Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ Read now. Do not delete. You’ve been warned. (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free NCYF Stock Alerts

CQS New City High Yield (NCYF) Competitors

CQS New City High Yield logo
GBX 51 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 11:54 AM Eastern
Compare

NCYF vs. BHMG, BNKR, JMG, ASHM, and WWH

Should you buy CQS New City High Yield stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CQS New City High Yield with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CQS New City High Yield include BH Macro GBP (BHMG), The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR), JPMorgan Emerging Markets (JMG), Ashmore Group (ASHM), and Worldwide Healthcare (WWH). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to BH Macro GBP?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, BH Macro GBP had 2 more articles in the media than CQS New City High Yield. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for BH Macro GBP and 0 mentions for CQS New City High Yield. CQS New City High Yield's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat BH Macro GBP's score of -1.00 indicating that CQS New City High Yield is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield Neutral
BH Macro GBP Negative

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.079, indicating that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.08712986, indicating that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

BH Macro GBP has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. BH Macro GBP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.25£47.15M£3.4814.66
BH Macro GBP£277.60M5.01£53.77M£45.689.28

BH Macro GBP has a net margin of 173.32% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. BH Macro GBP's return on equity of 13.25% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield73.82% 7.00% 4.54%
BH Macro GBP 173.32%13.25%-0.31%

Summary

BH Macro GBP beats CQS New City High Yield on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) and CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. The Bankers Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Bankers Investment Trust£221.50M6.40£218.53M£20.257.55
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.25£47.15M£3.4814.66

The Bankers Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.8%. The Bankers Investment Trust pays out 13.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

CQS New City High Yield has a net margin of 73.82% compared to The Bankers Investment Trust's net margin of -551.87%. The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity of 16.08% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Bankers Investment Trust-551.87% 16.08% 6.13%
CQS New City High Yield 73.82%7.00%4.54%

The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.9636273, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.079, indicating that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, The Bankers Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CQS New City High Yield'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Bankers Investment Trust Neutral
CQS New City High Yield Neutral

Summary

The Bankers Investment Trust beats CQS New City High Yield on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to JPMorgan Emerging Markets?

JPMorgan Emerging Markets (LON:JMG) and CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

JPMorgan Emerging Markets pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.8%. JPMorgan Emerging Markets pays out 42.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

JPMorgan Emerging Markets has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. CQS New City High Yield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Emerging Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan Emerging Markets£56.31M23.64£80.10M£4.6329.33
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.25£47.15M£3.4814.66

14.8% of JPMorgan Emerging Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of JPMorgan Emerging Markets shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

JPMorgan Emerging Markets has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.079, indicating that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

JPMorgan Emerging Markets has a net margin of 95.26% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. JPMorgan Emerging Markets' return on equity of 19.61% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan Emerging Markets95.26% 19.61% 1.55%
CQS New City High Yield 73.82%7.00%4.54%

In the previous week, JPMorgan Emerging Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CQS New City High Yield'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Neutral
CQS New City High Yield Neutral

Summary

JPMorgan Emerging Markets beats CQS New City High Yield on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Ashmore Group?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings and media sentiment.

Ashmore Group has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. Ashmore Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.25£47.15M£3.4814.66
Ashmore Group£135.90M9.70£94.67M£16.5412.26

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.8%. Ashmore Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ashmore Group pays out 102.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Ashmore Group has a consensus target price of GBX 150, indicating a potential downside of 26.05%. Given Ashmore Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than CQS New City High Yield.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CQS New City High Yield
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ashmore Group
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.079, indicating that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ashmore Group has a beta of 0.961, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Ashmore Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ashmore Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ashmore Group has a net margin of 78.55% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. Ashmore Group's return on equity of 14.60% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield73.82% 7.00% 4.54%
Ashmore Group 78.55%14.60%4.52%

In the previous week, CQS New City High Yield's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ashmore Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield Neutral
Ashmore Group Neutral

Summary

Ashmore Group beats CQS New City High Yield on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.079, indicating that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.265, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

Worldwide Healthcare has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CQS New City High Yield. Worldwide Healthcare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.25£47.15M£3.4814.66
Worldwide Healthcare-£164.31M-7.83£227.88M-£30.90N/A

Worldwide Healthcare has a net margin of 85.46% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity of 8.01% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield73.82% 7.00% 4.54%
Worldwide Healthcare 85.46%8.01%-2.02%

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 5 more articles in the media than CQS New City High Yield. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for CQS New City High Yield. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.69 beat CQS New City High Yield's score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield Neutral
Worldwide Healthcare Very Positive

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.8%. Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Worldwide Healthcare pays out -7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Worldwide Healthcare beats CQS New City High Yield on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CQS New City High Yield News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NCYF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NCYF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NCYF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCQS New City High YieldAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£348.79M£2.47B£6.02B£2.80B
Dividend Yield8.88%6.02%5.27%6.16%
P/E Ratio14.6625.9116.42367.11
Price / Sales15.252,096.051,105.7186,377.90
Price / Cash64.5060.1689.3527.85
Price / Book1.011.386.637.95
Net Income£47.15M£264.62M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.99%0.92%0.85%1.38%
1 Month Performance0.79%1.29%2.04%1.63%
1 Year Performance-0.78%10.97%20.73%73.73%

CQS New City High Yield Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NCYF
CQS New City High Yield
N/AGBX 51
flat		N/A-0.8%£348.79M£22.87M14.66N/A
BHMG
BH Macro GBP
N/AGBX 425
+0.1%		N/A+7.3%£1.36B£277.60M9.30N/A
BNKR
The Bankers Investment Trust
N/AGBX 149
+2.5%		N/A+27.6%£1.35B£221.50M7.36N/A
JMG
JPMorgan Emerging Markets
N/AGBX 135.80
-0.9%		N/A+19.1%£1.33B£56.31M29.33N/A
ASHM
Ashmore Group
N/AGBX 202
+2.5%		GBX 150
-25.7%		+29.8%£1.28B£135.90M12.21283

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:NCYF) was last updated on 6/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
This is the worst news for stocks in 50 years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are issuing a rare warning: what's ahead for U.S. stocks could be the worst e...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Hopeless About Retirement? Hopeless and Helpless Aren’t the Same Thing
Your retirement date didn't move once - it moved slowly, then repeatedly, until the shift felt normal. That's ...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Do NOT buy or sell SPCX before reading this
SpaceX may be the biggest IPO in history, but according to Joel Litman - who called AMD before it rose as much...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
How to play the Biggest IPO in stock market history!
SpaceX is eyeing a near-$2 trillion IPO valuation, and retail investors are already lining up - but early insi...
InvestPub | Sponsoredtc pixel
Tesla's robot factory goes live this summer
On Tesla's Q1 2026 earnings call, Elon Musk confirmed Optimus robot production at the Fremont factory begins l...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel
A 3M Oz. Historical Gold Resource And A Market That Hasn't Caught Up
One Canadian junior explorer controls a gold and copper system in British Columbia's Kootenay Golden Arc - a d...
Wall Street Logic | Sponsoredtc pixel