Go Pro
→ SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years (From TradeSmith) (Ad)tc pixel Free SOS Stock Alerts

Sosandar (SOS) Competitors

Sosandar logo
GBX 11.09 +0.34 (+3.14%)
As of 06:28 AM Eastern
Compare

SOS vs. RM, CFX, SBSI, OFG, and FCAP

Should you buy Sosandar stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sosandar with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sosandar include RM (RM), Colefax Group (CFX), Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (SBSI), Octopus Future Generations VCT (OFG), and Cavendish Financial (FCAP). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Sosandar compare to RM?

RM (LON:RM) and Sosandar (LON:SOS) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, RM's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Sosandar's score of 0.00 indicating that RM is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
RM Positive
Sosandar Neutral

RM has a beta of 1.627, indicating that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sosandar has a beta of 1.544, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Sosandar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RM. Sosandar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RM£189.50M0.41-£47.32M-£55.02N/A
Sosandar£39.64M0.62-£423.00K-£0.39N/A

63.5% of RM shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.7% of Sosandar shares are held by institutional investors. 20.1% of RM shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of Sosandar shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

RM has a net margin of 1.35% compared to Sosandar's net margin of -2.46%. RM's return on equity of 10.33% beat Sosandar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RM1.35% 10.33% -1.51%
Sosandar -2.46%-5.59%-0.81%

Summary

RM beats Sosandar on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sosandar compare to Colefax Group?

Colefax Group (LON:CFX) and Sosandar (LON:SOS) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Colefax Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 870, indicating a potential downside of 39.08%. Given Colefax Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Colefax Group is more favorable than Sosandar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Colefax Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Sosandar
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Colefax Group has a beta of 0.203, meaning that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sosandar has a beta of 1.544, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Colefax Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sosandar. Sosandar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colefax Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Colefax Group£116.16M0.64£5.49M£121.7011.73
Sosandar£39.64M0.62-£423.00K-£0.39N/A

Colefax Group has a net margin of 6.13% compared to Sosandar's net margin of -2.46%. Colefax Group's return on equity of 20.89% beat Sosandar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Colefax Group6.13% 20.89% 6.87%
Sosandar -2.46%-5.59%-0.81%

29.1% of Colefax Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.7% of Sosandar shares are held by institutional investors. 26.8% of Colefax Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of Sosandar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Colefax Group had 1 more articles in the media than Sosandar. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Colefax Group and 0 mentions for Sosandar. Colefax Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sosandar'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Colefax Group Neutral
Sosandar Neutral

Summary

Colefax Group beats Sosandar on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sosandar compare to Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust?

Sosandar (LON:SOS) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Sosandar has a beta of 1.544, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, indicating that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sosandar. Sosandar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sosandar£39.64M0.62-£423.00K-£0.39N/A
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M24.37£1.04M£2.1533.54

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to Sosandar's net margin of -2.46%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat Sosandar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sosandar-2.46% -5.59% -0.81%
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Sosandar. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Sosandar. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Sosandar's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sosandar Neutral
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive

22.7% of Sosandar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of Sosandar shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats Sosandar on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sosandar compare to Octopus Future Generations VCT?

Sosandar (LON:SOS) and Octopus Future Generations VCT (LON:OFG) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Octopus Future Generations VCT has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sosandar. Octopus Future Generations VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sosandar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sosandar£39.64M0.62-£423.00K-£0.39N/A
Octopus Future Generations VCT-£767K-63.53N/A-£2.30N/A

Octopus Future Generations VCT has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sosandar's net margin of -2.46%. Octopus Future Generations VCT's return on equity of 0.00% beat Sosandar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sosandar-2.46% -5.59% -0.81%
Octopus Future Generations VCT N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Sosandar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Octopus Future Generations VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sosandar Neutral
Octopus Future Generations VCT Neutral

22.7% of Sosandar shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of Sosandar shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Octopus Future Generations VCT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Sosandar beats Octopus Future Generations VCT on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sosandar compare to Cavendish Financial?

Cavendish Financial (LON:FCAP) and Sosandar (LON:SOS) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

9.2% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.7% of Sosandar shares are held by institutional investors. 85.6% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of Sosandar shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sosandar has higher revenue and earnings than Cavendish Financial. Sosandar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cavendish Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cavendish Financial£32.15M0.00-£5.52M-£0.03N/A
Sosandar£39.64M0.62-£423.00K-£0.39N/A

Cavendish Financial has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sosandar has a beta of 1.544, meaning that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Sosandar has a net margin of -2.46% compared to Cavendish Financial's net margin of -17.16%. Sosandar's return on equity of -5.59% beat Cavendish Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cavendish Financial-17.16% -18.69% -9.31%
Sosandar -2.46%-5.59%-0.81%

In the previous week, Cavendish Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sosandar'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cavendish Financial Neutral
Sosandar Neutral

Summary

Sosandar beats Cavendish Financial on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sosandar News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SOS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SOS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSosandarInternet Retail IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£24.66M£1.90B£3.85B£2.79B
Dividend YieldN/A1.51%3.49%6.15%
P/E Ratio-28.4326.7478.74366.72
Price / Sales0.6218.38336.3986,213.46
Price / Cash6.604.0030.8127.87
Price / Book1.511.883.517.75
Net Income-£423.00K-£327.35M£249.12M£5.89B
7 Day Performance8.49%1.57%0.13%0.35%
1 Month Performance3.14%0.80%-0.90%-1.50%
1 Year Performance30.45%5.69%-1.46%65.24%

Sosandar Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SOS
Sosandar
N/AGBX 11.09
+3.1%		N/A+30.2%£24.66M£39.64MN/A170
RM
RM
N/AGBX 91
-1.1%		N/A+11.3%£76.87M£189.50MN/A1,990
CFX
Colefax Group
0.7008 of 5 stars		GBX 1,415
+1.1%		GBX 870
-38.5%		+80.0%£73.10M£116.16M11.6355,900
SBSI
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
N/AGBX 71.55
-0.6%		N/A-6.4%£56.04M£2.32M33.28810
OFG
Octopus Future Generations VCT
N/AGBX 77
flat		N/AN/A£48.73M-£767KN/A2,250

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SOS) was last updated on 7/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
What Happens to Your Assets If You Die Without a Will?
Without a will, your state's intestacy laws decide how your assets are divided — a rigid formula that ignores ...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Urgent exposé on the "Mar-a-Lago Trade"
Dr. David Eifrig, former Goldman Sachs VP and Senior Partner at Stansberry Research, has released an urgent ex...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
The pre-flight check for options traders
Pilots never skip their pre-flight checklist - and neither should options traders. The Smart Trade Options Che...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX IPO hides a much bigger story
The SpaceX IPO could be the biggest in history at $1.75 trillion - but the real story isn't the IPO itself. ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Starlink of Energy
A portable energy unit - already used by the U.S. Navy for decades - is now drawing serious attention from Big...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold to $4,900—Here’s the Real Play
Gold is hitting new highs, fueled by tariffs and record central bank demand - 710 tonnes per quarter. JPMorgan...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel