Go Pro
→ Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free OMIP Stock Alerts

One Media iP Group (OMIP) Competitors

One Media iP Group logo
GBX 4.50 +0.25 (+5.88%)
As of 07/14/2026 11:00 AM Eastern
Compare

OMIP vs. TMO, ZIN, AEO, CINE, and RHM

Should you buy One Media iP Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares One Media iP Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with One Media iP Group include Time Out Group (TMO), Zinc Media Group (ZIN), Aeorema Communications (AEO), Cineworld Group (CINE), and Round Hill Music Royalty (RHM). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Time Out Group?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Time Out Group (LON:TMO) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

In the previous week, One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Time Out Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Neutral
Time Out Group Neutral

One Media iP Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Time Out Group. Time Out Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.75M2.11£160.32K£0.2022.50
Time Out Group£74.11M0.51-£5.09M-£18.20N/A

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.281, meaning that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Time Out Group has a beta of 0.07, meaning that its share price is 93% less volatile than the broader market.

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of Time Out Group shares are held by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Time Out Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 20.06% compared to Time Out Group's net margin of -87.11%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 7.31% beat Time Out Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group20.06% 7.31% 1.64%
Time Out Group -87.11%-22,303.85%-5.91%

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Time Out Group on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Zinc Media Group?

Zinc Media Group (LON:ZIN) and One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

Zinc Media Group has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.281, suggesting that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 20.06% compared to Zinc Media Group's net margin of -6.17%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 7.31% beat Zinc Media Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zinc Media Group-6.17% -114.84% -6.16%
One Media iP Group 20.06%7.31%1.64%

In the previous week, Zinc Media Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled One Media iP Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zinc Media Group Neutral
One Media iP Group Neutral

One Media iP Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Zinc Media Group. Zinc Media Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zinc Media Group£41.46M0.40-£3.29M-£10.36N/A
One Media iP Group£4.75M2.11£160.32K£0.2022.50

47.0% of Zinc Media Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. 18.7% of Zinc Media Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Zinc Media Group on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Aeorema Communications?

Aeorema Communications (LON:AEO) and One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

Aeorema Communications has higher revenue and earnings than One Media iP Group. One Media iP Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aeorema Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aeorema Communications£20.41M0.29£360.88K£2.2028.43
One Media iP Group£4.75M2.11£160.32K£0.2022.50

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. 99.3% of Aeorema Communications shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Aeorema Communications has a beta of 0.719, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.281, suggesting that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 20.06% compared to Aeorema Communications' net margin of 0.62%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 7.31% beat Aeorema Communications' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aeorema Communications0.62% 4.54% 4.43%
One Media iP Group 20.06%7.31%1.64%

In the previous week, Aeorema Communications' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled One Media iP Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aeorema Communications Neutral
One Media iP Group Neutral

Summary

Aeorema Communications beats One Media iP Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Cineworld Group?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Cineworld Group (LON:CINE) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Cineworld Group shares are held by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Cineworld Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.281, meaning that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cineworld Group has a beta of 3.09, meaning that its share price is 209% more volatile than the broader market.

One Media iP Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cineworld Group. Cineworld Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.75M2.11£160.32K£0.2022.50
Cineworld Group£3.03B0.00-£344.40M-£0.20N/A

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 20.06% compared to Cineworld Group's net margin of -11.38%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 7.31% beat Cineworld Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group20.06% 7.31% 1.64%
Cineworld Group -11.38%N/A 1.94%

In the previous week, One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cineworld Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Neutral
Cineworld Group Neutral

Summary

One Media iP Group and Cineworld Group tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Round Hill Music Royalty?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Round Hill Music Royalty (LON:RHM) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and dividends.

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.9% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.281, suggesting that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Round Hill Music Royalty has a beta of -0.2, suggesting that its stock price is 120% less volatile than the broader market.

Round Hill Music Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than One Media iP Group. Round Hill Music Royalty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.75M2.11£160.32K£0.2022.50
Round Hill Music Royalty£50.84M0.00£6.75M£0.01N/A

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 20.06% compared to Round Hill Music Royalty's net margin of 13.28%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 7.31% beat Round Hill Music Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group20.06% 7.31% 1.64%
Round Hill Music Royalty 13.28%0.13%0.75%

In the previous week, One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Round Hill Music Royalty'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Neutral
Round Hill Music Royalty Neutral

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Round Hill Music Royalty on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get One Media iP Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OMIP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OMIP vs. The Competition

Export
MetricOne Media iP GroupEntertainment IndustryCommunication SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£9.45M£1.07B£3.62B£2.79B
Dividend Yield1.26%3.40%6.76%6.12%
P/E Ratio22.506.5814.99368.63
Price / Sales2.1170.08103.8584,796.26
Price / Cash6.638.3316.0527.87
Price / Book0.651.885.027.77
Net Income£160.32K-£39.26M-£9.17M£5.89B
7 Day Performance9.76%-1.75%-0.02%1.32%
1 Month Performance12.50%-1.38%-0.97%-0.69%
1 Year Performance6.76%-17.89%-5.59%62.54%

One Media iP Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OMIP
One Media iP Group
N/AGBX 4.50
+5.9%		N/A+6.6%£9.45M£4.75M22.5021
TMO
Time Out Group
N/AGBX 7.25
-1.7%		N/A-55.8%£37.89M£74.11MN/A504
ZIN
Zinc Media Group
N/AGBX 60.20
-1.3%		N/A-13.5%£17.77M£41.46MN/A283
AEO
Aeorema Communications
N/AGBX 62
-0.8%		N/A+28.4%£5.85M£20.41M28.1840,800
CINE
Cineworld Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.22M£3.03BN/A25,686

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:OMIP) was last updated on 7/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
From the man who predicted 2008 crash…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
They proved it worked in '76. Then buried it.
In 1976, Chevron tapped an energy source with no fuel costs, no carbon, and no supply chain - then killed the ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel