Go Pro
→ Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free PIP Stock Alerts

PipeHawk (PIP) Competitors

GBX 2 -0.15 (-7.07%)
As of 08/21/2026 11:42 AM Eastern
Compare

PIP vs. PSL, OTAQ, BOU, NNN, and HDT

Should you buy PipeHawk stock or one of its competitors? PipeHawk's main competitors and comparable companies include Photonstar Led Group (PSL), OTAQ (OTAQ), Bould Opportunities (BOU), nanosynth group (NNN), and Holders Technology (HDT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment, instruments & components" industry.

How does PipeHawk compare to Photonstar Led Group?

Photonstar Led Group (LON:PSL) and PipeHawk (LON:PIP) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Photonstar Led Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PipeHawk'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Photonstar Led Group Neutral
PipeHawk Neutral

Photonstar Led Group has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Photonstar Led Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Photonstar Led Group£3.62M0.00N/A-£0.50N/A
PipeHawk£2.80M0.26-£1.69M-£2.23N/A

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Photonstar Led Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Photonstar Led Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Photonstar Led GroupN/A N/A N/A
PipeHawk -29.06%12.25%-7.84%

Summary

Photonstar Led Group beats PipeHawk on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to OTAQ?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and OTAQ (LON:OTAQ) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled OTAQ'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk Neutral
OTAQ Neutral

OTAQ has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat OTAQ's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PipeHawk-29.06% 12.25% -7.84%
OTAQ N/A N/A N/A

OTAQ has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OTAQ, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk£2.80M0.26-£1.69M-£2.23N/A
OTAQ£4.29M0.00N/A-£4.20N/A

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

PipeHawk beats OTAQ on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Bould Opportunities?

Bould Opportunities (LON:BOU) and PipeHawk (LON:PIP) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Bould Opportunities has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Bould Opportunities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bould OpportunitiesN/A N/A N/A
PipeHawk -29.06%12.25%-7.84%

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Bould Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PipeHawk'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bould Opportunities Neutral
PipeHawk Neutral

Bould Opportunities has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bould Opportunities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bould Opportunities£74K0.00N/A-£0.10N/A
PipeHawk£2.80M0.26-£1.69M-£2.23N/A

Summary

Bould Opportunities and PipeHawk tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to nanosynth group?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and nanosynth group (LON:NNN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.6% of nanosynth group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

nanosynth group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat nanosynth group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PipeHawk-29.06% 12.25% -7.84%
nanosynth group N/A -72.61%-40.84%

PipeHawk has a beta of 0.499, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, nanosynth group has a beta of 0.19, meaning that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

PipeHawk has higher revenue and earnings than nanosynth group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk£2.80M0.26-£1.69M-£2.23N/A
nanosynth group£85.65K0.00-£3.78MN/AN/A

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled nanosynth group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk Neutral
nanosynth group Neutral

Summary

PipeHawk beats nanosynth group on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Holders Technology?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and Holders Technology (LON:HDT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.4% of Holders Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 176.7% of Holders Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Holders Technology'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk Neutral
Holders Technology Neutral

Holders Technology has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Holders Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk£2.80M0.26-£1.69M-£2.23N/A
Holders Technology£8.73M0.00N/A-£0.13N/A

PipeHawk has a beta of 0.499, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Holders Technology has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Holders Technology has a net margin of -6.19% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Holders Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PipeHawk-29.06% 12.25% -7.84%
Holders Technology -6.19%-13.85%-5.36%

Summary

Holders Technology beats PipeHawk on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PipeHawk News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PIP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

PIP vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPipeHawkElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£780K£8.81B£29.55B£2.54B
Dividend Yield1.28%2.28%2.75%6.17%
P/E Ratio-0.9031.2273.35367.57
Price / Sales0.2646.42598.8483,481.74
Price / Cash7.3432.3450.3527.89
Price / Book-0.125.439.447.19
Net Income-£1.69M£203.80M£679.74M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-13.13%-3.52%-1.29%0.30%
1 Month Performance-0.10%1.06%4.03%3.31%
1 Year Performance45.31%826.39%189.70%22.13%

PipeHawk Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PIP
PipeHawk
N/AGBX 2
-7.1%		N/A+43.2%£780K£2.80MN/A98
PSL
Photonstar Led Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.15M£3.62MN/AN/A
OTAQ
OTAQ
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.04M£4.29MN/A42
BOU
Bould Opportunities
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.85M£74KN/AN/A
NNN
nanosynth group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.58M£85.65KN/A80

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PIP) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel