Free Trial

Sosandar (SOS) Competitors

Sosandar logo
GBX 11.19 +0.19 (+1.72%)
As of 07:00 AM Eastern

SOS vs. RM, CFX, SBSI, OFG, and FCAP

Should you buy Sosandar stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sosandar with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sosandar include RM (RM), Colefax Group (CFX), Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (SBSI), Octopus Future Generations VCT (OFG), and Cavendish Financial (FCAP). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Sosandar compare to RM?

Sosandar (LON:SOS) and RM (LON:RM) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Sosandar has a beta of 1.544, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RM has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

22.7% of Sosandar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.5% of RM shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of Sosandar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 20.1% of RM shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sosandar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RM. Sosandar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sosandar£39.64M0.63-£423.00K-£0.39N/A
RM£189.50M0.46-£47.32M-£55.02N/A

RM has a net margin of 1.35% compared to Sosandar's net margin of -2.46%. RM's return on equity of 10.33% beat Sosandar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sosandar-2.46% -5.59% -0.81%
RM 1.35%10.33%-1.51%

In the previous week, RM had 7 more articles in the media than Sosandar. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for RM and 0 mentions for Sosandar. RM's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Sosandar's score of 0.00 indicating that RM is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sosandar Neutral
RM Positive

Summary

RM beats Sosandar on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sosandar compare to Colefax Group?

Sosandar (LON:SOS) and Colefax Group (LON:CFX) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Colefax Group has a net margin of 6.13% compared to Sosandar's net margin of -2.46%. Colefax Group's return on equity of 20.89% beat Sosandar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sosandar-2.46% -5.59% -0.81%
Colefax Group 6.13%20.89%6.87%

In the previous week, Sosandar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Colefax Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sosandar Neutral
Colefax Group Neutral

Colefax Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sosandar. Sosandar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colefax Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sosandar£39.64M0.63-£423.00K-£0.39N/A
Colefax Group£116.16M0.63£5.49M£121.7011.59

Sosandar has a beta of 1.544, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Colefax Group has a beta of 0.211, meaning that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

22.7% of Sosandar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.1% of Colefax Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of Sosandar shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.8% of Colefax Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Colefax Group has a consensus target price of GBX 870, suggesting a potential downside of 38.34%. Given Colefax Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Colefax Group is more favorable than Sosandar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sosandar
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Colefax Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Colefax Group beats Sosandar on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sosandar compare to Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust?

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) and Sosandar (LON:SOS) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Sosandar. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Sosandar. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Sosandar's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive
Sosandar Neutral

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sosandar. Sosandar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M23.32£1.04M£2.1532.09
Sosandar£39.64M0.63-£423.00K-£0.39N/A

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to Sosandar's net margin of -2.46%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat Sosandar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust51.03% 2.12% 1.08%
Sosandar -2.46%-5.59%-0.81%

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, meaning that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sosandar has a beta of 1.544, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

10.9% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.7% of Sosandar shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of Sosandar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats Sosandar on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sosandar compare to Octopus Future Generations VCT?

Sosandar (LON:SOS) and Octopus Future Generations VCT (LON:OFG) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

Octopus Future Generations VCT has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sosandar. Octopus Future Generations VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sosandar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sosandar£39.64M0.63-£423.00K-£0.39N/A
Octopus Future Generations VCT-£767K-63.53N/A-£2.30N/A

In the previous week, Octopus Future Generations VCT had 1 more articles in the media than Sosandar. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Octopus Future Generations VCT and 0 mentions for Sosandar. Sosandar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Octopus Future Generations VCT's score of -0.49 indicating that Sosandar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sosandar Neutral
Octopus Future Generations VCT Neutral

Octopus Future Generations VCT has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sosandar's net margin of -2.46%. Octopus Future Generations VCT's return on equity of 0.00% beat Sosandar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sosandar-2.46% -5.59% -0.81%
Octopus Future Generations VCT N/A N/A N/A

22.7% of Sosandar shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of Sosandar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Octopus Future Generations VCT shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Sosandar beats Octopus Future Generations VCT on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sosandar compare to Cavendish Financial?

Sosandar (LON:SOS) and Cavendish Financial (LON:FCAP) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and risk.

Sosandar has a net margin of -2.46% compared to Cavendish Financial's net margin of -17.16%. Sosandar's return on equity of -5.59% beat Cavendish Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sosandar-2.46% -5.59% -0.81%
Cavendish Financial -17.16%-18.69%-9.31%

Sosandar has higher revenue and earnings than Cavendish Financial. Sosandar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cavendish Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sosandar£39.64M0.63-£423.00K-£0.39N/A
Cavendish Financial£32.15M0.00-£5.52M-£0.03N/A

22.7% of Sosandar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.2% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of Sosandar shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 85.6% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sosandar has a beta of 1.544, suggesting that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cavendish Financial has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Sosandar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cavendish Financial'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sosandar Neutral
Cavendish Financial Neutral

Summary

Sosandar beats Cavendish Financial on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sosandar News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SOS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SOS vs. The Competition

MetricSosandarInternet Retail IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£24.89M£1.89B£3.94B£2.73B
Dividend YieldN/A1.51%3.47%6.13%
P/E Ratio-28.6926.6275.89366.48
Price / Sales0.6317.80322.4886,600.07
Price / Cash6.604.0030.7927.87
Price / Book1.531.863.287.62
Net Income-£423.00K-£327.35M£249.12M£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.78%-0.83%-0.60%-1.34%
1 Month Performance31.56%10.39%0.95%0.48%
1 Year Performance31.64%6.66%-0.21%69.73%

Sosandar Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SOS
Sosandar
N/AGBX 11.19
+1.7%
N/A+32.6%£24.89M£39.64MN/A170
RM
RM
N/AGBX 105
-4.5%
N/A-8.1%£88.69M£189.50MN/A1,990
CFX
Colefax Group
N/AGBX 1,320
-1.5%
GBX 870
-34.1%
+76.9%£68.19M£116.16M10.8555,900
SBSI
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
N/AGBX 66.50
flat
N/A-8.1%£52.35M£2.32M30.93810
OFG
Octopus Future Generations VCT
N/AGBX 77
flat
N/AN/A£48.62M-£767KN/A2,250

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SOS) was last updated on 6/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners