Is PIP or MSYS more profitable?

PipeHawk has a net margin of -29.06% compared to Microsaic Systems' net margin of -527.85%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Microsaic Systems' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PipeHawk -29.06% 12.25% -7.84% Microsaic Systems -527.85% -181.40% -32.37%

Which has better earnings and valuation, UBI or PIP?

Ubisense Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PipeHawk. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ubisense Group N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A PipeHawk £2.80M 0.25 -£1.69M -£2.23 N/A

Which has better earnings and valuation, PIP or SXS?

Spectris has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Spectris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PipeHawk £2.80M 0.25 -£1.69M -£2.23 N/A Spectris £1.35B 3.06 £270.93M £57.60 71.91

Is PIP or SXS more profitable?

Spectris has a net margin of 17.96% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. Spectris' return on equity of 17.30% beat PipeHawk's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PipeHawk -29.06% 12.25% -7.84% Spectris 17.96% 17.30% 5.42%

PipeHawk (PIP) Competitors

GBX 1.90 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 09/11/2026

Compare

PIP vs. HDT, MSYS, TWD, UBI, and SXS

Should you buy PipeHawk stock or one of its competitors? PipeHawk's main competitors and comparable companies include Holders Technology (HDT), Microsaic Systems (MSYS), Trackwise Designs (TWD), Ubisense Group (UBI), and Spectris (SXS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment, instruments & components" industry.

How does PipeHawk compare to Holders Technology?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and Holders Technology (LON:HDT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and risk.

Holders Technology has a net margin of -6.19% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Holders Technology's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%
Holders Technology	-6.19%	-13.85%	-5.36%

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.4% of Holders Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 176.7% of Holders Technology shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PipeHawk has a beta of 0.499, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Holders Technology has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Holders Technology has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Holders Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.25	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A
Holders Technology	£8.73M	0.00	N/A	-£0.13	N/A

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Holders Technology'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk	Neutral
Holders Technology	Neutral

Summary

Holders Technology beats PipeHawk on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Microsaic Systems?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and Microsaic Systems (LON:MSYS) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

PipeHawk has a net margin of -29.06% compared to Microsaic Systems' net margin of -527.85%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Microsaic Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%
Microsaic Systems	-527.85%	-181.40%	-32.37%

PipeHawk has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Microsaic Systems. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Microsaic Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.25	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A
Microsaic Systems	£8.66M	0.00	-£45.72M	-£25.52	N/A

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.3% of Microsaic Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.2% of Microsaic Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Microsaic Systems'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk	Neutral
Microsaic Systems	Neutral

PipeHawk has a beta of 0.499, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Microsaic Systems has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

PipeHawk beats Microsaic Systems on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Trackwise Designs?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and Trackwise Designs (LON:TWD) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

PipeHawk has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trackwise Designs. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trackwise Designs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.25	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A
Trackwise Designs	£7.70M	0.00	-£2.48M	-£0.02	N/A

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.1% of Trackwise Designs shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.0% of Trackwise Designs shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trackwise Designs'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk	Neutral
Trackwise Designs	Neutral

PipeHawk has a beta of 0.499, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trackwise Designs has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

PipeHawk has a net margin of -29.06% compared to Trackwise Designs' net margin of -32.13%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Trackwise Designs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%
Trackwise Designs	-32.13%	-9.33%	-0.64%

Summary

PipeHawk and Trackwise Designs tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Ubisense Group?

Ubisense Group (LON:UBI) and PipeHawk (LON:PIP) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Ubisense Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PipeHawk'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ubisense Group	Neutral
PipeHawk	Neutral

Ubisense Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PipeHawk.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ubisense Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.25	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A

Ubisense Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Ubisense Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ubisense Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%

Summary

PipeHawk beats Ubisense Group on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Spectris?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and Spectris (LON:SXS) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.2% of Spectris shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Spectris shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Spectris'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk	Neutral
Spectris	Neutral

PipeHawk has a beta of 0.499, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Spectris has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Spectris has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Spectris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.25	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A
Spectris	£1.35B	3.06	£270.93M	£57.60	71.91

Spectris has a net margin of 17.96% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. Spectris' return on equity of 17.30% beat PipeHawk's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%
Spectris	17.96%	17.30%	5.42%

Summary

Spectris beats PipeHawk on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PipeHawk News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

PIP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	PipeHawk	Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry	Technology Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£690K	£8.77B	£29.64B	£2.87B
Dividend Yield	1.28%	2.23%	2.74%	6.23%
P/E Ratio	-0.85	26.23	76.55	366.83
Price / Sales	0.25	39.34	588.63	83,599.70
Price / Cash	7.34	30.70	47.50	27.89
Price / Book	-0.11	4.76	7.70	6.33
Net Income	-£1.69M	£202.80M	£704.99M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	N/A	-1.04%	-1.08%	-0.69%
1 Month Performance	-12.44%	-6.97%	-3.65%	0.18%
1 Year Performance	-9.70%	813.11%	180.35%	20.03%

PipeHawk Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count
PIP PipeHawk	N/A	GBX 1.90 flat	N/A	-30.2%	£690K	£2.80M	N/A	98
HDT Holders Technology	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£2.13M	£8.73M	N/A	53
MSYS Microsaic Systems	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£1.47M	£8.66M	N/A	23
TWD Trackwise Designs	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£899K	£7.70M	N/A	132
UBI Ubisense Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£0.00	N/A	N/A	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PIP) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

PipeHawk (PIP) Competitors

PIP vs. HDT, MSYS, TWD, UBI, and SXS

How does PipeHawk compare to Holders Technology?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Microsaic Systems?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Trackwise Designs?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Ubisense Group?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Spectris?

Summary

PIP vs. The Competition

PipeHawk Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

PipeHawk (PIP) Competitors

PIP vs. HDT, MSYS, TWD, UBI, and SXS

How does PipeHawk compare to Holders Technology?

Is PIP or HDT more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PIP or HDT?

Which has more volatility and risk, PIP or HDT?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PIP or HDT?

Does the media favor PIP or HDT?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Microsaic Systems?

Is PIP or MSYS more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PIP or MSYS?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PIP or MSYS?

Does the media prefer PIP or MSYS?

Which has more volatility & risk, PIP or MSYS?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Trackwise Designs?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PIP or TWD?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of PIP or TWD?

Does the media prefer PIP or TWD?

Which has more risk & volatility, PIP or TWD?

Is PIP or TWD more profitable?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Ubisense Group?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in UBI or PIP?

Does the media prefer UBI or PIP?

Which has better earnings and valuation, UBI or PIP?

Is UBI or PIP more profitable?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Spectris?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PIP or SXS?

Does the media prefer PIP or SXS?

Which has more risk & volatility, PIP or SXS?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PIP or SXS?

Is PIP or SXS more profitable?

Summary

PIP vs. The Competition

PipeHawk Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools