Go Pro

Newmark Security (NWT) Competitors

Newmark Security logo
GBX 112.88 +1.38 (+1.24%)
As of 07:18 AM Eastern

NWT vs. FCAP, OBT, PFC, TRIN, and SOS

Should you buy Newmark Security stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Newmark Security with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Newmark Security include Cavendish Financial (FCAP), Obtala (OBT), Petrofac (PFC), Trinity Exploration & Production (TRIN), and Sosandar (SOS). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Newmark Security compare to Cavendish Financial?

Cavendish Financial (LON:FCAP) and Newmark Security (LON:NWT) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, Cavendish Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Newmark Security'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cavendish Financial Neutral
Newmark Security Neutral

Newmark Security has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cavendish Financial. Cavendish Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Newmark Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cavendish Financial£32.15M0.00-£5.52M-£0.03N/A
Newmark Security£24.37M0.44£134.00K£10.4810.77

Cavendish Financial has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Newmark Security has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Newmark Security has a net margin of 4.19% compared to Cavendish Financial's net margin of -17.16%. Newmark Security's return on equity of 11.74% beat Cavendish Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cavendish Financial-17.16% -18.69% -9.31%
Newmark Security 4.19%11.74%2.75%

9.2% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.3% of Newmark Security shares are held by institutional investors. 85.6% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 52.3% of Newmark Security shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Newmark Security beats Cavendish Financial on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Newmark Security compare to Obtala?

Newmark Security (LON:NWT) and Obtala (LON:OBT) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

Newmark Security has higher revenue and earnings than Obtala. Obtala is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Newmark Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Newmark Security£24.37M0.44£134.00K£10.4810.77
Obtala£14.89M0.00N/A-£3.70N/A

Newmark Security has a net margin of 4.19% compared to Obtala's net margin of 0.00%. Newmark Security's return on equity of 11.74% beat Obtala's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Newmark Security4.19% 11.74% 2.75%
Obtala N/A N/A N/A

53.3% of Newmark Security shares are held by institutional investors. 52.3% of Newmark Security shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Newmark Security's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Obtala'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Newmark Security Neutral
Obtala Neutral

Summary

Newmark Security beats Obtala on 8 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Newmark Security compare to Petrofac?

Newmark Security (LON:NWT) and Petrofac (LON:PFC) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Newmark Security has a net margin of 4.19% compared to Petrofac's net margin of -20.23%. Petrofac's return on equity of 371.32% beat Newmark Security's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Newmark Security4.19% 11.74% 2.75%
Petrofac -20.23%371.32%-9.55%

In the previous week, Newmark Security's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Petrofac'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Newmark Security Neutral
Petrofac Neutral

Newmark Security has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Petrofac. Petrofac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Newmark Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Newmark Security£24.37M0.44£134.00K£10.4810.77
Petrofac£3.30B0.00-£714.53M-£81.55N/A

53.3% of Newmark Security shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Petrofac shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.3% of Newmark Security shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of Petrofac shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Newmark Security has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petrofac has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Newmark Security beats Petrofac on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Newmark Security compare to Trinity Exploration & Production?

Newmark Security (LON:NWT) and Trinity Exploration & Production (LON:TRIN) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

53.3% of Newmark Security shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.6% of Trinity Exploration & Production shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.3% of Newmark Security shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 85.5% of Trinity Exploration & Production shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Newmark Security has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trinity Exploration & Production. Trinity Exploration & Production is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Newmark Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Newmark Security£24.37M0.44£134.00K£10.4810.77
Trinity Exploration & Production£69.83M0.00-£6.80M-£0.13N/A

Newmark Security has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trinity Exploration & Production has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Newmark Security has a net margin of 4.19% compared to Trinity Exploration & Production's net margin of -9.74%. Newmark Security's return on equity of 11.74% beat Trinity Exploration & Production's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Newmark Security4.19% 11.74% 2.75%
Trinity Exploration & Production -9.74%-12.94%-4.73%

In the previous week, Newmark Security's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trinity Exploration & Production'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Newmark Security Neutral
Trinity Exploration & Production Neutral

Summary

Newmark Security beats Trinity Exploration & Production on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Newmark Security compare to Sosandar?

Newmark Security (LON:NWT) and Sosandar (LON:SOS) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Newmark Security has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sosandar. Sosandar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Newmark Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Newmark Security£24.37M0.44£134.00K£10.4810.77
Sosandar£39.64M0.62-£423.00K-£0.39N/A

In the previous week, Newmark Security's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sosandar'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Newmark Security Neutral
Sosandar Neutral

Newmark Security has a net margin of 4.19% compared to Sosandar's net margin of -2.46%. Newmark Security's return on equity of 11.74% beat Sosandar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Newmark Security4.19% 11.74% 2.75%
Sosandar -2.46%-5.59%-0.81%

Newmark Security has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sosandar has a beta of 1.544, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

53.3% of Newmark Security shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.7% of Sosandar shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.3% of Newmark Security shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of Sosandar shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Newmark Security beats Sosandar on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Newmark Security News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NWT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NWT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NWT vs. The Competition

MetricNewmark SecuritySecurity & Protection Services IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£10.64M£93.86M£9.78B£2.79B
Dividend Yield8.51%6.90%3.53%6.15%
P/E Ratio10.7735.0325.07366.72
Price / Sales0.4453.164,781.2186,213.46
Price / Cash14.359.5927.7427.87
Price / Book1.302.104.647.75
Net Income£134.00K£632.44K£791.01M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-4.34%0.75%0.55%0.35%
1 Month Performance-1.84%-0.77%-0.66%-1.50%
1 Year Performance55.91%-2.19%20.56%65.24%

Newmark Security Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NWT
Newmark Security
N/AGBX 112.88
+1.2%
N/A+63.0%£10.64M£24.37M10.77102
FCAP
Cavendish Financial
N/AN/AN/AN/A£28.61M£32.15MN/A220
OBT
Obtala
N/AN/AN/AN/A£28.50M£14.89MN/A210
PFC
Petrofac
N/AN/AN/AN/A£26.88M£3.30BN/A8,600
TRIN
Trinity Exploration & Production
N/AN/AN/AN/A£26.38M£69.83MN/A40

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:NWT) was last updated on 7/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners