Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ My feud with Zohran Mamdani (From Stansberry Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free PCGH Stock Alerts

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare (PCGH) Competitors

GBX 422.78 +1.78 (+0.42%)
As of 05:35 AM Eastern
Compare

PCGH vs. PNL, RAT, PIN, LWDB, and WTAN

Should you buy Polar Capital Glb Healthcare stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Polar Capital Glb Healthcare with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Polar Capital Glb Healthcare include Personal Assets (PNL), Rathbones Group (RAT), Pantheon International (PIN), Law Debenture (LWDB), and Witan Investment Trust (WTAN). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Polar Capital Glb Healthcare compare to Personal Assets?

Personal Assets (LON:PNL) and Polar Capital Glb Healthcare (LON:PCGH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Personal Assets had 1 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Glb Healthcare. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Personal Assets and 0 mentions for Polar Capital Glb Healthcare. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Personal Assets' score of 1.25 indicating that Polar Capital Glb Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Personal Assets Positive
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare Very Positive

Personal Assets has a net margin of 95.99% compared to Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's net margin of 87.94%. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's return on equity of 11.29% beat Personal Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Personal Assets95.99% 6.04% 1.96%
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare 87.94%11.29%N/A

0.1% of Personal Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Polar Capital Glb Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Polar Capital Glb Healthcare shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Personal Assets has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Capital Glb Healthcare. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Personal Assets£89.00M18.68£124.81M£29.1118.38
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare£48.41M8.76£77.59M£41.7610.12

Personal Assets has a beta of 0.33067337, suggesting that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Glb Healthcare has a beta of 0.63467383, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Personal Assets pays out 19.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Personal Assets beats Polar Capital Glb Healthcare on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Glb Healthcare compare to Rathbones Group?

Rathbones Group (LON:RAT) and Polar Capital Glb Healthcare (LON:PCGH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Rathbones Group. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rathbones Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rathbones Group£923.30M1.81£63.46M£104.7015.43
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare£48.41M8.76£77.59M£41.7610.12

In the previous week, Rathbones Group had 11 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Glb Healthcare. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Rathbones Group and 0 mentions for Polar Capital Glb Healthcare. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Rathbones Group's score of 0.74 indicating that Polar Capital Glb Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Rathbones Group Positive
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare Very Positive

Rathbones Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 94 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Rathbones Group pays out 89.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare has a net margin of 87.94% compared to Rathbones Group's net margin of 10.85%. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's return on equity of 11.29% beat Rathbones Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rathbones Group10.85% 8.33% 3.57%
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare 87.94%11.29%N/A

61.6% of Rathbones Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Polar Capital Glb Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Rathbones Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Polar Capital Glb Healthcare shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Rathbones Group has a beta of 0.709, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Glb Healthcare has a beta of 0.63467383, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Rathbones Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,982.50, indicating a potential upside of 22.68%. Given Rathbones Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Rathbones Group is more favorable than Polar Capital Glb Healthcare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rathbones Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Rathbones Group beats Polar Capital Glb Healthcare on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Glb Healthcare compare to Pantheon International?

Pantheon International (LON:PIN) and Polar Capital Glb Healthcare (LON:PCGH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Pantheon International's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Glb Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pantheon International Neutral
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare Very Positive

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare has a net margin of 87.94% compared to Pantheon International's net margin of -35.06%. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's return on equity of 11.29% beat Pantheon International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pantheon International-35.06% -0.30% 1.05%
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare 87.94%11.29%N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pantheon International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Pantheon International has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Glb Healthcare has a beta of 0.63467383, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

1.8% of Pantheon International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Polar Capital Glb Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Pantheon International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Polar Capital Glb Healthcare shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare has higher revenue and earnings than Pantheon International. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pantheon International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pantheon International£43.18M37.23£31.00M£8.1947.22
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare£48.41M8.76£77.59M£41.7610.12

Summary

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare beats Pantheon International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Glb Healthcare compare to Law Debenture?

Law Debenture (LON:LWDB) and Polar Capital Glb Healthcare (LON:PCGH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Law Debenture has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Capital Glb Healthcare. Law Debenture is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital Glb Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Law Debenture£366.00M4.35£142.39M£229.505.21
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare£48.41M8.76£77.59M£41.7610.12

In the previous week, Law Debenture had 1 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Glb Healthcare. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Law Debenture and 0 mentions for Polar Capital Glb Healthcare. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Law Debenture's score of 0.59 indicating that Polar Capital Glb Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Law Debenture Positive
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare Very Positive

Law Debenture has a beta of 0.716, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Glb Healthcare has a beta of 0.63467383, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare has a net margin of 87.94% compared to Law Debenture's net margin of 81.41%. Law Debenture's return on equity of 26.88% beat Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Law Debenture81.41% 26.88% 8.76%
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare 87.94%11.29%N/A

6.7% of Law Debenture shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Polar Capital Glb Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Law Debenture shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Polar Capital Glb Healthcare shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Law Debenture pays an annual dividend of GBX 34.63 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Law Debenture pays out 15.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Law Debenture beats Polar Capital Glb Healthcare on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Glb Healthcare compare to Witan Investment Trust?

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare (LON:PCGH) and Witan Investment Trust (LON:WTAN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Witan Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Capital Glb Healthcare. Witan Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital Glb Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare£48.41M8.76£77.59M£41.7610.12
Witan Investment Trust£246.38M0.00£220.34M£0.36N/A

5.8% of Polar Capital Glb Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.5% of Witan Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Polar Capital Glb Healthcare shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Witan Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Witan Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Glb Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare Very Positive
Witan Investment Trust Neutral

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare has a beta of 0.63467383, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Witan Investment Trust has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Witan Investment Trust has a net margin of 89.43% compared to Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's net margin of 87.94%. Witan Investment Trust's return on equity of 13.68% beat Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare87.94% 11.29% N/A
Witan Investment Trust 89.43%13.68%7.95%

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Witan Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Witan Investment Trust pays out 1,666.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Witan Investment Trust beats Polar Capital Glb Healthcare on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Polar Capital Glb Healthcare News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PCGH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PCGH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PCGH vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPolar Capital Glb HealthcareAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£424.00M£2.57B£6.06B£2.77B
Dividend Yield0.48%6.03%5.27%6.16%
P/E Ratio10.1225.8416.30366.30
Price / Sales8.762,099.741,445.6186,148.41
Price / CashN/A60.1684.9827.85
Price / Book1.071.376.657.83
Net Income£77.59M£264.62M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.14%-0.48%-0.21%-0.94%
1 Month Performance7.85%-0.13%1.03%-0.74%
1 Year Performance28.50%9.65%19.69%68.82%

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PCGH
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare
N/AGBX 422.78
+0.4%		N/A+28.4%£424.00M£48.41M10.12N/A
PNL
Personal Assets
N/AGBX 535
-0.4%		N/A+4.3%£1.66B£89.00M18.38N/A
RAT
Rathbones Group
4.1663 of 5 stars		GBX 1,592
-2.3%		GBX 1,982.50
+24.5%		-5.4%£1.65B£923.30M15.213,500
PIN
Pantheon International
1.2014 of 5 stars		GBX 392.50
-0.6%		N/A+27.7%£1.63B£43.18M47.92455
LWDB
Law Debenture
N/AGBX 1,208
-0.8%		N/A+23.7%£1.61B£366.00M5.26260

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PCGH) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Four winners over 400%. Here's #5
CFA and CMT analyst Garrett Goggin called G2 Goldfields before it rose 1,023%, Reunion Gold before 538%, Highl...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Nearly 40% of Americans now hold a positive view of socialism - and former hedge fund manager Whitney Tilson s...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
A drilling crew just broke a record nobody expected
A drilling crew in Beaver County, Utah hit 15,765 feet of solid granite in 16 days - a job the Department of E...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Millionaire trader who went 13-for-13 on Trump in 2025 now turns his attention to Elon.
Hedge fund trader Larry Benedict went 13-for-13 in Q1 2025 - not a single losing trade - and finished the year...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Karp just filed Form 144
On May 12, 2026, Palantir CEO Alex Karp filed to sell 585,000 shares - roughly $95.93 million. Combined with f...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel