Go Pro
→ Your book is inside (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free ZAM Stock Alerts

Zambeef Products (ZAM) Competitors

Zambeef Products logo
GBX 5 -0.25 (-4.76%)
As of 11:57 AM Eastern
Compare

ZAM vs. PAL, ANP, SIS, CARR, and RE

Should you buy Zambeef Products stock or one of its competitors? Zambeef Products's main competitors and comparable companies include Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) (PAL), Anpario (ANP), Science in Sport (SIS), Carr's Group (CARR), and R.E.A. (RE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)?

Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) (LON:PAL) and Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L). Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zambeef Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)£11K0.00N/A-£1.70N/A
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08

Zambeef Products has a net margin of 3.29% compared to Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Zambeef Products' return on equity of 3.89% beat Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)N/A N/A N/A
Zambeef Products 3.29%3.89%1.75%

In the previous week, Zambeef Products had 1 more articles in the media than Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Zambeef Products and 0 mentions for Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L). Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Zambeef Products is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) Neutral
Zambeef Products Positive

Summary

Zambeef Products beats Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) on 10 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Anpario?

Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) and Anpario (LON:ANP) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Anpario. Zambeef Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Anpario, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08
Anpario£47.18M1.80£3.09M£37.9413.74

Anpario has a net margin of 14.31% compared to Zambeef Products' net margin of 3.29%. Anpario's return on equity of 16.88% beat Zambeef Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zambeef Products3.29% 3.89% 1.75%
Anpario 14.31%16.88%5.51%

In the previous week, Zambeef Products had 1 more articles in the media than Anpario. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Zambeef Products and 0 mentions for Anpario. Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Anpario's score of 0.00 indicating that Zambeef Products is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zambeef Products Positive
Anpario Neutral

Anpario has a consensus price target of GBX 570, indicating a potential upside of 9.36%. Given Anpario's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Anpario is more favorable than Zambeef Products.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Zambeef Products
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Anpario
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, suggesting that its stock price is 148% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Anpario has a beta of 1.076, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.2% of Anpario shares are held by institutional investors. 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Anpario shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Anpario beats Zambeef Products on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Science in Sport?

Science in Sport (LON:SIS) and Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Science in Sport has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, indicating that its stock price is 148% less volatile than the broader market.

68.8% of Science in Sport shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.9% of Science in Sport shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Zambeef Products has a net margin of 3.29% compared to Science in Sport's net margin of -9.14%. Zambeef Products' return on equity of 3.89% beat Science in Sport's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Science in Sport-9.14% -15.33% -8.01%
Zambeef Products 3.29%3.89%1.75%

In the previous week, Zambeef Products had 1 more articles in the media than Science in Sport. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Zambeef Products and 0 mentions for Science in Sport. Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Science in Sport's score of 0.00 indicating that Zambeef Products is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Science in Sport Neutral
Zambeef Products Positive

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Science in Sport. Science in Sport is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zambeef Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Science in Sport£70.87M1.12-£13.78M-£5.66N/A
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08

Summary

Zambeef Products beats Science in Sport on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Carr's Group?

Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) and Carr's Group (LON:CARR) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Carr's Group has a net margin of 25.28% compared to Zambeef Products' net margin of 3.29%. Carr's Group's return on equity of 28.53% beat Zambeef Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zambeef Products3.29% 3.89% 1.75%
Carr's Group 25.28%28.53%-0.24%

In the previous week, Zambeef Products had 1 more articles in the media than Carr's Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Zambeef Products and 0 mentions for Carr's Group. Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Carr's Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Zambeef Products is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zambeef Products Positive
Carr's Group Neutral

Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, meaning that its share price is 148% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carr's Group has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Carr's Group. Carr's Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zambeef Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08
Carr's Group£79.03M0.89-£1.40M-£0.02N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Zambeef Products
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Carr's Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.7% of Carr's Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Carr's Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Zambeef Products beats Carr's Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to R.E.A.?

Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) and R.E.A. (LON:RE) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.4% of R.E.A. shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 41.4% of R.E.A. shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

R.E.A. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Zambeef Products' net margin of 3.29%. Zambeef Products' return on equity of 3.89% beat R.E.A.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zambeef Products3.29% 3.89% 1.75%
R.E.A. 4.18%3.79%2.53%

In the previous week, Zambeef Products and Zambeef Products both had 1 articles in the media. R.E.A.'s average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Zambeef Products' score of 0.67 indicating that R.E.A. is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Zambeef Products
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
R.E.A.
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, suggesting that its share price is 148% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, R.E.A. has a beta of 0.445, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than R.E.A.. Zambeef Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than R.E.A., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08
R.E.A.£387.39M0.15£4.07M£6.0118.06

R.E.A. has a consensus target price of GBX 260, suggesting a potential upside of 139.63%. Given R.E.A.'s stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe R.E.A. is more favorable than Zambeef Products.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Zambeef Products
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
R.E.A.
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

R.E.A. beats Zambeef Products on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Zambeef Products News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ZAM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ZAM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricZambeef ProductsFood Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£31.98M£5.79B£16.13B£2.88B
Dividend YieldN/A3.14%3.20%6.11%
P/E Ratio0.0811.7413.30368.70
Price / Sales0.0083.99262,280.3783,338.10
Price / CashN/A112.3857.6027.89
Price / Book0.004.935.067.18
Net Income£3.93B£766.88M£831.83M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A1.82%0.57%0.87%
1 Month Performance6.04%2.06%1.47%2.81%
1 Year Performance25.00%41.02%13.54%69.35%

Zambeef Products Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ZAM
Zambeef Products
N/AGBX 5
-4.8%		N/A+27.5%£31.98M£8.15B0.087,000
PAL
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£91.26M£11KN/A3
ANP
Anpario
N/AGBX 514.44
-1.1%		GBX 570
+10.8%		+28.2%£83.78M£47.18M13.56109
SIS
Science in Sport
N/AGBX 33.50
flat		N/A+0.0%£79.33M£70.87MN/A330
CARR
Carr's Group
0.1102 of 5 stars		GBX 135.56
+1.9%		N/A-7.8%£70.15M£79.03MN/A52,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:ZAM) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
AI insiders stockpile guns, gold & gas masks
Keith Kaplan, CEO of TradeSmith, has spent more than $17 million studying AI since 2022. He says a major shift...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s New Currency Reset
Trump is launching a new $250 bill - but that may be a distraction. Behind the scenes, Executive Order 14241 i...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Wall Street is staring at the wrong AI trade
Anthropic just signed a 9.1 billion dollar, 20 year data center agreement covering 191 megawatts of capacity, ...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Shocking Discovery Investigators Found Hidden Inside America's Port Cranes
U.S. investigators found unexplained cellular modems inside cranes made by a Chinese state-owned company that ...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Who Really Gets Rich from IPOs?
Peter Thiel turned a $500,000 stake in Meta into nearly $1 billion by investing eight years before its IPO. Tr...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
$100 for this… $500 for that. Here’s how to stop the bleeding today
Rising costs are squeezing households nationwide. USA Today reports more families are moving in together, whil...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel