Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ Buy the “unseen winner of the AI race” before July 22 (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free HUD Stock Alerts

Huddled Group (HUD) Competitors

Huddled Group logo
GBX 0.50 -0.03 (-4.76%)
As of 12:23 PM Eastern
Compare

HUD vs. OMIP, AEO, CINE, RHM, and LETS

Should you buy Huddled Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Huddled Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Huddled Group include One Media iP Group (OMIP), Aeorema Communications (AEO), Cineworld Group (CINE), Round Hill Music Royalty (RHM), and Huddled Group (LETS). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does Huddled Group compare to One Media iP Group?

One Media iP Group (LON:OMIP) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

One Media iP Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Media iP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
One Media iP Group£4.75M1.90£160.32K£0.2020.33
Huddled Group£18.45M0.12-£2.80M-£1.17N/A

In the previous week, One Media iP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Huddled Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
One Media iP Group Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

One Media iP Group has a net margin of 20.06% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. One Media iP Group's return on equity of 7.31% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
One Media iP Group20.06% 7.31% 1.64%
Huddled Group -22.43%-100.32%-19.20%

7.0% of One Media iP Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.7% of Huddled Group shares are held by institutional investors. 22.3% of One Media iP Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.4% of Huddled Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

One Media iP Group has a beta of 0.281, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.193, meaning that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

One Media iP Group beats Huddled Group on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Aeorema Communications?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and Aeorema Communications (LON:AEO) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

14.7% of Huddled Group shares are held by institutional investors. 21.4% of Huddled Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 99.3% of Aeorema Communications shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Aeorema Communications has higher revenue and earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aeorema Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.45M0.12-£2.80M-£1.17N/A
Aeorema Communications£20.41M0.30£360.88K£2.2029.55

In the previous week, Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aeorema Communications'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
Aeorema Communications Neutral

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.193, indicating that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aeorema Communications has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Aeorema Communications has a net margin of 0.62% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. Aeorema Communications' return on equity of 4.54% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-22.43% -100.32% -19.20%
Aeorema Communications 0.62%4.54%4.43%

Summary

Aeorema Communications beats Huddled Group on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Cineworld Group?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and Cineworld Group (LON:CINE) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.193, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cineworld Group has a beta of 3.09, suggesting that its share price is 209% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cineworld Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
Cineworld Group Neutral

Cineworld Group has a net margin of -11.38% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. Cineworld Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-22.43% -100.32% -19.20%
Cineworld Group -11.38%N/A 1.94%

14.7% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Cineworld Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.4% of Huddled Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Cineworld Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Huddled Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cineworld Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cineworld Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.45M0.12-£2.80M-£1.17N/A
Cineworld Group£3.03B0.00-£344.40M-£0.20N/A

Summary

Cineworld Group beats Huddled Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Round Hill Music Royalty?

Round Hill Music Royalty (LON:RHM) and Huddled Group (LON:HUD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

77.9% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.7% of Huddled Group shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Round Hill Music Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.4% of Huddled Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Round Hill Music Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Huddled Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Round Hill Music Royalty Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

Round Hill Music Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Round Hill Music Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Round Hill Music Royalty£50.84M0.00£6.75M£0.01N/A
Huddled Group£18.45M0.12-£2.80M-£1.17N/A

Round Hill Music Royalty has a beta of -0.2, meaning that its share price is 120% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 0.193, meaning that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Round Hill Music Royalty has a net margin of 13.28% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. Round Hill Music Royalty's return on equity of 0.13% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Round Hill Music Royalty13.28% 0.13% 0.75%
Huddled Group -22.43%-100.32%-19.20%

Summary

Round Hill Music Royalty beats Huddled Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Huddled Group compare to Huddled Group?

Huddled Group (LON:HUD) and Huddled Group (LON:LETS) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Huddled Group has a net margin of 1,839.74% compared to Huddled Group's net margin of -22.43%. Huddled Group's return on equity of -31.08% beat Huddled Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huddled Group-22.43% -100.32% -19.20%
Huddled Group 1,839.74%-31.08%-13.48%

Huddled Group has a beta of 0.193, suggesting that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huddled Group has a beta of 2.14, suggesting that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the broader market.

14.7% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.4% of Huddled Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.4% of Huddled Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 52.0% of Huddled Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Huddled Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Huddled Group. Huddled Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Huddled Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huddled Group£18.45M0.12-£2.80M-£1.17N/A
Huddled GroupN/AN/A-£2.11M-£0.01N/A

In the previous week, Huddled Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Huddled Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huddled Group Neutral
Huddled Group Neutral

Summary

Huddled Group beats Huddled Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Huddled Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HUD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HUD vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHuddled GroupEntertainment IndustryCommunication SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.17M£1.14B£3.35B£2.77B
Dividend YieldN/A3.41%6.75%6.16%
P/E Ratio-0.436.7715.20366.61
Price / Sales0.1271.79104.2186,103.13
Price / CashN/A8.3315.6927.87
Price / Book0.181.894.907.85
Net Income-£2.80M-£39.26M£128.81M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.96%-1.29%4.66%-0.97%
1 Month Performance-33.77%-0.97%1.72%-0.79%
1 Year Performance-84.85%-11.63%10.92%68.88%

Huddled Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HUD
Huddled Group
N/AGBX 0.50
-4.8%		N/A-84.7%£2.17M£18.45MN/AN/A
OMIP
One Media iP Group
N/AGBX 4
-5.9%		N/A+19.2%£8.90M£4.75M20.0021
AEO
Aeorema Communications
N/AGBX 66.54
+1.6%		N/A+39.9%£6.28M£20.41M30.2540,800
CINE
Cineworld Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.22M£3.03BN/A25,686
RHM
Round Hill Music Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.67M£50.84M114.50N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HUD) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Firm That Predicted 2008, 2020, 2022: Right Now Looks Worse
The firm that predicted the dot-com crash, the 2008 financial crisis, the 2020 COVID crash, and the 2022 bear ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Treasury just bought its own debt
On April 16th, the U.S. Treasury executed a $15 billion buyback of its own debt - the largest in history - whi...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock is hoarding it. JPMorgan is hoarding it. Do you own it?
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon Is Quietly Doubling Down on This Bizarre Asset
Yahoo Finance reports this technology 'May Unlock $400 Trillion' - and Bloomberg calls it 'unavoidable.' Elon ...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
PH: Do THESE 4 things to your bank account now …
In a few short months, the US government could gain unprecedented powers over personal bank accounts - includi...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Nearly 40% of Americans now hold a positive view of socialism - and former hedge fund manager Whitney Tilson s...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel