Which has higher valuation & earnings, PIP or OTAQ?

OTAQ has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OTAQ, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PipeHawk £2.80M 0.29 -£1.69M -£2.23 N/A OTAQ £4.29M 0.00 N/A -£4.20 N/A

Is PIP or OTAQ more profitable?

OTAQ has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat OTAQ's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PipeHawk -29.06% 12.25% -7.84% OTAQ N/A N/A N/A

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PIP or NNN?

PipeHawk has higher revenue and earnings than nanosynth group. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PipeHawk £2.80M 0.29 -£1.69M -£2.23 N/A nanosynth group £85.65K 0.00 -£3.78M N/A N/A

Is PIP or MSYS more profitable?

PipeHawk has a net margin of -29.06% compared to Microsaic Systems' net margin of -527.85%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Microsaic Systems' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PipeHawk -29.06% 12.25% -7.84% Microsaic Systems -527.85% -181.40% -32.37%

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, UBI or PIP?

Ubisense Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PipeHawk. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ubisense Group N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A PipeHawk £2.80M 0.29 -£1.69M -£2.23 N/A

Do analysts rate PIP or SXS?

Spectris has a consensus price target of GBX 4,147, suggesting a potential upside of 0.12%. Given Spectris' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Spectris is more favorable than PipeHawk. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score PipeHawk 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Spectris 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, PIP or SXS?

Spectris has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Spectris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PipeHawk £2.80M 0.29 -£1.69M -£2.23 N/A Spectris £1.35B 3.06 £270.93M £57.60 71.91

Is PIP or SXS more profitable?

Spectris has a net margin of 17.96% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. Spectris' return on equity of 17.30% beat PipeHawk's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PipeHawk -29.06% 12.25% -7.84% Spectris 17.96% 17.30% 5.42%

PipeHawk (PIP) Competitors

GBX 2.25 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 07/31/2026

Compare

PIP vs. OTAQ, NNN, MSYS, UBI, and SXS

Should you buy PipeHawk stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares PipeHawk with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with PipeHawk include OTAQ (OTAQ), nanosynth group (NNN), Microsaic Systems (MSYS), Ubisense Group (UBI), and Spectris (SXS).

How does PipeHawk compare to OTAQ?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and OTAQ (LON:OTAQ) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

OTAQ has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OTAQ, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.29	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A
OTAQ	£4.29M	0.00	N/A	-£4.20	N/A

OTAQ has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat OTAQ's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%
OTAQ	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled OTAQ'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk	Neutral
OTAQ	Neutral

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

PipeHawk beats OTAQ on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to nanosynth group?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and nanosynth group (LON:NNN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

PipeHawk has a beta of 0.499, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, nanosynth group has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.6% of nanosynth group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

PipeHawk has higher revenue and earnings than nanosynth group.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.29	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A
nanosynth group	£85.65K	0.00	-£3.78M	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled nanosynth group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk	Neutral
nanosynth group	Neutral

nanosynth group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat nanosynth group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%
nanosynth group	N/A	-72.61%	-40.84%

Summary

PipeHawk beats nanosynth group on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Microsaic Systems?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and Microsaic Systems (LON:MSYS) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Microsaic Systems'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk	Neutral
Microsaic Systems	Neutral

PipeHawk has a beta of 0.499, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Microsaic Systems has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.3% of Microsaic Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.2% of Microsaic Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PipeHawk has a net margin of -29.06% compared to Microsaic Systems' net margin of -527.85%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Microsaic Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%
Microsaic Systems	-527.85%	-181.40%	-32.37%

PipeHawk has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Microsaic Systems. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Microsaic Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.29	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A
Microsaic Systems	£8.66M	0.00	-£45.72M	-£25.52	N/A

Summary

PipeHawk beats Microsaic Systems on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Ubisense Group?

Ubisense Group (LON:UBI) and PipeHawk (LON:PIP) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, Ubisense Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PipeHawk'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ubisense Group	Neutral
PipeHawk	Neutral

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ubisense Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PipeHawk.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ubisense Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.29	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A

Ubisense Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Ubisense Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ubisense Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%

Summary

PipeHawk beats Ubisense Group on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Spectris?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and Spectris (LON:SXS) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Spectris has a consensus price target of GBX 4,147, suggesting a potential upside of 0.12%. Given Spectris' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Spectris is more favorable than PipeHawk.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PipeHawk	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Spectris	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Spectris'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk	Neutral
Spectris	Neutral

PipeHawk has a beta of 0.499, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Spectris has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Spectris has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Spectris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.29	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A
Spectris	£1.35B	3.06	£270.93M	£57.60	71.91

Spectris has a net margin of 17.96% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. Spectris' return on equity of 17.30% beat PipeHawk's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%
Spectris	17.96%	17.30%	5.42%

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.2% of Spectris shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Spectris shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Spectris beats PipeHawk on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PipeHawk News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

PIP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	PipeHawk	Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry	Technology Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£817K	£13.02B	£27.99B	£2.83B
Dividend Yield	1.28%	2.28%	2.77%	6.15%
P/E Ratio	-1.01	50.53	79.90	368.45
Price / Sales	0.29	47.67	596.17	83,513.51
Price / Cash	7.34	30.19	45.05	27.89
Price / Book	-0.13	4.90	7.60	7.11
Net Income	-£1.69M	£196.14M	£662.12M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-5.14%	0.32%	0.13%	6.57%
1 Month Performance	12.50%	-5.30%	-4.45%	0.29%
1 Year Performance	63.64%	602.31%	147.99%	64.28%

PipeHawk Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PIP PipeHawk	N/A	GBX 2.25 flat	N/A	+63.6%	£817K	£2.80M	N/A	98
OTAQ OTAQ	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£3.04M	£4.29M	N/A	42	Gap Down
NNN nanosynth group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£2.58M	£85.65K	N/A	80	High Trading Volume
MSYS Microsaic Systems	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£1.47M	£8.66M	N/A	23
UBI Ubisense Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£0.00	N/A	N/A	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PIP) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

PipeHawk (PIP) Competitors

PIP vs. OTAQ, NNN, MSYS, UBI, and SXS

How does PipeHawk compare to OTAQ?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to nanosynth group?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Microsaic Systems?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Ubisense Group?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Spectris?

Summary

PIP vs. The Competition

PipeHawk Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

PipeHawk (PIP) Competitors

PIP vs. OTAQ, NNN, MSYS, UBI, and SXS

How does PipeHawk compare to OTAQ?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, PIP or OTAQ?

Is PIP or OTAQ more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PIP or OTAQ?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PIP or OTAQ?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to nanosynth group?

Which has more risk & volatility, PIP or NNN?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in PIP or NNN?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PIP or NNN?

Does the media refer more to PIP or NNN?

Is PIP or NNN more profitable?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Microsaic Systems?

Does the media refer more to PIP or MSYS?

Which has more volatility and risk, PIP or MSYS?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in PIP or MSYS?

Is PIP or MSYS more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, PIP or MSYS?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Ubisense Group?

Does the media refer more to UBI or PIP?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in UBI or PIP?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, UBI or PIP?

Is UBI or PIP more profitable?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Spectris?

Do analysts rate PIP or SXS?

Does the media prefer PIP or SXS?

Which has more volatility & risk, PIP or SXS?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, PIP or SXS?

Is PIP or SXS more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PIP or SXS?

Summary

PIP vs. The Competition

PipeHawk Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools