Go Pro
→ Could Trump's second term dwarf his first? (From The Oxford Club) (Ad)tc pixel Free OMIP Stock Alerts

One Media iP Group (OMIP) Competitors

One Media iP Group logo
GBX 4.44 +0.33 (+8.03%)
As of 11:31 AM Eastern
Compare

OMIP vs. ZIN, CINE, RHM, LETS, and HUD

Should you buy One Media iP Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares One Media iP Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with One Media iP Group include Zinc Media Group (ZIN), Cineworld Group (CINE), Round Hill Music Royalty (RHM), Huddled Group (LETS), and Huddled Group (HUD). These companies are all part of the "movies & entertainment" industry.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Zinc Media Group?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Zinc Media Group (LON:ZIN) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

One Media iP Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Zinc Media Group. Zinc Media Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.75M2.08£160.32K£0.2022.20
Zinc Media Group£41.46M0.40-£3.29M-£10.36N/A

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 26.06% compared to Zinc Media Group's net margin of -6.17%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Zinc Media Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group26.06% 8.91% 1.64%
Zinc Media Group -6.17%-114.84%-6.16%

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.0% of Zinc Media Group shares are held by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Zinc Media Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.281, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zinc Media Group has a beta of -0.05, meaning that its stock price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, One Media iP Group had 1 more articles in the media than Zinc Media Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for One Media iP Group and 0 mentions for Zinc Media Group. One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Zinc Media Group's score of 0.00 indicating that One Media iP Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Positive
Zinc Media Group Neutral

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Zinc Media Group on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Cineworld Group?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Cineworld Group (LON:CINE) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Cineworld Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Cineworld Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.281, suggesting that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cineworld Group has a beta of 3.09, suggesting that its share price is 209% more volatile than the broader market.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 26.06% compared to Cineworld Group's net margin of -11.38%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Cineworld Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group26.06% 8.91% 1.64%
Cineworld Group -11.38%N/A 1.94%

One Media iP Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cineworld Group. Cineworld Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.75M2.08£160.32K£0.2022.20
Cineworld Group£3.03B0.00-£344.40M-£0.20N/A

In the previous week, One Media iP Group and One Media iP Group both had 1 articles in the media. One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Cineworld Group's score of 0.86 indicating that One Media iP Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Positive
Cineworld Group Positive

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Cineworld Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Round Hill Music Royalty?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Round Hill Music Royalty (LON:RHM) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 26.06% compared to Round Hill Music Royalty's net margin of 13.28%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Round Hill Music Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group26.06% 8.91% 1.64%
Round Hill Music Royalty 13.28%0.13%0.75%

In the previous week, One Media iP Group had 1 more articles in the media than Round Hill Music Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for One Media iP Group and 0 mentions for Round Hill Music Royalty. One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Round Hill Music Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that One Media iP Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Positive
Round Hill Music Royalty Neutral

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.281, indicating that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Round Hill Music Royalty has a beta of -0.2, indicating that its stock price is 120% less volatile than the broader market.

Round Hill Music Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than One Media iP Group. Round Hill Music Royalty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.75M2.08£160.32K£0.2022.20
Round Hill Music Royalty£50.84M0.00£6.75M£0.01N/A

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.9% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Round Hill Music Royalty on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Huddled Group?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Huddled Group (LON:LETS) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

One Media iP Group has higher revenue and earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.75M2.08£160.32K£0.2022.20
Huddled GroupN/AN/A-£2.11M-£0.01N/A

Huddled Group has a net margin of 1,839.74% compared to One Media iP Group's net margin of 26.06%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group26.06% 8.91% 1.64%
Huddled Group 1,839.74%-31.08%-13.48%

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.281, suggesting that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 2.14, suggesting that its share price is 114% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, One Media iP Group had 1 more articles in the media than Huddled Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for One Media iP Group and 0 mentions for Huddled Group. One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Huddled Group's score of 0.00 indicating that One Media iP Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Positive
Huddled Group Neutral

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.4% of Huddled Group shares are held by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.0% of Huddled Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Huddled Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does One Media iP Group compare to Huddled Group?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.281, suggesting that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.221, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 26.06% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group26.06% 8.91% 1.64%
Huddled Group -22.43%-100.32%-19.20%

One Media iP Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.75M2.08£160.32K£0.2022.20
Huddled Group£18.65M0.11-£2.80M-£1.17N/A

In the previous week, One Media iP Group had 1 more articles in the media than Huddled Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for One Media iP Group and 0 mentions for Huddled Group. One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Huddled Group's score of 0.00 indicating that One Media iP Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Positive
Huddled Group Neutral

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.7% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Huddled Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get One Media iP Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OMIP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OMIP vs. The Competition

Export
MetricOne Media iP GroupEntertainment IndustryCommunication Services SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£9.88M£10.43B£33.92B£3.02B
Dividend Yield1.26%3.85%5.32%6.13%
P/E Ratio22.2010.71225.00368.68
Price / Sales2.08110.2661.6583,704.62
Price / Cash6.6325.5319.6527.89
Price / Book0.657.3910.997.07
Net Income£160.32K£74.62M£1.11B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.33%-0.07%1.03%0.54%
1 Month Performance3.26%2.91%0.33%0.25%
1 Year Performance11.00%-4.17%5.68%64.64%

One Media iP Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OMIP
One Media iP Group
N/AGBX 4.44
+8.0%		N/A-0.1%£9.88M£4.75M22.2021
ZIN
Zinc Media Group
N/AGBX 56.05
-0.8%		N/A-19.9%£16.87M£41.46MN/A283
CINE
Cineworld Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.22M£3.03BN/A25,686
RHM
Round Hill Music Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.67M£50.84M114.50N/A
LETS
Huddled Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.01MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:OMIP) was last updated on 8/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
"Second Wave” Hitting Iran Soon? Wall Street Issues Warning
Analysts at Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are warning that a quiet domestic threat - unrelated to overseas ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
1 Stock to Own by July 31st
A scheduled announcement on July 31st could reshuffle the stock market's winners and losers - and one lesser-k...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
BofA: Digital Dollar Coming 2025-2030
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
70% of the Fortune 100 depend on this mystery AI stock
Seventy percent of the Fortune 100 already rely on one company's AI cybersecurity platform, which combines mor...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel