Free Trial
→ INSANE DRONE FOOTAGE (From Paradigm Press) (Ad)tc pixel Free OMIP Stock Alerts

One Media iP Group (OMIP) Competitors

One Media iP Group logo
GBX 4.55 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 10/15/2026
Compare

OMIP vs. ZIN, HUD, CINE, RHM, and LETS

Should you buy One Media iP Group stock or one of its competitors? One Media iP Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Zinc Media Group (ZIN), Huddled Group (HUD), Cineworld Group (CINE), Round Hill Music Royalty (RHM), and Huddled Group (LETS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "movies & entertainment" industry.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Zinc Media Group?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Zinc Media Group (LON:ZIN) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Zinc Media Group shares are held by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Zinc Media Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 26.06% compared to Zinc Media Group's net margin of -16.82%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Zinc Media Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group26.06% 8.91% 1.64%
Zinc Media Group -16.82%-996.83%-6.16%

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.6775183, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zinc Media Group has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Zinc Media Group's score of 0.00 indicating that One Media iP Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Positive
Zinc Media Group Neutral

One Media iP Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Zinc Media Group. Zinc Media Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.59M2.21£160.32K£0.3413.38
Zinc Media Group£31.76M0.45-£3.29M-£20.59N/A

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Zinc Media Group on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Huddled Group?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 26.06% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -36.87%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group26.06% 8.91% 1.64%
Huddled Group -36.87%-245.25%-19.20%

In the previous week, Huddled Group had 1 more articles in the media than One Media iP Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Huddled Group and 0 mentions for One Media iP Group. One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Huddled Group's score of 0.59 indicating that One Media iP Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Positive
Huddled Group Positive

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.3% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.6775183, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.24, meaning that its stock price is 76% less volatile than the broader market.

One Media iP Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.59M2.21£160.32K£0.3413.38
Huddled Group£16.30M0.44-£2.80M-£1.46N/A

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Huddled Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Cineworld Group?

Cineworld Group (LON:CINE) and One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Cineworld Group's score of 0.00 indicating that One Media iP Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cineworld Group Neutral
One Media iP Group Positive

One Media iP Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cineworld Group. Cineworld Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cineworld Group£3.03B0.00-£344.40M-£0.20N/A
One Media iP Group£4.59M2.21£160.32K£0.3413.38

17.3% of Cineworld Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.2% of Cineworld Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 26.06% compared to Cineworld Group's net margin of -11.38%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Cineworld Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cineworld Group-11.38% N/A 1.94%
One Media iP Group 26.06%8.91%1.64%

Cineworld Group has a beta of 3.09, suggesting that its stock price is 209% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.6775183, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Cineworld Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Round Hill Music Royalty?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Round Hill Music Royalty (LON:RHM) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.6775183, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Round Hill Music Royalty has a beta of -0.2, meaning that its stock price is 120% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Round Hill Music Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that One Media iP Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Positive
Round Hill Music Royalty Neutral

Round Hill Music Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than One Media iP Group. Round Hill Music Royalty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.59M2.21£160.32K£0.3413.38
Round Hill Music Royalty£50.84M0.00£6.75M£0.01N/A

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.9% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 26.06% compared to Round Hill Music Royalty's net margin of 13.28%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Round Hill Music Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group26.06% 8.91% 1.64%
Round Hill Music Royalty 13.28%0.13%0.75%

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Round Hill Music Royalty on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Huddled Group?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Huddled Group (LON:LETS) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Huddled Group has a net margin of 1,839.74% compared to One Media iP Group's net margin of 26.06%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group26.06% 8.91% 1.64%
Huddled Group 1,839.74%-31.08%-13.48%

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.4% of Huddled Group shares are held by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 52.0% of Huddled Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.6775183, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 2.14, suggesting that its share price is 114% more volatile than the broader market.

One Media iP Group has higher revenue and earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.59M2.21£160.32K£0.3413.38
Huddled GroupN/AN/A-£2.11M-£0.01N/A

In the previous week, One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Huddled Group's score of 0.00 indicating that One Media iP Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Positive
Huddled Group Neutral

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Huddled Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get One Media iP Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OMIP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OMIP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OMIP vs. The Competition

Export
MetricOne Media iP GroupEntertainment IndustryCommunication Services SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£10.12M£9.76B£33.12B£2.84B
Dividend Yield1.26%3.84%5.41%6.25%
P/E Ratio13.3827.7320.65366.90
Price / Sales2.21114.31106.4888,606.92
Price / Cash6.6335.7620.5727.83
Price / Book0.666.9512.276.89
Net Income£160.32K£63.27M£1.11B£5.88B
7 Day Performance-3.19%-2.33%-0.82%0.38%
1 Month Performance3.41%-3.54%-4.37%-0.17%
1 Year Performance29.22%-10.83%-8.08%22.59%

One Media iP Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OMIP
One Media iP Group
N/AGBX 4.55
flat		N/A+9.3%£10.12M£4.59M13.3811
ZIN
Zinc Media Group
N/AGBX 50.50
flat		N/A-5.0%£15.08M£31.76MN/A283
HUD
Huddled Group
N/AGBX 0.94
+17.1%		N/A-67.4%£7.60M£16.30MN/A94
CINE
Cineworld Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.22M£3.03BN/A25,686
RHM
Round Hill Music Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.67M£50.84M114.50N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:OMIP) was last updated on 10/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
$29.97... or free today
Bill Poulos's report, The Trading For Income System, normally sells for $29.97. Today, it's free through this ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Financial legend: “This is bad, really bad...”
Dr. Martin D. Weiss has publicly predicted six major American market crashes over his 55-year career, each war...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bezos… DOOMED?
A single FCC filing hints Elon Musk is planning his biggest project yet - bigger than Tesla, SpaceX, and X com...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s Plan To Cheat History
China has slashed its U.S. Treasury holdings by more than 45% from their peak, while building gold vaults and ...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon pays this company. Every time.
Every Tesla built since 2012 pays this small, overlooked supplier a fee for its technology. So does every Star...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why Some AI Stocks Already Surged Over 300 Percent
Jason Bodner's system flagged Nvidia before a 7000 percent run, Super Micro Computer before a 2600 percent run...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s issues shocking Executive Order on U.S. Dollar
Three days into his second term, President Trump signed Executive Order 14178 a move the press barely covered....
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Nobody is talking about this…
After the Dot-Com Bubble burst in March 2000, the Nasdaq fell 78% over the following decade. But gold staged a...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel