LON:TRT

Transense Technologies Competitors

GBX 80.90
+1.40 (+1.76 %)
(As of 04/15/2021 10:24 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
80.90
Now: GBX 80.90
82
50-Day Range
53.50
MA: GBX 70.41
85
52-Week Range
46
Now: GBX 80.90
86.44
Volume19,014 shs
Average Volume51,547 shs
Market Capitalization£13.19 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
BetaN/A

Competitors

Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) Vs. SHOE, TND, SWL, RM2, OBT, and BYOT

Should you be buying TRT stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "consumer goods" are considered alternatives and competitors to Transense Technologies, including Shoe Zone (SHOE), Tandem Group (TND), Swallowfield (SWL), RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L) (RM2), Obtala (OBT), and Byotrol (BYOT).

Shoe Zone (LON:SHOE) and Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) are both small-cap consumer goods companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Shoe Zone and Transense Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Shoe ZoneN/AN/AN/A
Transense TechnologiesN/AN/AN/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Shoe Zone and Transense Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shoe Zone£122.57 million0.29N/AGBX (23.80)-2.99
Transense Technologies£1.23 million10.75N/AGBX (8)-10.11

Transense Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shoe Zone, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Shoe Zone and Transense Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Shoe Zone0000N/A
Transense Technologies0000N/A

Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) and Tandem Group (LON:TND) are both small-cap consumer goods companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Transense Technologies and Tandem Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Transense TechnologiesN/AN/AN/A
Tandem GroupN/AN/AN/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Transense Technologies and Tandem Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transense Technologies£1.23 million10.75N/AGBX (8)-10.11
Tandem Group£37.06 million0.96N/AGBX 64.7010.74

Transense Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tandem Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Transense Technologies and Tandem Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Transense Technologies0000N/A
Tandem Group0000N/A

Summary

Tandem Group beats Transense Technologies on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) and Swallowfield (LON:SWL) are both small-cap consumer goods companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Transense Technologies and Swallowfield's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Transense TechnologiesN/AN/AN/A
SwallowfieldN/AN/AN/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Transense Technologies and Swallowfield's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transense Technologies£1.23 million10.75N/AGBX (8)-10.11
Swallowfield£75.42 million0.44N/AGBX 10.6018.40

Transense Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Swallowfield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Transense Technologies and Swallowfield, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Transense Technologies0000N/A
Swallowfield0000N/A

Summary

Swallowfield beats Transense Technologies on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) and RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L) (LON:RM2) are both small-cap consumer goods companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Transense Technologies and RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L)'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Transense TechnologiesN/AN/AN/A
RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L)N/AN/AN/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Transense Technologies and RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L), as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Transense Technologies0000N/A
RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L)0000N/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Transense Technologies and RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L)'s gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transense Technologies£1.23 million10.75N/AGBX (8)-10.11
RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L)£5.49 million5.27N/AGBX (692)-0.01

Transense Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Obtala (LON:OBT) and Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) are both small-cap consumer goods companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Obtala and Transense Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ObtalaN/AN/AN/A
Transense TechnologiesN/AN/AN/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Obtala and Transense Technologies' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Obtala£14.89 million1.91N/AGBX (3.70)-1.86
Transense Technologies£1.23 million10.75N/AGBX (8)-10.11

Transense Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Obtala, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Obtala and Transense Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Obtala0000N/A
Transense Technologies0000N/A

Summary

Obtala beats Transense Technologies on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) and Byotrol (LON:BYOT) are both small-cap consumer goods companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Transense Technologies and Byotrol, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Transense Technologies0000N/A
Byotrol0000N/A

Profitability

This table compares Transense Technologies and Byotrol's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Transense TechnologiesN/AN/AN/A
ByotrolN/AN/AN/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Transense Technologies and Byotrol's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transense Technologies£1.23 million10.75N/AGBX (8)-10.11
Byotrol£10.57 million2.57N/AGBX 0.4015.22

Transense Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Byotrol, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Byotrol beats Transense Technologies on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.


Transense Technologies Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Shoe Zone logo
SHOE
Shoe Zone
0.8$71.26+1.7%£36.25 million£122.57 million-2.99News Coverage
TND
Tandem Group
0.9$695.00+0.7%£35.38 million£37.06 million10.74
Swallowfield logo
SWL
Swallowfield
1.0$195.00+0.0%£33.41 million£75.42 million18.40
RM2
RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L)
0.6$8.50+0.0%£28.89 million£5.49 million-0.01High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
Obtala logo
OBT
Obtala
0.7$6.90+2.9%£28.08 million£14.89 million-1.86Gap Up
BYOT
Byotrol
0.6$6.09+0.6%£27.02 million£10.57 million15.22
RE
R.E.A.
0.6$58.00+0.4%£25.41 million£130.76 million-3.82Gap Up
RBN
Robinson
1.3$150.00+1.7%£24.50 million£37.20 million17.86
PXS
Provexis
0.5$0.99+5.1%£20.78 million£362,750.000.00Gap Up
OGN
Origin Enterprises
1.3$3.95+0.0%£4.96 million£1.56 billion21.47
TLA
TLA Worldwide
0.5$1.70+11.8%£3.37 million£52.47 million-0.09High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
PAL
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)
0.4$20.00+25.0%£3.31 million£11,000.00-11.76Gap Up
Real Good Food logo
RGD
Real Good Food
0.4$3.15+0.0%£3.14 million£58.03 million-0.15Gap Down
JLH
John Lewis of Hungerford
0.6$0.90+5.4%£1.84 million£5.53 million-3.00
Bagir Group logo
BAGR
Bagir Group
0.5$0.48+0.0%£1.48 million£64.39 million-0.43
LWRF
LightwaveRF plc (LWRF.L)
0.6$0.63+60.0%£1.24 million£4.09 million-0.18Gap Up
HVE
Havelock Europa
0.6N/AN/A£0.00N/A0.00
Produce Investments logo
PIL
Produce Investments
0.5$186.50+0.0%£0.00N/A0.00
This page was last updated on 4/15/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.