Go Pro
→ Porter flew 3,300 miles to investigate this system (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free NCYF Stock Alerts

CQS New City High Yield (NCYF) Competitors

CQS New City High Yield logo
GBX 50.70 +0.20 (+0.40%)
As of 08/21/2026 11:55 AM Eastern
Compare

NCYF vs. BHMG, BNKR, ASL, JMG, and TMPL

Should you buy CQS New City High Yield stock or one of its competitors? CQS New City High Yield's main competitors and comparable companies include BH Macro GBP (BHMG), The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR), Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust (ASL), JPMorgan Emerging Markets (JMG), and Temple Bar (TMPL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to BH Macro GBP?

BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) and CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

BH Macro GBP has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. BH Macro GBP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BH Macro GBP£277.60M4.99£53.77M£45.689.38
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.31£47.15M£3.4814.57

CQS New City High Yield has a net margin of 73.82% compared to BH Macro GBP's net margin of 54.44%. BH Macro GBP's return on equity of 7.42% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BH Macro GBP54.44% 7.42% -0.31%
CQS New City High Yield 73.82%7.00%4.54%

BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.1291358, indicating that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, indicating that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, BH Macro GBP's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CQS New City High Yield'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
BH Macro GBP Neutral
CQS New City High Yield Neutral

1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CQS New City High Yield beats BH Macro GBP on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

The Bankers Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,132.30% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.55% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield73.82% 7.00% 4.54%
The Bankers Investment Trust 1,132.30%22.55%6.13%

In the previous week, CQS New City High Yield's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled The Bankers Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield Neutral
The Bankers Investment Trust Neutral

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. The Bankers Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.31£47.15M£3.4814.57
The Bankers Investment Trust£322.40M4.25£218.53M£30.134.95

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, indicating that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.613, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. The Bankers Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Bankers Investment Trust pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

The Bankers Investment Trust beats CQS New City High Yield on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust (LON:ASL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 46.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust pays out 40.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, meaning that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust has a beta of 1.4412928, meaning that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

CQS New City High Yield has a net margin of 73.82% compared to Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's net margin of 63.47%. CQS New City High Yield's return on equity of 7.00% beat Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield73.82% 7.00% 4.54%
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust 63.47%6.52%11.67%

In the previous week, CQS New City High Yield's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield Neutral
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust Neutral

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. CQS New City High Yield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.31£47.15M£3.4814.57
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust£94.68M14.35£255.01M£115.7815.22

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.1% of Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust beats CQS New City High Yield on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to JPMorgan Emerging Markets?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and JPMorgan Emerging Markets (LON:JMG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

JPMorgan Emerging Markets has a net margin of 95.26% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. JPMorgan Emerging Markets' return on equity of 19.61% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield73.82% 7.00% 4.54%
JPMorgan Emerging Markets 95.26%19.61%1.55%

In the previous week, JPMorgan Emerging Markets had 1 more articles in the media than CQS New City High Yield. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for JPMorgan Emerging Markets and 0 mentions for CQS New City High Yield. CQS New City High Yield's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Emerging Markets'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield Neutral
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Neutral

JPMorgan Emerging Markets has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. CQS New City High Yield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Emerging Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.31£47.15M£3.4814.57
JPMorgan Emerging Markets£56.31M23.64£80.10M£4.6329.33

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. JPMorgan Emerging Markets pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. JPMorgan Emerging Markets pays out 42.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.8% of JPMorgan Emerging Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of JPMorgan Emerging Markets shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, indicating that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Emerging Markets has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

JPMorgan Emerging Markets beats CQS New City High Yield on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Temple Bar?

Temple Bar (LON:TMPL) and CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Temple Bar had 1 more articles in the media than CQS New City High Yield. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Temple Bar and 0 mentions for CQS New City High Yield. Temple Bar's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat CQS New City High Yield's score of 0.00 indicating that Temple Bar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Temple Bar Positive
CQS New City High Yield Neutral

Temple Bar pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Temple Bar pays out 14.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Temple Bar has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. Temple Bar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Temple Bar£281.60M4.55£154.90M£97.004.32
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.31£47.15M£3.4814.57

Temple Bar has a beta of 1.155, meaning that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, meaning that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

10.7% of Temple Bar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Temple Bar shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Temple Bar has a net margin of 82.15% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. Temple Bar's return on equity of 27.93% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Temple Bar82.15% 27.93% 7.08%
CQS New City High Yield 73.82%7.00%4.54%

Summary

Temple Bar beats CQS New City High Yield on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CQS New City High Yield News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NCYF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NCYF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCQS New City High YieldCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£350.06M£5.66B£13.63B£2.54B
Dividend Yield8.92%7.38%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio14.5739.1029.61367.57
Price / Sales15.311,260.31520.0283,481.74
Price / Cash64.5048.3138.1927.89
Price / Book1.002.132.187.19
Net Income£47.15M£416.48M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.42%-0.25%-0.30%0.30%
1 Month Performance-3.24%2.06%2.37%3.31%
1 Year Performance-0.59%5.71%9.68%22.13%

CQS New City High Yield Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NCYF
CQS New City High Yield
N/AGBX 50.70
+0.4%		N/A-0.6%£350.06M£22.87M14.57N/A
BHMG
BH Macro GBP
N/AGBX 428.32
+0.8%		N/A+6.1%£1.39B£277.60M9.38N/A
BNKR
The Bankers Investment Trust
N/AGBX 149.20
flat		N/A+20.3%£1.37B£322.40M4.95N/A
ASL
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust
N/AGBX 1,762
+0.7%		N/A+13.7%£1.34B£94.68M15.22N/A
JMG
JPMorgan Emerging Markets
N/AGBX 135.80
-0.9%		N/A+11.7%£1.33B£56.31M29.33N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:NCYF) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel