Do analysts recommend PFC or VEL?

Velocity Composites has a consensus price target of GBX 40, suggesting a potential upside of 188.79%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than Petrofac. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Petrofac 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Velocity Composites 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts rate TRIN or VEL?

Velocity Composites has a consensus price target of GBX 40, suggesting a potential upside of 188.79%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than Trinity Exploration & Production. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Trinity Exploration & Production 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Velocity Composites 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts prefer SOS or VEL?

Velocity Composites has a consensus price target of GBX 40, suggesting a potential upside of 188.79%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than Sosandar. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Sosandar 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Velocity Composites 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts rate HARL or VEL?

Velocity Composites has a consensus target price of GBX 40, suggesting a potential upside of 188.79%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than Harland & Wolff Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Harland & Wolff Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Velocity Composites 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Velocity Composites (VEL) Competitors

GBX 13.85 -0.15 (-1.06%)

As of 08:23 AM Eastern

Compare

VEL vs. PFC, TRIN, SOS, HARL, and NWT

Should you buy Velocity Composites stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Velocity Composites with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Velocity Composites include Petrofac (PFC), Trinity Exploration & Production (TRIN), Sosandar (SOS), Harland & Wolff Group (HARL), and Newmark Security (NWT). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Velocity Composites compare to Petrofac?

Petrofac (LON:PFC) and Velocity Composites (LON:VEL) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk and media sentiment.

Petrofac has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Velocity Composites has a beta of 1.161, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

27.4% of Petrofac shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Velocity Composites shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.5% of Petrofac shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Velocity Composites shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Velocity Composites has a net margin of -8.25% compared to Petrofac's net margin of -20.23%. Petrofac's return on equity of 371.32% beat Velocity Composites' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Petrofac	-20.23%	371.32%	-9.55%
Velocity Composites	-8.25%	-32.89%	-12.42%

Velocity Composites has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Petrofac. Velocity Composites is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Petrofac, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Petrofac	£3.30B	0.00	-£714.53M	-£81.55	N/A
Velocity Composites	£18.70M	0.40	-£2.41M	-£2.83	N/A

Velocity Composites has a consensus price target of GBX 40, suggesting a potential upside of 188.79%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than Petrofac.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Petrofac	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Velocity Composites	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Petrofac's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Velocity Composites'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Petrofac	Neutral
Velocity Composites	Neutral

Summary

Velocity Composites beats Petrofac on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Velocity Composites compare to Trinity Exploration & Production?

Trinity Exploration & Production (LON:TRIN) and Velocity Composites (LON:VEL) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

20.6% of Trinity Exploration & Production shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Velocity Composites shares are held by institutional investors. 85.5% of Trinity Exploration & Production shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Velocity Composites shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Velocity Composites has a consensus price target of GBX 40, suggesting a potential upside of 188.79%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than Trinity Exploration & Production.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trinity Exploration & Production	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Velocity Composites	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Velocity Composites has a net margin of -8.25% compared to Trinity Exploration & Production's net margin of -9.74%. Trinity Exploration & Production's return on equity of -12.94% beat Velocity Composites' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trinity Exploration & Production	-9.74%	-12.94%	-4.73%
Velocity Composites	-8.25%	-32.89%	-12.42%

Velocity Composites has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Trinity Exploration & Production. Velocity Composites is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trinity Exploration & Production, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trinity Exploration & Production	£69.83M	0.00	-£6.80M	-£0.13	N/A
Velocity Composites	£18.70M	0.40	-£2.41M	-£2.83	N/A

Trinity Exploration & Production has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Velocity Composites has a beta of 1.161, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Trinity Exploration & Production's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Velocity Composites'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Trinity Exploration & Production	Neutral
Velocity Composites	Neutral

Summary

Velocity Composites beats Trinity Exploration & Production on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Velocity Composites compare to Sosandar?

Sosandar (LON:SOS) and Velocity Composites (LON:VEL) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Sosandar has a net margin of -2.46% compared to Velocity Composites' net margin of -8.25%. Sosandar's return on equity of -5.59% beat Velocity Composites' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sosandar	-2.46%	-5.59%	-0.81%
Velocity Composites	-8.25%	-32.89%	-12.42%

Sosandar has a beta of 1.552, meaning that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Velocity Composites has a beta of 1.161, meaning that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Sosandar had 2 more articles in the media than Velocity Composites. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Sosandar and 0 mentions for Velocity Composites. Velocity Composites' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Sosandar's score of -1.29 indicating that Velocity Composites is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Sosandar	Negative
Velocity Composites	Neutral

22.7% of Sosandar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Velocity Composites shares are held by institutional investors. 9.3% of Sosandar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Velocity Composites shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sosandar has higher revenue and earnings than Velocity Composites. Sosandar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Velocity Composites, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sosandar	£39.64M	0.65	-£423.00K	-£0.39	N/A
Velocity Composites	£18.70M	0.40	-£2.41M	-£2.83	N/A

Velocity Composites has a consensus price target of GBX 40, suggesting a potential upside of 188.79%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than Sosandar.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sosandar	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Velocity Composites	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Sosandar beats Velocity Composites on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Velocity Composites compare to Harland & Wolff Group?

Harland & Wolff Group (LON:HARL) and Velocity Composites (LON:VEL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

Harland & Wolff Group has a beta of 3.14, suggesting that its stock price is 214% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Velocity Composites has a beta of 1.161, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

Velocity Composites has a consensus target price of GBX 40, suggesting a potential upside of 188.79%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than Harland & Wolff Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Harland & Wolff Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Velocity Composites	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

60.8% of Harland & Wolff Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Velocity Composites shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.3% of Harland & Wolff Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Velocity Composites shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Velocity Composites has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Harland & Wolff Group. Velocity Composites is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harland & Wolff Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Harland & Wolff Group	£86.91M	0.00	-£43.09M	-£0.24	N/A
Velocity Composites	£18.70M	0.40	-£2.41M	-£2.83	N/A

In the previous week, Harland & Wolff Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Velocity Composites'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Harland & Wolff Group	Neutral
Velocity Composites	Neutral

Velocity Composites has a net margin of -8.25% compared to Harland & Wolff Group's net margin of -49.57%. Harland & Wolff Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Velocity Composites' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Harland & Wolff Group	-49.57%	N/A	-16.78%
Velocity Composites	-8.25%	-32.89%	-12.42%

Summary

Velocity Composites beats Harland & Wolff Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Velocity Composites compare to Newmark Security?

Velocity Composites (LON:VEL) and Newmark Security (LON:NWT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Velocity Composites has a beta of 1.161, indicating that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Newmark Security has a beta of 1.241, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Velocity Composites currently has a consensus target price of GBX 40, suggesting a potential upside of 188.79%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than Newmark Security.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Velocity Composites	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Newmark Security	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

1.1% of Velocity Composites shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.3% of Newmark Security shares are held by institutional investors. 15.2% of Velocity Composites shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 52.3% of Newmark Security shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Newmark Security had 1 more articles in the media than Velocity Composites. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Newmark Security and 0 mentions for Velocity Composites. Newmark Security's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Velocity Composites' score of 0.00 indicating that Newmark Security is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Velocity Composites	Neutral
Newmark Security	Positive

Newmark Security has higher revenue and earnings than Velocity Composites. Velocity Composites is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Newmark Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Velocity Composites	£18.70M	0.40	-£2.41M	-£2.83	N/A
Newmark Security	£24.37M	0.42	£134.00K	£10.48	10.45

Newmark Security has a net margin of 4.19% compared to Velocity Composites' net margin of -8.25%. Newmark Security's return on equity of 11.74% beat Velocity Composites' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Velocity Composites	-8.25%	-32.89%	-12.42%
Newmark Security	4.19%	11.74%	2.75%

Summary

Newmark Security beats Velocity Composites on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Velocity Composites News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding VEL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

VEL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Velocity Composites	Aerospace & Defense Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£7.57M	£17.51B	£9.46B	£2.78B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.59%	3.54%	6.12%
P/E Ratio	-4.89	40.41	26.75	368.21
Price / Sales	0.40	87.13	1,978.62	84,742.86
Price / Cash	4.91	20.37	27.28	27.87
Price / Book	1.26	5.86	4.43	7.56
Net Income	-£2.41M	£256.04M	£791.21M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-1.06%	-5.33%	-0.74%	-0.18%
1 Month Performance	-13.43%	-4.36%	0.20%	-0.91%
1 Year Performance	-46.83%	18.09%	15.35%	61.94%

Velocity Composites Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
VEL Velocity Composites	1.5036 of 5 stars	GBX 13.85 -1.1%	GBX 40 +188.8%	-50.0%	£7.57M	£18.70M	N/A	102	Gap Down
PFC Petrofac	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£26.88M	£3.30B	N/A	8,600	Gap Up
TRIN Trinity Exploration & Production	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£26.38M	£69.83M	N/A	40
SOS Sosandar	N/A	GBX 11 -2.2%	N/A	+36.9%	£24.00M	£39.64M	N/A	170	Negative News Earnings Report Gap Down
HARL Harland & Wolff Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£14.49M	£86.91M	N/A	81

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:VEL) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Velocity Composites (VEL) Competitors

VEL vs. PFC, TRIN, SOS, HARL, and NWT

How does Velocity Composites compare to Petrofac?

Summary

How does Velocity Composites compare to Trinity Exploration & Production?

Summary

How does Velocity Composites compare to Sosandar?

Summary

How does Velocity Composites compare to Harland & Wolff Group?

Summary

How does Velocity Composites compare to Newmark Security?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

VEL vs. The Competition

Velocity Composites Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Velocity Composites (VEL) Competitors

VEL vs. PFC, TRIN, SOS, HARL, and NWT

How does Velocity Composites compare to Petrofac?

Which has more risk and volatility, PFC or VEL?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PFC or VEL?

Is PFC or VEL more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PFC or VEL?

Do analysts recommend PFC or VEL?

Does the media favor PFC or VEL?

Summary

How does Velocity Composites compare to Trinity Exploration & Production?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of TRIN or VEL?

Do analysts rate TRIN or VEL?

Is TRIN or VEL more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, TRIN or VEL?

Which has more risk & volatility, TRIN or VEL?

Does the media refer more to TRIN or VEL?

Summary

How does Velocity Composites compare to Sosandar?

Is SOS or VEL more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, SOS or VEL?

Does the media favor SOS or VEL?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in SOS or VEL?

Which has better earnings and valuation, SOS or VEL?

Do analysts prefer SOS or VEL?

Summary

How does Velocity Composites compare to Harland & Wolff Group?

Which has more risk & volatility, HARL or VEL?

Do analysts rate HARL or VEL?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of HARL or VEL?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, HARL or VEL?

Does the media prefer HARL or VEL?

Is HARL or VEL more profitable?

Summary

How does Velocity Composites compare to Newmark Security?

Which has more volatility and risk, VEL or NWT?

Do analysts rate VEL or NWT?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in VEL or NWT?

Does the media refer more to VEL or NWT?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, VEL or NWT?

Is VEL or NWT more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

VEL vs. The Competition

Velocity Composites Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools