Go Pro

Sosandar (SOS) Competitors

Sosandar logo
GBX 12 -0.10 (-0.83%)
As of 07/22/2026 11:59 AM Eastern

SOS vs. RM, CFX, SBSI, OFG, and FCAP

Should you buy Sosandar stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sosandar with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sosandar include RM (RM), Colefax Group (CFX), Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (SBSI), Octopus Future Generations VCT (OFG), and Cavendish Financial (FCAP). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Sosandar compare to RM?

Sosandar (LON:SOS) and RM (LON:RM) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and valuation.

22.7% of Sosandar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.5% of RM shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.3% of Sosandar shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.1% of RM shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

RM has a net margin of 2.20% compared to Sosandar's net margin of 0.84%. RM's return on equity of 11.11% beat Sosandar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sosandar0.84% 2.09% -0.81%
RM 2.20%11.11%-1.51%

In the previous week, RM had 1 more articles in the media than Sosandar. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for RM and 1 mentions for Sosandar. Sosandar's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat RM's score of 0.16 indicating that Sosandar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sosandar
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
RM
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Sosandar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RM. Sosandar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sosandar£39.64M0.66-£423.00K-£0.39N/A
RM£189.50M0.40-£47.32M-£55.02N/A

Sosandar has a beta of 1.552, suggesting that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RM has a beta of 1.657, suggesting that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

RM beats Sosandar on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sosandar compare to Colefax Group?

Sosandar (LON:SOS) and Colefax Group (LON:CFX) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Colefax Group has a net margin of 6.13% compared to Sosandar's net margin of 0.84%. Colefax Group's return on equity of 20.89% beat Sosandar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sosandar0.84% 2.09% -0.81%
Colefax Group 6.13%20.89%6.87%

In the previous week, Sosandar had 1 more articles in the media than Colefax Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Sosandar and 0 mentions for Colefax Group. Sosandar's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Colefax Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Sosandar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sosandar Positive
Colefax Group Neutral

Colefax Group has a consensus target price of GBX 870, indicating a potential downside of 37.86%. Given Colefax Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Colefax Group is more favorable than Sosandar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sosandar
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Colefax Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Sosandar has a beta of 1.552, indicating that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Colefax Group has a beta of 0.187, indicating that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Colefax Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sosandar. Sosandar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colefax Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sosandar£39.64M0.66-£423.00K-£0.39N/A
Colefax Group£116.16M0.60£5.49M£121.7011.50

22.7% of Sosandar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.1% of Colefax Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.3% of Sosandar shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.7% of Colefax Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Colefax Group beats Sosandar on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sosandar compare to Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust?

Sosandar (LON:SOS) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

22.7% of Sosandar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 9.3% of Sosandar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sosandar. Sosandar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sosandar£39.64M0.66-£423.00K-£0.39N/A
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M25.63£1.04M£2.1535.35

In the previous week, Sosandar and Sosandar both had 1 articles in the media. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Sosandar's score of 1.42 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sosandar
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to Sosandar's net margin of 0.84%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat Sosandar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sosandar0.84% 2.09% -0.81%
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

Sosandar has a beta of 1.552, indicating that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, indicating that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats Sosandar on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sosandar compare to Octopus Future Generations VCT?

Sosandar (LON:SOS) and Octopus Future Generations VCT (LON:OFG) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

22.7% of Sosandar shares are held by institutional investors. 9.3% of Sosandar shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Octopus Future Generations VCT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Sosandar had 1 more articles in the media than Octopus Future Generations VCT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Sosandar and 0 mentions for Octopus Future Generations VCT. Sosandar's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Octopus Future Generations VCT's score of 0.00 indicating that Sosandar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sosandar Positive
Octopus Future Generations VCT Neutral

Octopus Future Generations VCT has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sosandar. Octopus Future Generations VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sosandar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sosandar£39.64M0.66-£423.00K-£0.39N/A
Octopus Future Generations VCT-£767K-63.53N/A-£2.30N/A

Sosandar has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Octopus Future Generations VCT's net margin of 0.00%. Sosandar's return on equity of 2.09% beat Octopus Future Generations VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sosandar0.84% 2.09% -0.81%
Octopus Future Generations VCT N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Sosandar beats Octopus Future Generations VCT on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sosandar compare to Cavendish Financial?

Cavendish Financial (LON:FCAP) and Sosandar (LON:SOS) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Sosandar had 1 more articles in the media than Cavendish Financial. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Sosandar and 0 mentions for Cavendish Financial. Sosandar's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Cavendish Financial's score of 0.00 indicating that Sosandar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cavendish Financial Neutral
Sosandar Positive

Sosandar has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Cavendish Financial's net margin of -17.16%. Sosandar's return on equity of 2.09% beat Cavendish Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cavendish Financial-17.16% -18.69% -9.31%
Sosandar 0.84%2.09%-0.81%

Cavendish Financial has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sosandar has a beta of 1.552, suggesting that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

Sosandar has higher revenue and earnings than Cavendish Financial. Sosandar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cavendish Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cavendish Financial£32.15M0.00-£5.52M-£0.03N/A
Sosandar£39.64M0.66-£423.00K-£0.39N/A

9.2% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.7% of Sosandar shares are held by institutional investors. 85.6% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.3% of Sosandar shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sosandar beats Cavendish Financial on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sosandar News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SOS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SOS vs. The Competition

MetricSosandarInternet Retail IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£26.18M£1.91B£3.87B£2.88B
Dividend YieldN/A1.51%3.46%6.16%
P/E Ratio-30.7726.6077.36368.27
Price / Sales0.6618.50343.4484,379.67
Price / Cash6.604.0030.8227.89
Price / Book1.641.953.577.61
Net Income-£423.00K-£327.35M£249.12M£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.89%-0.58%0.03%0.39%
1 Month Performance4.35%3.25%6.51%-0.64%
1 Year Performance118.14%12.03%3.71%62.99%

Sosandar Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SOS
Sosandar
N/AGBX 12
-0.8%
N/A+118.1%£26.18M£39.64MN/A170
RM
RM
N/AGBX 91.60
+2.2%
N/A-10.9%£77.38M£189.50MN/A1,990
CFX
Colefax Group
N/AGBX 1,435
+1.7%
GBX 870
-39.4%
+83.9%£71.23M£116.16M11.7955,900
SBSI
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
N/AGBX 75
+0.7%
N/A+5.6%£58.63M£2.32M34.88810
OFG
Octopus Future Generations VCT
N/AGBX 77
flat
N/AN/A£48.73M-£767KN/A2,250

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SOS) was last updated on 7/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners