Go Pro
→ A “bloodbath” Is Coming (From TradeSmith) (Ad)tc pixel Free NCYF Stock Alerts

CQS New City High Yield (NCYF) Competitors

CQS New City High Yield logo
GBX 50.59 -0.11 (-0.22%)
As of 12:00 PM Eastern
Compare

NCYF vs. BNKR, ASHM, BHMG, ASL, and WWH

Should you buy CQS New City High Yield stock or one of its competitors? CQS New City High Yield's main competitors and comparable companies include The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR), Ashmore Group (ASHM), BH Macro GBP (BHMG), Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust (ASL), and Worldwide Healthcare (WWH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

The Bankers Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,132.30% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 79.02%. The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.55% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield79.02% 8.83% 4.54%
The Bankers Investment Trust 1,132.30%22.55%6.13%

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. The Bankers Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.86£47.15M£3.4814.51
The Bankers Investment Trust£322.40M4.40£218.53M£30.135.16

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, indicating that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.613, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, The Bankers Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than CQS New City High Yield. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for The Bankers Investment Trust and 3 mentions for CQS New City High Yield. The Bankers Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat CQS New City High Yield's score of 0.25 indicating that The Bankers Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
The Bankers Investment Trust
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. The Bankers Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Bankers Investment Trust pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

The Bankers Investment Trust beats CQS New City High Yield on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Ashmore Group?

Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) and CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

Ashmore Group has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. Ashmore Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ashmore Group£144.30M9.83£94.67M£16.5413.19
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.86£47.15M£3.4814.51

Ashmore Group has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, suggesting that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

CQS New City High Yield has a net margin of 79.02% compared to Ashmore Group's net margin of 73.84%. Ashmore Group's return on equity of 13.19% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ashmore Group73.84% 13.19% 4.52%
CQS New City High Yield 79.02%8.83%4.54%

Ashmore Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 220, suggesting a potential upside of 0.82%. Given Ashmore Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than CQS New City High Yield.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ashmore Group
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
CQS New City High Yield
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, CQS New City High Yield had 3 more articles in the media than Ashmore Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CQS New City High Yield and 0 mentions for Ashmore Group. Ashmore Group's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat CQS New City High Yield's score of 0.25 indicating that Ashmore Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ashmore Group Positive
CQS New City High Yield Neutral

39.9% of Ashmore Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by institutional investors. 37.5% of Ashmore Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ashmore Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Ashmore Group pays out 102.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Ashmore Group beats CQS New City High Yield on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to BH Macro GBP?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CQS New City High Yield had 2 more articles in the media than BH Macro GBP. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CQS New City High Yield and 1 mentions for BH Macro GBP. CQS New City High Yield's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat BH Macro GBP's score of -0.15 indicating that CQS New City High Yield is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
BH Macro GBP
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CQS New City High Yield has a net margin of 79.02% compared to BH Macro GBP's net margin of 54.44%. CQS New City High Yield's return on equity of 8.83% beat BH Macro GBP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield79.02% 8.83% 4.54%
BH Macro GBP 54.44%7.42%-0.31%

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, suggesting that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.126, suggesting that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

BH Macro GBP has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. BH Macro GBP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.86£47.15M£3.4814.51
BH Macro GBP£277.60M4.79£53.77M£45.689.01

Summary

CQS New City High Yield beats BH Macro GBP on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust (LON:ASL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.1% of Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CQS New City High Yield had 2 more articles in the media than Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CQS New City High Yield and 1 mentions for Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust. Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat CQS New City High Yield's score of 0.25 indicating that Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. CQS New City High Yield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.86£47.15M£3.4814.51
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust£94.68M14.55£255.01M£115.7815.57

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 46.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust pays out 40.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, suggesting that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust has a beta of 1.433, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

CQS New City High Yield has a net margin of 79.02% compared to Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's net margin of 63.47%. CQS New City High Yield's return on equity of 8.83% beat Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield79.02% 8.83% 4.54%
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust 63.47%6.52%11.67%

Summary

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust beats CQS New City High Yield on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Worldwide Healthcare has a net margin of 85.46% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 79.02%. CQS New City High Yield's return on equity of 8.83% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield79.02% 8.83% 4.54%
Worldwide Healthcare 85.46%8.01%-2.02%

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, indicating that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

Worldwide Healthcare has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. Worldwide Healthcare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.86£47.15M£3.4814.51
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M10.98£227.88M£26.7013.86

In the previous week, CQS New City High Yield and CQS New City High Yield both had 3 articles in the media. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat CQS New City High Yield's score of 0.25 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Worldwide Healthcare
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Worldwide Healthcare beats CQS New City High Yield on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CQS New City High Yield News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NCYF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NCYF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCQS New City High YieldCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£363.34M£5.15B£13.32B£2.80B
Dividend Yield8.92%7.55%6.03%6.18%
P/E Ratio14.5429.3224.46366.17
Price / Sales15.891,256.39505.8789,425.29
Price / Cash64.5047.7747.4527.89
Price / Book1.003.492.706.83
Net Income£47.15M£417.69M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.08%-0.74%-1.04%-0.75%
1 Month Performance-0.03%5.21%0.99%16.84%
1 Year Performance-2.72%3.31%8.15%16.40%

CQS New City High Yield Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NCYF
CQS New City High Yield
N/AGBX 50.59
-0.2%		N/A-2.5%£363.34M£22.87M14.54N/A
BNKR
The Bankers Investment Trust
N/AGBX 153.40
+0.4%		N/A+18.1%£1.40B£322.40M5.09N/A
ASHM
Ashmore Group
1.3463 of 5 stars		GBX 215
+1.5%		GBX 212.50
-1.2%		+20.0%£1.40B£144.30M13.00272
BHMG
BH Macro GBP
N/AGBX 421.35
+2.4%		N/A+4.6%£1.36B£277.60M9.22N/A
ASL
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust
N/AGBX 1,764
+0.9%		N/A+17.5%£1.35B£94.68M15.24N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:NCYF) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Elon Warns "America Will Go Bankrupt". Trump's Plan Inside.
National debt just crossed 40 trillion dollars, and Elon Musk says America is 1,000% going to go bankrupt with...
American Hartford Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
MILLIONAIRE MASTERCLASS INVITE: Altucher
James Altucher says Elon Musk is preparing an unprecedented project set to surface on December 8th. Altuche...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
First Look: Elon’s “Starphone”
Rumors are swirling that Elon Musk is developing a new mobile device that could rival the iPhone. It's said to...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The SEC Just Opened The Floodgates…
The SEC removed the 25 year old Pattern Day Trader rule in June 2026, cutting the minimum to open a trading ac...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel
How Elon’s Empire Ends (and how to profit)
Marc Chaikin, the 60 year Wall Street veteran whose Chaikin Money Flow indicator sits on every Bloomberg termi...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
How options let you do more with less capital
Would you rather spend $5,000 buying 100 shares of a $50 stock, or control those same 100 shares for a fractio...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
New Chip takes minutes, not days
George Gilder believes today's AI data centers could become tomorrow's typewriters - replaced by a single wafe...
Eagle Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
"How Much Can I Actually Spend Each Year With $2.5M Saved?"
Having $2.5 million saved puts you ahead of most Americans, but how long it lasts depends on the decisions you...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel