Go Pro
→ The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free NCYF Stock Alerts

CQS New City High Yield (NCYF) Competitors

CQS New City High Yield logo
GBX 50.29 -0.70 (-1.37%)
As of 05:09 AM Eastern
Compare

NCYF vs. BNKR, ASHM, JMG, ASL, and BHMG

Should you buy CQS New City High Yield stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CQS New City High Yield with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CQS New City High Yield include The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR), Ashmore Group (ASHM), JPMorgan Emerging Markets (JMG), Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust (ASL), and BH Macro GBP (BHMG). These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and dividends.

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.08, suggesting that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.9636718, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.0%. The Bankers Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Bankers Investment Trust pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. The Bankers Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.18£47.15M£3.4814.45
The Bankers Investment Trust£322.40M4.27£218.53M£30.134.95

In the previous week, CQS New City High Yield had 2 more articles in the media than The Bankers Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CQS New City High Yield and 1 mentions for The Bankers Investment Trust. CQS New City High Yield's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat The Bankers Investment Trust's score of 1.41 indicating that CQS New City High Yield is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
The Bankers Investment Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

The Bankers Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,132.30% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.55% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield73.82% 7.00% 4.54%
The Bankers Investment Trust 1,132.30%22.55%6.13%

Summary

The Bankers Investment Trust beats CQS New City High Yield on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Ashmore Group?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Ashmore Group has a consensus target price of GBX 155, suggesting a potential downside of 26.33%. Given Ashmore Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than CQS New City High Yield.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CQS New City High Yield
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ashmore Group
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.08, indicating that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ashmore Group has a beta of 0.962, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.4% of Ashmore Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ashmore Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.0%. Ashmore Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ashmore Group pays out 102.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Ashmore Group has a net margin of 78.55% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. Ashmore Group's return on equity of 14.60% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield73.82% 7.00% 4.54%
Ashmore Group 78.55%14.60%4.52%

Ashmore Group has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. Ashmore Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.18£47.15M£3.4814.45
Ashmore Group£135.90M10.07£94.67M£16.5412.72

In the previous week, CQS New City High Yield had 3 more articles in the media than Ashmore Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CQS New City High Yield and 0 mentions for Ashmore Group. CQS New City High Yield's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Ashmore Group's score of 0.00 indicating that CQS New City High Yield is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield Positive
Ashmore Group Neutral

Summary

Ashmore Group beats CQS New City High Yield on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to JPMorgan Emerging Markets?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and JPMorgan Emerging Markets (LON:JMG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.08, meaning that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Emerging Markets has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

JPMorgan Emerging Markets has a net margin of 95.26% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. JPMorgan Emerging Markets' return on equity of 19.61% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield73.82% 7.00% 4.54%
JPMorgan Emerging Markets 95.26%19.61%1.55%

In the previous week, CQS New City High Yield had 3 more articles in the media than JPMorgan Emerging Markets. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CQS New City High Yield and 0 mentions for JPMorgan Emerging Markets. CQS New City High Yield's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat JPMorgan Emerging Markets' score of 0.00 indicating that CQS New City High Yield is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield Positive
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Neutral

JPMorgan Emerging Markets has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. CQS New City High Yield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Emerging Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.18£47.15M£3.4814.45
JPMorgan Emerging Markets£56.31M23.64£80.10M£4.6329.33

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.0%. JPMorgan Emerging Markets pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. JPMorgan Emerging Markets pays out 42.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.8% of JPMorgan Emerging Markets shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of JPMorgan Emerging Markets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

JPMorgan Emerging Markets beats CQS New City High Yield on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust (LON:ASL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.0%. Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 44.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.08, suggesting that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust has a beta of 1.4412794, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. CQS New City High Yield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.18£47.15M£3.4814.45
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust£99.87M13.32£255.01M£117.9014.57

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.1% of Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CQS New City High Yield had 2 more articles in the media than Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CQS New City High Yield and 1 mentions for Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust. Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat CQS New City High Yield's score of 1.45 indicating that Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield Positive
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust Very Positive

CQS New City High Yield has a net margin of 73.82% compared to Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's net margin of 60.50%. CQS New City High Yield's return on equity of 7.00% beat Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield73.82% 7.00% 4.54%
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust 60.50%6.52%11.67%

Summary

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust beats CQS New City High Yield on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to BH Macro GBP?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

BH Macro GBP has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. BH Macro GBP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.18£47.15M£3.4814.45
BH Macro GBP£277.60M4.88£53.77M£45.689.15

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.08, suggesting that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.14339958, suggesting that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CQS New City High Yield had 3 more articles in the media than BH Macro GBP. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CQS New City High Yield and 0 mentions for BH Macro GBP. CQS New City High Yield's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat BH Macro GBP's score of 0.00 indicating that CQS New City High Yield is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield Positive
BH Macro GBP Neutral

CQS New City High Yield has a net margin of 73.82% compared to BH Macro GBP's net margin of 54.44%. BH Macro GBP's return on equity of 7.42% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield73.82% 7.00% 4.54%
BH Macro GBP 54.44%7.42%-0.31%

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CQS New City High Yield beats BH Macro GBP on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CQS New City High Yield News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NCYF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NCYF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NCYF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCQS New City High YieldCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£347.24M£5.46B£13.87B£2.83B
Dividend Yield8.93%7.50%5.95%6.15%
P/E Ratio14.4536.7828.68368.45
Price / Sales15.181,123.37466.1083,513.51
Price / Cash64.5084.8844.5027.89
Price / Book1.003.693.687.11
Net Income£47.15M£417.14M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-4.02%7.84%3.69%6.57%
1 Month Performance-2.91%-1.18%0.12%0.29%
1 Year Performance-0.41%5.75%13.05%64.28%

CQS New City High Yield Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NCYF
CQS New City High Yield
N/AGBX 50.29
-1.4%		N/A-0.2%£347.24M£22.87M14.45N/A
BNKR
The Bankers Investment Trust
N/AGBX 147
+0.7%		N/A+21.5%£1.34B£322.40M4.88N/A
ASHM
Ashmore Group
0.8523 of 5 stars		GBX 208.40
+0.7%		GBX 155
-25.6%		+21.7%£1.33B£135.90M12.60283
JMG
JPMorgan Emerging Markets
N/AGBX 135.80
-0.9%		N/A+13.2%£1.33B£56.31M29.33N/A
ASL
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust
N/AGBX 1,704
+0.5%		N/A+9.4%£1.33B£99.87M14.45N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:NCYF) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
BofA: Digital Dollar Coming 2025-2030
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
Three oil giants buried the same discovery for 50 years
In 1976, Chevron tapped an energy source with no fuel costs, no carbon, and no supply chain - then killed the ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel