Zambeef Products (ZAM) Competitors

Anpario currently has a consensus target price of GBX 600, indicating a potential upside of 17.65%. Given Anpario's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Anpario is more favorable than Zambeef Products.

Anpario has a beta of 1.077, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, indicating that its stock price is 148% less volatile than the broader market.

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Anpario. Zambeef Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Anpario, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Anpario has a net margin of 14.53% compared to Zambeef Products' net margin of 3.29%. Anpario's return on equity of 17.05% beat Zambeef Products' return on equity.

In the previous week, Anpario and Anpario both had 1 articles in the media. Anpario's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zambeef Products'average media sentiment score.

16.2% of Anpario shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Zambeef Products shares are held by institutional investors. 5.4% of Anpario shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Science in Sport has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, meaning that its stock price is 148% less volatile than the broader market.

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Science in Sport. Science in Sport is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zambeef Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Zambeef Products has a net margin of 3.29% compared to Science in Sport's net margin of -9.14%. Zambeef Products' return on equity of 3.89% beat Science in Sport's return on equity.

In the previous week, Zambeef Products had 1 more articles in the media than Science in Sport. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Zambeef Products and 0 mentions for Science in Sport. Science in Sport's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zambeef Products'average media sentiment score.

68.8% of Science in Sport shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Zambeef Products shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of Science in Sport shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, meaning that its share price is 148% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carr's Group has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

0.7% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.7% of Carr's Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Carr's Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Zambeef Products had 1 more articles in the media than Carr's Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Zambeef Products and 0 mentions for Carr's Group. Carr's Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Zambeef Products' score of 0.00 indicating that Carr's Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Carr's Group has a net margin of 25.28% compared to Zambeef Products' net margin of 3.29%. Carr's Group's return on equity of 30.13% beat Zambeef Products' return on equity.

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Carr's Group. Carr's Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zambeef Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

43.4% of R.E.A. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Zambeef Products shares are held by institutional investors. 41.4% of R.E.A. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

R.E.A. presently has a consensus price target of GBX 280, indicating a potential upside of 147.79%. Given R.E.A.'s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe R.E.A. is more favorable than Zambeef Products.

R.E.A. has a beta of 0.445, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, suggesting that its stock price is 148% less volatile than the broader market.

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than R.E.A.. Zambeef Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than R.E.A., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, R.E.A. and R.E.A. both had 1 articles in the media. R.E.A.'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zambeef Products'average media sentiment score.

R.E.A. has a net margin of 10.43% compared to Zambeef Products' net margin of 3.29%. R.E.A.'s return on equity of 8.78% beat Zambeef Products' return on equity.