Go Pro
→ My top 3 AI picks for the next decade (From The Oxford Club) (Ad)tc pixel Free TRT Stock Alerts

Transense Technologies (TRT) Competitors

Transense Technologies logo
GBX 39 -0.50 (-1.27%)
As of 09/25/2026 10:43 AM Eastern
Compare

TRT vs. CTA, AUTG, STG, SCE, and SED

Should you buy Transense Technologies stock or one of its competitors? Transense Technologies's main competitors and comparable companies include CT Automotive Group (CTA), Autins Group (AUTG), Strip Tinning (STG), Surface Transforms (SCE), and Saietta Group (SED). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "automotive parts & equipment" industry.

How does Transense Technologies compare to CT Automotive Group?

Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) and CT Automotive Group (LON:CTA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

13.1% of Transense Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of CT Automotive Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.4% of Transense Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 32.2% of CT Automotive Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CT Automotive Group has a net margin of 5.30% compared to Transense Technologies' net margin of -2.27%. CT Automotive Group's return on equity of 20.83% beat Transense Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Transense Technologies-2.27% -1.47% 14.52%
CT Automotive Group 5.30%20.83%8.52%

In the previous week, Transense Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than CT Automotive Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Transense Technologies and 0 mentions for CT Automotive Group. Transense Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat CT Automotive Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Transense Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Transense Technologies Neutral
CT Automotive Group Neutral

Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Automotive Group has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

CT Automotive Group has higher revenue and earnings than Transense Technologies. CT Automotive Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Transense Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transense Technologies£4.92M1.21£1.51M£5.447.17
CT Automotive Group£114.83M0.13£11.82M£10.901.83

Summary

Transense Technologies beats CT Automotive Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Transense Technologies compare to Autins Group?

Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) and Autins Group (LON:AUTG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Autins Group has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Autins Group has a net margin of -2.00% compared to Transense Technologies' net margin of -2.27%. Transense Technologies' return on equity of -1.47% beat Autins Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Transense Technologies-2.27% -1.47% 14.52%
Autins Group -2.00%-4.44%-0.43%

In the previous week, Transense Technologies and Transense Technologies both had 3 articles in the media. Transense Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Autins Group's score of 0.33 indicating that Transense Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Transense Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Autins Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

13.1% of Transense Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.5% of Autins Group shares are held by institutional investors. 46.4% of Transense Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Autins Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Transense Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Autins Group. Transense Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autins Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transense Technologies£4.92M1.21£1.51M£5.447.17
Autins Group£17.63M0.34-£2.79M£0.3036.67

Summary

Transense Technologies beats Autins Group on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Transense Technologies compare to Strip Tinning?

Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) and Strip Tinning (LON:STG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Transense Technologies has a net margin of -2.27% compared to Strip Tinning's net margin of -20.47%. Strip Tinning's return on equity of 617.63% beat Transense Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Transense Technologies-2.27% -1.47% 14.52%
Strip Tinning -20.47%617.63%-12.65%

13.1% of Transense Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Strip Tinning shares are held by institutional investors. 46.4% of Transense Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 49.1% of Strip Tinning shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Transense Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Strip Tinning. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Transense Technologies and 0 mentions for Strip Tinning. Transense Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Strip Tinning's score of 0.00 indicating that Transense Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Transense Technologies Neutral
Strip Tinning Neutral

Transense Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Strip Tinning. Strip Tinning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Transense Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transense Technologies£4.92M1.21£1.51M£5.447.17
Strip Tinning£8.59M0.53-£2.99M-£11.60N/A

Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strip Tinning has a beta of 0.445, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Transense Technologies beats Strip Tinning on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Transense Technologies compare to Surface Transforms?

Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) and Surface Transforms (LON:SCE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Transense Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Surface Transforms. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Transense Technologies and 1 mentions for Surface Transforms. Transense Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Surface Transforms' score of 0.00 indicating that Transense Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Transense Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Surface Transforms
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Transense Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Surface Transforms. Surface Transforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Transense Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transense Technologies£4.92M1.21£1.51M£5.447.17
Surface Transforms£11.71M0.13-£5.00B-£1.42N/A

Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Surface Transforms has a beta of 0.706, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

13.1% of Transense Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Surface Transforms shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.4% of Transense Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Surface Transforms shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Transense Technologies has a net margin of -2.27% compared to Surface Transforms' net margin of -271.13%. Transense Technologies' return on equity of -1.47% beat Surface Transforms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Transense Technologies-2.27% -1.47% 14.52%
Surface Transforms -271.13%-131.28%-22.15%

Summary

Transense Technologies beats Surface Transforms on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Transense Technologies compare to Saietta Group?

Saietta Group (LON:SED) and Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Transense Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Saietta Group. Saietta Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Transense Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Saietta Group£2.33M0.00-£18.52M-£0.21N/A
Transense Technologies£4.92M1.21£1.51M£5.447.17

In the previous week, Transense Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Saietta Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Transense Technologies and 0 mentions for Saietta Group. Transense Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Saietta Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Transense Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Saietta Group Neutral
Transense Technologies Neutral

Saietta Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Transense Technologies' net margin of -2.27%. Transense Technologies' return on equity of -1.47% beat Saietta Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Saietta GroupN/A -54.31% -27.40%
Transense Technologies -2.27%-1.47%14.52%

15.8% of Saietta Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.1% of Transense Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 35.2% of Saietta Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.4% of Transense Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Saietta Group has a beta of -0.03, indicating that its stock price is 103% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Transense Technologies beats Saietta Group on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Transense Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TRT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TRT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTransense TechnologiesAutomobile Components IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£5.94M£4.80B£12.43B£2.89B
Dividend Yield2.35%2.32%64.33%6.19%
P/E Ratio7.1710.4844.33366.48
Price / Sales1.2125.9490.8189,848.70
Price / Cash14.0910.5728.4127.89
Price / Book1.081.633.956.35
Net Income£1.51M£70.95M£445.57M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-11.36%-1.28%-0.34%0.28%
1 Month Performance-15.22%-5.03%-4.60%5.51%
1 Year Performance-68.80%-1.24%-7.32%18.75%

Transense Technologies Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TRT
Transense Technologies
N/AGBX 39
-1.3%		N/A-68.8%£5.94M£4.92M7.17740
CTA
CT Automotive Group
N/AGBX 22
-3.8%		N/A-39.0%£16.19M£114.83M2.022,721
AUTG
Autins Group
N/AGBX 14
flat		N/A+28.7%£7.64M£17.63M46.67156
STG
Strip Tinning
N/AGBX 25.02
-5.6%		N/A+4.2%£4.56M£8.59MN/A4,060
SCE
Surface Transforms
N/AGBX 0.12
+7.1%		N/A-95.5%£1.56M£11.71MN/A96

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TRT) was last updated on 9/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s Why Trump Won’t End The Iran War
Trump has called an Iran deal close 38 times since the war began, yet the fighting keeps flaring back up. O...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
100% overnight gains?
Rumors are circulating that Elon Musk is preparing to acquire three publicly traded companies. Dr. Mark Sko...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel