Go Pro
→ They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you. (From Reagan Gold Group) (Ad)tc pixel Free SMJ Stock Alerts

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC (SMJ) Competitors

GBX 114.90 +2.40 (+2.13%)
As of 08/13/2026 06:55 AM Eastern
Compare

SMJ vs. SFR, ROAD, CTO, VANL, and BILN

Should you buy J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC stock or one of its competitors? J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's main competitors and comparable companies include Severfield (SFR), Roadside Real Estate (ROAD), TClarke (CTO), Van Elle (VANL), and Billington (BILN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC compare to Severfield?

Severfield (LON:SFR) and J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC (LON:SMJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, Severfield had 1 more articles in the media than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Severfield and 0 mentions for J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. Severfield's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's score of 0.00 indicating that Severfield is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Severfield Positive
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC Neutral

Severfield has higher revenue and earnings than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. Severfield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Severfield£454.25M0.25£15.24M-£12.03N/A
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC£29.00M1.53£1.61M£13.068.80

59.8% of Severfield shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Severfield shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 71.4% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a net margin of 17.61% compared to Severfield's net margin of -7.84%. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's return on equity of 3.92% beat Severfield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Severfield-7.84% -22.06% 4.69%
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC 17.61%3.92%0.82%

Severfield has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a beta of 0.214, suggesting that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

Severfield currently has a consensus target price of GBX 44, indicating a potential upside of 16.40%. Given Severfield's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Severfield is more favorable than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Severfield
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Severfield beats J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC compare to Roadside Real Estate?

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC (LON:SMJ) and Roadside Real Estate (LON:ROAD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Roadside Real Estate has lower revenue, but higher earnings than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. Roadside Real Estate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC£29.00M1.53£1.61M£13.068.80
Roadside Real Estate£2.70M37.25£41.90M-£1.51N/A

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a beta of 0.214, meaning that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Roadside Real Estate has a beta of 0.587, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Roadside Real Estate had 1 more articles in the media than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Roadside Real Estate and 0 mentions for J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Roadside Real Estate'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC Neutral
Roadside Real Estate Neutral

0.9% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of Roadside Real Estate shares are held by institutional investors. 71.4% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 86.9% of Roadside Real Estate shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a net margin of 17.61% compared to Roadside Real Estate's net margin of -141.78%. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's return on equity of 3.92% beat Roadside Real Estate's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC17.61% 3.92% 0.82%
Roadside Real Estate -141.78%-11.33%N/A

Summary

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC and Roadside Real Estate tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC compare to TClarke?

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC (LON:SMJ) and TClarke (LON:CTO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

0.9% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of TClarke shares are owned by institutional investors. 71.4% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 56.4% of TClarke shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

TClarke has higher revenue and earnings than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. TClarke is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC£29.00M1.53£1.61M£13.068.80
TClarke£491M0.00£6.50M£0.14N/A

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. TClarke pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TClarke pays out 4,285.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a net margin of 17.61% compared to TClarke's net margin of 1.32%. TClarke's return on equity of 14.11% beat J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC17.61% 3.92% 0.82%
TClarke 1.32%14.11%2.74%

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a beta of 0.214, suggesting that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TClarke has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TClarke'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC Neutral
TClarke Neutral

Summary

TClarke beats J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC compare to Van Elle?

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC (LON:SMJ) and Van Elle (LON:VANL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a beta of 0.214, meaning that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Van Elle has a beta of 0.782, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

0.9% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Van Elle shares are owned by institutional investors. 71.4% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Van Elle shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Van Elle pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Van Elle pays out 300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a net margin of 17.61% compared to Van Elle's net margin of 0.35%. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's return on equity of 3.92% beat Van Elle's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC17.61% 3.92% 0.82%
Van Elle 0.35%0.90%3.37%

Van Elle has higher revenue and earnings than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Van Elle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC£29.00M1.53£1.61M£13.068.80
Van Elle£140.48M0.40£4.27M£0.40130.00

In the previous week, J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Van Elle'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC Neutral
Van Elle Neutral

Summary

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC beats Van Elle on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC compare to Billington?

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC (LON:SMJ) and Billington (LON:BILN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a net margin of 17.61% compared to Billington's net margin of 1.39%. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's return on equity of 3.92% beat Billington's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC17.61% 3.92% 0.82%
Billington 1.39%2.61%10.37%

In the previous week, J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Billington'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC Neutral
Billington Neutral

0.9% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Billington shares are owned by institutional investors. 71.4% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.8% of Billington shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Billington pays an annual dividend of GBX 25 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Billington pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Billington has higher revenue and earnings than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Billington, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC£29.00M1.53£1.61M£13.068.80
Billington£95.69M0.55£10.46M£10.0041.01

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a beta of 0.214, suggesting that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Billington has a beta of 0.553, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Billington beats J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SMJ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SMJ vs. The Competition

Export
MetricJ. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLCConstruction & Engineering IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£44.48M£8.63B£10.90B£2.89B
Dividend Yield2.89%2.63%97.00%6.11%
P/E Ratio8.8023.9927.93368.75
Price / Sales1.5360.40354.1283,356.42
Price / Cash2.0919.1424.9027.89
Price / Book0.364.754.587.25
Net Income£1.61M£487.35M£609.88M£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.13%-0.63%0.78%0.88%
1 Month Performance0.84%-1.08%3.21%2.80%
1 Year Performance-4.25%25.49%14.08%69.54%

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SMJ
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC
N/AGBX 114.90
+2.1%		N/A-4.3%£44.48M£29.00M8.80152
SFR
Severfield
2.4912 of 5 stars		GBX 37.40
-0.8%		GBX 44
+17.6%		+21.9%£110.44M£454.25MN/A1,900
ROAD
Roadside Real Estate
N/AGBX 57.25
flat		N/A+15.3%£102.05M£2.70MN/A3,790
CTO
TClarke
N/AN/AN/AN/A£84.08M£491M1,135.7130
VANL
Van Elle
N/AGBX 52
flat		N/AN/A£56.27M£140.48M130.00670

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SMJ) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Elon's Terrifying Warning: America Is "1,000% Going Bankrupt"
The national debt just crossed $39 trillion, and Elon Musk - former head of the Department of Government Effic...
American Hartford Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s New Currency Reset
Trump is launching a new $250 bill - but that may be a distraction. Behind the scenes, Executive Order 14241 i...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Man who Predicted Trump 2016 Win: “Prepare for Mid-Term Meltdown”
In 2016, major election models gave Hillary Clinton a 99% chance of winning - but former CIA and Pentagon advi...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Starlink of Energy
A portable energy unit - already used by the U.S. Navy for decades - is now drawing serious attention from Big...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Three oil giants buried the same discovery for 50 years
In 1976, Chevron tapped an energy source with no fuel costs, no carbon, and no supply chain - then killed the ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel