Go Pro
→ The end may be near for these iconic stocks (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free HUD Stock Alerts

Huddled Group (HUD) Competitors

Huddled Group logo
GBX 0.43 +0.03 (+8.25%)
As of 04:33 AM Eastern
Compare

HUD vs. OMIP, CINE, RHM, LETS, and BONH

Should you buy Huddled Group stock or one of its competitors? Huddled Group's main competitors and comparable companies include One Media iP Group (OMIP), Cineworld Group (CINE), Round Hill Music Royalty (RHM), Huddled Group (LETS), and Bonhill Group (BONH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "movies & entertainment" industry.

How does Huddled Group compare to One Media iP Group?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.6775183, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.221, meaning that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

One Media iP Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.59M2.16£160.32K£0.3413.11
Huddled Group£18.65M0.19-£2.80M-£1.17N/A

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 26.06% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group26.06% 8.91% 1.64%
Huddled Group -22.43%-100.32%-19.20%

In the previous week, One Media iP Group had 2 more articles in the media than Huddled Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for One Media iP Group and 0 mentions for Huddled Group. Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat One Media iP Group's score of 0.04 indicating that Huddled Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.3% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.6% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Huddled Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Cineworld Group?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and Cineworld Group (LON:CINE) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Cineworld Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Huddled Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
Cineworld Group Neutral

Huddled Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cineworld Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cineworld Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.65M0.19-£2.80M-£1.17N/A
Cineworld Group£3.03B0.00-£344.40M-£0.20N/A

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.221, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cineworld Group has a beta of 3.09, suggesting that its share price is 209% more volatile than the broader market.

16.3% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Cineworld Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.6% of Huddled Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Cineworld Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cineworld Group has a net margin of -11.38% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. Cineworld Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-22.43% -100.32% -19.20%
Cineworld Group -11.38%N/A 1.94%

Summary

Cineworld Group beats Huddled Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Round Hill Music Royalty?

Round Hill Music Royalty (LON:RHM) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Round Hill Music Royalty has a net margin of 13.28% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. Round Hill Music Royalty's return on equity of 0.13% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Round Hill Music Royalty13.28% 0.13% 0.75%
Huddled Group -22.43%-100.32%-19.20%

Round Hill Music Royalty has a beta of -0.2, indicating that its stock price is 120% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.221, indicating that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

Round Hill Music Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Round Hill Music Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Round Hill Music Royalty£50.84M0.00£6.75M£0.01N/A
Huddled Group£18.65M0.19-£2.80M-£1.17N/A

In the previous week, Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Round Hill Music Royalty's score of -1.05 indicating that Huddled Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Round Hill Music Royalty Negative
Huddled Group Neutral

77.9% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.3% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.5% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.6% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Round Hill Music Royalty beats Huddled Group on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Huddled Group?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and Huddled Group (LON:LETS) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Huddled Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Huddled Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.221, indicating that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its share price is 114% more volatile than the broader market.

Huddled Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Huddled Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.65M0.19-£2.80M-£1.17N/A
Huddled GroupN/AN/A-£2.11M-£0.01N/A

Huddled Group has a net margin of 1,839.74% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. Huddled Group's return on equity of -31.08% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-22.43% -100.32% -19.20%
Huddled Group 1,839.74%-31.08%-13.48%

16.3% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.4% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.6% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.0% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Huddled Group beats Huddled Group on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Bonhill Group?

Bonhill Group (LON:BONH) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Huddled Group has a net margin of -22.43% compared to Bonhill Group's net margin of -43.93%. Bonhill Group's return on equity of -65.71% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bonhill Group-43.93% -65.71% -13.11%
Huddled Group -22.43%-100.32%-19.20%

Huddled Group has higher revenue and earnings than Bonhill Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bonhill Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bonhill Group£14.91M0.00-£6.55M-£0.05N/A
Huddled Group£18.65M0.19-£2.80M-£1.17N/A

In the previous week, Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Bonhill Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Huddled Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bonhill Group Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

Bonhill Group has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.221, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

73.3% of Bonhill Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.3% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.7% of Bonhill Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.6% of Huddled Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Huddled Group beats Bonhill Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Huddled Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HUD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HUD vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHuddled GroupEntertainment IndustryCommunication Services SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.51M£11.49B£33.07B£2.92B
Dividend YieldN/A3.92%5.36%6.17%
P/E Ratio-0.3726.8624.71367.27
Price / Sales0.19110.45131.5283,460.67
Price / CashN/A37.2120.8027.89
Price / Book0.166.6711.107.12
Net Income-£2.80M£84.02M£1.10B£5.89B
7 Day Performance8.25%0.19%0.54%0.74%
1 Month Performance17.03%2.02%3.77%3.13%
1 Year Performance-85.69%-5.04%-0.60%22.34%

Huddled Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HUD
Huddled Group
N/AGBX 0.43
+8.3%		N/A-85.2%£3.51M£18.65MN/AN/A
OMIP
One Media iP Group
N/AGBX 4.40
-1.1%		N/A+14.1%£9.79M£4.59M12.9421
CINE
Cineworld Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.22M£3.03BN/A25,686
RHM
Round Hill Music Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.67M£50.84M114.50N/A
LETS
Huddled Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.01MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HUD) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel