Afya (AFYA) Competitors

Laureate Education has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Afya has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

Laureate Education currently has a consensus target price of $40.50, suggesting a potential upside of 10.11%. Afya has a consensus target price of $17.88, suggesting a potential upside of 25.88%. Given Afya's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Afya is more favorable than Laureate Education.

In the previous week, Laureate Education had 26 more articles in the media than Afya. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Laureate Education and 1 mentions for Afya. Laureate Education's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Afya's score of -0.14 indicating that Laureate Education is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Laureate Education has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Afya. Afya is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Laureate Education, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

96.3% of Laureate Education shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.0% of Afya shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Laureate Education shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Afya shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Afya has a net margin of 20.20% compared to Laureate Education's net margin of 17.57%. Laureate Education's return on equity of 23.54% beat Afya's return on equity.

Laureate Education pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Afya pays an annual dividend of $0.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Laureate Education pays out 30.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Afya pays out 42.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Adtalem Global Education has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Afya. Afya is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Adtalem Global Education, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Afya and Afya both had 1 articles in the media. Adtalem Global Education's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Afya's score of -0.14 indicating that Adtalem Global Education is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Afya presently has a consensus price target of $17.88, suggesting a potential upside of 25.88%. Adtalem Global Education has a consensus price target of $155.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.68%. Given Afya's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Afya is more favorable than Adtalem Global Education.

Afya has a net margin of 20.20% compared to Adtalem Global Education's net margin of 12.26%. Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 20.19% beat Afya's return on equity.

Afya has a beta of 0.32, meaning that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

88.0% of Afya shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Adtalem Global Education shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Afya shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Adtalem Global Education shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Boyd Group Services had 5 more articles in the media than Afya. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Boyd Group Services and 1 mentions for Afya. Boyd Group Services' average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat Afya's score of -0.14 indicating that Boyd Group Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Boyd Group Services currently has a consensus price target of $157.00, indicating a potential upside of 48.61%. Afya has a consensus price target of $17.88, indicating a potential upside of 25.88%. Given Boyd Group Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Boyd Group Services is more favorable than Afya.

Boyd Group Services pays an annual dividend of $0.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Afya pays an annual dividend of $0.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Boyd Group Services pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Afya pays out 42.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Afya is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Afya has a net margin of 20.20% compared to Boyd Group Services' net margin of 0.39%. Afya's return on equity of 17.94% beat Boyd Group Services' return on equity.

Afya has higher revenue and earnings than Boyd Group Services. Afya is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boyd Group Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

0.2% of Boyd Group Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.0% of Afya shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Afya shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Boyd Group Services has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Afya has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

Afya has a net margin of 20.20% compared to Driven Brands' net margin of 9.08%. Driven Brands' return on equity of 25.70% beat Afya's return on equity.

Driven Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Afya. Afya is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Driven Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

88.0% of Afya shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Driven Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Afya shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Driven Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Afya has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Driven Brands has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Driven Brands had 4 more articles in the media than Afya. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Driven Brands and 1 mentions for Afya. Driven Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Afya's score of -0.14 indicating that Driven Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Afya currently has a consensus price target of $17.88, suggesting a potential upside of 25.88%. Driven Brands has a consensus price target of $17.18, suggesting a potential upside of 15.31%. Given Afya's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Afya is more favorable than Driven Brands.