Go Pro

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust (ORIT) Competitors

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust logo
GBX 61.20 -0.20 (-0.33%)
As of 10:10 AM Eastern

ORIT vs. IHP, GROW, FCSS, BPCR, and GSS

Should you buy Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust stock or one of its competitors? Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's main competitors and comparable companies include IntegraFin (IHP), Molten Ventures (GROW), Fidelity China Special (FCSS), BioPharma Credit (BPCR), and Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (GSS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust compare to IntegraFin?

IntegraFin (LON:IHP) and Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust (LON:ORIT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation and earnings.

44.0% of IntegraFin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 14.5% of IntegraFin shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

IntegraFin has a net margin of 28.60% compared to Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's net margin of -114.42%. IntegraFin's return on equity of 27.60% beat Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IntegraFin28.60% 27.60% 20.29%
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust -114.42%-8.90%1.89%

IntegraFin currently has a consensus price target of GBX 435, indicating a potential upside of 19.67%. Given IntegraFin's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe IntegraFin is more favorable than Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IntegraFin
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

IntegraFin has a beta of 1.276, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust has a beta of 0.23463126, suggesting that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

IntegraFin pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. IntegraFin pays out 59.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust pays out -144.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust had 2 more articles in the media than IntegraFin. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust and 6 mentions for IntegraFin. IntegraFin's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's score of 0.74 indicating that IntegraFin is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
IntegraFin
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

IntegraFin has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IntegraFin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IntegraFin£165.40M7.26£52.54M£19.1019.03
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust-£21.34M-15.08£18.16M-£4.23N/A

Summary

IntegraFin beats Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust compare to Molten Ventures?

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust (LON:ORIT) and Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk and valuation.

27.2% of Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.5% of Molten Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Molten Ventures. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Molten Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust-£21.34M-15.08£18.16M-£4.23N/A
Molten Ventures£148M7.76-£33.58M£69.009.64

Molten Ventures has a consensus price target of GBX 638.67, indicating a potential downside of 4.03%. Given Molten Ventures' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Molten Ventures is more favorable than Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 75.09% compared to Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's net margin of -114.42%. Molten Ventures' return on equity of 9.21% beat Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust-114.42% -8.90% 1.89%
Molten Ventures 75.09%9.21%-3.46%

In the previous week, Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust had 8 more articles in the media than Molten Ventures. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust and 0 mentions for Molten Ventures. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Molten Ventures' score of 0.00 indicating that Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust Positive
Molten Ventures Neutral

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust has a beta of 0.23463126, meaning that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.9564402, meaning that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Molten Ventures beats Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust compare to Fidelity China Special?

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust (LON:ORIT) and Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

27.2% of Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust had 7 more articles in the media than Fidelity China Special. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust and 1 mentions for Fidelity China Special. Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's score of 0.74 indicating that Fidelity China Special is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fidelity China Special
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Fidelity China Special
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Fidelity China Special has a net margin of 81.41% compared to Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's net margin of -114.42%. Fidelity China Special's return on equity of 9.12% beat Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust-114.42% -8.90% 1.89%
Fidelity China Special 81.41%9.12%N/A

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Fidelity China Special pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust pays out -144.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity China Special pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Fidelity China Special has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity China Special, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust-£21.34M-15.08£18.16M-£4.23N/A
Fidelity China Special£146.54M7.94£997.06M£29.758.61

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust has a beta of 0.23463126, suggesting that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.919, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fidelity China Special beats Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust compare to BioPharma Credit?

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust (LON:ORIT) and BioPharma Credit (LON:BPCR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

BioPharma Credit has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BioPharma Credit, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust-£21.34M-15.08£18.16M-£4.23N/A
BioPharma Credit£132.06M0.08£10.42B£11.400.09

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
BioPharma Credit
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

27.2% of Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.3% of BioPharma Credit shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of BioPharma Credit shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust had 8 more articles in the media than BioPharma Credit. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust and 0 mentions for BioPharma Credit. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat BioPharma Credit's score of 0.00 indicating that Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust Positive
BioPharma Credit Neutral

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust has a beta of 0.23463126, suggesting that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BioPharma Credit has a beta of 0.22688746, suggesting that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

BioPharma Credit has a net margin of 92.62% compared to Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's net margin of -114.42%. BioPharma Credit's return on equity of 11.29% beat Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust-114.42% -8.90% 1.89%
BioPharma Credit 92.62%11.29%4.98%

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. BioPharma Credit pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 720.2%. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust pays out -144.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BioPharma Credit pays out 61.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

BioPharma Credit beats Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust compare to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund?

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust (LON:ORIT) and Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (LON:GSS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Genesis Emerging Markets Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's net margin of -114.42%. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's return on equity of 0.00% beat Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust-114.42% -8.90% 1.89%
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust had 8 more articles in the media than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust and 0 mentions for Genesis Emerging Markets Fund. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

27.2% of Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.17 per share. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust pays out -144.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund. Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust-£21.34M-15.08£18.16M-£4.23N/A
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund£250.40M0.00N/A£140.70N/A

Given Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Genesis Emerging Markets Fund is more favorable than Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust beats Genesis Emerging Markets Fund on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ORIT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ORIT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ORIT vs. The Competition

MetricOctopus Renewables Infrastructure TrustCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£321.82M£5.36B£13.78B£2.89B
Dividend Yield10.15%7.49%5.96%6.22%
P/E Ratio-14.4229.9325.21366.54
Price / Sales-15.081,240.90516.0890,065.96
Price / Cash22.3947.8746.1227.89
Price / Book0.583.512.716.33
Net Income£18.16M£417.39M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.16%0.39%-0.36%0.17%
1 Month Performance-0.97%-1.55%-1.55%6.34%
1 Year Performance-4.69%4.85%8.89%19.23%

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ORIT
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust
0.9832 of 5 stars
GBX 61.20
-0.3%
N/A-4.1%£322.88M-£21.34MN/AN/A
IHP
IntegraFin
4.1301 of 5 stars
GBX 371
-0.4%
GBX 435
+17.3%
+10.5%£1.23B£165.40M19.423,520
GROW
Molten Ventures
0.7965 of 5 stars
GBX 668.50
-0.4%
GBX 638.67
-4.5%
+85.5%£1.16B£148M9.6920
FCSS
Fidelity China Special
N/AGBX 248
+1.2%
N/A-20.8%£1.11B£146.54M8.34N/A
BPCR
BioPharma Credit
N/AGBX 0.97
-0.4%
N/A+6.4%£1.09B£132.06M0.09N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:ORIT) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners