Free Trial
→ $30 stock to buy before Starlink goes public (WATCH NOW!) (From Paradigm Press) (Ad)tc pixel Free TCF Stock Alerts

Theracryf (TCF) Competitors

GBX 0.22 0.00 (-0.89%)
As of 07:18 AM Eastern
Compare

TCF vs. HARL, ING, NWT, VEL, and SPO

Should you buy Theracryf stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Theracryf with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Theracryf include Harland & Wolff Group (HARL), Ingenta (ING), Newmark Security (NWT), Velocity Composites (VEL), and Sportech (SPO). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Theracryf compare to Harland & Wolff Group?

Theracryf (LON:TCF) and Harland & Wolff Group (LON:HARL) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Harland & Wolff Group has a net margin of -49.57% compared to Theracryf's net margin of -792.17%. Harland & Wolff Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Theracryf's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Theracryf-792.17% -37.30% -48.26%
Harland & Wolff Group -49.57%N/A -16.78%

Theracryf has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Harland & Wolff Group. Theracryf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harland & Wolff Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TheracryfN/AN/A-£5.45M-£0.13N/A
Harland & Wolff Group£86.91M0.00-£43.09M-£0.24N/A

2.2% of Theracryf shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.8% of Harland & Wolff Group shares are held by institutional investors. 23.1% of Theracryf shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.3% of Harland & Wolff Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Theracryf has a beta of 1.402, meaning that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harland & Wolff Group has a beta of 3.14, meaning that its stock price is 214% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Theracryf's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Harland & Wolff Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Theracryf Neutral
Harland & Wolff Group Neutral

Summary

Harland & Wolff Group beats Theracryf on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Theracryf compare to Ingenta?

Ingenta (LON:ING) and Theracryf (LON:TCF) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

Ingenta has a net margin of 16.94% compared to Theracryf's net margin of -792.17%. Ingenta's return on equity of 24.87% beat Theracryf's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ingenta16.94% 24.87% 7.54%
Theracryf -792.17%-37.30%-48.26%

Ingenta has a beta of 0.676, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Theracryf has a beta of 1.402, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

12.6% of Ingenta shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of Theracryf shares are held by institutional investors. 76.8% of Ingenta shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.1% of Theracryf shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ingenta's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Theracryf'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ingenta Neutral
Theracryf Neutral

Ingenta has higher revenue and earnings than Theracryf. Theracryf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingenta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ingenta£10.27M1.31£1.34M£11.997.71
TheracryfN/AN/A-£5.45M-£0.13N/A

Summary

Ingenta beats Theracryf on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Theracryf compare to Newmark Security?

Newmark Security (LON:NWT) and Theracryf (LON:TCF) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

53.3% of Newmark Security shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of Theracryf shares are held by institutional investors. 52.3% of Newmark Security shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.1% of Theracryf shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Newmark Security has a net margin of 4.19% compared to Theracryf's net margin of -792.17%. Newmark Security's return on equity of 11.74% beat Theracryf's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Newmark Security4.19% 11.74% 2.75%
Theracryf -792.17%-37.30%-48.26%

Newmark Security has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Theracryf has a beta of 1.402, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Newmark Security has higher revenue and earnings than Theracryf. Theracryf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Newmark Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Newmark Security£24.37M0.43£134.00K£10.4810.50
TheracryfN/AN/A-£5.45M-£0.13N/A

In the previous week, Newmark Security had 1 more articles in the media than Theracryf. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Newmark Security and 0 mentions for Theracryf. Newmark Security's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Theracryf's score of 0.00 indicating that Newmark Security is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Newmark Security Positive
Theracryf Neutral

Summary

Newmark Security beats Theracryf on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Theracryf compare to Velocity Composites?

Velocity Composites (LON:VEL) and Theracryf (LON:TCF) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

1.1% of Velocity Composites shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of Theracryf shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Velocity Composites shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.1% of Theracryf shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Velocity Composites' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Theracryf'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Velocity Composites Neutral
Theracryf Neutral

Velocity Composites currently has a consensus target price of GBX 40, indicating a potential upside of 166.49%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than Theracryf.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Velocity Composites
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Theracryf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Velocity Composites has a beta of 1.109, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Theracryf has a beta of 1.402, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Velocity Composites has a net margin of -5.24% compared to Theracryf's net margin of -792.17%. Velocity Composites' return on equity of -20.69% beat Theracryf's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Velocity Composites-5.24% -20.69% -12.42%
Theracryf -792.17%-37.30%-48.26%

Velocity Composites has higher revenue and earnings than Theracryf. Velocity Composites is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Theracryf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Velocity Composites£20.70M0.40-£2.41M-£2.00N/A
TheracryfN/AN/A-£5.45M-£0.13N/A

Summary

Velocity Composites beats Theracryf on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Theracryf compare to Sportech?

Theracryf (LON:TCF) and Sportech (LON:SPO) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Sportech has higher revenue and earnings than Theracryf. Theracryf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sportech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TheracryfN/AN/A-£5.45M-£0.13N/A
Sportech£26.98M0.00-£1.01M-£0.05N/A

In the previous week, Sportech's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Theracryf's score of 0.00 indicating that Sportech is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Theracryf Neutral
Sportech Positive

Sportech has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Theracryf's net margin of -792.17%. Sportech's return on equity of -3.95% beat Theracryf's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Theracryf-792.17% -37.30% -48.26%
Sportech 2.47%-3.95%0.31%

2.2% of Theracryf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.3% of Sportech shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.1% of Theracryf shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 31.4% of Sportech shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Theracryf has a beta of 1.402, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sportech has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sportech beats Theracryf on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Theracryf News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TCF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TCF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTheracryfBiotechnology IndustryMedical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£4.79M£461.60M£6.48B£2.77B
Dividend YieldN/A3.87%2.67%6.12%
P/E Ratio-1.723.1423.93365.21
Price / SalesN/A6,606.57517.3187,168.40
Price / CashN/A13.1342.3527.85
Price / Book0.2683.479.737.68
Net Income-£5.45M-£96.07M£3.56B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.04%-1.70%-3.19%-0.55%
1 Month PerformanceN/A0.74%-0.11%3.15%
1 Year Performance-11.16%70.06%25.29%73.57%

Theracryf Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TCF
Theracryf
N/AGBX 0.22
-0.9%		N/A-20.4%£4.79MN/AN/A10
HARL
Harland & Wolff Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£14.49M£86.91MN/A81
ING
Ingenta
N/AGBX 93.83
-3.8%		N/A+53.7%£13.62M£10.27M7.8365,000
NWT
Newmark Security
N/AGBX 120
+6.7%		N/A+36.1%£11.31M£24.37M11.45102
VEL
Velocity Composites
N/AGBX 17
+9.7%		GBX 40
+135.3%		-41.1%£9.29M£20.70MN/A102

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TCF) was last updated on 6/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
$30 stock to buy before Starlink goes public (WATCH NOW!)
In the next 3 minutes… James Altucher – legendary investor and venture capitalist… And someone who’s kno...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
June 12: $100 Turns Into $100,000?
The SpaceX IPO is scheduled for June 12, and former tech executive Jeff Brown - who identified Bitcoin, Tesla,...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX just filed. The clock is ticking.
Reuters reports Elon Musk filed secretly. Barron's says it's being finalized behind closed doors. CNBC just re...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Emmy-winning analyst releases his next big story Whitney Tilson shocked the nation on 60 Minutes when he ac...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX will mint billionaires. You won't be one of them.
By the time a company goes public, 95% of profits have already been made. Insiders bought SpaceX at $20 billio...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel