Go Pro
→ Elon Musk’s Hushed FCC Filing. Sept 25th. (From Paradigm Press) (Ad)tc pixel Free HUD Stock Alerts

Huddled Group (HUD) Competitors

Huddled Group logo
GBX 0.70 +0.04 (+6.22%)
As of 12:06 PM Eastern
Compare

HUD vs. ZIN, OMIP, CINE, RHM, and LETS

Should you buy Huddled Group stock or one of its competitors? Huddled Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Zinc Media Group (ZIN), One Media iP Group (OMIP), Cineworld Group (CINE), Round Hill Music Royalty (RHM), and Huddled Group (LETS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "movies & entertainment" industry.

How does Huddled Group compare to Zinc Media Group?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and Zinc Media Group (LON:ZIN) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

16.3% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.4% of Zinc Media Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Huddled Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Zinc Media Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.223, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zinc Media Group has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its share price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

Zinc Media Group has a net margin of -6.17% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. Huddled Group's return on equity of -100.32% beat Zinc Media Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-22.43% -100.32% -19.20%
Zinc Media Group -6.17%-114.84%-6.16%

In the previous week, Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zinc Media Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
Zinc Media Group Neutral

Huddled Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Zinc Media Group. Zinc Media Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Huddled Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.65M0.30-£2.80M-£1.17N/A
Zinc Media Group£41.46M0.41-£3.29M-£10.36N/A

Summary

Zinc Media Group beats Huddled Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to One Media iP Group?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.6775183, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.223, indicating that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, One Media iP Group had 1 more articles in the media than Huddled Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for One Media iP Group and 0 mentions for Huddled Group. One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Huddled Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

One Media iP Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.59M2.14£160.32K£0.3412.97
Huddled Group£18.65M0.30-£2.80M-£1.17N/A

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.3% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 26.06% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group26.06% 8.91% 1.64%
Huddled Group -22.43%-100.32%-19.20%

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Huddled Group on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Cineworld Group?

Cineworld Group (LON:CINE) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Cineworld Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Huddled Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cineworld Group Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

Cineworld Group has a beta of 3.09, meaning that its share price is 209% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.223, meaning that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

Huddled Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cineworld Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cineworld Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cineworld Group£3.03B0.00-£344.40M-£0.20N/A
Huddled Group£18.65M0.30-£2.80M-£1.17N/A

Cineworld Group has a net margin of -11.38% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. Cineworld Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cineworld Group-11.38% N/A 1.94%
Huddled Group -22.43%-100.32%-19.20%

17.3% of Cineworld Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.3% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.2% of Cineworld Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of Huddled Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cineworld Group beats Huddled Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Round Hill Music Royalty?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and Round Hill Music Royalty (LON:RHM) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Round Hill Music Royalty'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
Round Hill Music Royalty Neutral

16.3% of Huddled Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.9% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. 15.8% of Huddled Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Round Hill Music Royalty has a net margin of 13.28% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. Round Hill Music Royalty's return on equity of 0.13% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-22.43% -100.32% -19.20%
Round Hill Music Royalty 13.28%0.13%0.75%

Round Hill Music Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Round Hill Music Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.65M0.30-£2.80M-£1.17N/A
Round Hill Music Royalty£50.84M0.00£6.75M£0.01N/A

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.223, indicating that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Round Hill Music Royalty has a beta of -0.2, indicating that its share price is 120% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Round Hill Music Royalty beats Huddled Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Huddled Group?

Huddled Group (LON:LETS) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends and earnings.

Huddled Group has a net margin of 1,839.74% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. Huddled Group's return on equity of -31.08% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group1,839.74% -31.08% -13.48%
Huddled Group -22.43%-100.32%-19.20%

47.4% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.3% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.0% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Huddled Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

Huddled Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Huddled Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled GroupN/AN/A-£2.11M-£0.01N/A
Huddled Group£18.65M0.30-£2.80M-£1.17N/A

Huddled Group has a beta of 2.14, meaning that its share price is 114% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.223, meaning that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Huddled Group beats Huddled Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Huddled Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HUD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HUD vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHuddled GroupEntertainment IndustryCommunication Services SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£5.68M£10.56B£33.60B£2.87B
Dividend YieldN/A3.89%5.34%6.25%
P/E Ratio-0.6026.19232.09367.03
Price / Sales0.30112.1661.9089,972.82
Price / CashN/A35.9520.8427.89
Price / Book0.266.8111.586.30
Net Income-£2.80M£74.90M£1.10B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.01%0.74%-0.46%-1.13%
1 Month Performance110.21%-0.61%-1.60%-0.61%
1 Year Performance-78.57%-10.66%-7.51%19.59%

Huddled Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HUD
Huddled Group
N/AGBX 0.70
+6.2%		N/A-79.8%£5.68M£18.65MN/AN/A
ZIN
Zinc Media Group
N/AGBX 56
-2.6%		N/AN/A£16.73M£41.46MN/A283
OMIP
One Media iP Group
N/AGBX 5
+6.4%		N/A-1.1%£11.12M£4.59M14.7121
CINE
Cineworld Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.22M£3.03BN/A25,686
RHM
Round Hill Music Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.67M£50.84M114.50N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HUD) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
U.S. Government Exposes Elon Musk’s Crazy Plan
Two government documents have reportedly confirmed a major move by Elon Musk, according to Brownstone Research...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock and Vanguard already own THIS
Institutions own roughly 88 percent of an overlooked American oil and natural gas company. BlackRock holds 32 ...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold majors have a big problem
Newmont spent 15 billion dollars acquiring Newcrest in 2023, the largest deal in gold mining history. Yet prod...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon Musk’s Hushed FCC Filing. Sept 25th.
Elon Musk quietly filed a document with the federal government tied to artificial intelligence, one of the lar...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
How options let you do more with less capital
Would you rather spend $5,000 buying 100 shares of a $50 stock, or control those same 100 shares for a fractio...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
New Form of AI Could Ignite the ‘Great Wealth Rotation’
Marc Chaikin, a 60-year Wall Street veteran who worked alongside Paul Tudor Jones and Steve Cohen, says a new ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel