Free Trial
→ Ticker Revealed: Pre-IPO Access to 'Next Elon Musk' Company (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free HUD Stock Alerts

Huddled Group (HUD) Competitors

Huddled Group logo
GBX 0.57 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 10/2/2026 12:41 PM Eastern
Compare

HUD vs. OMIP, CINE, RHM, LETS, and BONH

Should you buy Huddled Group stock or one of its competitors? Huddled Group's main competitors and comparable companies include One Media iP Group (OMIP), Cineworld Group (CINE), Round Hill Music Royalty (RHM), Huddled Group (LETS), and Bonhill Group (BONH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "movies & entertainment" industry.

How does Huddled Group compare to One Media iP Group?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Huddled Group had 3 more articles in the media than One Media iP Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Huddled Group and 1 mentions for One Media iP Group. One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Huddled Group's score of -0.24 indicating that One Media iP Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
One Media iP Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.223, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.6775183, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

16.3% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 26.06% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -36.87%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 8.91% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-36.87% -245.25% -19.20%
One Media iP Group 26.06%8.91%1.64%

One Media iP Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.65M0.25-£2.80M-£1.17N/A
One Media iP Group£4.59M2.28£160.32K£0.3413.82

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Huddled Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Cineworld Group?

Cineworld Group (LON:CINE) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Huddled Group had 4 more articles in the media than Cineworld Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Huddled Group and 0 mentions for Cineworld Group. Cineworld Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Huddled Group's score of -0.24 indicating that Cineworld Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cineworld Group Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

Huddled Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cineworld Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cineworld Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cineworld Group£3.03B0.00-£344.40M-£0.20N/A
Huddled Group£18.65M0.25-£2.80M-£1.17N/A

17.3% of Cineworld Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.3% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.2% of Cineworld Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cineworld Group has a net margin of -11.38% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -36.87%. Cineworld Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cineworld Group-11.38% N/A 1.94%
Huddled Group -36.87%-245.25%-19.20%

Cineworld Group has a beta of 3.09, suggesting that its share price is 209% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.223, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cineworld Group beats Huddled Group on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Round Hill Music Royalty?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and Round Hill Music Royalty (LON:RHM) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

16.3% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.9% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Huddled Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Round Hill Music Royalty has a net margin of 13.28% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -36.87%. Round Hill Music Royalty's return on equity of 0.13% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-36.87% -245.25% -19.20%
Round Hill Music Royalty 13.28%0.13%0.75%

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.223, indicating that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Round Hill Music Royalty has a beta of -0.2, indicating that its stock price is 120% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Huddled Group had 4 more articles in the media than Round Hill Music Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Huddled Group and 0 mentions for Round Hill Music Royalty. Round Hill Music Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Huddled Group's score of -0.24 indicating that Round Hill Music Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
Round Hill Music Royalty Neutral

Round Hill Music Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Round Hill Music Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.65M0.25-£2.80M-£1.17N/A
Round Hill Music Royalty£50.84M0.00£6.75M£0.01N/A

Summary

Round Hill Music Royalty beats Huddled Group on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Huddled Group?

Huddled Group (LON:LETS) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Huddled Group has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.223, indicating that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

Huddled Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Huddled Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled GroupN/AN/A-£2.11M-£0.01N/A
Huddled Group£18.65M0.25-£2.80M-£1.17N/A

Huddled Group has a net margin of 1,839.74% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -36.87%. Huddled Group's return on equity of -31.08% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group1,839.74% -31.08% -13.48%
Huddled Group -36.87%-245.25%-19.20%

In the previous week, Huddled Group had 4 more articles in the media than Huddled Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Huddled Group and 0 mentions for Huddled Group. Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Huddled Group's score of -0.24 indicating that Huddled Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

47.4% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.3% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.0% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Huddled Group beats Huddled Group on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Bonhill Group?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and Bonhill Group (LON:BONH) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

16.3% of Huddled Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.3% of Bonhill Group shares are held by institutional investors. 15.8% of Huddled Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of Bonhill Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Huddled Group has higher revenue and earnings than Bonhill Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bonhill Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.65M0.25-£2.80M-£1.17N/A
Bonhill Group£14.91M0.00-£6.55M-£0.05N/A

Huddled Group has a net margin of -36.87% compared to Bonhill Group's net margin of -43.93%. Bonhill Group's return on equity of -65.71% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-36.87% -245.25% -19.20%
Bonhill Group -43.93%-65.71%-13.11%

In the previous week, Huddled Group had 4 more articles in the media than Bonhill Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Huddled Group and 0 mentions for Bonhill Group. Bonhill Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Huddled Group's score of -0.24 indicating that Bonhill Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
Bonhill Group Neutral

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.223, meaning that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bonhill Group has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Bonhill Group beats Huddled Group on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Huddled Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HUD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HUD vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHuddled GroupEntertainment IndustryCommunication Services SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£4.60M£9.93B£34.19B£2.46B
Dividend YieldN/A3.84%5.55%6.25%
P/E Ratio-0.4826.80232.68366.33
Price / Sales0.25113.2166.7189,426.82
Price / CashN/A34.8420.2927.89
Price / Book0.216.7812.186.83
Net Income-£2.80M£72.95M£1.12B£5.89B
7 Day Performance26.00%-1.44%-1.07%-0.72%
1 Month Performance-22.22%-2.53%-4.06%-1.14%
1 Year Performance-76.76%-13.62%-9.55%22.82%

Huddled Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HUD
Huddled Group
N/AGBX 0.57
flat		N/A-76.8%£4.60M£18.65MN/A94
OMIP
One Media iP Group
N/AGBX 4.41
-3.1%		N/A+17.5%£9.81M£4.59M12.9711
CINE
Cineworld Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.22M£3.03BN/A25,686
RHM
Round Hill Music Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.67M£50.84M114.50N/A
LETS
Huddled Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.01MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HUD) was last updated on 10/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel