Go Pro
→ Your $29.97 book is free today (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free TRT Stock Alerts

Transense Technologies (TRT) Competitors

Transense Technologies logo
GBX 47.90 +0.78 (+1.66%)
As of 05:52 AM Eastern
Compare

TRT vs. CAR, CTA, AUTG, STG, and SCE

Should you buy Transense Technologies stock or one of its competitors? Transense Technologies's main competitors and comparable companies include Carclo (CAR), CT Automotive Group (CTA), Autins Group (AUTG), Strip Tinning (STG), and Surface Transforms (SCE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "automotive parts & equipment" industry.

How does Transense Technologies compare to Carclo?

Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) and Carclo (LON:CAR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Transense Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Carclo. Transense Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carclo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transense Technologies£4.92M1.48£1.51M£5.448.81
Carclo£114.21M0.25-£3.30M£3.7010.49

In the previous week, Carclo had 2 more articles in the media than Transense Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Carclo and 0 mentions for Transense Technologies. Carclo's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Transense Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Carclo is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Transense Technologies Neutral
Carclo Positive

13.1% of Transense Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.2% of Carclo shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.4% of Transense Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Carclo shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carclo has a beta of 0.611, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Transense Technologies has a net margin of 16.10% compared to Carclo's net margin of 2.36%. Transense Technologies' return on equity of 12.05% beat Carclo's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Transense Technologies16.10% 12.05% 14.52%
Carclo 2.36%-29.78%2.73%

Summary

Transense Technologies beats Carclo on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Transense Technologies compare to CT Automotive Group?

CT Automotive Group (LON:CTA) and Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, CT Automotive Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Transense Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Automotive Group Neutral
Transense Technologies Neutral

Transense Technologies has a net margin of 16.10% compared to CT Automotive Group's net margin of 7.26%. CT Automotive Group's return on equity of 28.74% beat Transense Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Automotive Group7.26% 28.74% 8.52%
Transense Technologies 16.10%12.05%14.52%

CT Automotive Group has higher revenue and earnings than Transense Technologies. CT Automotive Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Transense Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Automotive Group£114.83M0.24£11.82M£10.903.44
Transense Technologies£4.92M1.48£1.51M£5.448.81

CT Automotive Group has a beta of 0.641, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

3.0% of CT Automotive Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.1% of Transense Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 32.2% of CT Automotive Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.4% of Transense Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Transense Technologies beats CT Automotive Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Transense Technologies compare to Autins Group?

Autins Group (LON:AUTG) and Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Autins Group has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Transense Technologies has a net margin of 16.10% compared to Autins Group's net margin of -2.00%. Transense Technologies' return on equity of 12.05% beat Autins Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Autins Group-2.00% -4.44% -0.43%
Transense Technologies 16.10%12.05%14.52%

Transense Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Autins Group. Transense Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autins Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Autins Group£17.63M0.43-£2.79M£0.3046.67
Transense Technologies£4.92M1.48£1.51M£5.448.81

30.5% of Autins Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.1% of Transense Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Autins Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.4% of Transense Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Autins Group had 1 more articles in the media than Transense Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Autins Group and 0 mentions for Transense Technologies. Autins Group's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Transense Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Autins Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Autins Group Positive
Transense Technologies Neutral

Summary

Transense Technologies beats Autins Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Transense Technologies compare to Strip Tinning?

Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) and Strip Tinning (LON:STG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Strip Tinning's average media sentiment score of 1.78 beat Transense Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Strip Tinning is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Transense Technologies Neutral
Strip Tinning Very Positive

13.1% of Transense Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Strip Tinning shares are held by institutional investors. 46.4% of Transense Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 49.1% of Strip Tinning shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strip Tinning has a beta of 0.437, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Transense Technologies has a net margin of 16.10% compared to Strip Tinning's net margin of -24.52%. Transense Technologies' return on equity of 12.05% beat Strip Tinning's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Transense Technologies16.10% 12.05% 14.52%
Strip Tinning -24.52%-387.32%-12.65%

Transense Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Strip Tinning. Strip Tinning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Transense Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transense Technologies£4.92M1.48£1.51M£5.448.81
Strip Tinning£8.59M0.70-£2.99M-£11.60N/A

Summary

Transense Technologies beats Strip Tinning on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Transense Technologies compare to Surface Transforms?

Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) and Surface Transforms (LON:SCE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Transense Technologies has a net margin of 16.10% compared to Surface Transforms' net margin of -271.13%. Transense Technologies' return on equity of 12.05% beat Surface Transforms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Transense Technologies16.10% 12.05% 14.52%
Surface Transforms -271.13%-131.28%-22.15%

Transense Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Surface Transforms. Surface Transforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Transense Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transense Technologies£4.92M1.48£1.51M£5.448.81
Surface Transforms£11.71M0.13-£5.00B-£1.42N/A

Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Surface Transforms has a beta of 0.706, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Surface Transforms had 1 more articles in the media than Transense Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Surface Transforms and 0 mentions for Transense Technologies. Transense Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Surface Transforms'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Transense Technologies Neutral
Surface Transforms Neutral

13.1% of Transense Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Surface Transforms shares are held by institutional investors. 46.4% of Transense Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Surface Transforms shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Transense Technologies beats Surface Transforms on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Transense Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TRT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TRT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTransense TechnologiesAutomobile Components IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£7.29M£5.18B£13.01B£2.88B
Dividend Yield2.35%2.26%54.81%6.10%
P/E Ratio8.8111.3047.99368.46
Price / Sales1.4825.2492.5883,426.45
Price / Cash14.0911.1019.2427.89
Price / Book1.331.874.427.08
Net Income£1.51M£72.28M£445.74M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.44%0.27%-0.39%0.54%
1 Month Performance-2.14%2.55%0.65%3.02%
1 Year Performance-65.16%8.24%-0.07%64.50%

Transense Technologies Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TRT
Transense Technologies
N/AGBX 47.90
+1.7%		N/A-65.7%£7.29M£4.92M8.81740
CAR
Carclo
N/AGBX 37.70
flat		N/AN/A£27.68M£114.21M10.191,059
CTA
CT Automotive Group
N/AGBX 37.20
flat		N/A-0.4%£27.38M£114.83M3.412,721
AUTG
Autins Group
N/AGBX 15.40
flat		N/A+52.4%£8.41M£17.63M51.33156
STG
Strip Tinning
N/AGBX 20
flat		N/A+53.2%£3.65M£8.59MN/A4,060

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TRT) was last updated on 8/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel