Go Pro

Thruvision Group (THRU) Competitors

Thruvision Group logo
GBX 0.70 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/26/2026 11:27 AM Eastern

THRU vs. MRL, NWT, CSSG, MORT, and PEG

Should you buy Thruvision Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Thruvision Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Thruvision Group include Marlowe (MRL), Newmark Security (NWT), Croma Security Solutions Group (CSSG), Mortice (MORT), and Petards Group (PEG). These companies are all part of the "security & protection services" industry.

How does Thruvision Group compare to Marlowe?

Thruvision Group (LON:THRU) and Marlowe (LON:MRL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Thruvision Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Marlowe. Thruvision Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marlowe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thruvision Group£4.87M0.64-£4.31M-£2.13N/A
Marlowe£304.50M0.03-£8.48M£1.598.06

In the previous week, Thruvision Group had 3 more articles in the media than Marlowe. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Thruvision Group and 0 mentions for Marlowe. Thruvision Group's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Marlowe's score of 0.00 indicating that Thruvision Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thruvision Group Positive
Marlowe Neutral

Marlowe has a consensus target price of GBX 466, indicating a potential upside of 3,529.28%. Given Marlowe's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Marlowe is more favorable than Thruvision Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thruvision Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Marlowe
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

20.2% of Thruvision Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.2% of Marlowe shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Thruvision Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.4% of Marlowe shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Marlowe has a net margin of 46.34% compared to Thruvision Group's net margin of -90.86%. Marlowe's return on equity of 45.01% beat Thruvision Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thruvision Group-90.86% -76.54% -15.16%
Marlowe 46.34%45.01%1.41%

Thruvision Group has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marlowe has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Marlowe beats Thruvision Group on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thruvision Group compare to Newmark Security?

Newmark Security (LON:NWT) and Thruvision Group (LON:THRU) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Newmark Security has higher revenue and earnings than Thruvision Group. Thruvision Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Newmark Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Newmark Security£24.37M0.45£134.00K£10.4811.14
Thruvision Group£4.87M0.64-£4.31M-£2.13N/A

53.3% of Newmark Security shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.2% of Thruvision Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.3% of Newmark Security shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Thruvision Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Thruvision Group had 3 more articles in the media than Newmark Security. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Thruvision Group and 0 mentions for Newmark Security. Thruvision Group's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Newmark Security's score of 0.00 indicating that Thruvision Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Newmark Security Neutral
Thruvision Group Positive

Newmark Security has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thruvision Group has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

Newmark Security has a net margin of 4.19% compared to Thruvision Group's net margin of -90.86%. Newmark Security's return on equity of 11.74% beat Thruvision Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Newmark Security4.19% 11.74% 2.75%
Thruvision Group -90.86%-76.54%-15.16%

Summary

Newmark Security beats Thruvision Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thruvision Group compare to Croma Security Solutions Group?

Thruvision Group (LON:THRU) and Croma Security Solutions Group (LON:CSSG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Thruvision Group had 2 more articles in the media than Croma Security Solutions Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Thruvision Group and 1 mentions for Croma Security Solutions Group. Thruvision Group's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Croma Security Solutions Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Thruvision Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Thruvision Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Croma Security Solutions Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

20.2% of Thruvision Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.8% of Croma Security Solutions Group shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Thruvision Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 75.4% of Croma Security Solutions Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Croma Security Solutions Group has a net margin of 6.60% compared to Thruvision Group's net margin of -90.86%. Croma Security Solutions Group's return on equity of 4.23% beat Thruvision Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thruvision Group-90.86% -76.54% -15.16%
Croma Security Solutions Group 6.60%4.23%1.67%

Thruvision Group has a beta of 0.25, indicating that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Croma Security Solutions Group has a beta of 0.381, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Croma Security Solutions Group has higher revenue and earnings than Thruvision Group. Thruvision Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Croma Security Solutions Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thruvision Group£4.87M0.64-£4.31M-£2.13N/A
Croma Security Solutions Group£10.05M0.91£562.28K£4.8113.83

Summary

Croma Security Solutions Group beats Thruvision Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thruvision Group compare to Mortice?

Thruvision Group (LON:THRU) and Mortice (LON:MORT) are both small-cap security & protection services industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Thruvision Group had 3 more articles in the media than Mortice. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Thruvision Group and 0 mentions for Mortice. Thruvision Group's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Mortice's score of 0.00 indicating that Thruvision Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thruvision Group Positive
Mortice Neutral

20.2% of Thruvision Group shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Thruvision Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mortice has higher revenue and earnings than Thruvision Group. Thruvision Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mortice, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thruvision Group£4.87M0.64-£4.31M-£2.13N/A
Mortice£229.62M0.00N/A£5.30N/A

Mortice has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Thruvision Group's net margin of -90.86%. Mortice's return on equity of 0.00% beat Thruvision Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thruvision Group-90.86% -76.54% -15.16%
Mortice N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Mortice beats Thruvision Group on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thruvision Group compare to Petards Group?

Petards Group (LON:PEG) and Thruvision Group (LON:THRU) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Petards Group has higher revenue and earnings than Thruvision Group. Petards Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thruvision Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petards Group£14.95M0.38-£1.83M-£0.67N/A
Thruvision Group£4.87M0.64-£4.31M-£2.13N/A

Petards Group has a net margin of -2.72% compared to Thruvision Group's net margin of -90.86%. Petards Group's return on equity of -6.73% beat Thruvision Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petards Group-2.72% -6.73% -8.39%
Thruvision Group -90.86%-76.54%-15.16%

In the previous week, Thruvision Group had 2 more articles in the media than Petards Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Thruvision Group and 1 mentions for Petards Group. Thruvision Group's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Petards Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Thruvision Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Petards Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Thruvision Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

0.0% of Petards Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.2% of Thruvision Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.7% of Petards Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Thruvision Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Petards Group has a beta of 0.221, indicating that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thruvision Group has a beta of 0.25, indicating that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Petards Group beats Thruvision Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thruvision Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for THRU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

THRU vs. The Competition

MetricThruvision GroupSecurity & Protection Services IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.13M£89.86M£9.69B£2.79B
Dividend Yield1.85%6.90%3.54%6.16%
P/E Ratio-0.3333.8125.62366.66
Price / Sales0.6453.104,851.7286,088.44
Price / Cash6.039.5927.9827.87
Price / Book0.172.054.587.79
Net Income-£4.31M£632.44K£792.16M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-6.67%-0.63%0.12%-0.61%
1 Month Performance-6.67%-2.05%-0.87%-1.14%
1 Year Performance-15.66%-2.41%21.49%65.93%

Thruvision Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
THRU
Thruvision Group
N/AGBX 0.70
flat
N/A-26.3%£3.13M£4.87MN/A43
MRL
Marlowe
N/AGBX 12.84
flat
GBX 466
+3,529.3%
-97.1%£10.11M£304.50M8.064,972
NWT
Newmark Security
N/AGBX 106.30
-4.7%
N/A+56.6%£10.02M£24.37M10.14102
CSSG
Croma Security Solutions Group
N/AGBX 70
+3.7%
N/A-15.0%£9.64M£10.05M14.5572
MORT
Mortice
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.40M£229.62M2.64N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:THRU) was last updated on 6/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners