Free Trial
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free HUD Stock Alerts

Huddled Group (HUD) Competitors

Huddled Group logo
GBX 0.68 +0.03 (+4.62%)
As of 12:18 PM Eastern
Compare

HUD vs. OMIP, AEO, CINE, RHM, and LETS

Should you buy Huddled Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Huddled Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Huddled Group include One Media iP Group (OMIP), Aeorema Communications (AEO), Cineworld Group (CINE), Round Hill Music Royalty (RHM), and Huddled Group (LETS). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does Huddled Group compare to One Media iP Group?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.206, meaning that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.272, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

One Media iP Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.45M0.16-£2.80M-£1.15N/A
One Media iP Group£4.75M1.87£160.32K£0.2020.00

In the previous week, Huddled Group had 3 more articles in the media than One Media iP Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Huddled Group and 0 mentions for One Media iP Group. Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat One Media iP Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Huddled Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
One Media iP Group Neutral

13.9% of Huddled Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. 21.6% of Huddled Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 20.06% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.01%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 7.31% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-22.01% -73.62% -19.20%
One Media iP Group 20.06%7.31%1.64%

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Huddled Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Aeorema Communications?

Aeorema Communications (LON:AEO) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Aeorema Communications has a net margin of 0.62% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.01%. Aeorema Communications' return on equity of 4.54% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aeorema Communications0.62% 4.54% 4.43%
Huddled Group -22.01%-73.62%-19.20%

In the previous week, Huddled Group had 2 more articles in the media than Aeorema Communications. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Huddled Group and 1 mentions for Aeorema Communications. Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Aeorema Communications' score of 0.00 indicating that Huddled Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Aeorema Communications
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Huddled Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

13.9% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 96.2% of Aeorema Communications shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.6% of Huddled Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Aeorema Communications has higher revenue and earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aeorema Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aeorema Communications£20.41M0.28£360.88K£2.2027.95
Huddled Group£18.45M0.16-£2.80M-£1.15N/A

Aeorema Communications has a beta of 1.670362, meaning that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.206, meaning that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Aeorema Communications beats Huddled Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Cineworld Group?

Cineworld Group (LON:CINE) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Cineworld Group has a beta of 3.09, suggesting that its stock price is 209% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.206, suggesting that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Huddled Group had 3 more articles in the media than Cineworld Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Huddled Group and 0 mentions for Cineworld Group. Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Cineworld Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Huddled Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cineworld Group Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

Huddled Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cineworld Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cineworld Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cineworld Group£3.03B0.00-£344.40M-£0.20N/A
Huddled Group£18.45M0.16-£2.80M-£1.15N/A

Cineworld Group has a net margin of -11.38% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.01%. Cineworld Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cineworld Group-11.38% N/A 1.94%
Huddled Group -22.01%-73.62%-19.20%

17.3% of Cineworld Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.9% of Huddled Group shares are held by institutional investors. 24.2% of Cineworld Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.6% of Huddled Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Cineworld Group beats Huddled Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Round Hill Music Royalty?

Round Hill Music Royalty (LON:RHM) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Round Hill Music Royalty has a beta of -0.2, indicating that its stock price is 120% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.206, indicating that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

77.9% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.9% of Huddled Group shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.6% of Huddled Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Huddled Group had 3 more articles in the media than Round Hill Music Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Huddled Group and 0 mentions for Round Hill Music Royalty. Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Round Hill Music Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that Huddled Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Round Hill Music Royalty Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

Round Hill Music Royalty has a net margin of 13.28% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.01%. Round Hill Music Royalty's return on equity of 0.13% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Round Hill Music Royalty13.28% 0.13% 0.75%
Huddled Group -22.01%-73.62%-19.20%

Round Hill Music Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Round Hill Music Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Round Hill Music Royalty£50.84M0.00£6.75M£0.01N/A
Huddled Group£18.45M0.16-£2.80M-£1.15N/A

Summary

Round Hill Music Royalty beats Huddled Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Huddled Group?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and Huddled Group (LON:LETS) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Huddled Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Huddled Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.45M0.16-£2.80M-£1.15N/A
Huddled GroupN/AN/A-£2.11M-£0.01N/A

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.206, suggesting that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 2.14, suggesting that its share price is 114% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Huddled Group had 3 more articles in the media than Huddled Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Huddled Group and 0 mentions for Huddled Group. Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Huddled Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Huddled Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

Huddled Group has a net margin of 1,839.74% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.01%. Huddled Group's return on equity of -31.08% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-22.01% -73.62% -19.20%
Huddled Group 1,839.74%-31.08%-13.48%

13.9% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.4% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.6% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.0% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Huddled Group beats Huddled Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Huddled Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HUD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HUD vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHuddled GroupEntertainment IndustryCommunication SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.95M£1.24B£3.44B£2.78B
Dividend YieldN/A3.40%6.71%6.12%
P/E Ratio-0.596.6714.26363.21
Price / Sales0.1669.03117.4387,415.85
Price / CashN/A8.3415.8327.85
Price / Book0.251.935.157.70
Net Income-£2.80M-£39.26M£124.16M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-14.89%-1.06%0.17%0.20%
1 Year Performance-80.55%-5.78%4.45%74.70%

Huddled Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HUD
Huddled Group
N/AGBX 0.68
+4.6%		N/A-77.2%£2.95M£18.45MN/AN/A
OMIP
One Media iP Group
N/AGBX 4.50
+7.1%		N/A-2.0%£10.01M£4.75M22.5021
AEO
Aeorema Communications
N/AGBX 60.50
flat		N/A+16.5%£5.71M£20.41M27.5040,800
CINE
Cineworld Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.22M£3.03BN/A25,686
RHM
Round Hill Music Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.67M£50.84M114.50N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HUD) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
A New Approach to Affordable Housing
75% of U.S. households cannot afford a median-priced new home. BOXABL's factory-built, foldable homes are desi...
BOXABL | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s secret China deal
Trump just returned from Beijing with the most powerful business delegation in American history - Elon Musk, J...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Giving “2022 pre-ChatGPT” vibes (but 10x bigger)
When ChatGPT launched in 2022, Nvidia surged 1,800% over three years. Now, Nvidia's CEO suggests July 22nd cou...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel
The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran
For a moment… Forget about Trump’s ties to Israel. Forget about reports of Iran’s nuclear program. Be...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book at no charge - the same book that sells for $...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
The chokepoint supplier behind SpaceX's $1.75 trillion empire
When Musk laughed and said 'you need transformers to run transformers,' it wasn't a joke - it was a confession...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Where did Vanguard quietly put $101 billion?
Tech investor George Gilder spent 40 years identifying paradigm shifts before they went mainstream - flagging ...
Eagle Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel