Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ Buy this stock today (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free SMIF Stock Alerts

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (SMIF) Competitors

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund logo
GBX 86.16 -0.04 (-0.05%)
As of 12:19 PM Eastern
Compare

SMIF vs. FCSS, TMPL, IHP, SDP, and GSS

Should you buy TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund include Fidelity China Special (FCSS), Temple Bar (TMPL), IntegraFin (IHP), Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (SDP), and Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (GSS). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund compare to Fidelity China Special?

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (LON:SMIF) and Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Fidelity China Special pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays out 73.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity China Special pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fidelity China Special'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund Neutral
Fidelity China Special Neutral

4.9% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity China Special has a net margin of 81.41% compared to TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's net margin of 57.51%. Fidelity China Special's return on equity of 9.12% beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund57.51% 5.95% N/A
Fidelity China Special 81.41%9.12%N/A

Fidelity China Special has higher revenue and earnings than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. Fidelity China Special is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund£28.22M10.78N/A£9.708.88
Fidelity China Special£559.02M2.03£997.06M£112.602.19

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a beta of 0.66879916, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.88140285, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fidelity China Special beats TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund compare to Temple Bar?

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (LON:SMIF) and Temple Bar (LON:TMPL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Temple Bar has higher revenue and earnings than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. Temple Bar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund£28.22M10.78N/A£9.708.88
Temple Bar£281.60M4.23£154.90M£97.004.05

In the previous week, TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Temple Bar'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund Neutral
Temple Bar Neutral

Temple Bar has a net margin of 82.15% compared to TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's net margin of 57.51%. Temple Bar's return on equity of 27.93% beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund57.51% 5.95% N/A
Temple Bar 82.15%27.93%7.08%

4.9% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Temple Bar shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Temple Bar shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Temple Bar pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays out 73.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Temple Bar pays out 14.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a beta of 0.66879916, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Temple Bar has a beta of 1.1508299, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Temple Bar beats TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund compare to IntegraFin?

IntegraFin (LON:IHP) and TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (LON:SMIF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

IntegraFin currently has a consensus target price of GBX 423, indicating a potential upside of 20.17%. Given IntegraFin's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe IntegraFin is more favorable than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IntegraFin
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

IntegraFin pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. IntegraFin pays out 59.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays out 73.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

IntegraFin has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a beta of 0.66879916, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, IntegraFin had 4 more articles in the media than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for IntegraFin and 0 mentions for TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. IntegraFin's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that IntegraFin is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
IntegraFin Positive
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund Neutral

IntegraFin has higher revenue and earnings than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IntegraFin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IntegraFin£165.40M7.03£52.54M£19.1018.43
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund£28.22M10.78N/A£9.708.88

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a net margin of 57.51% compared to IntegraFin's net margin of 28.60%. IntegraFin's return on equity of 27.60% beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IntegraFin28.60% 27.60% 20.29%
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund 57.51%5.95%N/A

43.3% of IntegraFin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.9% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.5% of IntegraFin shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

IntegraFin beats TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund compare to Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund?

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (LON:SDP) and TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (LON:SMIF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

17.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.9% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays out 73.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has a beta of 1.0276442, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a beta of 0.66879916, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund had 1 more articles in the media than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund and 0 mentions for TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund Positive
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund Neutral

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has higher revenue and earnings than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund£191.10M5.66£121.21M£135.646.30
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund£28.22M10.78N/A£9.708.88

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has a net margin of 95.12% compared to TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's net margin of 57.51%. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's return on equity of 20.01% beat TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund95.12% 20.01% -1.73%
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund 57.51%5.95%N/A

Summary

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund beats TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund compare to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund?

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund (LON:SMIF) and Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (LON:GSS) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.17 per share. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund pays out 73.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Genesis Emerging Markets Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund Neutral
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund Neutral

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund has a net margin of 57.51% compared to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's net margin of 0.00%. TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund's return on equity of 5.95% beat Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund57.51% 5.95% N/A
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund N/A N/A N/A

4.9% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Genesis Emerging Markets Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund£28.22M10.78N/A£9.708.88
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund£250.40M0.00N/A£140.70N/A

Summary

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund beats Genesis Emerging Markets Fund on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SMIF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SMIF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SMIF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTwentyFour Select Monthly Income FundAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£304.22M£2.38B£5.97B£2.77B
Dividend Yield8.21%6.02%5.26%6.16%
P/E Ratio8.8860.2629.29366.66
Price / Sales10.782,054.671,107.4285,978.63
Price / CashN/A60.3384.9827.87
Price / BookN/A1.386.687.76
Net IncomeN/A£265.27M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.18%-0.32%-0.37%-0.71%
1 Month Performance0.77%-0.34%0.36%-1.20%
1 Year Performance-0.74%9.04%18.33%65.93%

TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SMIF
TwentyFour Select Monthly Income Fund
N/AGBX 86.16
-0.1%		N/A-0.7%£304.22M£28.22M8.88N/A
FCSS
Fidelity China Special
N/AGBX 258.89
-1.2%		N/A-1.2%£1.19B£559.02M2.30N/A
TMPL
Temple Bar
N/AGBX 391.50
-0.6%		N/A+25.2%£1.19B£281.60M4.04N/A
IHP
IntegraFin
4.6397 of 5 stars		GBX 352.50
-1.9%		GBX 423
+20.0%		+13.7%£1.16B£165.40M18.463,520
SDP
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund
N/AGBX 877.85
-0.2%		N/A+55.8%£1.11B£191.10M6.47N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SMIF) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX just went public - and Whitney Tilson, Harvard MBA and 30-year Wall Street veteran, says buying in coul...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Solar is dead. Here’s what replaces it.
Starting July 4th, every new solar and wind project in America loses its federal tax credits. But one zero-car...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold Is About to Do Something It Hasn’t in 90 Years
The U.S. Treasury still carries America's gold reserves at $42 per ounce — a price set generations ago. Buried...
US Gold Bureau | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock is hoarding it. JPMorgan is hoarding it. Do you own it?
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
Print this before your next trade
Bill Poulos is offering his Smart Trade Options Checklist at no cost today - normally priced at $29.97. It'...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon Musk, Larry Fink & Brian Armstrong are ALL Piling into This
Elon Musk, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong are all quietly investing in the same te...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel