Alliance MMA Competitors

Alliance MMA (NASDAQ:AMMA) and The Walt Disney (NYSE:DIS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Alliance MMA has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Walt Disney has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Alliance MMA and The Walt Disney, as provided by MarketBeat.

The Walt Disney has a consensus price target of $186.7857, suggesting a potential downside of 0.36%. Given The Walt Disney's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe The Walt Disney is more favorable than Alliance MMA.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Alliance MMA and The Walt Disney's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Alliance MMA has higher earnings, but lower revenue than The Walt Disney.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

3.1% of Alliance MMA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.8% of The Walt Disney shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of The Walt Disney shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Alliance MMA and The Walt Disney's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

The Walt Disney beats Alliance MMA on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

DraftKings (NASDAQ:DKNG) and Alliance MMA (NASDAQ:AMMA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Risk and Volatility

DraftKings has a beta of 2.18, suggesting that its share price is 118% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Alliance MMA has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for DraftKings and Alliance MMA, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

DraftKings presently has a consensus target price of $66.4815, suggesting a potential upside of 12.91%. Given DraftKings' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe DraftKings is more favorable than Alliance MMA.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares DraftKings and Alliance MMA's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

DraftKings has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alliance MMA.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

46.5% of DraftKings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of Alliance MMA shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares DraftKings and Alliance MMA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

DraftKings beats Alliance MMA on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Vail Resorts (NYSE:MTN) and Alliance MMA (NASDAQ:AMMA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Vail Resorts has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Alliance MMA has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Vail Resorts and Alliance MMA, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Vail Resorts presently has a consensus target price of $289.1538, suggesting a potential downside of 7.65%. Given Vail Resorts' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Vail Resorts is more favorable than Alliance MMA.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Vail Resorts and Alliance MMA's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Vail Resorts has higher revenue and earnings than Alliance MMA.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

3.1% of Alliance MMA shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Vail Resorts shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Vail Resorts and Alliance MMA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Vail Resorts beats Alliance MMA on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Madison Square Garden Sports (NYSE:MSGS) and Alliance MMA (NASDAQ:AMMA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Madison Square Garden Sports has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Alliance MMA has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Madison Square Garden Sports and Alliance MMA, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Madison Square Garden Sports presently has a consensus target price of $205.8889, suggesting a potential upside of 15.43%. Given Madison Square Garden Sports' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Madison Square Garden Sports is more favorable than Alliance MMA.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Madison Square Garden Sports and Alliance MMA's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Alliance MMA has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Madison Square Garden Sports.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

70.3% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of Alliance MMA shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.8% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Madison Square Garden Sports and Alliance MMA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Madison Square Garden Sports beats Alliance MMA on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Six Flags Entertainment (NYSE:SIX) and Alliance MMA (NASDAQ:AMMA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Six Flags Entertainment and Alliance MMA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.9% of Six Flags Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of Alliance MMA shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Six Flags Entertainment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Six Flags Entertainment has a beta of 2.45, suggesting that its share price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Alliance MMA has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Six Flags Entertainment and Alliance MMA's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Six Flags Entertainment has higher revenue and earnings than Alliance MMA.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Six Flags Entertainment and Alliance MMA, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Six Flags Entertainment presently has a consensus target price of $34.8462, suggesting a potential downside of 25.25%. Given Six Flags Entertainment's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Six Flags Entertainment is more favorable than Alliance MMA.

Summary

Six Flags Entertainment beats Alliance MMA on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

SeaWorld Entertainment (NYSE:SEAS) and Alliance MMA (NASDAQ:AMMA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares SeaWorld Entertainment and Alliance MMA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of Alliance MMA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

SeaWorld Entertainment has a beta of 2.37, suggesting that its stock price is 137% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Alliance MMA has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares SeaWorld Entertainment and Alliance MMA's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SeaWorld Entertainment has higher revenue and earnings than Alliance MMA.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for SeaWorld Entertainment and Alliance MMA, as reported by MarketBeat.

SeaWorld Entertainment currently has a consensus target price of $40.2143, indicating a potential downside of 20.00%. Given SeaWorld Entertainment's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe SeaWorld Entertainment is more favorable than Alliance MMA.

Summary

SeaWorld Entertainment beats Alliance MMA on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.