Go Pro
→ Elon did WHAT?! (From Brownstone Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free SMIF Stock Alerts

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (SMIF) Competitors

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund logo
GBX 85.80 +0.10 (+0.12%)
As of 07/24/2026 11:54 AM Eastern
Compare

SMIF vs. JFJ, FCSS, GROW, GSS, and EDIN

Should you buy TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund include JPMorgan Japanese (JFJ), Fidelity China Special (FCSS), Molten Ventures (GROW), Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (GSS), and Edinburgh Investment (EDIN). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund compare to JPMorgan Japanese?

JPMorgan Japanese (LON:JFJ) and TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (LON:SMIF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

JPMorgan Japanese has higher revenue and earnings than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. JPMorgan Japanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan Japanese£245.55M4.85£194.81M£149.065.27
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund£17.70M17.28N/A£5.7514.92

JPMorgan Japanese has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a beta of 0.6692135, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

JPMorgan Japanese has a net margin of 96.52% compared to TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's net margin of 57.51%. JPMorgan Japanese's return on equity of 20.00% beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan Japanese96.52% 20.00% 8.06%
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund 57.51%5.95%N/A

JPMorgan Japanese pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.2%. JPMorgan Japanese pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays out 122.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

18.9% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.1% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, JPMorgan Japanese's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan Japanese Neutral
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund Neutral

Summary

JPMorgan Japanese beats TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund compare to Fidelity China Special?

Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) and TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (LON:SMIF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and profitability.

Fidelity China Special has higher revenue and earnings than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. Fidelity China Special is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity China Special£146.54M8.00£997.06M£29.758.64
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund£17.70M17.28N/A£5.7514.92

Fidelity China Special has a net margin of 81.41% compared to TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's net margin of 57.51%. Fidelity China Special's return on equity of 9.12% beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity China Special81.41% 9.12% N/A
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund 57.51%5.95%N/A

Fidelity China Special pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.2%. Fidelity China Special pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays out 122.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.1% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity China Special is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity China Special Positive
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund Neutral

Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.88374627, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a beta of 0.6692135, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fidelity China Special beats TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund compare to Molten Ventures?

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (LON:SMIF) and Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 75.09% compared to TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's net margin of 57.51%. Molten Ventures' return on equity of 9.21% beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund57.51% 5.95% N/A
Molten Ventures 75.09%9.21%-3.46%

Molten Ventures has a consensus target price of GBX 638.67, indicating a potential upside of 2.60%. Given Molten Ventures' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Molten Ventures is more favorable than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Molten Ventures'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund Neutral
Molten Ventures Neutral

15.1% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.0% of Molten Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a beta of 0.6692135, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.9573506, meaning that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Molten Ventures. Molten Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund£17.70M17.28N/A£5.7514.92
Molten Ventures£148M7.24-£33.58M£69.009.02

Summary

Molten Ventures beats TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund compare to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund?

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (LON:SMIF) and Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (LON:GSS) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Genesis Emerging Markets Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund Neutral
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund Neutral

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.2%. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.17 per share. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays out 122.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a net margin of 57.51% compared to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's net margin of 0.00%. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's return on equity of 5.95% beat Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund57.51% 5.95% N/A
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund N/A N/A N/A

15.1% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Genesis Emerging Markets Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund£17.70M17.28N/A£5.7514.92
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund£250.40M0.00N/A£140.70N/A

Summary

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund beats Genesis Emerging Markets Fund on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund compare to Edinburgh Investment?

Edinburgh Investment (LON:EDIN) and TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (LON:SMIF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Edinburgh Investment had 3 more articles in the media than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Edinburgh Investment and 0 mentions for TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. Edinburgh Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.74 beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Edinburgh Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Edinburgh Investment Very Positive
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund Neutral

Edinburgh Investment has higher revenue and earnings than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. Edinburgh Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Edinburgh Investment£79.43M13.14£180.50M£55.9114.72
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund£17.70M17.28N/A£5.7514.92

9.7% of Edinburgh Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.1% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Edinburgh Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Edinburgh Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 30.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.2%. Edinburgh Investment pays out 54.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays out 122.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Edinburgh Investment has a beta of 0.968503, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a beta of 0.6692135, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Edinburgh Investment has a net margin of 89.72% compared to TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's net margin of 57.51%. Edinburgh Investment's return on equity of 7.03% beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Edinburgh Investment89.72% 7.03% 6.69%
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund 57.51%5.95%N/A

Summary

Edinburgh Investment beats TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SMIF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SMIF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SMIF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTwentyFour Select Monthly Income FundAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£305.97M£2.53B£5.53B£2.58B
Dividend Yield8.21%6.05%5.26%6.17%
P/E Ratio14.9261.3429.41368.39
Price / Sales17.281,784.801,138.5384,422.84
Price / CashN/A60.50114.0027.89
Price / BookN/A1.306.687.41
Net IncomeN/A£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.58%-0.68%-0.46%0.39%
1 Month Performance-0.41%-0.58%-0.18%0.27%
1 Year Performance-1.38%6.32%13.15%68.12%

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SMIF
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund
N/AGBX 85.80
+0.1%		N/A-1.4%£305.97M£17.70M14.92N/A
JFJ
JPMorgan Japanese
N/AGBX 785.06
+0.1%		N/A+20.4%£1.19B£245.55M5.27N/A
FCSS
Fidelity China Special
N/AGBX 257
-0.2%		N/A-7.9%£1.17B£146.54M8.64N/A
GROW
Molten Ventures
1.1664 of 5 stars		GBX 622.50
+4.7%		GBX 638.67
+2.6%		+78.6%£1.07B£148M9.0220
GSS
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.06B£250.40M6.181,626

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SMIF) was last updated on 7/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran
For a moment… Forget about Trump’s ties to Israel. Forget about reports of Iran’s nuclear program. Be...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Oxford Club Analyst’s Urgent AI Warning
Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist at The Oxford Club, is sharing a private presentation with a warn...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
This tiny piece of glass could be bigger than GPUs
Jensen Huang says AI can't scale without it. Google Ventures calls it the future of AI compute. Sequoia Capita...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The 90%-off options that empty accounts
A call that cost $3.00 last month now trades for $0.30 - a 90% discount that looks tempting. It's not a bar...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Have you seen Elon’s new “supercurrency”? (It affects you)
Elon Musk just became the world's first trillionaire following the biggest IPO in history, giving him access t...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel