Go Pro

tinyBuild (TBLD) Competitors

tinyBuild logo
GBX 12.60 +0.60 (+5.00%)
As of 12:30 PM Eastern

TBLD vs. CCP, FDEV, MVR, 0GFE, and EMAN

Should you buy tinyBuild stock or one of its competitors? tinyBuild's main competitors and comparable companies include Celtic (CCP), Frontier Developments (FDEV), Napster Group (MVR), Embracer Group AB (publ) (0GFE), and Everyman Media Group (EMAN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does tinyBuild compare to Celtic?

Celtic (LON:CCP) and tinyBuild (LON:TBLD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Celtic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled tinyBuild'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celtic Neutral
tinyBuild Neutral

18.0% of Celtic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of tinyBuild shares are held by institutional investors. 38.8% of Celtic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 62.3% of tinyBuild shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Celtic has a net margin of 9.12% compared to tinyBuild's net margin of -9.03%. Celtic's return on equity of 6.79% beat tinyBuild's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celtic9.12% 6.79% 2.20%
tinyBuild -9.03%-8.26%-23.69%

Celtic has higher revenue and earnings than tinyBuild. tinyBuild is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celtic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celtic£119.54M1.47£11.82M£8.3922.05
tinyBuild£35.51M1.40-£57.37M-£1.00N/A

Celtic presently has a consensus price target of GBX 212, suggesting a potential upside of 14.59%. tinyBuild has a consensus price target of GBX 8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 32.54%. Given Celtic's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Celtic is more favorable than tinyBuild.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celtic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
tinyBuild
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Celtic has a beta of 0.011, meaning that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, tinyBuild has a beta of -0.43, meaning that its stock price is 143% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Celtic beats tinyBuild on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does tinyBuild compare to Frontier Developments?

tinyBuild (LON:TBLD) and Frontier Developments (LON:FDEV) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Frontier Developments had 14 more articles in the media than tinyBuild. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Frontier Developments and 0 mentions for tinyBuild. Frontier Developments' average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat tinyBuild's score of 0.00 indicating that Frontier Developments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
tinyBuild Neutral
Frontier Developments Positive

1.8% of tinyBuild shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.0% of Frontier Developments shares are owned by institutional investors. 62.3% of tinyBuild shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 38.1% of Frontier Developments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

tinyBuild has a beta of -0.43, meaning that its stock price is 143% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frontier Developments has a beta of 0.03, meaning that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

Frontier Developments has a net margin of 26.03% compared to tinyBuild's net margin of -9.03%. Frontier Developments' return on equity of 27.12% beat tinyBuild's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
tinyBuild-9.03% -8.26% -23.69%
Frontier Developments 26.03%27.12%-4.87%

tinyBuild presently has a consensus target price of GBX 8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 32.54%. Frontier Developments has a consensus target price of GBX 618.75, suggesting a potential upside of 13.95%. Given Frontier Developments' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Frontier Developments is more favorable than tinyBuild.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
tinyBuild
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Frontier Developments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Frontier Developments has higher revenue and earnings than tinyBuild. tinyBuild is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontier Developments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
tinyBuild£35.51M1.40-£57.37M-£1.00N/A
Frontier Developments£104.80M1.80-£21.36M£49.8010.90

Summary

Frontier Developments beats tinyBuild on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does tinyBuild compare to Napster Group?

tinyBuild (LON:TBLD) and Napster Group (LON:MVR) are both small-cap entertainment industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

1.8% of tinyBuild shares are owned by institutional investors. 62.3% of tinyBuild shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, tinyBuild's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Napster Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
tinyBuild Neutral
Napster Group Neutral

Napster Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than tinyBuild. tinyBuild is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Napster Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
tinyBuild£35.51M1.40-£57.37M-£1.00N/A
Napster Group£256.47K0.00N/A-£1.20N/A

tinyBuild currently has a consensus price target of GBX 8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 32.54%. Given Napster Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Napster Group is more favorable than tinyBuild.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
tinyBuild
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Napster Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Napster Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to tinyBuild's net margin of -9.03%. Napster Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat tinyBuild's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
tinyBuild-9.03% -8.26% -23.69%
Napster Group N/A N/A N/A

Summary

tinyBuild and Napster Group tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does tinyBuild compare to Embracer Group AB (publ)?

Embracer Group AB (publ) (LON:0GFE) and tinyBuild (LON:TBLD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

tinyBuild has a consensus price target of GBX 8.50, indicating a potential downside of 32.54%. Given tinyBuild's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe tinyBuild is more favorable than Embracer Group AB (publ).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Embracer Group AB (publ)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
tinyBuild
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

tinyBuild has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Embracer Group AB (publ). Embracer Group AB (publ) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than tinyBuild, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Embracer Group AB (publ)£39.83B0.00-£22.61B-£4.15N/A
tinyBuild£35.51M1.40-£57.37M-£1.00N/A

In the previous week, Embracer Group AB (publ)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled tinyBuild'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Embracer Group AB (publ) Neutral
tinyBuild Neutral

Embracer Group AB (publ) has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, tinyBuild has a beta of -0.43, meaning that its stock price is 143% less volatile than the broader market.

36.5% of Embracer Group AB (publ) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of tinyBuild shares are held by institutional investors. 38.0% of Embracer Group AB (publ) shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 62.3% of tinyBuild shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

tinyBuild has a net margin of -9.03% compared to Embracer Group AB (publ)'s net margin of -56.77%. tinyBuild's return on equity of -8.26% beat Embracer Group AB (publ)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Embracer Group AB (publ)-56.77% -37.17% -6.65%
tinyBuild -9.03%-8.26%-23.69%

Summary

tinyBuild beats Embracer Group AB (publ) on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does tinyBuild compare to Everyman Media Group?

Everyman Media Group (LON:EMAN) and tinyBuild (LON:TBLD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Everyman Media Group has higher revenue and earnings than tinyBuild. tinyBuild is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everyman Media Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Everyman Media Group£116.60M0.43-£2.18M-£6.40N/A
tinyBuild£35.51M1.40-£57.37M-£1.00N/A

In the previous week, Everyman Media Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled tinyBuild'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Everyman Media Group Neutral
tinyBuild Neutral

Everyman Media Group has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, tinyBuild has a beta of -0.43, suggesting that its stock price is 143% less volatile than the broader market.

tinyBuild has a consensus target price of GBX 8.50, indicating a potential downside of 32.54%. Given tinyBuild's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe tinyBuild is more favorable than Everyman Media Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Everyman Media Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
tinyBuild
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Everyman Media Group has a net margin of -4.42% compared to tinyBuild's net margin of -9.03%. tinyBuild's return on equity of -8.26% beat Everyman Media Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Everyman Media Group-4.42% -21.82% 0.26%
tinyBuild -9.03%-8.26%-23.69%

2.2% of Everyman Media Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of tinyBuild shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.0% of Everyman Media Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 62.3% of tinyBuild shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Everyman Media Group beats tinyBuild on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get tinyBuild News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TBLD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TBLD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TBLD vs. The Competition

MetrictinyBuildEntertainment IndustryCommunication Services SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£49.55M£10.56B£33.60B£2.87B
Dividend YieldN/A3.89%5.34%6.25%
P/E Ratio-12.6026.19232.09367.03
Price / Sales1.40112.1661.9089,972.82
Price / Cash5.5335.9520.8427.89
Price / Book0.876.8111.586.30
Net Income-£57.37M£74.90M£1.10B£5.89B
7 Day Performance10.28%0.74%-0.46%-1.13%
1 Month Performance26.00%-0.61%-1.60%-0.61%
1 Year Performance36.22%-10.66%-7.51%19.59%

tinyBuild Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TBLD
tinyBuild
N/AGBX 12.60
+5.0%
GBX 8.50
-32.5%
+29.7%£49.55M£35.51MN/A400
CCP
Celtic
1.7743 of 5 stars
GBX 184.70
+1.2%
GBX 212
+14.8%
+8.8%£175.72M£119.54M22.01465
FDEV
Frontier Developments
2.2426 of 5 stars
GBX 452.60
+1.6%
GBX 618.75
+36.7%
+37.3%£157.20M£102.94M9.09915
MVR
Napster Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£76.53M£256.47KN/A78
0GFE
Embracer Group AB (publ)
N/AGBX 75.34
+1.0%
N/A-8.8%£66.41M£39.83BN/A10,844

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TBLD) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners