Go Pro

Tiger Royalties and Investments (TIR) Competitors

GBX 5.75 -51.75 (-90.00%)
As of 07/13/2026

TIR vs. TEAM, TPVE, YOLO, FFWD, and MAFL

Should you buy Tiger Royalties and Investments stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tiger Royalties and Investments with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tiger Royalties and Investments include TEAM (TEAM), Triple Point Income VCT Plc E (TPVE), Yolo Leisure and Technology (YOLO), Fastforward Innovations (FFWD), and Mineral & Financial Investments (MAFL). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Tiger Royalties and Investments compare to TEAM?

TEAM (LON:TEAM) and Tiger Royalties and Investments (LON:TIR) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

TEAM has a beta of 0.863, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tiger Royalties and Investments has a beta of 0.508, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

3.0% of TEAM shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.9% of Tiger Royalties and Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of TEAM shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.2% of Tiger Royalties and Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

TEAM has a net margin of -25.49% compared to Tiger Royalties and Investments' net margin of -379.39%. TEAM's return on equity of -25.29% beat Tiger Royalties and Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TEAM-25.49% -25.29% -12.47%
Tiger Royalties and Investments -379.39%-73.93%-46.81%

Tiger Royalties and Investments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TEAM. TEAM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tiger Royalties and Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TEAM£11.95M1.46-£1.73M-£5.90N/A
Tiger Royalties and Investments-£477.59K-102.76-£296.64K-£4.00N/A

In the previous week, TEAM had 2 more articles in the media than Tiger Royalties and Investments. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for TEAM and 0 mentions for Tiger Royalties and Investments. TEAM's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Tiger Royalties and Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that TEAM is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TEAM Positive
Tiger Royalties and Investments Neutral

Summary

TEAM beats Tiger Royalties and Investments on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tiger Royalties and Investments compare to Triple Point Income VCT Plc E?

Tiger Royalties and Investments (LON:TIR) and Triple Point Income VCT Plc E (LON:TPVE) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Triple Point Income VCT Plc E has a net margin of 32.42% compared to Tiger Royalties and Investments' net margin of -379.39%. Triple Point Income VCT Plc E's return on equity of 3.97% beat Tiger Royalties and Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tiger Royalties and Investments-379.39% -73.93% -46.81%
Triple Point Income VCT Plc E 32.42%3.97%2.47%

7.9% of Tiger Royalties and Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 31.2% of Tiger Royalties and Investments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.3% of Triple Point Income VCT Plc E shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Tiger Royalties and Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Triple Point Income VCT Plc E'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tiger Royalties and Investments Neutral
Triple Point Income VCT Plc E Neutral

Tiger Royalties and Investments has a beta of 0.508, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Triple Point Income VCT Plc E has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

Triple Point Income VCT Plc E has higher revenue and earnings than Tiger Royalties and Investments. Tiger Royalties and Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Point Income VCT Plc E, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tiger Royalties and Investments-£477.59K-102.76-£296.64K-£4.00N/A
Triple Point Income VCT Plc E£4.35M0.00£1.41M£0.08N/A

Summary

Triple Point Income VCT Plc E beats Tiger Royalties and Investments on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tiger Royalties and Investments compare to Yolo Leisure and Technology?

Tiger Royalties and Investments (LON:TIR) and Yolo Leisure and Technology (LON:YOLO) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Yolo Leisure and Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Tiger Royalties and Investments. Tiger Royalties and Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yolo Leisure and Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tiger Royalties and Investments-£477.59K-102.76-£296.64K-£4.00N/A
Yolo Leisure and Technology£14K0.00N/A-£1.50N/A

7.9% of Tiger Royalties and Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 31.2% of Tiger Royalties and Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Yolo Leisure and Technology has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tiger Royalties and Investments' net margin of -379.39%. Yolo Leisure and Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tiger Royalties and Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tiger Royalties and Investments-379.39% -73.93% -46.81%
Yolo Leisure and Technology N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Tiger Royalties and Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Yolo Leisure and Technology'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tiger Royalties and Investments Neutral
Yolo Leisure and Technology Neutral

Summary

Yolo Leisure and Technology beats Tiger Royalties and Investments on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tiger Royalties and Investments compare to Fastforward Innovations?

Fastforward Innovations (LON:FFWD) and Tiger Royalties and Investments (LON:TIR) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

7.9% of Tiger Royalties and Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 31.2% of Tiger Royalties and Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fastforward Innovations has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tiger Royalties and Investments. Tiger Royalties and Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fastforward Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fastforward Innovations-£4.19M0.00N/A-£3.30N/A
Tiger Royalties and Investments-£477.59K-102.76-£296.64K-£4.00N/A

Fastforward Innovations has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tiger Royalties and Investments' net margin of -379.39%. Fastforward Innovations' return on equity of 0.00% beat Tiger Royalties and Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fastforward InnovationsN/A N/A N/A
Tiger Royalties and Investments -379.39%-73.93%-46.81%

In the previous week, Fastforward Innovations' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tiger Royalties and Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fastforward Innovations Neutral
Tiger Royalties and Investments Neutral

Summary

Fastforward Innovations and Tiger Royalties and Investments tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tiger Royalties and Investments compare to Mineral & Financial Investments?

Tiger Royalties and Investments (LON:TIR) and Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

Mineral & Financial Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Tiger Royalties and Investments. Tiger Royalties and Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mineral & Financial Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tiger Royalties and Investments-£477.59K-102.76-£296.64K-£4.00N/A
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M11.07£2.04M£8.405.02

7.9% of Tiger Royalties and Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.2% of Tiger Royalties and Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 125.37% compared to Tiger Royalties and Investments' net margin of -379.39%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat Tiger Royalties and Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tiger Royalties and Investments-379.39% -73.93% -46.81%
Mineral & Financial Investments 125.37%23.41%11.52%

In the previous week, Tiger Royalties and Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mineral & Financial Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tiger Royalties and Investments Neutral
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral

Tiger Royalties and Investments has a beta of 0.508, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.683, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Tiger Royalties and Investments on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tiger Royalties and Investments News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TIR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TIR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TIR vs. The Competition

MetricTiger Royalties and InvestmentsAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£49.08M£2.54B£6.21B£2.78B
Dividend YieldN/A6.00%5.24%6.13%
P/E Ratio-1.4462.8430.12368.63
Price / Sales-102.761,850.861,180.4284,796.30
Price / Cash3.5060.3388.6827.87
Price / Book330.792.167.157.79
Net Income-£296.64K£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance936.04%1.86%0.96%1.32%
1 Month PerformanceN/A1.56%0.74%-0.69%
1 Year Performance173.81%8.38%15.98%62.55%

Tiger Royalties and Investments Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TIR
Tiger Royalties and Investments
N/AGBX 5.75
-90.0%
N/A-75.7%£49.08M-£477.59KN/A4
TEAM
TEAM
N/AGBX 16.70
+1.2%
N/A-50.0%£18.32M£11.95MN/A87
TPVE
Triple Point Income VCT Plc E
N/AN/AN/AN/A£18.09M£4.35M781.25N/A
YOLO
Yolo Leisure and Technology
N/AN/AN/AN/A£17.57M£14KN/A2
FFWD
Fastforward Innovations
N/AN/AN/AN/A£17.55M-£4.19MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TIR) was last updated on 7/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners