Free Trial

Zambeef Products (ZAM) Competitors

Zambeef Products logo
GBX 5 +0.15 (+3.09%)
As of 06/12/2026 11:02 AM Eastern

ZAM vs. GLB, UKR, OHT, WALG, and BMK

Should you buy Zambeef Products stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Zambeef Products with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Zambeef Products include Glanbia (GLB), Ukrproduct Group (UKR), Ocean Harvest Technology Group (OHT), Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L) (WALG), and Benchmark (BMK). These companies are all part of the "packaged foods" industry.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Glanbia?

Glanbia (LON:GLB) and Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Glanbia has a beta of 0.519, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, suggesting that its stock price is 148% less volatile than the broader market.

Glanbia has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Zambeef Products. Zambeef Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glanbia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Glanbia£3.95B0.01£12.80B£72.440.30
Zambeef Products£8.06B0.00£3.93B£56.370.09

Glanbia has a net margin of 4.64% compared to Zambeef Products' net margin of 2.77%. Glanbia's return on equity of 9.25% beat Zambeef Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Glanbia4.64% 9.25% 6.05%
Zambeef Products 2.77%3.86%1.75%

In the previous week, Zambeef Products had 1 more articles in the media than Glanbia. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Zambeef Products and 0 mentions for Glanbia. Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Glanbia's score of 0.00 indicating that Zambeef Products is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Glanbia Neutral
Zambeef Products Positive

29.1% of Glanbia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Glanbia shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Glanbia beats Zambeef Products on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Ukrproduct Group?

Ukrproduct Group (LON:UKR) and Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Zambeef Products has a net margin of 2.77% compared to Ukrproduct Group's net margin of 1.79%. Ukrproduct Group's return on equity of 12.82% beat Zambeef Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ukrproduct Group1.79% 12.82% 7.33%
Zambeef Products 2.77%3.86%1.75%

In the previous week, Zambeef Products had 1 more articles in the media than Ukrproduct Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Zambeef Products and 0 mentions for Ukrproduct Group. Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Ukrproduct Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Zambeef Products is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ukrproduct Group Neutral
Zambeef Products Positive

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Ukrproduct Group. Ukrproduct Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zambeef Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ukrproduct Group£40.67M0.07N/A-£7.88N/A
Zambeef Products£8.06B0.00£3.93B£56.370.09

0.0% of Ukrproduct Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are held by institutional investors. 76.0% of Ukrproduct Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of Zambeef Products shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ukrproduct Group has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, suggesting that its stock price is 148% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Zambeef Products beats Ukrproduct Group on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Ocean Harvest Technology Group?

Ocean Harvest Technology Group (LON:OHT) and Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Zambeef Products has a net margin of 2.77% compared to Ocean Harvest Technology Group's net margin of -101.14%. Zambeef Products' return on equity of 3.86% beat Ocean Harvest Technology Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ocean Harvest Technology Group-101.14% -107.80% -33.75%
Zambeef Products 2.77%3.86%1.75%

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Ocean Harvest Technology Group. Ocean Harvest Technology Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zambeef Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ocean Harvest Technology Group£2.57M0.49-£3.35M-£0.02N/A
Zambeef Products£8.06B0.00£3.93B£56.370.09

6.8% of Ocean Harvest Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are held by institutional investors. 77.9% of Ocean Harvest Technology Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of Zambeef Products shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Zambeef Products had 1 more articles in the media than Ocean Harvest Technology Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Zambeef Products and 0 mentions for Ocean Harvest Technology Group. Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Ocean Harvest Technology Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Zambeef Products is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ocean Harvest Technology Group Neutral
Zambeef Products Positive

Summary

Zambeef Products beats Ocean Harvest Technology Group on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L)?

Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) and Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L) (LON:WALG) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

Zambeef Products has a net margin of 2.77% compared to Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Zambeef Products' return on equity of 3.86% beat Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zambeef Products2.77% 3.86% 1.75%
Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L) N/A N/A N/A

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L).

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zambeef Products£8.06B0.00£3.93B£56.370.09
Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are held by institutional investors. 17.4% of Zambeef Products shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Zambeef Products had 1 more articles in the media than Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Zambeef Products and 0 mentions for Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L). Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Zambeef Products is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zambeef Products Positive
Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L) Neutral

Summary

Zambeef Products beats Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L) on 8 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Benchmark?

Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) and Benchmark (LON:BMK) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

Benchmark has a net margin of 188.33% compared to Zambeef Products' net margin of 2.77%. Benchmark's return on equity of 29.28% beat Zambeef Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zambeef Products2.77% 3.86% 1.75%
Benchmark 188.33%29.28%-1.07%

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Benchmark. Zambeef Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Benchmark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zambeef Products£8.06B0.00£3.93B£56.370.09
Benchmark£79.16M1,189.43-£39.55M£0.06246,774.19

Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, indicating that its stock price is 148% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Benchmark has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Zambeef Products had 1 more articles in the media than Benchmark. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Zambeef Products and 0 mentions for Benchmark. Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Benchmark's score of 0.00 indicating that Zambeef Products is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zambeef Products Positive
Benchmark Neutral

1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.3% of Benchmark shares are held by institutional investors. 17.4% of Zambeef Products shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 63.7% of Benchmark shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Benchmark beats Zambeef Products on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Zambeef Products News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ZAM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ZAM vs. The Competition

MetricZambeef ProductsPackaged Foods IndustryDefensive SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£15.03M£4.67B£8.48B£2.85B
Dividend YieldN/A2.56%3.22%6.15%
P/E Ratio0.092,882.04888.40366.78
Price / Sales0.003,430.89992,150.2186,623.68
Price / CashN/A119.32140.9327.87
Price / Book0.0022.509.967.85
Net Income£3.93B£2.71B£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A1.61%0.75%-0.07%
1 Month PerformanceN/A2.91%1.12%1.38%
1 Year Performance25.00%729.18%279.15%75.30%

Zambeef Products Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ZAM
Zambeef Products
N/AGBX 5
+3.1%
N/A+25.0%£15.03M£8.06B0.097,000
GLB
Glanbia
N/AGBX 22
+2.8%
N/A+73.5%£53.17M£3.95B0.305,534
UKR
Ukrproduct Group
N/AGBX 6.10
-21.4%
N/AN/A£2.42M£40.67MN/A836
OHT
Ocean Harvest Technology Group
N/AGBX 1
flat
N/AN/A£1.26M£2.57MN/A35
WALG
Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£138KN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:ZAM) was last updated on 6/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners