Log in
NYSE:HTZ

Hertz Global Competitors

$1.75
-0.01 (-0.57 %)
(As of 10/23/2020 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$1.71
Now: $1.75
$1.86
50-Day Range
$1.03
MA: $1.36
$2.50
52-Week Range
$0.40
Now: $1.75
$20.85
Volume29.43 million shs
Average Volume36.44 million shs
Market Capitalization$273.36 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.45

Competitors

Hertz Global (NYSE:HTZ) Vs. ODFL, JBHT, UHAL, KNX, LSTR, and SAIA

Should you be buying HTZ stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "trucking" are considered alternatives and competitors to Hertz Global, including Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL), J.B. Hunt Transport Services (JBHT), AMERCO (UHAL), Knight-Swift Transportation (KNX), Landstar System (LSTR), and Saia (SAIA).

Hertz Global (NYSE:HTZ) and Old Dominion Freight Line (NASDAQ:ODFL) are both transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Hertz Global and Old Dominion Freight Line's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hertz Global$9.78 billion0.03$-58,000,000.00$1.441.22
Old Dominion Freight Line$4.11 billion5.73$615.52 million$5.1139.26

Old Dominion Freight Line has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hertz Global. Hertz Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Dominion Freight Line, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Hertz Global has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its share price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Hertz Global and Old Dominion Freight Line, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hertz Global43101.63
Old Dominion Freight Line35402.08

Hertz Global presently has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential upside of 357.14%. Old Dominion Freight Line has a consensus price target of $179.3889, indicating a potential downside of 10.58%. Given Hertz Global's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Hertz Global is more favorable than Old Dominion Freight Line.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

23.0% of Hertz Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.3% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Hertz Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.7% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Hertz Global and Old Dominion Freight Line's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hertz Global-14.55%-38.47%-2.34%
Old Dominion Freight Line14.95%19.66%14.82%

Summary

Old Dominion Freight Line beats Hertz Global on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hertz Global (NYSE:HTZ) and J.B. Hunt Transport Services (NASDAQ:JBHT) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

23.0% of Hertz Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.4% of J.B. Hunt Transport Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Hertz Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of J.B. Hunt Transport Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Hertz Global and J.B. Hunt Transport Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hertz Global-14.55%-38.47%-2.34%
J.B. Hunt Transport Services5.31%21.07%8.96%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Hertz Global and J.B. Hunt Transport Services' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hertz Global$9.78 billion0.03$-58,000,000.00$1.441.22
J.B. Hunt Transport Services$9.17 billion1.48$516.32 million$4.8926.37

J.B. Hunt Transport Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hertz Global. Hertz Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J.B. Hunt Transport Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Hertz Global and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hertz Global43101.63
J.B. Hunt Transport Services011802.42

Hertz Global presently has a consensus price target of $8.00, suggesting a potential upside of 357.14%. J.B. Hunt Transport Services has a consensus price target of $135.50, suggesting a potential upside of 5.06%. Given Hertz Global's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Hertz Global is more favorable than J.B. Hunt Transport Services.

Risk & Volatility

Hertz Global has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, J.B. Hunt Transport Services has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Summary

J.B. Hunt Transport Services beats Hertz Global on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

AMERCO (NASDAQ:UHAL) and Hertz Global (NYSE:HTZ) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares AMERCO and Hertz Global's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AMERCO$3.98 billion1.82$442.05 million$15.1024.42
Hertz Global$9.78 billion0.03$-58,000,000.00$1.441.22

AMERCO has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hertz Global. Hertz Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AMERCO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

35.2% of AMERCO shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.0% of Hertz Global shares are held by institutional investors. 42.6% of AMERCO shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Hertz Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares AMERCO and Hertz Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AMERCO10.22%5.83%1.90%
Hertz Global-14.55%-38.47%-2.34%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for AMERCO and Hertz Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AMERCO00103.00
Hertz Global43101.63

Hertz Global has a consensus price target of $8.00, suggesting a potential upside of 357.14%. Given Hertz Global's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hertz Global is more favorable than AMERCO.

Risk & Volatility

AMERCO has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hertz Global has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

AMERCO beats Hertz Global on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hertz Global (NYSE:HTZ) and Knight-Swift Transportation (NYSE:KNX) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Hertz Global and Knight-Swift Transportation, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hertz Global43101.63
Knight-Swift Transportation121302.75

Hertz Global presently has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential upside of 357.14%. Knight-Swift Transportation has a consensus price target of $48.8824, indicating a potential upside of 24.29%. Given Hertz Global's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Hertz Global is more favorable than Knight-Swift Transportation.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Hertz Global and Knight-Swift Transportation's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hertz Global$9.78 billion0.03$-58,000,000.00$1.441.22
Knight-Swift Transportation$4.84 billion1.38$309.21 million$2.1718.12

Knight-Swift Transportation has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hertz Global. Hertz Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Knight-Swift Transportation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

23.0% of Hertz Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.4% of Knight-Swift Transportation shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Hertz Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 27.5% of Knight-Swift Transportation shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Hertz Global and Knight-Swift Transportation's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hertz Global-14.55%-38.47%-2.34%
Knight-Swift Transportation6.28%6.14%4.21%

Volatility and Risk

Hertz Global has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Knight-Swift Transportation has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Knight-Swift Transportation beats Hertz Global on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hertz Global (NYSE:HTZ) and Landstar System (NASDAQ:LSTR) are both transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

23.0% of Hertz Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Hertz Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Landstar System shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Hertz Global has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Landstar System has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Hertz Global and Landstar System, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hertz Global43101.63
Landstar System19202.08

Hertz Global presently has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential upside of 357.14%. Landstar System has a consensus price target of $121.4167, indicating a potential downside of 8.00%. Given Hertz Global's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Hertz Global is more favorable than Landstar System.

Profitability

This table compares Hertz Global and Landstar System's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hertz Global-14.55%-38.47%-2.34%
Landstar System4.48%26.42%13.67%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Hertz Global and Landstar System's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hertz Global$9.78 billion0.03$-58,000,000.00$1.441.22
Landstar System$4.08 billion1.24$227.72 million$5.7223.07

Landstar System has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hertz Global. Hertz Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landstar System, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Landstar System beats Hertz Global on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Saia (NASDAQ:SAIA) and Hertz Global (NYSE:HTZ) are both transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

23.0% of Hertz Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Saia shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Hertz Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Saia and Hertz Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Saia6.25%13.12%7.33%
Hertz Global-14.55%-38.47%-2.34%

Risk and Volatility

Saia has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hertz Global has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Saia and Hertz Global's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Saia$1.79 billion2.16$113.72 million$4.2334.85
Hertz Global$9.78 billion0.03$-58,000,000.00$1.441.22

Saia has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hertz Global. Hertz Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Saia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Saia and Hertz Global, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Saia17502.31
Hertz Global43101.63

Saia presently has a consensus target price of $115.00, indicating a potential downside of 21.99%. Hertz Global has a consensus target price of $8.00, indicating a potential upside of 357.14%. Given Hertz Global's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hertz Global is more favorable than Saia.

Summary

Saia beats Hertz Global on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Hertz Global Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Old Dominion Freight Line logo
ODFL
Old Dominion Freight Line
1.6$200.62-2.2%$23.54 billion$4.11 billion40.72Upcoming Earnings
Dividend Announcement
Heavy News Reporting
J.B. Hunt Transport Services logo
JBHT
J.B. Hunt Transport Services
1.7$128.97-1.2%$13.61 billion$9.17 billion27.74Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
AMERCO logo
UHAL
AMERCO
1.5$368.79-0.9%$7.23 billion$3.98 billion18.20Analyst Upgrade
Knight-Swift Transportation logo
KNX
Knight-Swift Transportation
2.0$39.33-1.2%$6.69 billion$4.84 billion23.41Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
Landstar System logo
LSTR
Landstar System
1.4$131.98-0.4%$5.07 billion$4.08 billion30.76Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
Saia logo
SAIA
Saia
1.2$147.41-0.2%$3.85 billion$1.79 billion35.18Upcoming Earnings
Werner Enterprises logo
WERN
Werner Enterprises
2.0$41.12-1.5%$2.84 billion$2.46 billion19.13Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Downgrade
Avis Budget Group logo
CAR
Avis Budget Group
1.6$40.38-5.6%$2.81 billion$9.17 billion-8.65Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
Unusual Options Activity
Heavy News Reporting
Ryder System logo
R
Ryder System
1.6$51.58-0.5%$2.78 billion$8.93 billion-8.20Upcoming Earnings
Heartland Express logo
HTLD
Heartland Express
1.8$19.05-0.4%$1.55 billion$596.82 million23.52Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Marten Transport logo
MRTN
Marten Transport
1.3$16.27-0.7%$1.34 billion$843.27 million20.34
FRP logo
FRPH
FRP
1.3$41.31-1.0%$394.43 million$23.76 million39.72Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
Roadrunner Transportation Systems logo
RRTS
Roadrunner Transportation Systems
0.8$2.24-1.3%$84.88 million$1.85 billion-0.22
This page was last updated on 10/25/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.