Free Trial

Frontier Developments (FDEV) Competitors

Frontier Developments logo
GBX 550.70 +20.33 (+3.83%)
As of 08:35 AM Eastern

FDEV vs. EVPL, CCPA, CCPC, CCP, and 0GFE

Should you buy Frontier Developments stock or one of its competitors? Frontier Developments's main competitors and comparable companies include Everplay Group (EVPL), Celtic (CCPA), Celtic (CCPC), Celtic (CCP), and Embracer Group AB (publ) (0GFE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does Frontier Developments compare to Everplay Group?

Frontier Developments (LON:FDEV) and Everplay Group (LON:EVPL) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, Frontier Developments had 2 more articles in the media than Everplay Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Frontier Developments and 0 mentions for Everplay Group. Frontier Developments' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Everplay Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Frontier Developments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frontier Developments Positive
Everplay Group Neutral

Everplay Group has higher revenue and earnings than Frontier Developments. Frontier Developments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everplay Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frontier Developments£104.80M1.78-£21.36M£70.007.87
Everplay Group£160.55M3.99-£3.75M£11.0040.45

Frontier Developments has a beta of 0.03, meaning that its share price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Everplay Group has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

9.5% of Frontier Developments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.4% of Everplay Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.0% of Frontier Developments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.1% of Everplay Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Frontier Developments has a net margin of 26.03% compared to Everplay Group's net margin of -0.18%. Frontier Developments' return on equity of 27.12% beat Everplay Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frontier Developments26.03% 27.12% -4.87%
Everplay Group -0.18%-0.12%6.83%

Frontier Developments presently has a consensus price target of GBX 618.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.22%. Everplay Group has a consensus price target of GBX 508, suggesting a potential upside of 14.16%. Given Everplay Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Everplay Group is more favorable than Frontier Developments.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frontier Developments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Everplay Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Everplay Group beats Frontier Developments on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frontier Developments compare to Celtic?

Frontier Developments (LON:FDEV) and Celtic (LON:CCPA) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

9.5% of Frontier Developments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Celtic shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.0% of Frontier Developments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 53.8% of Celtic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Celtic has higher revenue and earnings than Frontier Developments. Frontier Developments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celtic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frontier Developments£104.80M1.78-£21.36M£70.007.87
Celtic£111.03M1.76£13.44M£14.1014.54

Frontier Developments has a net margin of 26.03% compared to Celtic's net margin of -4.31%. Frontier Developments' return on equity of 27.12% beat Celtic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frontier Developments26.03% 27.12% -4.87%
Celtic -4.31%-3.02%2.20%

Frontier Developments presently has a consensus price target of GBX 618.33, indicating a potential upside of 12.22%. Given Frontier Developments' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Frontier Developments is more favorable than Celtic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frontier Developments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Celtic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Frontier Developments has a beta of 0.03, indicating that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celtic has a beta of 0.011, indicating that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Frontier Developments had 2 more articles in the media than Celtic. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Frontier Developments and 0 mentions for Celtic. Frontier Developments' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Celtic's score of 0.00 indicating that Frontier Developments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frontier Developments Positive
Celtic Neutral

Summary

Frontier Developments beats Celtic on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frontier Developments compare to Celtic?

Frontier Developments (LON:FDEV) and Celtic (LON:CCPC) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

Frontier Developments currently has a consensus price target of GBX 618.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.22%. Given Frontier Developments' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Frontier Developments is more favorable than Celtic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frontier Developments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Celtic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Celtic has higher revenue and earnings than Frontier Developments. Frontier Developments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celtic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frontier Developments£104.80M1.78-£21.36M£70.007.87
Celtic£111.03M1.70£5.82M£29.0414.95

Frontier Developments has a net margin of 26.03% compared to Celtic's net margin of -4.31%. Frontier Developments' return on equity of 27.12% beat Celtic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frontier Developments26.03% 27.12% -4.87%
Celtic -4.31%-3.02%2.20%

9.5% of Frontier Developments shares are held by institutional investors. 39.0% of Frontier Developments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 87.9% of Celtic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Frontier Developments had 2 more articles in the media than Celtic. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Frontier Developments and 0 mentions for Celtic. Frontier Developments' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Celtic's score of 0.00 indicating that Frontier Developments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frontier Developments Positive
Celtic Neutral

Frontier Developments has a beta of 0.03, meaning that its share price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celtic has a beta of 0.013, meaning that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Frontier Developments beats Celtic on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frontier Developments compare to Celtic?

Celtic (LON:CCP) and Frontier Developments (LON:FDEV) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Celtic has a beta of 0.011, suggesting that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frontier Developments has a beta of 0.03, suggesting that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

18.0% of Celtic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.5% of Frontier Developments shares are owned by institutional investors. 45.7% of Celtic shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 39.0% of Frontier Developments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Frontier Developments has a net margin of 26.03% compared to Celtic's net margin of -4.31%. Frontier Developments' return on equity of 27.12% beat Celtic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celtic-4.31% -3.02% 2.20%
Frontier Developments 26.03%27.12%-4.87%

Celtic has higher revenue and earnings than Frontier Developments. Celtic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontier Developments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celtic£111.03M1.58£11.82M-£5.03N/A
Frontier Developments£104.80M1.78-£21.36M£70.007.87

In the previous week, Frontier Developments had 2 more articles in the media than Celtic. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Frontier Developments and 0 mentions for Celtic. Frontier Developments' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Celtic's score of 0.00 indicating that Frontier Developments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celtic Neutral
Frontier Developments Positive

Celtic currently has a consensus target price of GBX 215, indicating a potential upside of 16.40%. Frontier Developments has a consensus target price of GBX 618.33, indicating a potential upside of 12.22%. Given Celtic's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Celtic is more favorable than Frontier Developments.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celtic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Frontier Developments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Frontier Developments beats Celtic on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frontier Developments compare to Embracer Group AB (publ)?

Frontier Developments (LON:FDEV) and Embracer Group AB (publ) (LON:0GFE) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Embracer Group AB (publ) had 3 more articles in the media than Frontier Developments. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Embracer Group AB (publ) and 2 mentions for Frontier Developments. Frontier Developments' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Embracer Group AB (publ)'s score of 0.67 indicating that Frontier Developments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Frontier Developments
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Embracer Group AB (publ)
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Frontier Developments has a beta of 0.03, meaning that its share price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Embracer Group AB (publ) has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Frontier Developments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Embracer Group AB (publ). Embracer Group AB (publ) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontier Developments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frontier Developments£104.80M1.78-£21.36M£70.007.87
Embracer Group AB (publ)£39.83B0.00-£22.61B-£4.15N/A

9.5% of Frontier Developments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Embracer Group AB (publ) shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.0% of Frontier Developments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.0% of Embracer Group AB (publ) shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Frontier Developments has a net margin of 26.03% compared to Embracer Group AB (publ)'s net margin of -56.77%. Frontier Developments' return on equity of 27.12% beat Embracer Group AB (publ)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frontier Developments26.03% 27.12% -4.87%
Embracer Group AB (publ) -56.77%-37.17%-6.65%

Frontier Developments currently has a consensus target price of GBX 618.33, indicating a potential upside of 12.22%. Given Frontier Developments' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Frontier Developments is more favorable than Embracer Group AB (publ).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frontier Developments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Embracer Group AB (publ)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Frontier Developments beats Embracer Group AB (publ) on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Frontier Developments News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FDEV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FDEV and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FDEV vs. The Competition

MetricFrontier DevelopmentsEntertainment IndustryCommunication Services SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£186.46M£9.83B£30.36B£2.84B
Dividend YieldN/A3.85%4.52%5.12%
P/E Ratio7.8725.6325.1623.40
Price / Sales1.783.282.905.03
Price / Cash9.9417.8814.9820.23
Price / Book2.774.733.702.46
Net Income-£21.36M£57.07M£1.11B£5.88B
7 Day Performance8.62%1.43%1.30%-0.10%
1 Month Performance-13.00%-0.25%0.01%-1.93%
1 Year Performance1.98%-9.75%-5.89%6.85%

Frontier Developments Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FDEV
Frontier Developments
2.2609 of 5 stars
GBX 550.70
+3.8%
GBX 618.33
+12.3%
-0.3%£186.46M£104.80M7.87915
EVPL
Everplay Group
N/AGBX 417.50
+2.6%
GBX 508
+21.7%
+20.3%£601.60M£160.55M37.95438
CCPA
Celtic
N/AGBX 205
-1.0%
N/AN/A£194.95M£111.03M14.54942
CCPC
Celtic
N/AGBX 434
-0.5%
N/AN/A£189.22M£111.03M14.95942
CCP
Celtic
1.5028 of 5 stars
GBX 180.50
-1.1%
GBX 215
+19.1%
-2.2%£171.73M£111.03MN/A465

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FDEV) was last updated on 11/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners