Go Pro
→ The dollar reset no one told you about (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free NCYF Stock Alerts

CQS New City High Yield (NCYF) Competitors

CQS New City High Yield logo
GBX 50.70 +0.10 (+0.20%)
As of 09/11/2026 12:44 PM Eastern
Compare

NCYF vs. BNKR, WWH, BHMG, ASL, and JMG

Should you buy CQS New City High Yield stock or one of its competitors? CQS New City High Yield's main competitors and comparable companies include The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR), Worldwide Healthcare (WWH), BH Macro GBP (BHMG), Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust (ASL), and JPMorgan Emerging Markets (JMG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. The Bankers Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.92£47.15M£3.4814.57
The Bankers Investment Trust£322.40M4.26£218.53M£30.135.00

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, The Bankers Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than CQS New City High Yield. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for The Bankers Investment Trust and 0 mentions for CQS New City High Yield. CQS New City High Yield's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled The Bankers Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield Neutral
The Bankers Investment Trust Neutral

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, suggesting that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.613, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

The Bankers Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,132.30% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.55% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield73.82% 7.00% 4.54%
The Bankers Investment Trust 1,132.30%22.55%6.13%

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. The Bankers Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Bankers Investment Trust pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

The Bankers Investment Trust beats CQS New City High Yield on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Worldwide Healthcare has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. Worldwide Healthcare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.92£47.15M£3.4814.57
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M11.05£227.88M£26.7013.95

Worldwide Healthcare has a net margin of 85.46% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity of 8.01% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield73.82% 7.00% 4.54%
Worldwide Healthcare 85.46%8.01%-2.02%

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, meaning that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, meaning that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 2 more articles in the media than CQS New City High Yield. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for CQS New City High Yield. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat CQS New City High Yield's score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield Neutral
Worldwide Healthcare Positive

Summary

Worldwide Healthcare beats CQS New City High Yield on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to BH Macro GBP?

CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) and BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, indicating that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.126, indicating that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

CQS New City High Yield has a net margin of 73.82% compared to BH Macro GBP's net margin of 54.44%. BH Macro GBP's return on equity of 7.42% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS New City High Yield73.82% 7.00% 4.54%
BH Macro GBP 54.44%7.42%-0.31%

BH Macro GBP has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. BH Macro GBP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.92£47.15M£3.4814.57
BH Macro GBP£277.60M4.95£53.77M£45.689.30

7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, CQS New City High Yield's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BH Macro GBP'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS New City High Yield Neutral
BH Macro GBP Neutral

Summary

CQS New City High Yield beats BH Macro GBP on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust?

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust (LON:ASL) and CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CQS New City High Yield'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust Neutral
CQS New City High Yield Neutral

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. CQS New City High Yield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust£94.68M13.92£255.01M£115.7814.89
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.92£47.15M£3.4814.57

CQS New City High Yield has a net margin of 73.82% compared to Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's net margin of 63.47%. CQS New City High Yield's return on equity of 7.00% beat Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust63.47% 6.52% 11.67%
CQS New City High Yield 73.82%7.00%4.54%

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust has a beta of 1.433, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, suggesting that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

13.1% of Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 46.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust pays out 40.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust beats CQS New City High Yield on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS New City High Yield compare to JPMorgan Emerging Markets?

JPMorgan Emerging Markets (LON:JMG) and CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

JPMorgan Emerging Markets pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. JPMorgan Emerging Markets pays out 42.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

JPMorgan Emerging Markets has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. CQS New City High Yield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Emerging Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan Emerging Markets£56.31M23.64£80.10M£4.6329.33
CQS New City High Yield£22.87M15.92£47.15M£3.4814.57

JPMorgan Emerging Markets has a net margin of 95.26% compared to CQS New City High Yield's net margin of 73.82%. JPMorgan Emerging Markets' return on equity of 19.61% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan Emerging Markets95.26% 19.61% 1.55%
CQS New City High Yield 73.82%7.00%4.54%

14.8% of JPMorgan Emerging Markets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of JPMorgan Emerging Markets shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, JPMorgan Emerging Markets had 1 more articles in the media than CQS New City High Yield. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for JPMorgan Emerging Markets and 0 mentions for CQS New City High Yield. JPMorgan Emerging Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat CQS New City High Yield's score of 0.00 indicating that JPMorgan Emerging Markets is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Positive
CQS New City High Yield Neutral

JPMorgan Emerging Markets has a beta of 0.906, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, meaning that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

JPMorgan Emerging Markets beats CQS New City High Yield on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CQS New City High Yield News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NCYF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NCYF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCQS New City High YieldCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£364.15M£5.51B£13.99B£2.87B
Dividend Yield8.93%7.47%5.94%6.23%
P/E Ratio14.5730.5425.67366.83
Price / Sales15.921,218.06506.9183,599.70
Price / Cash64.5047.8940.1627.89
Price / Book1.003.532.756.33
Net Income£47.15M£418.04M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.20%-1.39%-1.17%-0.69%
1 Month Performance1.00%-1.45%0.25%0.18%
1 Year Performance-1.74%4.83%9.27%20.03%

CQS New City High Yield Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NCYF
CQS New City High Yield
N/AGBX 50.70
+0.2%		N/A-1.7%£364.15M£22.87M14.57N/A
BNKR
The Bankers Investment Trust
N/AGBX 151.40
+0.4%		N/A+19.5%£1.39B£322.40M5.02N/A
WWH
Worldwide Healthcare
N/AGBX 386.53
-0.6%		N/A+10.7%£1.39B£118.16M14.48N/A
BHMG
BH Macro GBP
N/AGBX 422.50
-0.6%		N/A+8.6%£1.37B£277.60M9.25N/A
ASL
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust
N/AGBX 1,760
+0.5%		N/A+11.5%£1.36B£94.68M15.20N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:NCYF) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
My ‘one day’ retirement secret
TradeSmith's AI research team, backed by a $17 million investment and led by a former NSA codebreaker, built a...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
The retirement stock I'd buy before Nvidia today
In 2014, Marc Chaikin pointed readers toward Nvidia. Now the 60-year Wall Street veteran and creator of the Ch...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
This 38 Dollar Fund Holds Every Major AI Stock and Pays Weekly
The biggest AI stocks like Nvidia, CrowdStrike, and Palantir now trade for hundreds of dollars a share. One fu...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
17 Nobel Prize winners… one startling warning
On July 13, 17 Nobel laureates including Bernanke, Krugman, and Stiglitz signed an 88-word letter warning that...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
your job is on the list
The CEO of one of the largest AI labs on earth said it plainly: AI could wipe out half of all entry-level whit...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
I called NVDA at $6 - Here's what’s next…
Matt McCall called NVDA at 6 dollars - it's since climbed more than 3,100 percent. He's identified 51 stocks t...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel