Free Trial

PipeHawk (PIP) Competitors

GBX 2.25 -0.50 (-18.25%)
As of 11:52 AM Eastern

PIP vs. OTAQ, NNN, MSYS, UBI, and SXS

Should you buy PipeHawk stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares PipeHawk with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with PipeHawk include OTAQ (OTAQ), nanosynth group (NNN), Microsaic Systems (MSYS), Ubisense Group (UBI), and Spectris (SXS). These companies are all part of the "scientific & technical instruments" industry.

How does PipeHawk compare to OTAQ?

OTAQ (LON:OTAQ) and PipeHawk (LON:PIP) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, OTAQ's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PipeHawk'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
OTAQ Neutral
PipeHawk Neutral

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

OTAQ has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat OTAQ's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OTAQN/A N/A N/A
PipeHawk -29.06%12.25%-7.84%

OTAQ has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OTAQ, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OTAQ£4.29M0.00N/A-£4.20N/A
PipeHawk£2.80M0.29-£1.69M-£2.23N/A

Summary

PipeHawk beats OTAQ on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to nanosynth group?

nanosynth group (LON:NNN) and PipeHawk (LON:PIP) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. 24.6% of nanosynth group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

PipeHawk has higher revenue and earnings than nanosynth group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
nanosynth group£85.65K0.00-£3.78MN/AN/A
PipeHawk£2.80M0.29-£1.69M-£2.23N/A

In the previous week, nanosynth group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PipeHawk'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
nanosynth group Neutral
PipeHawk Neutral

nanosynth group has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PipeHawk has a beta of 0.13, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

nanosynth group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat nanosynth group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
nanosynth groupN/A -72.61% -40.84%
PipeHawk -29.06%12.25%-7.84%

Summary

PipeHawk beats nanosynth group on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Microsaic Systems?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and Microsaic Systems (LON:MSYS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and dividends.

PipeHawk has a beta of 0.13, meaning that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Microsaic Systems has a beta of 0.32, meaning that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Microsaic Systems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk Neutral
Microsaic Systems Neutral

PipeHawk has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Microsaic Systems. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Microsaic Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk£2.80M0.29-£1.69M-£2.23N/A
Microsaic Systems£8.66M0.00-£45.72M-£25.52N/A

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.3% of Microsaic Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.2% of Microsaic Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PipeHawk has a net margin of -29.06% compared to Microsaic Systems' net margin of -527.85%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Microsaic Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PipeHawk-29.06% 12.25% -7.84%
Microsaic Systems -527.85%-181.40%-32.37%

Summary

PipeHawk beats Microsaic Systems on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Ubisense Group?

Ubisense Group (LON:UBI) and PipeHawk (LON:PIP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Ubisense Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PipeHawk.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ubisense GroupN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
PipeHawk£2.80M0.29-£1.69M-£2.23N/A

Ubisense Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Ubisense Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ubisense GroupN/A N/A N/A
PipeHawk -29.06%12.25%-7.84%

In the previous week, Ubisense Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PipeHawk'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ubisense Group Neutral
PipeHawk Neutral

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

PipeHawk beats Ubisense Group on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Spectris?

Spectris (LON:SXS) and PipeHawk (LON:PIP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Spectris presently has a consensus price target of GBX 4,147, suggesting a potential upside of 0.12%. Given Spectris' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Spectris is more favorable than PipeHawk.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Spectris
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
PipeHawk
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

99.2% of Spectris shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of PipeHawk shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Spectris shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Spectris has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Spectris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Spectris£1.35B3.06£270.93M£57.6071.91
PipeHawk£2.80M0.29-£1.69M-£2.23N/A

In the previous week, Spectris' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PipeHawk'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Spectris Neutral
PipeHawk Neutral

Spectris has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PipeHawk has a beta of 0.13, meaning that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Spectris has a net margin of 4.31% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Spectris' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Spectris4.31% 4.30% 5.42%
PipeHawk -29.06%12.25%-7.84%

Summary

Spectris beats PipeHawk on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PipeHawk News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PIP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PIP vs. The Competition

MetricPipeHawkScientific & Technical Instruments IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£816K£2.64B£39.44B£2.79B
Dividend Yield1.28%2.75%3.20%6.09%
P/E Ratio-1.0166.33163.78366.15
Price / Sales0.29152.69622.7288,429.84
Price / Cash7.3420.4647.8227.89
Price / Book-0.134.279.567.74
Net Income-£1.69M£82.40M£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance7.05%0.36%0.34%0.82%
1 Month Performance-11.67%-0.78%9.50%2.78%
1 Year Performance49.87%44.89%164.60%87.90%

PipeHawk Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PIP
PipeHawk
N/AGBX 2.25
-18.3%
N/A+39.6%£816K£2.80MN/A98
OTAQ
OTAQ
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.04M£4.29MN/A42
NNN
nanosynth group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.58M£85.65KN/A80
MSYS
Microsaic Systems
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.47M£8.66MN/A23
UBI
Ubisense Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£0.00N/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PIP) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners