Go Pro

Thruvision Group (THRU) Competitors

Thruvision Group logo
GBX 0.62 0.00 (-0.16%)
As of 11:04 AM Eastern

THRU vs. MRL, NWT, CSSG, MORT, and PEG

Should you buy Thruvision Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Thruvision Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Thruvision Group include Marlowe (MRL), Newmark Security (NWT), Croma Security Solutions Group (CSSG), Mortice (MORT), and Petards Group (PEG).

How does Thruvision Group compare to Marlowe?

Marlowe (LON:MRL) and Thruvision Group (LON:THRU) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

50.2% of Marlowe shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.2% of Thruvision Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.4% of Marlowe shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Thruvision Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Marlowe's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Thruvision Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Marlowe Neutral
Thruvision Group Neutral

Marlowe has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thruvision Group has a beta of 0.263, suggesting that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

Thruvision Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Marlowe. Thruvision Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marlowe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marlowe£304.50M0.03-£8.48M£1.598.06
Thruvision Group£6.02M0.46-£4.31M-£1.01N/A

Marlowe has a net margin of 46.34% compared to Thruvision Group's net margin of -60.32%. Marlowe's return on equity of 45.01% beat Thruvision Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marlowe46.34% 45.01% 1.41%
Thruvision Group -60.32%-67.80%-15.16%

Summary

Marlowe beats Thruvision Group on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thruvision Group compare to Newmark Security?

Thruvision Group (LON:THRU) and Newmark Security (LON:NWT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Newmark Security's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Thruvision Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Newmark Security is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thruvision Group Neutral
Newmark Security Positive

Newmark Security has higher revenue and earnings than Thruvision Group. Thruvision Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Newmark Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thruvision Group£6.02M0.46-£4.31M-£1.01N/A
Newmark Security£24.37M0.44£134.00K£10.4810.88

Thruvision Group has a beta of 0.263, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Newmark Security has a beta of 1.241, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Newmark Security has a net margin of 4.19% compared to Thruvision Group's net margin of -60.32%. Newmark Security's return on equity of 11.74% beat Thruvision Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thruvision Group-60.32% -67.80% -15.16%
Newmark Security 4.19%11.74%2.75%

20.2% of Thruvision Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.3% of Newmark Security shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Thruvision Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.3% of Newmark Security shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Newmark Security beats Thruvision Group on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thruvision Group compare to Croma Security Solutions Group?

Thruvision Group (LON:THRU) and Croma Security Solutions Group (LON:CSSG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Croma Security Solutions Group has higher revenue and earnings than Thruvision Group. Thruvision Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Croma Security Solutions Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thruvision Group£6.02M0.46-£4.31M-£1.01N/A
Croma Security Solutions Group£10.05M0.99£562.28K£4.8114.97

Croma Security Solutions Group has a net margin of 6.60% compared to Thruvision Group's net margin of -60.32%. Croma Security Solutions Group's return on equity of 4.23% beat Thruvision Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thruvision Group-60.32% -67.80% -15.16%
Croma Security Solutions Group 6.60%4.23%1.67%

20.2% of Thruvision Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.8% of Croma Security Solutions Group shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Thruvision Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 75.5% of Croma Security Solutions Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Thruvision Group has a beta of 0.263, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Croma Security Solutions Group has a beta of 0.398, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Croma Security Solutions Group had 1 more articles in the media than Thruvision Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Croma Security Solutions Group and 0 mentions for Thruvision Group. Croma Security Solutions Group's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Thruvision Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Croma Security Solutions Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thruvision Group Neutral
Croma Security Solutions Group Positive

Summary

Croma Security Solutions Group beats Thruvision Group on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thruvision Group compare to Mortice?

Thruvision Group (LON:THRU) and Mortice (LON:MORT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Mortice has higher revenue and earnings than Thruvision Group. Thruvision Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mortice, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thruvision Group£6.02M0.46-£4.31M-£1.01N/A
Mortice£229.62M0.00N/A£5.30N/A

Mortice has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Thruvision Group's net margin of -60.32%. Mortice's return on equity of 0.00% beat Thruvision Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thruvision Group-60.32% -67.80% -15.16%
Mortice N/A N/A N/A

20.2% of Thruvision Group shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Thruvision Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Thruvision Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mortice'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thruvision Group Neutral
Mortice Neutral

Summary

Mortice beats Thruvision Group on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thruvision Group compare to Petards Group?

Petards Group (LON:PEG) and Thruvision Group (LON:THRU) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

0.0% of Petards Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.2% of Thruvision Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.7% of Petards Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Thruvision Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Petards Group has a beta of 0.235, meaning that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thruvision Group has a beta of 0.263, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Petards Group had 1 more articles in the media than Thruvision Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Petards Group and 0 mentions for Thruvision Group. Petards Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Thruvision Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Petards Group Neutral
Thruvision Group Neutral

Petards Group has a net margin of -2.72% compared to Thruvision Group's net margin of -60.32%. Petards Group's return on equity of -6.73% beat Thruvision Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petards Group-2.72% -6.73% -8.39%
Thruvision Group -60.32%-67.80%-15.16%

Petards Group has higher revenue and earnings than Thruvision Group. Petards Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thruvision Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petards Group£14.95M0.41-£1.83M-£0.67N/A
Thruvision Group£6.02M0.46-£4.31M-£1.01N/A

Summary

Petards Group beats Thruvision Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thruvision Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for THRU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

THRU vs. The Competition

MetricThruvision GroupCommercial Services & Supplies IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.80M£4.27B£10.82B£2.87B
Dividend Yield1.85%5.07%120.64%6.13%
P/E Ratio-0.6230.7028.40369.49
Price / Sales0.461,070.03318.2483,955.55
Price / Cash6.0322.9924.9127.89
Price / Book0.164.154.517.07
Net Income-£4.31M£147.34M£607.47M£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.65%0.86%2.87%1.18%
1 Month Performance-4.00%-0.01%-0.77%0.90%
1 Year Performance-59.43%13.31%13.67%75.31%

Thruvision Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
THRU
Thruvision Group
N/AGBX 0.62
-0.2%
N/A-61.7%£2.80M£6.02MN/A43
MRL
Marlowe
N/AGBX 12.84
flat
N/A-97.1%£10.11M£304.50M8.064,972
NWT
Newmark Security
N/AGBX 105
-4.5%
N/A+40.3%£9.90M£24.37M10.02102
CSSG
Croma Security Solutions Group
N/AGBX 67.25
-1.1%
N/A-17.1%£9.26M£10.05M13.9872
MORT
Mortice
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.40M£229.62M2.64N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:THRU) was last updated on 8/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners