Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PIP or NNN?

PipeHawk has higher revenue and earnings than nanosynth group. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PipeHawk £2.80M 0.26 -£1.69M -£2.23 N/A nanosynth group £85.65K 0.00 -£3.78M N/A N/A

Is MSYS or PIP more profitable?

PipeHawk has a net margin of -29.06% compared to Microsaic Systems' net margin of -527.85%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Microsaic Systems' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Microsaic Systems -527.85% -181.40% -32.37% PipeHawk -29.06% 12.25% -7.84%

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PIP or UBI?

Ubisense Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PipeHawk. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PipeHawk £2.80M 0.26 -£1.69M -£2.23 N/A Ubisense Group N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

PipeHawk (PIP) Competitors

GBX 2.01 +0.11 (+5.79%)

As of 06:46 AM Eastern

Compare

PIP vs. NNN, HDT, MSYS, TWD, and UBI

Should you buy PipeHawk stock or one of its competitors? PipeHawk's main competitors and comparable companies include nanosynth group (NNN), Holders Technology (HDT), Microsaic Systems (MSYS), Trackwise Designs (TWD), and Ubisense Group (UBI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment, instruments & components" industry.

How does PipeHawk compare to nanosynth group?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and nanosynth group (LON:NNN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.6% of nanosynth group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled nanosynth group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk	Neutral
nanosynth group	Neutral

PipeHawk has a beta of 0.499, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, nanosynth group has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

PipeHawk has higher revenue and earnings than nanosynth group.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.26	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A
nanosynth group	£85.65K	0.00	-£3.78M	N/A	N/A

nanosynth group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat nanosynth group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%
nanosynth group	N/A	-72.61%	-40.84%

Summary

PipeHawk beats nanosynth group on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Holders Technology?

Holders Technology (LON:HDT) and PipeHawk (LON:PIP) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Holders Technology has higher revenue and earnings than PipeHawk. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Holders Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Holders Technology	£8.73M	0.00	N/A	-£0.13	N/A
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.26	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A

In the previous week, Holders Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PipeHawk'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Holders Technology	Neutral
PipeHawk	Neutral

10.4% of Holders Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of PipeHawk shares are owned by institutional investors. 176.7% of Holders Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Holders Technology has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PipeHawk has a beta of 0.499, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Holders Technology has a net margin of -6.19% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Holders Technology's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Holders Technology	-6.19%	-13.85%	-5.36%
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%

Summary

Holders Technology beats PipeHawk on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Microsaic Systems?

Microsaic Systems (LON:MSYS) and PipeHawk (LON:PIP) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

PipeHawk has a net margin of -29.06% compared to Microsaic Systems' net margin of -527.85%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Microsaic Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Microsaic Systems	-527.85%	-181.40%	-32.37%
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%

14.3% of Microsaic Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of PipeHawk shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.2% of Microsaic Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Microsaic Systems has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PipeHawk has a beta of 0.499, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Microsaic Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PipeHawk'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Microsaic Systems	Neutral
PipeHawk	Neutral

PipeHawk has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Microsaic Systems. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Microsaic Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Microsaic Systems	£8.66M	0.00	-£45.72M	-£25.52	N/A
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.26	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A

Summary

PipeHawk beats Microsaic Systems on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Trackwise Designs?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and Trackwise Designs (LON:TWD) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

PipeHawk has a beta of 0.499, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trackwise Designs has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

PipeHawk has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trackwise Designs. PipeHawk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trackwise Designs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.26	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A
Trackwise Designs	£7.70M	0.00	-£2.48M	-£0.02	N/A

PipeHawk has a net margin of -29.06% compared to Trackwise Designs' net margin of -32.13%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Trackwise Designs' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%
Trackwise Designs	-32.13%	-9.33%	-0.64%

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trackwise Designs'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk	Neutral
Trackwise Designs	Neutral

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.1% of Trackwise Designs shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.0% of Trackwise Designs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

PipeHawk and Trackwise Designs tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PipeHawk compare to Ubisense Group?

PipeHawk (LON:PIP) and Ubisense Group (LON:UBI) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk and analyst recommendations.

Ubisense Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PipeHawk.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PipeHawk	£2.80M	0.26	-£1.69M	-£2.23	N/A
Ubisense Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, PipeHawk's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ubisense Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PipeHawk	Neutral
Ubisense Group	Neutral

Ubisense Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PipeHawk's net margin of -29.06%. PipeHawk's return on equity of 12.25% beat Ubisense Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PipeHawk	-29.06%	12.25%	-7.84%
Ubisense Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

1.1% of PipeHawk shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of PipeHawk shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

PipeHawk beats Ubisense Group on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PipeHawk News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

PIP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	PipeHawk	Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry	Technology Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£730K	£9.38B	£31.66B	£2.80B
Dividend Yield	1.28%	2.26%	2.75%	6.18%
P/E Ratio	-0.90	29.38	81.36	366.17
Price / Sales	0.26	41.55	589.18	89,425.29
Price / Cash	7.34	37.68	49.13	27.89
Price / Book	-0.12	4.71	8.12	6.83
Net Income	-£1.69M	£202.36M	£702.36M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-12.61%	0.85%	114.86%	-0.75%
1 Month Performance	12.92%	1.65%	74.28%	16.84%
1 Year Performance	29.43%	773.37%	168.48%	16.40%

PipeHawk Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PIP PipeHawk	N/A	GBX 2.01 +5.8%	N/A	+48.1%	£730K	£2.80M	N/A	98	Gap Up
NNN nanosynth group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£2.58M	£85.65K	N/A	80	High Trading Volume
HDT Holders Technology	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£2.13M	£8.73M	N/A	53
MSYS Microsaic Systems	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£1.47M	£8.66M	N/A	23
TWD Trackwise Designs	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£899K	£7.70M	N/A	132

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PIP) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

PipeHawk (PIP) Competitors

PIP vs. NNN, HDT, MSYS, TWD, and UBI

How does PipeHawk compare to nanosynth group?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Holders Technology?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Microsaic Systems?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Trackwise Designs?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Ubisense Group?

Summary

PIP vs. The Competition

PipeHawk Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

PipeHawk (PIP) Competitors

PIP vs. NNN, HDT, MSYS, TWD, and UBI

How does PipeHawk compare to nanosynth group?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in PIP or NNN?

Does the media prefer PIP or NNN?

Which has more risk & volatility, PIP or NNN?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PIP or NNN?

Is PIP or NNN more profitable?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Holders Technology?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, HDT or PIP?

Does the media prefer HDT or PIP?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in HDT or PIP?

Which has more risk and volatility, HDT or PIP?

Is HDT or PIP more profitable?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Microsaic Systems?

Is MSYS or PIP more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MSYS or PIP?

Which has more volatility and risk, MSYS or PIP?

Does the media prefer MSYS or PIP?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, MSYS or PIP?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Trackwise Designs?

Which has more risk and volatility, PIP or TWD?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PIP or TWD?

Is PIP or TWD more profitable?

Does the media favor PIP or TWD?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PIP or TWD?

Summary

How does PipeHawk compare to Ubisense Group?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PIP or UBI?

Does the media favor PIP or UBI?

Is PIP or UBI more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PIP or UBI?

Summary

PIP vs. The Competition

PipeHawk Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools