Go Pro
→ The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month (From Investors Alley) (Ad)tc pixel Free SMIF Stock Alerts

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (SMIF) Competitors

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund logo
GBX 86.50 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 12:03 PM Eastern
Compare

SMIF vs. FCSS, GROW, EDIN, GSS, and SDP

Should you buy TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund stock or one of its competitors? TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's main competitors and comparable companies include Fidelity China Special (FCSS), Molten Ventures (GROW), Edinburgh Investment (EDIN), Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (GSS), and Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (SDP). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund compare to Fidelity China Special?

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (LON:SMIF) and Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends and institutional ownership.

15.1% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a beta of 0.6692135, meaning that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.908, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.2%. Fidelity China Special pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays out 122.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fidelity China Special pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Fidelity China Special has a net margin of 81.41% compared to TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's net margin of 57.51%. Fidelity China Special's return on equity of 9.12% beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund57.51% 5.95% N/A
Fidelity China Special 81.41%9.12%N/A

In the previous week, TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund had 1 more articles in the media than Fidelity China Special. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund and 1 mentions for Fidelity China Special. Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity China Special is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Fidelity China Special
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Fidelity China Special has higher revenue and earnings than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. Fidelity China Special is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund£17.70M17.65N/A£5.7515.04
Fidelity China Special£146.54M8.23£997.06M£29.758.91

Summary

Fidelity China Special beats TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund compare to Molten Ventures?

Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) and TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (LON:SMIF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Molten Ventures presently has a consensus target price of GBX 638.67, suggesting a potential downside of 6.08%. Given Molten Ventures' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Molten Ventures is more favorable than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Molten Ventures. Molten Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Molten Ventures£148M7.96-£33.58M£69.009.86
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund£17.70M17.65N/A£5.7515.04

In the previous week, Molten Ventures and Molten Ventures both had 2 articles in the media. Molten Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Molten Ventures
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 75.09% compared to TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's net margin of 57.51%. Molten Ventures' return on equity of 9.21% beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Molten Ventures75.09% 9.21% -3.46%
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund 57.51%5.95%N/A

Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.9564402, meaning that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a beta of 0.6692135, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

40.6% of Molten Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.1% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Molten Ventures beats TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund compare to Edinburgh Investment?

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (LON:SMIF) and Edinburgh Investment (LON:EDIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Edinburgh Investment has higher revenue and earnings than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Edinburgh Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund£17.70M17.65N/A£5.7515.04
Edinburgh Investment£79.43M13.33£180.50M£55.9115.10

15.1% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.7% of Edinburgh Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Edinburgh Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Edinburgh Investment had 4 more articles in the media than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Edinburgh Investment and 2 mentions for TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. Edinburgh Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Edinburgh Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Edinburgh Investment
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a beta of 0.6692135, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Edinburgh Investment has a beta of 0.967, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.2%. Edinburgh Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 30.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays out 122.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Edinburgh Investment pays out 54.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Edinburgh Investment has a net margin of 89.72% compared to TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's net margin of 57.51%. Edinburgh Investment's return on equity of 7.03% beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund57.51% 5.95% N/A
Edinburgh Investment 89.72%7.03%6.69%

Summary

Edinburgh Investment beats TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund compare to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund?

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (LON:SMIF) and Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (LON:GSS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund had 2 more articles in the media than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund and 0 mentions for Genesis Emerging Markets Fund. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Genesis Emerging Markets Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund Neutral
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund Neutral

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a net margin of 57.51% compared to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's net margin of 0.00%. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's return on equity of 5.95% beat Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund57.51% 5.95% N/A
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund N/A N/A N/A

15.1% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Genesis Emerging Markets Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund£17.70M17.65N/A£5.7515.04
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund£250.40M0.00N/A£140.70N/A

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.2%. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.17 per share. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays out 122.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund beats Genesis Emerging Markets Fund on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund compare to Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund?

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (LON:SDP) and TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (LON:SMIF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has a net margin of 95.12% compared to TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's net margin of 57.51%. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's return on equity of 20.01% beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund95.12% 20.01% -1.73%
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund 57.51%5.95%N/A

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has higher revenue and earnings than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund£191.10M5.51£121.21M£135.646.20
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund£17.70M17.65N/A£5.7515.04

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.2%. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays out 122.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

17.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.1% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has a beta of 0.964, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a beta of 0.6692135, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund had 2 more articles in the media than Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund and 0 mentions for Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund Neutral
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund Neutral

Summary

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund beats TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SMIF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SMIF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SMIF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTwentyFour Select Monthly Income FundCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£312.57M£5.64B£14.01B£2.88B
Dividend Yield8.15%7.39%5.87%6.10%
P/E Ratio15.0438.4029.39368.46
Price / Sales17.651,201.87508.6883,426.45
Price / CashN/A48.2830.4227.89
Price / BookN/A3.742.847.08
Net IncomeN/A£417.12M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.38%0.64%0.54%
1 Month Performance0.23%1.34%1.58%3.02%
1 Year Performance-1.70%6.49%11.85%64.50%

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SMIF
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund
N/AGBX 86.50
flat		N/A-1.7%£312.57M£17.70M15.04N/A
FCSS
Fidelity China Special
N/AGBX 263
+0.2%		N/A-9.5%£1.20B£146.54M8.84N/A
GROW
Molten Ventures
0.8212 of 5 stars		GBX 687.50
+0.5%		GBX 638.67
-7.1%		+87.9%£1.19B£148M9.9620
EDIN
Edinburgh Investment
N/AGBX 849.01
+0.1%		N/A+6.9%£1.07B£79.43M15.19N/A
GSS
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.06B£250.40M6.181,626

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SMIF) was last updated on 8/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel