Which has higher earnings & valuation, PIP or NNN?

PipeHawk has higher revenue and earnings than nanosynth group. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PipeHawk £2.80M 0.27 -£1.69M -£2.23 N/A nanosynth group £85.65K 0.00 -£3.78M N/A N/A

Is MSYS or PIP more profitable?

PipeHawk has a net margin of -29.06% compared to Microsaic Systems' net margin of -527.85%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Microsaic Systems' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Microsaic Systems -527.85% -181.40% -32.37% PipeHawk -29.06% 12.25% -7.84%

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PIP or UBI?

Ubisense Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PipeHawk. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PipeHawk £2.80M 0.27 -£1.69M -£2.23 N/A Ubisense Group N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer PIP or SXS?

Spectris has a consensus price target of GBX 4,147, indicating a potential upside of 0.12%. Given Spectris' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Spectris is more favorable than PipeHawk. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score PipeHawk 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Spectris 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PIP or SXS?

Spectris has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Spectris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PipeHawk £2.80M 0.27 -£1.69M -£2.23 N/A Spectris £1.35B 3.06 £270.93M £57.60 71.91

Is PIP or SXS more profitable?

Spectris has a net margin of 4.31% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Spectris' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PipeHawk -29.06% 12.25% -7.84% Spectris 4.31% 4.30% 5.42%

Do analysts recommend RSW or PIP?

Renishaw currently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,763.33, suggesting a potential downside of 25.90%. Given Renishaw's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Renishaw is more favorable than PipeHawk. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Renishaw 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25 PipeHawk 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher earnings & valuation, RSW or PIP?

Renishaw has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renishaw, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Renishaw £737.26M 5.01 £96.00M £101.90 49.84 PipeHawk £2.80M 0.27 -£1.69M -£2.23 N/A

Is RSW or PIP more profitable?

Renishaw has a net margin of 10.06% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Renishaw's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Renishaw 10.06% 8.06% 6.85% PipeHawk -29.06% 12.25% -7.84%

PipeHawk (PIP) Competitors

GBX 2.05 -0.45 (-18.00%)

As of 11:21 AM Eastern

Compare

PIP vs. NNN, MSYS, UBI, SXS, and RSW

Should you buy PipeHawk stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares PipeHawk with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with PipeHawk include nanosynth group (NNN), Microsaic Systems (MSYS), Ubisense Group (UBI), Spectris (SXS), and Renishaw (RSW). These companies are all part of the "scientific & technical instruments" industry.

How does PipeHawk compare to nanosynth group?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and nanosynth group (LON:NNN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

PipeHawk has a beta of 0.506, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, nanosynth group has a beta of 0.19, indicating that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

PipeHawk has higher revenue and earnings than nanosynth group.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.27	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A
nanosynth group	£85.65K	0.00	-£3.78M	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled nanosynth group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk	Neutral
nanosynth group	Neutral

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.6% of nanosynth group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

nanosynth group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat nanosynth group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%
nanosynth group	N/A	-72.61%	-40.84%

Summary

PipeHawk beats nanosynth group on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Microsaic Systems?

Microsaic Systems (LON:MSYS) and PipeHawk (LON:PIP) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Microsaic Systems has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PipeHawk has a beta of 0.506, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

PipeHawk has a net margin of -29.06% compared to Microsaic Systems' net margin of -527.85%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Microsaic Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Microsaic Systems	-527.85%	-181.40%	-32.37%
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%

In the previous week, Microsaic Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PipeHawk'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Microsaic Systems	Neutral
PipeHawk	Neutral

14.3% of Microsaic Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. 17.2% of Microsaic Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PipeHawk has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Microsaic Systems. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Microsaic Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Microsaic Systems	£8.66M	0.00	-£45.72M	-£25.52	N/A
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.27	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A

Summary

PipeHawk beats Microsaic Systems on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Ubisense Group?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and Ubisense Group (LON:UBI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Ubisense Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Ubisense Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%
Ubisense Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ubisense Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk	Neutral
Ubisense Group	Neutral

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ubisense Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PipeHawk.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.27	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A
Ubisense Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

PipeHawk beats Ubisense Group on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Spectris?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and Spectris (LON:SXS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.2% of Spectris shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Spectris shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Spectris has a consensus price target of GBX 4,147, indicating a potential upside of 0.12%. Given Spectris' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Spectris is more favorable than PipeHawk.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PipeHawk	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Spectris	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Spectris has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Spectris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.27	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A
Spectris	£1.35B	3.06	£270.93M	£57.60	71.91

Spectris has a net margin of 4.31% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Spectris' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%
Spectris	4.31%	4.30%	5.42%

PipeHawk has a beta of 0.506, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Spectris has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Spectris'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk	Neutral
Spectris	Neutral

Summary

Spectris beats PipeHawk on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Renishaw?

Renishaw (LON:RSW) and PipeHawk (LON:PIP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, Renishaw's average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat PipeHawk's score of 0.00 indicating that Renishaw is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Renishaw	Very Positive
PipeHawk	Neutral

Renishaw has a net margin of 10.06% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Renishaw's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Renishaw	10.06%	8.06%	6.85%
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%

Renishaw has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renishaw, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Renishaw	£737.26M	5.01	£96.00M	£101.90	49.84
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.27	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A

Renishaw has a beta of 1.146, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PipeHawk has a beta of 0.506, indicating that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Renishaw currently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,763.33, suggesting a potential downside of 25.90%. Given Renishaw's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Renishaw is more favorable than PipeHawk.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Renishaw	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
PipeHawk	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

25.3% of Renishaw shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of PipeHawk shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.9% of Renishaw shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Renishaw beats PipeHawk on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PipeHawk News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PIP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	PipeHawk	Scientific & Technical Instruments Industry	Computer Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£744K	£2.29B	£39.41B	£2.78B
Dividend Yield	1.28%	2.81%	3.27%	6.16%
P/E Ratio	-0.92	71.19	169.90	365.72
Price / Sales	0.27	144.65	625.41	86,253.69
Price / Cash	7.34	20.29	48.53	27.85
Price / Book	-0.12	3.90	9.58	7.92
Net Income	-£1.69M	£82.40M	£1.07B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-31.67%	-1.02%	-1.41%	-0.87%
1 Month Performance	-23.13%	-4.56%	0.99%	-0.76%
1 Year Performance	21.45%	23.19%	159.21%	70.67%

PipeHawk Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PIP PipeHawk	N/A	GBX 2.05 -18.0%	N/A	+76.5%	£744K	£2.80M	N/A	98	Gap Down
NNN nanosynth group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£2.58M	£85.65K	N/A	80	High Trading Volume
MSYS Microsaic Systems	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£1.47M	£8.66M	N/A	23
UBI Ubisense Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£0.00	N/A	N/A	N/A
SXS Spectris	N/A	GBX 4,142 flat	GBX 4,147 +0.1%	+23.7%	£4.12B	£1.35B	71.91	7,266

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PIP) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

PipeHawk (PIP) Competitors

PIP vs. NNN, MSYS, UBI, SXS, and RSW

How does PipeHawk compare to nanosynth group?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Microsaic Systems?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Ubisense Group?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Spectris?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Renishaw?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

PIP vs. The Competition

PipeHawk Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

PipeHawk (PIP) Competitors

PIP vs. NNN, MSYS, UBI, SXS, and RSW

How does PipeHawk compare to nanosynth group?

Which has more volatility and risk, PIP or NNN?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, PIP or NNN?

Does the media prefer PIP or NNN?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in PIP or NNN?

Is PIP or NNN more profitable?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Microsaic Systems?

Which has more risk and volatility, MSYS or PIP?

Is MSYS or PIP more profitable?

Does the media prefer MSYS or PIP?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MSYS or PIP?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MSYS or PIP?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Ubisense Group?

Is PIP or UBI more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PIP or UBI?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PIP or UBI?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PIP or UBI?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Spectris?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PIP or SXS?

Do analysts prefer PIP or SXS?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PIP or SXS?

Is PIP or SXS more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, PIP or SXS?

Does the media refer more to PIP or SXS?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Renishaw?

Does the media favor RSW or PIP?

Is RSW or PIP more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, RSW or PIP?

Which has more risk and volatility, RSW or PIP?

Do analysts recommend RSW or PIP?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of RSW or PIP?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

PIP vs. The Competition

PipeHawk Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools