Go Pro

Phoenix New Media (FENG) Competitors

Phoenix New Media logo
$1.46 0.00 (-0.21%)
Closing price 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.46 0.00 (-0.14%)
As of 04:04 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FENG vs. TZOO, SEAT, SST, TEAD, and MNY

Should you buy Phoenix New Media stock or one of its competitors? Phoenix New Media's main competitors and comparable companies include Travelzoo (TZOO), Vivid Seats (SEAT), System1 (SST), Teads (TEAD), and MoneyHero (MNY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "interactive media & services" industry.

How does Phoenix New Media compare to Travelzoo?

Travelzoo (NASDAQ:TZOO) and Phoenix New Media (NYSE:FENG) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Phoenix New Media has a net margin of 3.62% compared to Travelzoo's net margin of 0.51%. Phoenix New Media's return on equity of 2.78% beat Travelzoo's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Travelzoo0.51% -9.35% 1.00%
Phoenix New Media 3.62%2.78%1.87%

Travelzoo currently has a consensus target price of $13.83, indicating a potential upside of 143.97%. Given Travelzoo's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Travelzoo is more favorable than Phoenix New Media.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Travelzoo
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Phoenix New Media
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Travelzoo had 1 more articles in the media than Phoenix New Media. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Travelzoo and 2 mentions for Phoenix New Media. Travelzoo's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Phoenix New Media's score of 0.00 indicating that Travelzoo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Travelzoo
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Phoenix New Media
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Travelzoo has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Phoenix New Media. Phoenix New Media is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Travelzoo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Travelzoo$91.72M0.63$4.70M$0.03189.00
Phoenix New Media$828.75M0.02$50K$0.364.05

Travelzoo has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phoenix New Media has a beta of -0.19, suggesting that its stock price is 119% less volatile than the broader market.

27.4% of Travelzoo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.3% of Phoenix New Media shares are owned by institutional investors. 45.3% of Travelzoo shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Phoenix New Media shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Travelzoo beats Phoenix New Media on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phoenix New Media compare to Vivid Seats?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Phoenix New Media (NYSE:FENG) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 1 more articles in the media than Phoenix New Media. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vivid Seats and 2 mentions for Phoenix New Media. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Phoenix New Media's score of 0.00 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Phoenix New Media
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Vivid Seats presently has a consensus target price of $10.27, suggesting a potential upside of 161.90%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Phoenix New Media.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Phoenix New Media
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Phoenix New Media has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats. Vivid Seats is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phoenix New Media, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats$570.78M0.08-$429.30M-$45.51N/A
Phoenix New Media$828.75M0.02$50K$0.364.05

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.3% of Phoenix New Media shares are held by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Phoenix New Media shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phoenix New Media has a beta of -0.19, suggesting that its share price is 119% less volatile than the broader market.

Phoenix New Media has a net margin of 3.62% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -60.26%. Phoenix New Media's return on equity of 2.78% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vivid Seats-60.26% -211.26% 0.91%
Phoenix New Media 3.62%2.78%1.87%

Summary

Vivid Seats beats Phoenix New Media on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phoenix New Media compare to System1?

Phoenix New Media (NYSE:FENG) and System1 (NYSE:SST) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

6.3% of Phoenix New Media shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of System1 shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.9% of Phoenix New Media shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.2% of System1 shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Phoenix New Media has a net margin of 3.62% compared to System1's net margin of -50.66%. Phoenix New Media's return on equity of 2.78% beat System1's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Phoenix New Media3.62% 2.78% 1.87%
System1 -50.66%-439.90%-19.35%

Phoenix New Media has higher revenue and earnings than System1. System1 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phoenix New Media, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phoenix New Media$828.75M0.02$50K$0.364.05
System1$266.13M0.14-$65.35M-$11.31N/A

Phoenix New Media has a beta of -0.19, suggesting that its stock price is 119% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, System1 has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Phoenix New Media had 2 more articles in the media than System1. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Phoenix New Media and 0 mentions for System1. Phoenix New Media's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled System1'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Phoenix New Media Neutral
System1 Neutral

System1 has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 89.23%. Given System1's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe System1 is more favorable than Phoenix New Media.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Phoenix New Media
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
System1
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Phoenix New Media beats System1 on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phoenix New Media compare to Teads?

Phoenix New Media (NYSE:FENG) and Teads (NASDAQ:TEAD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Phoenix New Media has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Teads. Teads is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phoenix New Media, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phoenix New Media$828.75M0.02$50K$0.364.05
Teads$1.30B0.03-$517.07M-$5.53N/A

In the previous week, Phoenix New Media and Phoenix New Media both had 2 articles in the media. Phoenix New Media's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Teads'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Phoenix New Media
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Teads
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Teads has a consensus target price of $1.00, suggesting a potential upside of 120.22%. Given Teads' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Teads is more favorable than Phoenix New Media.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Phoenix New Media
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Teads
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Phoenix New Media has a beta of -0.19, indicating that its share price is 119% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teads has a beta of 1.63, indicating that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Phoenix New Media has a net margin of 3.62% compared to Teads' net margin of -43.32%. Phoenix New Media's return on equity of 2.78% beat Teads' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Phoenix New Media3.62% 2.78% 1.87%
Teads -43.32%-49.37%-6.14%

6.3% of Phoenix New Media shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.4% of Teads shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Phoenix New Media shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.0% of Teads shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Teads beats Phoenix New Media on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phoenix New Media compare to MoneyHero?

MoneyHero (NASDAQ:MNY) and Phoenix New Media (NYSE:FENG) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Phoenix New Media has a net margin of 3.62% compared to MoneyHero's net margin of -14.85%. Phoenix New Media's return on equity of 2.78% beat MoneyHero's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MoneyHero-14.85% -21.04% -10.59%
Phoenix New Media 3.62%2.78%1.87%

Phoenix New Media has higher revenue and earnings than MoneyHero. MoneyHero is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phoenix New Media, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MoneyHero$73.43M0.42-$5.18M-$0.33N/A
Phoenix New Media$828.75M0.02$50K$0.364.05

In the previous week, Phoenix New Media had 1 more articles in the media than MoneyHero. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Phoenix New Media and 1 mentions for MoneyHero. MoneyHero's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Phoenix New Media's score of 0.00 indicating that MoneyHero is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MoneyHero
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Phoenix New Media
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

30.9% of MoneyHero shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.3% of Phoenix New Media shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.2% of MoneyHero shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Phoenix New Media shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MoneyHero has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phoenix New Media has a beta of -0.19, indicating that its share price is 119% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MoneyHero
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Phoenix New Media
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Phoenix New Media beats MoneyHero on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Phoenix New Media News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FENG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FENG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FENG vs. The Competition

MetricPhoenix New MediaInteractive Media & Services IndustryCommunication Services SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$17.50M$99.88B$34.42B$23.02B
Dividend YieldN/A3.88%5.42%3.62%
P/E Ratio4.0528.3423.1728.41
Price / Sales0.02107.6162.5021.40
Price / Cash11.3317.5721.0119.33
Price / Book0.1127.3112.114.73
Net Income$50K$3.59B$1.12B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.55%-0.47%-0.42%-0.05%
1 Month Performance-3.51%-2.57%-1.36%-3.43%
1 Year Performance-47.40%-19.64%-8.30%8.44%

Phoenix New Media Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FENG
Phoenix New Media
1.0516 of 5 stars
$1.46
-0.2%
N/A-43.1%$17.50M$828.75M4.05611
TZOO
Travelzoo
2.475 of 5 stars
$6.00
-2.6%
$13.83
+130.6%
-44.0%$62.85M$91.72M200.00210
SEAT
Vivid Seats
2.3615 of 5 stars
$4.92
-5.2%
$10.27
+108.7%
-76.1%$58.34M$570.78MN/A430
SST
System1
1.7442 of 5 stars
$4.35
-13.0%
$6.50
+49.4%
-52.7%$52.44M$266.13MN/A320
TEAD
Teads
1.8275 of 5 stars
$0.47
-9.1%
$1.00
+111.4%
-72.4%$51.05M$1.30BN/A1,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FENG) was last updated on 9/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners