Go Pro

Zambeef Products (ZAM) Competitors

Zambeef Products logo
GBX 5.50 +0.25 (+4.76%)
As of 03:18 AM Eastern

ZAM vs. PAL, SIS, ANP, CARR, and RE

Should you buy Zambeef Products stock or one of its competitors? Zambeef Products's main competitors and comparable companies include Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) (PAL), Science in Sport (SIS), Anpario (ANP), Carr's Group (CARR), and R.E.A. (RE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)?

Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) and Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) (LON:PAL) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L). Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zambeef Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)£11K0.00N/A-£1.70N/A

In the previous week, Zambeef Products had 1 more articles in the media than Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Zambeef Products and 0 mentions for Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L). Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Zambeef Products is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zambeef Products Positive
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) Neutral

Zambeef Products has a net margin of 3.29% compared to Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Zambeef Products' return on equity of 3.89% beat Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zambeef Products3.29% 3.89% 1.75%
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) N/A N/A N/A

1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Zambeef Products beats Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) on 10 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Science in Sport?

Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) and Science in Sport (LON:SIS) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, indicating that its stock price is 148% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Science in Sport has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Zambeef Products has a net margin of 3.29% compared to Science in Sport's net margin of -9.14%. Zambeef Products' return on equity of 3.89% beat Science in Sport's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zambeef Products3.29% 3.89% 1.75%
Science in Sport -9.14%-15.33%-8.01%

In the previous week, Zambeef Products had 1 more articles in the media than Science in Sport. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Zambeef Products and 0 mentions for Science in Sport. Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Science in Sport's score of 0.00 indicating that Zambeef Products is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zambeef Products Positive
Science in Sport Neutral

1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.8% of Science in Sport shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of Science in Sport shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Science in Sport. Science in Sport is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zambeef Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08
Science in Sport£70.87M1.12-£13.78M-£5.66N/A

Summary

Zambeef Products beats Science in Sport on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Anpario?

Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) and Anpario (LON:ANP) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, meaning that its stock price is 148% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Anpario has a beta of 1.077, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Anpario has a net margin of 14.53% compared to Zambeef Products' net margin of 3.29%. Anpario's return on equity of 17.05% beat Zambeef Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zambeef Products3.29% 3.89% 1.75%
Anpario 14.53%17.05%5.51%

1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.2% of Anpario shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Anpario shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Anpario has a consensus target price of GBX 600, indicating a potential upside of 21.21%. Given Anpario's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Anpario is more favorable than Zambeef Products.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Zambeef Products
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Anpario
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Zambeef Products and Zambeef Products both had 1 articles in the media. Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.75 equaled Anpario'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Zambeef Products
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Anpario
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Anpario. Zambeef Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Anpario, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08
Anpario£47.18M1.71£3.09M£37.9413.05

Summary

Anpario beats Zambeef Products on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Carr's Group?

Carr's Group (LON:CARR) and Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Carr's Group has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, indicating that its stock price is 148% less volatile than the broader market.

Carr's Group has a net margin of 25.28% compared to Zambeef Products' net margin of 3.29%. Carr's Group's return on equity of 30.13% beat Zambeef Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carr's Group25.28% 30.13% -0.24%
Zambeef Products 3.29%3.89%1.75%

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Carr's Group. Carr's Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zambeef Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carr's Group£79.03M0.89-£1.40M-£0.02N/A
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08

In the previous week, Carr's Group had 1 more articles in the media than Zambeef Products. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Carr's Group and 1 mentions for Zambeef Products. Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Carr's Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Zambeef Products is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carr's Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Zambeef Products
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

30.7% of Carr's Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.1% of Carr's Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Zambeef Products beats Carr's Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to R.E.A.?

Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) and R.E.A. (LON:RE) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than R.E.A.. Zambeef Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than R.E.A., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08
R.E.A.£387.39M0.17£4.07M£6.0120.15

Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, meaning that its share price is 148% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, R.E.A. has a beta of 0.445, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

R.E.A. has a consensus target price of GBX 260, suggesting a potential upside of 114.88%. Given R.E.A.'s stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe R.E.A. is more favorable than Zambeef Products.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Zambeef Products
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
R.E.A.
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

R.E.A. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Zambeef Products' net margin of 3.29%. Zambeef Products' return on equity of 3.89% beat R.E.A.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zambeef Products3.29% 3.89% 1.75%
R.E.A. 4.18%3.79%2.53%

1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.4% of R.E.A. shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 41.4% of R.E.A. shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Zambeef Products had 1 more articles in the media than R.E.A.. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Zambeef Products and 0 mentions for R.E.A.. Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat R.E.A.'s score of 0.00 indicating that Zambeef Products is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zambeef Products Positive
R.E.A. Neutral

Summary

R.E.A. beats Zambeef Products on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Zambeef Products News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ZAM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ZAM vs. The Competition

MetricZambeef ProductsFood Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£33.50M£5.46B£15.71B£2.88B
Dividend YieldN/A3.23%3.27%6.22%
P/E Ratio0.0813.3914.15366.50
Price / Sales0.0083.94262,948.9990,075.82
Price / CashN/A113.0756.9627.89
Price / Book0.003.694.316.40
Net Income£3.93B£772.51M£837.18M£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.85%-1.46%-1.10%0.15%
1 Month Performance0.18%-4.54%-4.36%6.33%
1 Year Performance10.00%35.97%10.12%19.15%

Zambeef Products Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ZAM
Zambeef Products
N/AGBX 5.50
+4.8%
N/A+9.8%£33.50M£8.15B0.087,000
PAL
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£91.26M£11KN/A3
SIS
Science in Sport
N/AGBX 33.50
flat
N/A+0.0%£79.33M£70.87MN/A330
ANP
Anpario
3.3651 of 5 stars
GBX 453.46
-1.4%
GBX 600
+32.3%
-2.3%£73.85M£47.18M11.95109
CARR
Carr's Group
N/AGBX 135.56
+1.9%
N/A-8.4%£70.15M£79.03MN/A52,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:ZAM) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners