consensus price target of GBX 155, suggesting a potential downside of 28.05%. Given Ashmore Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than CQS New City High Yield.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CQS New City High Yield	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Ashmore Group	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

Summary

Ashmore Group beats CQS New City High Yield on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and profitability.

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. The Bankers Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Bankers Investment Trust pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. The Bankers Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield	£22.87M	15.74	£47.15M	£3.48	14.98
The Bankers Investment Trust	£322.40M	4.30	£218.53M	£30.13	4.99

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.08, suggesting that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.618, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

The Bankers Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,132.30% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.55% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield	73.82%	7.00%	4.54%
The Bankers Investment Trust	1,132.30%	22.55%	6.13%

In the previous week, CQS New City High Yield's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled The Bankers Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield	Neutral
The Bankers Investment Trust	Neutral

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

The Bankers Investment Trust beats CQS New City High Yield on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to BH Macro GBP?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.08, suggesting that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.14339958, suggesting that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

CQS New City High Yield has a net margin of 73.82% compared to BH Macro GBP's net margin of 54.44%. BH Macro GBP's return on equity of 7.42% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield	73.82%	7.00%	4.54%
BH Macro GBP	54.44%	7.42%	-0.31%

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CQS New City High Yield's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BH Macro GBP'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield	Neutral
BH Macro GBP	Neutral

BH Macro GBP has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. BH Macro GBP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield	£22.87M	15.74	£47.15M	£3.48	14.98
BH Macro GBP	£277.60M	4.95	£53.77M	£45.68	9.28

Summary

CQS New City High Yield beats BH Macro GBP on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CQS New City High Yield News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NCYF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NCYF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	CQS New City High Yield	Asset Management Industry	Financial Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£359.91M	£2.43B	£6.19B	£2.85B
Dividend Yield	8.66%	6.01%	5.23%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	14.98	61.84	29.75	368.18
Price / Sales	15.74	1,858.15	1,187.15	84,612.72
Price / Cash	64.50	60.33	88.64	27.87
Price / Book	1.03	1.39	6.43	7.49
Net Income	£47.15M	£265.27M	£1.13B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-0.14%	-0.06%	-0.13%	-0.19%
1 Month Performance	1.81%	0.23%	0.30%	-1.00%
1 Year Performance	-0.53%	7.68%	15.08%	61.67%

CQS New City High Yield Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NCYF CQS New City High Yield	N/A	GBX 52.13 -0.3%	N/A	-0.1%	£359.91M	£22.87M	14.98	N/A
WWH Worldwide Healthcare	N/A	GBX 390.56 -1.0%	N/A	+26.3%	£1.42B	£118.16M	14.63	N/A	Positive News
FSV Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values	N/A	GBX 434.50 +0.8%	N/A	+17.5%	£1.40B	£354.63M	3.97	25,000
ASHM Ashmore Group	1.3676 of 5 stars	GBX 213.41 -0.6%	GBX 155 -27.4%	+28.4%	£1.40B	£135.90M	12.90	283	Positive News
BNKR The Bankers Investment Trust	N/A	GBX 150 -0.1%	N/A	+22.5%	£1.38B	£322.40M	4.98	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:NCYF) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

CQS New City High Yield (NCYF) Competitors

NCYF vs. WWH, FSV, ASHM, BNKR, and BHMG

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Summary

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Summary

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Ashmore Group?

Summary

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

Summary

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to BH Macro GBP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NCYF vs. The Competition

CQS New City High Yield Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

CQS New City High Yield (NCYF) Competitors

NCYF vs. WWH, FSV, ASHM, BNKR, and BHMG

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of NCYF or WWH?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, NCYF or WWH?

Does the media favor NCYF or WWH?

Is NCYF or WWH a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, NCYF or WWH?

Is NCYF or WWH more profitable?

Summary

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Does the media prefer FSV or NCYF?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in FSV or NCYF?

Is FSV or NCYF more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, FSV or NCYF?

Is FSV or NCYF a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, FSV or NCYF?

Summary

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Ashmore Group?

Is NCYF or ASHM more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in NCYF or ASHM?

Does the media prefer NCYF or ASHM?

Which has more risk & volatility, NCYF or ASHM?

Is NCYF or ASHM a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, NCYF or ASHM?

Do analysts recommend NCYF or ASHM?

Summary

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

Is NCYF or BNKR a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, NCYF or BNKR?

Which has more volatility & risk, NCYF or BNKR?

Is NCYF or BNKR more profitable?

Does the media favor NCYF or BNKR?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in NCYF or BNKR?

Summary

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to BH Macro GBP?

Which has more risk and volatility, NCYF or BHMG?

Is NCYF or BHMG more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of NCYF or BHMG?

Does the media refer more to NCYF or BHMG?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, NCYF or BHMG?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NCYF vs. The Competition

CQS New City High Yield Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools