Free Trial
→ The 1934 playbook (From American Alternative) (Ad)tc pixel Free HUD Stock Alerts

Huddled Group (HUD) Competitors

Huddled Group logo
GBX 0.71 -0.04 (-5.60%)
As of 11:51 AM Eastern
Compare

HUD vs. ZIN, OMIP, AEO, CINE, and RHM

Should you buy Huddled Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Huddled Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Huddled Group include Zinc Media Group (ZIN), One Media iP Group (OMIP), Aeorema Communications (AEO), Cineworld Group (CINE), and Round Hill Music Royalty (RHM). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does Huddled Group compare to Zinc Media Group?

Zinc Media Group (LON:ZIN) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation and earnings.

Zinc Media Group has a net margin of -6.17% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.01%. Huddled Group's return on equity of -73.62% beat Zinc Media Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zinc Media Group-6.17% -114.84% -6.16%
Huddled Group -22.01%-73.62%-19.20%

40.7% of Zinc Media Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.9% of Huddled Group shares are held by institutional investors. 18.7% of Zinc Media Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.6% of Huddled Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Huddled Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Zinc Media Group. Zinc Media Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Huddled Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zinc Media Group£41.46M0.30-£3.29M-£10.36N/A
Huddled Group£18.45M0.17-£2.80M-£1.15N/A

In the previous week, Zinc Media Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Huddled Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zinc Media Group Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

Zinc Media Group has a beta of -0.05, indicating that its share price is 105% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.404, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Huddled Group beats Zinc Media Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to One Media iP Group?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.404, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.272, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

One Media iP Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.45M0.17-£2.80M-£1.15N/A
One Media iP Group£4.75M2.06£160.32K£0.2022.00

In the previous week, One Media iP Group had 1 more articles in the media than Huddled Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for One Media iP Group and 0 mentions for Huddled Group. Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled One Media iP Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
One Media iP Group Neutral

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 20.06% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.01%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 7.31% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-22.01% -73.62% -19.20%
One Media iP Group 20.06%7.31%1.64%

13.9% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.6% of Huddled Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Huddled Group on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Aeorema Communications?

Aeorema Communications (LON:AEO) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Aeorema Communications has a beta of 0.603, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.404, meaning that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Aeorema Communications has higher revenue and earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aeorema Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aeorema Communications£20.41M0.27£360.88K£2.2026.27
Huddled Group£18.45M0.17-£2.80M-£1.15N/A

In the previous week, Aeorema Communications' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Huddled Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aeorema Communications Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

Aeorema Communications has a net margin of 1.17% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.01%. Aeorema Communications' return on equity of 8.63% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aeorema Communications1.17% 8.63% 4.43%
Huddled Group -22.01%-73.62%-19.20%

13.9% of Huddled Group shares are held by institutional investors. 96.2% of Aeorema Communications shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.6% of Huddled Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Aeorema Communications beats Huddled Group on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Cineworld Group?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and Cineworld Group (LON:CINE) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.404, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cineworld Group has a beta of 3.09, suggesting that its share price is 209% more volatile than the broader market.

Cineworld Group has a net margin of -11.38% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.01%. Cineworld Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-22.01% -73.62% -19.20%
Cineworld Group -11.38%N/A 1.94%

13.9% of Huddled Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Cineworld Group shares are held by institutional investors. 21.6% of Huddled Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Cineworld Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Huddled Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cineworld Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cineworld Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.45M0.17-£2.80M-£1.15N/A
Cineworld Group£3.03B0.00-£344.40M-£0.20N/A

In the previous week, Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cineworld Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
Cineworld Group Neutral

Summary

Cineworld Group beats Huddled Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Round Hill Music Royalty?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and Round Hill Music Royalty (LON:RHM) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

13.9% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.9% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.6% of Huddled Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.404, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Round Hill Music Royalty has a beta of -0.2, suggesting that its share price is 120% less volatile than the broader market.

Round Hill Music Royalty has a net margin of 13.28% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.01%. Round Hill Music Royalty's return on equity of 0.13% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-22.01% -73.62% -19.20%
Round Hill Music Royalty 13.28%0.13%0.75%

Round Hill Music Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Round Hill Music Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.45M0.17-£2.80M-£1.15N/A
Round Hill Music Royalty£50.84M0.00£6.75M£0.01N/A

In the previous week, Round Hill Music Royalty had 1 more articles in the media than Huddled Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Round Hill Music Royalty and 0 mentions for Huddled Group. Round Hill Music Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Huddled Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Round Hill Music Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
Round Hill Music Royalty Positive

Summary

Round Hill Music Royalty beats Huddled Group on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Huddled Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HUD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HUD vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHuddled GroupEntertainment IndustryCommunication SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.07M£1.25B£3.36B£2.75B
Dividend YieldN/A3.68%6.83%6.07%
P/E Ratio-0.626.4614.16365.90
Price / Sales0.1762.44115.7788,017.01
Price / CashN/A8.3415.9827.89
Price / Book0.261.814.677.74
Net Income-£2.80M-£39.26M£125.80M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-18.62%-1.66%-0.44%0.27%
1 Month Performance-31.59%9.49%6.91%2.05%
1 Year Performance-78.20%2.63%8.99%86.43%

Huddled Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HUD
Huddled Group
N/AGBX 0.71
-5.6%		N/A-78.3%£3.07M£18.45MN/AN/A
ZIN
Zinc Media Group
N/AGBX 41.10
-3.3%		N/AN/A£11.98M£41.46MN/A283
OMIP
One Media iP Group
N/AGBX 4.30
+6.2%		N/A+16.3%£9.57M£4.75M21.5021
AEO
Aeorema Communications
N/AGBX 56
-0.9%		N/A+24.1%£5.28M£20.41M25.4540,800
CINE
Cineworld Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.22M£3.03BN/A25,686

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HUD) was last updated on 5/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SpaceX eyes a 1.75 trillion valuation - here's what to know
Elon Musk's team has quietly filed confidential paperwork with the SEC for what Bloomberg estimates could be a...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran's New Leader Just Said Something That Should Terrify Every American
Iran's Supreme Leader has declared the Strait of Hormuz closed as leverage against the U.S. - and with 40% of ...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
$30 stock to buy before Starlink goes public (WATCH NOW!)
In the next 3 minutes… James Altucher – legendary investor and venture capitalist… And someone who’s kno...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Emmy-winning analyst releases his next big story Whitney Tilson shocked the nation on 60 Minutes when he ac...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why this tiny stock may move before the SpaceX IPO drops
The projected SpaceX and xAI S-1 filing hits the SEC on June 1st - and analyst Dylan Jovine says $1.75 trillio...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel