Free Trial

Transense Technologies (TRT) Competitors

Transense Technologies logo
GBX 39.49 -0.51 (-1.28%)
As of 07:19 AM Eastern

TRT vs. CTA, AUTG, STG, SCE, and SED

Should you buy Transense Technologies stock or one of its competitors? Transense Technologies's main competitors and comparable companies include CT Automotive Group (CTA), Autins Group (AUTG), Strip Tinning (STG), Surface Transforms (SCE), and Saietta Group (SED). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "automotive parts & equipment" industry.

How does Transense Technologies compare to CT Automotive Group?

CT Automotive Group (LON:CTA) and Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

CT Automotive Group has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

CT Automotive Group has a net margin of 5.30% compared to Transense Technologies' net margin of -2.27%. CT Automotive Group's return on equity of 20.83% beat Transense Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Automotive Group5.30% 20.83% 8.52%
Transense Technologies -2.27%-1.47%14.52%

CT Automotive Group has higher revenue and earnings than Transense Technologies. Transense Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Automotive Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Automotive Group£122.38M0.13£11.82M£8.502.60
Transense Technologies£4.23M1.42£1.51M-£0.69N/A

7.7% of CT Automotive Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.1% of Transense Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 32.2% of CT Automotive Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.5% of Transense Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CT Automotive Group had 2 more articles in the media than Transense Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CT Automotive Group and 0 mentions for Transense Technologies. CT Automotive Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Transense Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Automotive Group Neutral
Transense Technologies Neutral

Summary

CT Automotive Group beats Transense Technologies on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Transense Technologies compare to Autins Group?

Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) and Autins Group (LON:AUTG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

Autins Group has a net margin of -2.00% compared to Transense Technologies' net margin of -2.27%. Transense Technologies' return on equity of -1.47% beat Autins Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Transense Technologies-2.27% -1.47% 14.52%
Autins Group -2.00%-4.44%-0.43%

Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Autins Group has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Transense Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Autins Group. Transense Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autins Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transense Technologies£4.23M1.42£1.51M-£0.69N/A
Autins Group£17.63M0.29-£2.79M£0.3031.15

In the previous week, Transense Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Autins Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Transense Technologies Neutral
Autins Group Neutral

13.1% of Transense Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.5% of Autins Group shares are held by institutional investors. 46.5% of Transense Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Autins Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Autins Group beats Transense Technologies on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Transense Technologies compare to Strip Tinning?

Strip Tinning (LON:STG) and Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Transense Technologies has a net margin of -2.27% compared to Strip Tinning's net margin of -20.47%. Strip Tinning's return on equity of 617.63% beat Transense Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strip Tinning-20.47% 617.63% -12.65%
Transense Technologies -2.27%-1.47%14.52%

Strip Tinning has a beta of 0.445, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Strip Tinning's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Transense Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Strip Tinning is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Strip Tinning Positive
Transense Technologies Neutral

Transense Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Strip Tinning. Transense Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strip Tinning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strip Tinning£9.41M0.41-£2.99M-£10.61N/A
Transense Technologies£4.23M1.42£1.51M-£0.69N/A

2.1% of Strip Tinning shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.1% of Transense Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 49.1% of Strip Tinning shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.5% of Transense Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Strip Tinning and Transense Technologies tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Transense Technologies compare to Surface Transforms?

Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) and Surface Transforms (LON:SCE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

Transense Technologies has a net margin of -2.27% compared to Surface Transforms' net margin of -271.13%. Transense Technologies' return on equity of -1.47% beat Surface Transforms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Transense Technologies-2.27% -1.47% 14.52%
Surface Transforms -271.13%-131.28%-22.15%

In the previous week, Transense Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Surface Transforms'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Transense Technologies Neutral
Surface Transforms Neutral

13.1% of Transense Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Surface Transforms shares are held by institutional investors. 46.5% of Transense Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Surface Transforms shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Transense Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Surface Transforms. Transense Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Surface Transforms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transense Technologies£4.23M1.42£1.51M-£0.69N/A
Surface Transforms£11.71M0.13-£5.00B-£1.42N/A

Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Surface Transforms has a beta of 0.706, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Transense Technologies beats Surface Transforms on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Transense Technologies compare to Saietta Group?

Saietta Group (LON:SED) and Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, Saietta Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Transense Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Saietta Group Neutral
Transense Technologies Neutral

Saietta Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Transense Technologies' net margin of -2.27%. Transense Technologies' return on equity of -1.47% beat Saietta Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Saietta GroupN/A -54.31% -27.40%
Transense Technologies -2.27%-1.47%14.52%

15.8% of Saietta Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.1% of Transense Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.2% of Saietta Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.5% of Transense Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Transense Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Saietta Group. Transense Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Saietta Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Saietta Group£2.33M0.00-£18.52M-£0.21N/A
Transense Technologies£4.23M1.42£1.51M-£0.69N/A

Saietta Group has a beta of -0.03, indicating that its share price is 103% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Transense Technologies beats Saietta Group on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Transense Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TRT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TRT vs. The Competition

MetricTransense TechnologiesAutomobile Components IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£6.01M£4.39B£13.00B£2.84B
Dividend Yield2.35%2.36%3.10%5.12%
P/E Ratio-57.2315.9726.1223.41
Price / Sales1.421.221.714.99
Price / Cash14.099.8015.6520.23
Price / Book1.091.513.502.47
Net Income£1.51M£74.66M£444.25M£5.88B
7 Day Performance-3.68%-0.83%-1.35%-0.08%
1 Month Performance-14.15%-5.03%0.49%-1.12%
1 Year Performance-64.61%-6.09%-1.96%7.08%

Transense Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TRT
Transense Technologies
N/AGBX 39.49
-1.3%
N/A-64.3%£6.01M£4.23MN/A740
CTA
CT Automotive Group
N/AGBX 23
+4.0%
N/A-33.4%£16.93M£122.38M2.712,721
AUTG
Autins Group
N/AGBX 10
flat
N/A-8.9%£5.46M£17.63M33.33156
STG
Strip Tinning
N/AGBX 24
+13.7%
N/A-6.8%£4.37M£9.41MN/A4,060
SCE
Surface Transforms
N/AGBX 0.12
+7.1%
N/A-93.9%£1.56M£11.71MN/A96

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TRT) was last updated on 11/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners