Go Pro
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free ZAM Stock Alerts

Zambeef Products (ZAM) Competitors

Zambeef Products logo
GBX 5 +0.15 (+3.09%)
As of 07/24/2026 08:35 AM Eastern
Compare

ZAM vs. ANP, SIS, CARR, GLB, and UKR

Should you buy Zambeef Products stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Zambeef Products with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Zambeef Products include Anpario (ANP), Science in Sport (SIS), Carr's Group (CARR), Glanbia (GLB), and Ukrproduct Group (UKR). These companies are all part of the "packaged foods" industry.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Anpario?

Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) and Anpario (LON:ANP) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and dividends.

Anpario has a net margin of 14.31% compared to Zambeef Products' net margin of 3.29%. Anpario's return on equity of 16.88% beat Zambeef Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zambeef Products3.29% 3.89% 1.75%
Anpario 14.31%16.88%5.51%

1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.2% of Anpario shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Anpario shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Anpario has a consensus price target of GBX 570, suggesting a potential upside of 1.79%. Given Anpario's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Anpario is more favorable than Zambeef Products.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Zambeef Products
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Anpario
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Anpario'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zambeef Products Neutral
Anpario Neutral

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Anpario. Zambeef Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Anpario, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08
Anpario£47.18M1.94£3.09M£37.9414.76

Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, indicating that its share price is 148% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Anpario has a beta of 1.077, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Anpario beats Zambeef Products on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Science in Sport?

Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) and Science in Sport (LON:SIS) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and institutional ownership.

Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, meaning that its stock price is 148% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Science in Sport has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Zambeef Products has a net margin of 3.29% compared to Science in Sport's net margin of -9.14%. Zambeef Products' return on equity of 3.89% beat Science in Sport's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zambeef Products3.29% 3.89% 1.75%
Science in Sport -9.14%-15.33%-8.01%

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Science in Sport. Science in Sport is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zambeef Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08
Science in Sport£70.87M1.12-£13.78M-£5.66N/A

In the previous week, Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Science in Sport'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zambeef Products Neutral
Science in Sport Neutral

1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.8% of Science in Sport shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of Science in Sport shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Zambeef Products beats Science in Sport on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Carr's Group?

Carr's Group (LON:CARR) and Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

Carr's Group has a net margin of 25.28% compared to Zambeef Products' net margin of 3.29%. Carr's Group's return on equity of 28.53% beat Zambeef Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carr's Group25.28% 28.53% -0.24%
Zambeef Products 3.29%3.89%1.75%

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Carr's Group. Carr's Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zambeef Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carr's Group£79.03M0.89-£1.40M-£0.02N/A
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08

30.7% of Carr's Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are held by institutional investors. 7.1% of Carr's Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carr's Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Zambeef Products
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Carr's Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zambeef Products'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Carr's Group Neutral
Zambeef Products Neutral

Carr's Group has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, suggesting that its stock price is 148% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Carr's Group and Zambeef Products tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Glanbia?

Glanbia (LON:GLB) and Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

29.7% of Glanbia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Glanbia shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Glanbia has a net margin of 4.64% compared to Zambeef Products' net margin of 3.29%. Glanbia's return on equity of 9.25% beat Zambeef Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Glanbia4.64% 9.25% 6.05%
Zambeef Products 3.29%3.89%1.75%

In the previous week, Glanbia's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zambeef Products'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Glanbia Neutral
Zambeef Products Neutral

Glanbia has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, indicating that its stock price is 148% less volatile than the broader market.

Glanbia has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Zambeef Products. Zambeef Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glanbia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Glanbia£3.95B0.01£12.80B£72.440.31
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08

Summary

Glanbia beats Zambeef Products on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zambeef Products compare to Ukrproduct Group?

Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) and Ukrproduct Group (LON:UKR) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Ukrproduct Group had 1 more articles in the media than Zambeef Products. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ukrproduct Group and 0 mentions for Zambeef Products. Ukrproduct Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Zambeef Products' score of 0.00 indicating that Ukrproduct Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zambeef Products Neutral
Ukrproduct Group Positive

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Ukrproduct Group. Ukrproduct Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zambeef Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08
Ukrproduct Group£40.67M0.06N/A-£7.88N/A

1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Ukrproduct Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 76.0% of Ukrproduct Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Zambeef Products has a net margin of 3.29% compared to Ukrproduct Group's net margin of 1.79%. Ukrproduct Group's return on equity of 12.82% beat Zambeef Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zambeef Products3.29% 3.89% 1.75%
Ukrproduct Group 1.79%12.82%7.33%

Zambeef Products has a beta of -0.48, indicating that its share price is 148% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ukrproduct Group has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ukrproduct Group beats Zambeef Products on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Zambeef Products News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ZAM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ZAM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ZAM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricZambeef ProductsPackaged Foods IndustryDefensive SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£29.54M£4.66B£8.34B£2.82B
Dividend YieldN/A2.48%3.13%6.17%
P/E Ratio0.082,882.38888.56368.39
Price / Sales0.003,430.87992,150.2984,422.75
Price / CashN/A119.32142.3327.89
Price / Book0.0022.509.737.41
Net Income£3.93B£2.71B£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.09%-1.11%-0.35%0.38%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-0.32%0.01%0.27%
1 Year Performance32.98%791.45%273.43%68.27%

Zambeef Products Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ZAM
Zambeef Products
N/AGBX 5
+3.1%		N/A+31.6%£29.54M£8.15B0.087,000
ANP
Anpario
1.328 of 5 stars		GBX 550
+0.7%		GBX 570
+3.6%		+48.3%£90.06M£47.18M14.50109
SIS
Science in Sport
N/AGBX 33.50
flat		N/A+0.0%£79.33M£70.87MN/A330
CARR
Carr's Group
0.1175 of 5 stars		GBX 135.56
+1.9%		N/A-9.0%£70.15M£79.03MN/A52,000
GLB
Glanbia
N/AGBX 23.02
+0.6%		N/A+70.5%£55.64M£3.95B0.325,534

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:ZAM) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Three oil giants buried the same discovery for 50 years
In 1976, Chevron tapped an energy source with no fuel costs, no carbon, and no supply chain - then killed the ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel