Go Pro
→ First Look: Elon’s “Starphone” (From Stansberry Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free SMJ Stock Alerts

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC (SMJ) Competitors

GBX 115 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 10/1/2026
Compare

SMJ vs. SFR, ROAD, CTO, BILN, and VANL

Should you buy J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC stock or one of its competitors? J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's main competitors and comparable companies include Severfield (SFR), Roadside Real Estate (ROAD), TClarke (CTO), Billington (BILN), and Van Elle (VANL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC compare to Severfield?

Severfield (LON:SFR) and J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC (LON:SMJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Severfield has a beta of 0.926, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a beta of 0.214, suggesting that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

Severfield presently has a consensus target price of GBX 44, indicating a potential upside of 16.07%. Given Severfield's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Severfield is more favorable than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Severfield
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

59.8% of Severfield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Severfield shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 71.4% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC had 1 more articles in the media than Severfield. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC and 0 mentions for Severfield. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Severfield's score of 0.00 indicating that J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Severfield Neutral
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC Very Positive

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a net margin of 17.61% compared to Severfield's net margin of -7.84%. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's return on equity of 3.92% beat Severfield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Severfield-7.84% -22.06% 4.69%
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC 17.61%3.92%0.82%

Severfield has higher revenue and earnings than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. Severfield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Severfield£454.25M0.25£15.24M-£12.03N/A
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC£29.00M1.54£1.61M£13.068.81

Summary

Severfield and J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC compare to Roadside Real Estate?

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC (LON:SMJ) and Roadside Real Estate (LON:ROAD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a net margin of 17.61% compared to Roadside Real Estate's net margin of -141.78%. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's return on equity of 3.92% beat Roadside Real Estate's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC17.61% 3.92% 0.82%
Roadside Real Estate -141.78%-11.33%N/A

Roadside Real Estate has lower revenue, but higher earnings than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. Roadside Real Estate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC£29.00M1.54£1.61M£13.068.81
Roadside Real Estate£2.70M36.92£41.90M-£1.51N/A

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a beta of 0.214, indicating that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Roadside Real Estate has a beta of 0.582, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC had 1 more articles in the media than Roadside Real Estate. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC and 0 mentions for Roadside Real Estate. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Roadside Real Estate's score of 0.00 indicating that J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC Very Positive
Roadside Real Estate Neutral

0.9% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.0% of Roadside Real Estate shares are held by institutional investors. 71.4% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 87.8% of Roadside Real Estate shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC beats Roadside Real Estate on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC compare to TClarke?

TClarke (LON:CTO) and J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC (LON:SMJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

TClarke has higher revenue and earnings than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. TClarke is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TClarke£491M0.00£6.50M£0.14N/A
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC£29.00M1.54£1.61M£13.068.81

TClarke pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. TClarke pays out 4,285.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a net margin of 17.61% compared to TClarke's net margin of 1.32%. TClarke's return on equity of 14.11% beat J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TClarke1.32% 14.11% 2.74%
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC 17.61%3.92%0.82%

In the previous week, J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC had 1 more articles in the media than TClarke. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC and 0 mentions for TClarke. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat TClarke's score of 0.00 indicating that J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TClarke Neutral
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC Very Positive

15.2% of TClarke shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are owned by institutional investors. 56.4% of TClarke shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 71.4% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TClarke has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a beta of 0.214, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

TClarke and J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC compare to Billington?

Billington (LON:BILN) and J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC (LON:SMJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Billington had 4 more articles in the media than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Billington and 1 mentions for J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Billington's score of 0.44 indicating that J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Billington
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a net margin of 17.61% compared to Billington's net margin of 2.03%. Billington's return on equity of 4.31% beat J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Billington2.03% 4.31% 10.37%
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC 17.61%3.92%0.82%

Billington has higher revenue and earnings than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Billington, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Billington£95.69M0.61£10.46M£10.0045.10
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC£29.00M1.54£1.61M£13.068.81

2.5% of Billington shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are held by institutional investors. 12.8% of Billington shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 71.4% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Billington has a beta of 0.551, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a beta of 0.214, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

Billington pays an annual dividend of GBX 25 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Billington pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Billington beats J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC compare to Van Elle?

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC (LON:SMJ) and Van Elle (LON:VANL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC had 1 more articles in the media than Van Elle. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC and 0 mentions for Van Elle. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Van Elle's score of 0.00 indicating that J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC Very Positive
Van Elle Neutral

0.9% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Van Elle shares are held by institutional investors. 71.4% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Van Elle shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Van Elle has higher revenue and earnings than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Van Elle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC£29.00M1.54£1.61M£13.068.81
Van Elle£140.48M0.40£4.27M£0.40130.00

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a net margin of 17.61% compared to Van Elle's net margin of 0.35%. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's return on equity of 3.92% beat Van Elle's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC17.61% 3.92% 0.82%
Van Elle 0.35%0.90%3.37%

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Van Elle pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Van Elle pays out 300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a beta of 0.214, suggesting that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Van Elle has a beta of 0.782, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC beats Van Elle on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SMJ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SMJ vs. The Competition

Export
MetricJ. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLCConstruction & Engineering IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£44.51M£7.95B£10.26B£2.80B
Dividend Yield2.83%2.67%96.75%6.18%
P/E Ratio8.8121.7525.44366.19
Price / Sales1.5459.37274.9989,457.53
Price / Cash2.0916.6323.8227.89
Price / Book0.365.144.816.85
Net Income£1.61M£487.38M£616.98M£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.66%-0.91%-0.89%-0.71%
1 Month Performance-4.17%-1.70%-1.80%16.92%
1 Year Performance-14.81%12.32%3.10%16.51%

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SMJ
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC
N/AGBX 115
flat		N/A-11.1%£44.51M£29.00M8.81152
SFR
Severfield
N/AGBX 38
flat		GBX 44
+15.8%		+28.5%£112.21M£454.25MN/A1,900
ROAD
Roadside Real Estate
N/AGBX 55.50
-0.9%		N/A-6.1%£98.94M£2.70MN/A3,790
CTO
TClarke
N/AN/AN/AN/A£84.08M£491M1,135.7130
BILN
Billington
N/AGBX 442.27
-0.6%		N/A+58.2%£56.85M£95.69M44.23463

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SMJ) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Elon Warns "America Will Go Bankrupt". Trump's Plan Inside.
National debt just crossed 40 trillion dollars, and Elon Musk says America is 1,000% going to go bankrupt with...
American Hartford Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
This AI fund posted a 34 percent annualized payout last month
One small fund tied to artificial intelligence stocks delivered $1,051 in a single month, not through selling ...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
The rich already moved their money
By the time a crash hits the news, it's already too late to protect your money. Parkview Capital's free Mar...
Parkview Capital Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
My next big call (under $1)
Crypto traders have a name for this month... Uptober. Since 2013, Bitcoin has closed October higher in 10 of 1...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel
The SEC Just Opened The Floodgates…
The SEC removed the 25 year old Pattern Day Trader rule in June 2026, cutting the minimum to open a trading ac...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel
The investigation Porter spent tens of thousands to document
Porter Stansberry flew the Porter and Co. team 3,300 miles to Dublin to investigate a 17-year investing experi...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bank of America: 'Digital Dollar Inevitable'
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel