Go Pro

Velocity Composites (VEL) Competitors

Velocity Composites logo
GBX 18.50 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 12:34 PM Eastern

VEL vs. HARL, LMT, AERO, RR, and BA

Should you buy Velocity Composites stock or one of its competitors? Velocity Composites's main competitors and comparable companies include Harland & Wolff Group (HARL), Lockheed Martin (LMT), Strat Aero (AERO), Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RR), and BAE Systems (BA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "aerospace & defense" industry.

How does Velocity Composites compare to Harland & Wolff Group?

Harland & Wolff Group (LON:HARL) and Velocity Composites (LON:VEL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Harland & Wolff Group had 1 more articles in the media than Velocity Composites. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Harland & Wolff Group and 0 mentions for Velocity Composites. Harland & Wolff Group's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Velocity Composites' score of 0.00 indicating that Harland & Wolff Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Harland & Wolff Group Positive
Velocity Composites Neutral

Velocity Composites has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Harland & Wolff Group. Velocity Composites is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harland & Wolff Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harland & Wolff Group£86.91M0.00-£43.09M-£0.24N/A
Velocity Composites£18.70M0.54-£2.41M-£2.83N/A

60.8% of Harland & Wolff Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Velocity Composites shares are held by institutional investors. 16.3% of Harland & Wolff Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Velocity Composites shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Velocity Composites has a consensus target price of GBX 40, suggesting a potential upside of 116.22%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than Harland & Wolff Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Harland & Wolff Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Velocity Composites
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Velocity Composites has a net margin of -8.25% compared to Harland & Wolff Group's net margin of -49.57%. Harland & Wolff Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Velocity Composites' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harland & Wolff Group-49.57% N/A -16.78%
Velocity Composites -8.25%-32.89%-12.42%

Harland & Wolff Group has a beta of 3.14, indicating that its share price is 214% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Velocity Composites has a beta of 1.162, indicating that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Harland & Wolff Group beats Velocity Composites on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Velocity Composites compare to Lockheed Martin?

Lockheed Martin (LON:LMT) and Velocity Composites (LON:VEL) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

1.1% of Velocity Composites shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Velocity Composites shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Velocity Composites' net margin of -8.25%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 0.00% beat Velocity Composites' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lockheed MartinN/A N/A N/A
Velocity Composites -8.25%-32.89%-12.42%

Lockheed Martin has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Velocity Composites.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lockheed MartinN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Velocity Composites£18.70M0.54-£2.41M-£2.83N/A

Velocity Composites has a consensus price target of GBX 40, indicating a potential upside of 116.22%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than Lockheed Martin.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lockheed Martin
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Velocity Composites
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Lockheed Martin had 1 more articles in the media than Velocity Composites. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Lockheed Martin and 0 mentions for Velocity Composites. Lockheed Martin's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Velocity Composites' score of 0.00 indicating that Lockheed Martin is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lockheed Martin Positive
Velocity Composites Neutral

Summary

Velocity Composites beats Lockheed Martin on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Velocity Composites compare to Strat Aero?

Strat Aero (LON:AERO) and Velocity Composites (LON:VEL) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, Strat Aero's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Velocity Composites'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Strat Aero Neutral
Velocity Composites Neutral

Velocity Composites has a consensus target price of GBX 40, indicating a potential upside of 116.22%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than Strat Aero.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Strat Aero
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Velocity Composites
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Strat Aero has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Velocity Composites' net margin of -8.25%. Strat Aero's return on equity of 0.00% beat Velocity Composites' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strat AeroN/A N/A N/A
Velocity Composites -8.25%-32.89%-12.42%

Strat Aero has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Velocity Composites.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strat AeroN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Velocity Composites£18.70M0.54-£2.41M-£2.83N/A

1.1% of Velocity Composites shares are held by institutional investors. 15.2% of Velocity Composites shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Velocity Composites beats Strat Aero on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Velocity Composites compare to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc?

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (LON:RR) and Velocity Composites (LON:VEL) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc had 2 more articles in the media than Velocity Composites. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and 0 mentions for Velocity Composites. Rolls-Royce Holdings plc's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Velocity Composites' score of 0.00 indicating that Rolls-Royce Holdings plc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc Neutral
Velocity Composites Neutral

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc has a beta of 1.203, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Velocity Composites has a beta of 1.162, indicating that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,690.33, indicating a potential upside of 10.49%. Velocity Composites has a consensus price target of GBX 40, indicating a potential upside of 116.22%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than Rolls-Royce Holdings plc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Velocity Composites
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc has higher revenue and earnings than Velocity Composites. Velocity Composites is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rolls-Royce Holdings plc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc£18.13B7.24£2.37B£27.4355.77
Velocity Composites£18.70M0.54-£2.41M-£2.83N/A

63.3% of Rolls-Royce Holdings plc shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Velocity Composites shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Rolls-Royce Holdings plc shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Velocity Composites shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc has a net margin of 13.11% compared to Velocity Composites' net margin of -8.25%. Rolls-Royce Holdings plc's return on equity of 108.91% beat Velocity Composites' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc13.11% 108.91% 4.61%
Velocity Composites -8.25%-32.89%-12.42%

Summary

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc beats Velocity Composites on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Velocity Composites compare to BAE Systems?

BAE Systems (LON:BA) and Velocity Composites (LON:VEL) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

BAE Systems has a net margin of 7.19% compared to Velocity Composites' net margin of -8.25%. BAE Systems' return on equity of 17.49% beat Velocity Composites' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BAE Systems7.19% 17.49% 4.46%
Velocity Composites -8.25%-32.89%-12.42%

In the previous week, BAE Systems had 4 more articles in the media than Velocity Composites. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for BAE Systems and 0 mentions for Velocity Composites. BAE Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Velocity Composites' score of 0.00 indicating that BAE Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BAE Systems Neutral
Velocity Composites Neutral

BAE Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Velocity Composites. Velocity Composites is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BAE Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BAE Systems£24.86B2.61£1.86B£58.2935.89
Velocity Composites£18.70M0.54-£2.41M-£2.83N/A

70.6% of BAE Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Velocity Composites shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of BAE Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Velocity Composites shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

BAE Systems has a beta of 0.005, suggesting that its stock price is 100% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Velocity Composites has a beta of 1.162, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

BAE Systems presently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,275, suggesting a potential upside of 8.75%. Velocity Composites has a consensus target price of GBX 40, suggesting a potential upside of 116.22%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than BAE Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BAE Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Velocity Composites
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

BAE Systems beats Velocity Composites on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Velocity Composites News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for VEL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding VEL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

VEL vs. The Competition

MetricVelocity CompositesAerospace & Defense IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£10.11M£21.99B£10.59B£2.92B
Dividend YieldN/A1.64%97.13%6.17%
P/E Ratio-6.5440.0426.36367.32
Price / Sales0.54146.38358.8083,333.29
Price / Cash4.9128.6424.4927.89
Price / Book1.696.344.446.97
Net Income-£2.41M£566.76M£611.08M£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.78%-3.18%-0.74%0.75%
1 Month Performance25.00%1.62%1.59%3.35%
1 Year Performance-19.57%11.52%10.26%23.05%

Velocity Composites Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
VEL
Velocity Composites
N/AGBX 18.50
flat
GBX 40
+116.2%
-19.6%£10.11M£18.70MN/A102
HARL
Harland & Wolff Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£14.49M£86.91MN/A81
LMT
Lockheed Martin
N/AN/AN/AN/A£0.00N/AN/A116,000
AERO
Strat Aero
N/AN/AN/AN/A£0.00N/AN/AN/A
RR
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
3.6802 of 5 stars
GBX 1,541
+1.0%
GBX 1,521
-1.3%
+45.9%£132.16B£18.13B56.1741,400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:VEL) was last updated on 8/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners