Go Pro
→ The cat is out the bag (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free OMIP Stock Alerts

One Media iP Group (OMIP) Competitors

One Media iP Group logo
GBX 4.70 +0.15 (+3.30%)
As of 06:41 AM Eastern
Compare

OMIP vs. ZIN, HUD, CINE, RHM, and LETS

Should you buy One Media iP Group stock or one of its competitors? One Media iP Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Zinc Media Group (ZIN), Huddled Group (HUD), Cineworld Group (CINE), Round Hill Music Royalty (RHM), and Huddled Group (LETS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "movies & entertainment" industry.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Zinc Media Group?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Zinc Media Group (LON:ZIN) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 26.06% compared to Zinc Media Group's net margin of -6.17%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Zinc Media Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group26.06% 8.91% 1.64%
Zinc Media Group -6.17%-114.84%-6.16%

In the previous week, One Media iP Group had 1 more articles in the media than Zinc Media Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for One Media iP Group and 0 mentions for Zinc Media Group. One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zinc Media Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Neutral
Zinc Media Group Neutral

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.6775183, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zinc Media Group has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its share price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

One Media iP Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Zinc Media Group. Zinc Media Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.59M2.28£160.32K£0.3413.82
Zinc Media Group£41.46M0.40-£3.29M-£10.36N/A

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.4% of Zinc Media Group shares are held by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Zinc Media Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Zinc Media Group on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Huddled Group?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.223, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.6775183, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 26.06% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-22.43% -100.32% -19.20%
One Media iP Group 26.06%8.91%1.64%

In the previous week, One Media iP Group had 1 more articles in the media than Huddled Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for One Media iP Group and 0 mentions for Huddled Group. Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled One Media iP Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
One Media iP Group Neutral

16.3% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Huddled Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

One Media iP Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.65M0.23-£2.80M-£1.17N/A
One Media iP Group£4.59M2.28£160.32K£0.3413.82

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Huddled Group on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Cineworld Group?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Cineworld Group (LON:CINE) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Cineworld Group shares are held by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Cineworld Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.6775183, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cineworld Group has a beta of 3.09, meaning that its share price is 209% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, One Media iP Group had 1 more articles in the media than Cineworld Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for One Media iP Group and 0 mentions for Cineworld Group. One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cineworld Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Neutral
Cineworld Group Neutral

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 26.06% compared to Cineworld Group's net margin of -11.38%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Cineworld Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group26.06% 8.91% 1.64%
Cineworld Group -11.38%N/A 1.94%

One Media iP Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cineworld Group. Cineworld Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.59M2.28£160.32K£0.3413.82
Cineworld Group£3.03B0.00-£344.40M-£0.20N/A

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Cineworld Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Round Hill Music Royalty?

Round Hill Music Royalty (LON:RHM) and One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, One Media iP Group had 1 more articles in the media than Round Hill Music Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for One Media iP Group and 0 mentions for Round Hill Music Royalty. Round Hill Music Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled One Media iP Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Round Hill Music Royalty Neutral
One Media iP Group Neutral

77.9% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Round Hill Music Royalty has a beta of -0.2, indicating that its share price is 120% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.6775183, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 26.06% compared to Round Hill Music Royalty's net margin of 13.28%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Round Hill Music Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Round Hill Music Royalty13.28% 0.13% 0.75%
One Media iP Group 26.06%8.91%1.64%

Round Hill Music Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than One Media iP Group. Round Hill Music Royalty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Round Hill Music Royalty£50.84M0.00£6.75M£0.01N/A
One Media iP Group£4.59M2.28£160.32K£0.3413.82

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Round Hill Music Royalty on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Huddled Group?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Huddled Group (LON:LETS) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.6775183, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, One Media iP Group had 1 more articles in the media than Huddled Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for One Media iP Group and 0 mentions for Huddled Group. One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Huddled Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.4% of Huddled Group shares are held by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.0% of Huddled Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

One Media iP Group has higher revenue and earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.59M2.28£160.32K£0.3413.82
Huddled GroupN/AN/A-£2.11M-£0.01N/A

Huddled Group has a net margin of 1,839.74% compared to One Media iP Group's net margin of 26.06%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group26.06% 8.91% 1.64%
Huddled Group 1,839.74%-31.08%-13.48%

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Huddled Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get One Media iP Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OMIP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OMIP vs. The Competition

Export
MetricOne Media iP GroupEntertainment IndustryCommunication Services SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£10.46M£10.87B£34.11B£2.87B
Dividend Yield1.26%3.86%5.32%6.26%
P/E Ratio13.8226.08231.50366.92
Price / Sales2.28113.3462.0290,001.90
Price / Cash6.6336.9320.9827.89
Price / Book0.686.7511.706.33
Net Income£160.32K£74.90M£1.10B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-6.00%0.41%-0.56%-0.75%
1 Month Performance11.88%-1.46%-2.06%-0.68%
1 Year Performance4.44%-11.26%-8.24%19.29%

One Media iP Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OMIP
One Media iP Group
N/AGBX 4.70
+3.3%		N/A-2.0%£10.46M£4.59M13.8221
ZIN
Zinc Media Group
N/AGBX 57.50
flat		N/AN/A£17.17M£41.46MN/A283
HUD
Huddled Group
N/AGBX 0.66
+1.4%		N/A-78.6%£5.35M£18.65MN/AN/A
CINE
Cineworld Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.22M£3.03BN/A25,686
RHM
Round Hill Music Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.67M£50.84M114.50N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:OMIP) was last updated on 9/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your withdrawal order could cost you in taxes
If you have $2M or more saved, the 4% rule points to roughly $92,000 a year - but it's a single-variable answe...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel