Go Pro

Polar Capital (POLR) Competitors

Polar Capital logo
GBX 877 +2.00 (+0.23%)
As of 07/20/2026 12:44 PM Eastern

POLR vs. PHLL, JGGI, CTY, TEM, and QLT

Should you buy Polar Capital stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Polar Capital with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Polar Capital include Petershill Partners (PHLL), JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (JGGI), City of London (CTY), Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM), and Quilter (QLT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Polar Capital compare to Petershill Partners?

Petershill Partners (LON:PHLL) and Polar Capital (LON:POLR) are both asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

Petershill Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Polar Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Petershill Partners pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polar Capital pays out 77.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Petershill Partners has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital has a beta of 0.928, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

3.7% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.0% of Polar Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Polar Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Petershill Partners has a net margin of 67.97% compared to Polar Capital's net margin of 21.43%. Polar Capital's return on equity of 42.37% beat Petershill Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petershill Partners67.97% 16.42% 5.95%
Polar Capital 21.43%42.37%14.85%

Petershill Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Capital. Petershill Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petershill Partners£1.15B2.93£420.55M£86.433.59
Polar Capital£264.30M3.13£41.05M£59.2014.81

Petershill Partners presently has a consensus price target of GBX 311.33, indicating a potential upside of 0.27%. Polar Capital has a consensus price target of GBX 1,045, indicating a potential upside of 19.16%. Given Polar Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Polar Capital is more favorable than Petershill Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Petershill Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Polar Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Petershill Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Polar Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Petershill Partners Neutral
Polar Capital Neutral

Summary

Polar Capital beats Petershill Partners on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital compare to JPMorgan Global Growth & Income?

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (LON:JGGI) and Polar Capital (LON:POLR) are both asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a net margin of 91.40% compared to Polar Capital's net margin of 21.43%. Polar Capital's return on equity of 42.37% beat JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income91.40% 7.63% 10.62%
Polar Capital 21.43%42.37%14.85%

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Polar Capital. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income£255.23M12.99£625.87M£41.8114.53
Polar Capital£264.30M3.13£41.05M£59.2014.81

7.1% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.0% of Polar Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Polar Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Polar Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polar Capital pays out 77.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Polar Capital has a consensus price target of GBX 1,045, indicating a potential upside of 19.16%. Given Polar Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Polar Capital is more favorable than JPMorgan Global Growth & Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Polar Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Polar Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income Neutral
Polar Capital Neutral

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a beta of 0.79442686, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital has a beta of 0.928, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Polar Capital beats JPMorgan Global Growth & Income on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital compare to City of London?

City of London (LON:CTY) and Polar Capital (LON:POLR) are both asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Polar Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polar Capital pays out 77.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

City of London has a net margin of 97.40% compared to Polar Capital's net margin of 21.43%. Polar Capital's return on equity of 42.37% beat City of London's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London97.40% 22.92% 4.00%
Polar Capital 21.43%42.37%14.85%

Polar Capital has a consensus price target of GBX 1,045, indicating a potential upside of 19.16%. Given Polar Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Polar Capital is more favorable than City of London.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
City of London
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Polar Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, City of London had 2 more articles in the media than Polar Capital. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for City of London and 0 mentions for Polar Capital. City of London's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat Polar Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that City of London is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Neutral
Polar Capital Neutral

8.7% of City of London shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.0% of Polar Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of City of London shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Polar Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

City of London has a beta of 0.502, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital has a beta of 0.928, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Capital. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London£568.96M5.28£294.08M£113.995.11
Polar Capital£264.30M3.13£41.05M£59.2014.81

Summary

Polar Capital beats City of London on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and Polar Capital (LON:POLR) are both asset management industry companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability and valuation.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a net margin of 96.24% compared to Polar Capital's net margin of 21.43%. Polar Capital's return on equity of 42.37% beat Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust96.24% 31.30% 4.50%
Polar Capital 21.43%42.37%14.85%

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Polar Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Neutral
Polar Capital Neutral

10.9% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.0% of Polar Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Polar Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.0834277, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital has a beta of 0.928, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Polar Capital has a consensus price target of GBX 1,045, indicating a potential upside of 19.16%. Given Polar Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Polar Capital is more favorable than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Polar Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Polar Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polar Capital pays out 77.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Capital. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.64£130.50M£77.543.95
Polar Capital£264.30M3.13£41.05M£59.2014.81

Summary

Polar Capital beats Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital compare to Quilter?

Polar Capital (LON:POLR) and Quilter (LON:QLT) are both asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Polar Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Polar Capital pays out 77.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Quilter pays out 72.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Polar Capital has a beta of 0.928, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quilter has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Polar Capital currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,045, indicating a potential upside of 19.16%. Quilter has a consensus target price of GBX 203.71, indicating a potential downside of 0.14%. Given Polar Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Polar Capital is more favorable than Quilter.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Polar Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Quilter
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Quilter has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Capital. Polar Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quilter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital£264.30M3.13£41.05M£59.2014.81
Quilter£9.34B0.30£49.61M£8.6023.72

32.0% of Polar Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.4% of Quilter shares are held by institutional investors. 12.9% of Polar Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Quilter shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Quilter had 2 more articles in the media than Polar Capital. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Quilter and 0 mentions for Polar Capital. Quilter's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Polar Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Quilter is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Neutral
Quilter Positive

Polar Capital has a net margin of 21.43% compared to Quilter's net margin of 1.28%. Polar Capital's return on equity of 42.37% beat Quilter's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital21.43% 42.37% 14.85%
Quilter 1.28%8.35%0.21%

Summary

Polar Capital beats Quilter on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Polar Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for POLR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding POLR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

POLR vs. The Competition

MetricPolar CapitalAsset Management IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£826.01M£2.42B£14.38B£2.77B
Dividend Yield5.26%6.02%5.67%6.16%
P/E Ratio14.8161.7120.55368.03
Price / Sales3.131,875.6044.4284,416.01
Price / Cash2.6860.5019.2427.89
Price / Book6.861.312.267.61
Net Income£41.05M£265.96M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.94%-0.65%0.19%-0.15%
1 Month Performance3.54%-0.49%1.38%-0.86%
1 Year Performance82.14%6.68%13.19%61.61%

Polar Capital Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
POLR
Polar Capital
3.3411 of 5 stars
GBX 877
+0.2%
GBX 1,045
+19.2%
+82.5%£826.01M£264.30M14.81135
PHLL
Petershill Partners
N/AGBX 310.50
flat
GBX 311.33
+0.3%
N/A£3.36B£1.15B3.59N/A
JGGI
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income
N/AGBX 614
+0.7%
N/A+8.1%£3.35B£255.23M14.69N/A
CTY
City of London
N/AGBX 582
+1.2%
N/A+17.7%£3.00B£568.96M5.11N/A
TEM
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
N/AGBX 310.21
-1.5%
N/A+56.2%£2.88B£781.18M4.00N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:POLR) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners